Israel will take in 100 Syrian orphans

Israel has announced that it will take in 100 orphaned Syrian refugee children.

According to a report by Israel’s Channel 10, the children will receive temporary resident status and become permanent residents after four years. Additionally, the children, who will be housed in an Education Ministry boarding school for the first three months and then enrolled in Israeli schools, will eventually be placed by the government with Arab-Israeli foster families. Israeli Interior Minister Aryeh Deri approved the plan.

“Israel to take in Syrian orphans as refugees w/ path to citizenship. Arab-Israelis will help absorbing,” Israeli-Arab diplomat George Deek wrote on Twitter.

The report also said that Israel may allow close relatives of the Syrian children—such as siblings or parents, if they are found alive—to be granted Israeli residence.







https://unitedwithisrael.org/israel-will-take-in-100-orphaned-syrian-refugee-children/?utm_source=pushengage&utm_medium=push_notification&utm_campaign=pushengage

Such wonderful news. Meanwhile, Trump has said no to any more Syrian refugees coming to the U.S.

Ben Reilly wrote:Such wonderful news. Meanwhile, Trump has said no to any more Syrian refugees coming to the U.S.

Great news too - you seem to not want your country safe . I would love it if our government did the same . Hoping Theresa May comes back with some ideas from The President of America .

Vicar of Dibley (vod) wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:Such wonderful news. Meanwhile, Trump has said no to any more Syrian refugees coming to the U.S.

Great news too - you seem to not want your country safe . I would love it if our government did the same . Hoping Theresa May comes back with some ideas from The President of America .

I do want my country safe, and I'm utterly convinced that Syrian refugees do not make it less safe.

Ben Reilly wrote:

Vicar of Dibley (vod) wrote:

Great news too - you seem to not want your country safe . I would love it if our government did the same . Hoping Theresa May comes back with some ideas from The President of America .

I do want my country safe, and I'm utterly convinced that Syrian refugees do not make it less safe.

That's very trusting but they are not all to be trusted - but you haven't experienced any of them raping and beating up women and raping little children yet so until that happens and it will sadly .

Vicar of Dibley (vod) wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:Such wonderful news. Meanwhile, Trump has said no to any more Syrian refugees coming to the U.S.

Great news too - you seem to not want your country safe . I would love it if our government did the same . Hoping Theresa May comes back with some ideas from The President of America .

How are refugee children deemed unsafe to you?
What is even more odd, is you hail Israel for taking in refugees, then say that we should not allow them in.
What you are basically saying is Israel is making itself unsafe by helping innocent children.

Vicar of Dibley (vod) wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:

I do want my country safe, and I'm utterly convinced that Syrian refugees do not make it less safe.

That's very trusting but they are not all to be trusted - but you haven't experienced any of them raping and beating up women and raping little children yet so until that happens and it will sadly .

So by your reasoning. We should not allow any men into this country or onto the streets. Due to the fact they are not all to be trusted and you haven't experienced any of them raping and beating up women and raping little children yet so until that happens and it will sadly .

So how are you going to implement this plan, which will cost the Uk a fortune in lost revenue from the tourist industry, let alone business, students etc. Or the male workforce unable to step out onto the streets?

Thorin wrote:

Vicar of Dibley (vod) wrote:

Great news too - you seem to not want your country safe . I would love it if our government did the same . Hoping Theresa May comes back with some ideas from The President of America .

How are refugee children deemed unsafe to you?
What is even more odd, is you hail Israel for taking in refugees, then say that we should not allow them in.
What you are basically saying is Israel is making itself unsafe by helping innocent children.

You need to read the whole thread and then reply

Vicar of Dibley (vod) wrote:

Thorin wrote:


How are refugee children deemed unsafe to you?
What is even more odd, is you hail Israel for taking in refugees, then say that we should not allow them in.
What you are basically saying is Israel is making itself unsafe by helping innocent children.

You need to read the whole thread and then reply

That does not answer my questions and is just poor misdirection

So try again

Thorin wrote:

Vicar of Dibley (vod) wrote:

That's very trusting but they are not all to be trusted - but you haven't experienced any of them raping and beating up women and raping little children yet so until that happens and it will sadly .

So by your reasoning. We should not allow any men into this country or onto the streets. Due to the fact they are not all to be trusted and  you haven't experienced any of them raping and beating up women and raping little children yet so until that happens and it will sadly .

So how are you going to implement this plan, which will cost the Uk a fortune in lost revenue from the tourist industry, let alone business, students etc. Or the male workforce unable to step out onto the streets?

Lol i don't want to implement any plan i would leave that to the government . The last sentence of your post makes no sense at all

Thorin wrote:

Vicar of Dibley (vod) wrote:

You need to read the whole thread and then reply

That does not answer my questions and is just poor misdirection

So try again

My goodness you're still boring as watching paint dry - see ya

Vicar of Dibley (vod) wrote:

Thorin wrote:


So by your reasoning. We should not allow any men into this country or onto the streets. Due to the fact they are not all to be trusted and  you haven't experienced any of them raping and beating up women and raping little children yet so until that happens and it will sadly .

So how are you going to implement this plan, which will cost the Uk a fortune in lost revenue from the tourist industry, let alone business, students etc. Or the male workforce unable to step out onto the streets?

Lol i don't want to implement any plan i would leave that to the government . The last sentence of your post makes no sense at all

It makes every sense. Your reasoning to deny refugee men is based off how at least some may commit rape of women and children. Yet you do not propose to do anything in regards to countless other men, whether they live here or come from abroad. So I am asking why your methodology is like the hate against Israel by the BDS? That you highlight only one perceived problem and ignoring actual problems in this country?

Vicar of Dibley (vod) wrote:

Thorin wrote:

That does not answer my questions and is just poor misdirection

So try again

My goodness you're still boring as watching paint dry - see ya

Misdirection again, and I am not surprised you are running away
I would be too after making such a poor double standard as you did.

Oh and one last think Dibs. You do realize that around 10% of Syrians are Christian?

Vicar of Dibley (vod) wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:

Vicar of Dibley (vod) wrote:

Great news too - you seem to not want your country safe . I would love it if our government did the same . Hoping Theresa May comes back with some ideas from The President of America .

I do want my country safe, and I'm utterly convinced that Syrian refugees do not make it less safe.

That's very trusting but they are not all to be trusted - but you haven't experienced any of them raping and beating up women and raping little children yet so until that happens and it will sadly .

Okay VOD, which race/religion/gender/etc. is 100 percent to be trusted?

Ben Reilly wrote:

Vicar of Dibley (vod) wrote:

That's very trusting but they are not all to be trusted - but you haven't experienced any of them raping and beating up women and raping little children yet so until that happens and it will sadly .

Okay VOD, which race/religion/gender/etc. is 100 percent to be trusted?

First of all i know not all Syrians are out to rape but until they can be vetted then for the safety of everyone stopping them entering your country and i wish mine is for the safety of citizens . It's only my opinion and belief Ben .

Thorin wrote:Oh and one last think Dibs. You do realize that around 10% of Syrians are Christian?

And where are the Christian Syrians ?

Still in Syria .

Vicar of Dibley (vod) wrote:

Thorin wrote:Oh and one last think Dibs. You do realize that around 10% of Syrians are Christian?

And where are the Christian Syrians ?

Still in Syria .

Wrong, some are still there and many have fled.

Thorin wrote:

Vicar of Dibley (vod) wrote:

And where are the Christian Syrians ?

Still in Syria .

Wrong, some are still there and many have fled.

some so I'm not wrong

Vicar of Dibley (vod) wrote:

Thorin wrote:

Wrong, some are still there and many have fled.

some so I'm not wrong

You said still in Syria, when in fact some are not.

So your answer was wrong,

So why are you not calling for the vetting of 36 million tourists that come to the UK each year Dibs?
If safety is your first priority?
How about vetting all men, before they are allowed to walk onto the streets?
If safety is your first priority?

Thorin wrote:

Vicar of Dibley (vod) wrote:

some so I'm not wrong

You said still in Syria, when in fact some are not.

So your answer was wrong,

So why are you not calling for the vetting of 36 million tourists that come to the UK each year Dibs?
If safety is your first priority?
How about vetting all men, before they are allowed to walk onto the streets?
If safety is your first priority?

I haven't counted them true but i know many are still there because of the persecution , and I know they are pulling together with Muslims . Nit picking again didge .

Vicar of Dibley (vod) wrote:

Thorin wrote:

You said still in Syria, when in fact some are not.

So your answer was wrong,

So why are you not calling for the vetting of 36 million tourists that come to the UK each year Dibs?
If safety is your first priority?
How about vetting all men, before they are allowed to walk onto the streets?
If safety is your first priority?

I haven't counted them true but i know many are still there because of the persecution , and I know they are pulling together with Muslims . Nit picking again didge .

Many are still there, because they do not want to give up everything they have. Yes Christians are being persecuted there and so are Muslims. So not nick picking. I am just questioning your reasoning to disallow refugees here but not apply the same principles to 36 million tourists each year?

100 little orphans getting a home. That's got to be good news.