Newest Clinton e-mails: FBI has no idea what's in them & no warrant to read them yet
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
Newest Clinton e-mails: FBI has no idea what's in them & no warrant to read them yet
When FBI Director James Comey wrote his bombshell letter to Congress on Friday about newly discovered emails that were potentially “pertinent” to the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server, agents had not been able to review any of the material, because the bureau had not yet gotten a search warrant to read them, three government officials who have been briefed on the probe told Yahoo News.
At the time Comey wrote the letter, “he had no idea what was in the content of the emails,” one of the officials said, referring to recently discovered emails that were found on the laptop of disgraced ex-Rep. Anthony Weiner, the estranged husband of top Clinton aide Huma Abedin. Weiner is under investigation for allegedly sending illicit text messages to a 15-year-old girl.
As of Saturday night, the FBI was still in talks with the Justice Department about obtaining a warrant that would allow agency officials to read any of the newly discovered Abedin emails, and therefore was still in the dark about whether they include any classified material that the bureau has not already seen.
“We do not have a warrant,” a senior law enforcement official said. “Discussions are under way [between the FBI and the Justice Department] as to the best way to move forward.”
That Comey and other senior FBI officials were not aware of what was in the emails — and whether they contained any material the FBI had not already obtained — is important because Donald Trump’s campaign and Republicans in Congress have suggested that the FBI director would not have written his letter unless he had been made aware of significant new emails that might justify reopening the investigation into the Clinton server.
But a message that Comey wrote to all FBI agents Friday seeking to explain his decision to write the controversial letter strongly hinted that investigators did not not yet have legal authority establishing “probable cause” to review the content of Abedin’s emails on Weiner’s electronic devices.
In that message, Comey told agents that he had only been briefed on Thursday about the matter and that the “recommendation” of investigators was “with respect to seeking access to emails that have recently been found in an unrelated case.”
Comey approved the recommendation to seek judicial access to the material that day, he wrote.
“Because those emails appear to be pertinent to our investigation, I agreed that we should take appropriate steps to obtain and review them,” he told agents.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/comey-wrote-bombshell-letter-to-congress-before-fbi-had-reviewed-new-emails-220219586.html
First Whitewater, then Marc Rich, now two cracks at her e-mails, the latest of which smacks of Republican desperation -- when is Bush-appointee James Comey going to stop injecting his political agenda into his law enforcement career?
Re: Newest Clinton e-mails: FBI has no idea what's in them & no warrant to read them yet
LOOKS LIKE the FBI will have a new director next year...
Comey has probably already been offered a cushy new job somewhere ???
'Wolfie- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 8189
Join date : 2016-02-24
Age : 66
Location : Lake Macquarie, NSW, Australia
Re: Newest Clinton e-mails: FBI has no idea what's in them & no warrant to read them yet
Comey is a Banana Republican, and he's been a sleeper spy for the Alt-right, laying in wait for some time. But in order to attempt to fix this election, he has broken a couple of molds. This reveals that tradition and tried-and-true is not in the banana Republican tool box.
One, he has politicized the FBI, and it will never be seen as the detached and objective agency that it once was. The FBI was once looked up to as the standard. Comey has introduced the possibility that anything that the FBI does now, might be politically motivated...or, at the very least, disingenuous.
Another mole he has broken is, he has broken the tradition of law enforcement only going public with cases pre-trial; the tradition has always been to be silent and stoic, unless going public advances the purposes of the investigation (compare: the silence of the prosecutors before the Christie trial).
Finally, Comey's release of partial information reveals the partisan nature of his action: he creates the appearance of Clinton wrongdoing, when in fact the only person who could possibly face indictment would be the owner/user of the computer, Huma Abedin.
Remember, the search is for violations of the Espionage Act. Hillary Clinton has no more input for what is on a third-party's computer, than she would have for what is on your computer. If the Abedin computer sent or received emails to or from Hillary, then the FBI already has them since it searched all of the Clinton computers. If Hillary was neither the sender nor the receiver, then she is not implicated whatsoever.
It's just noise, and fodder for Trump.
One, he has politicized the FBI, and it will never be seen as the detached and objective agency that it once was. The FBI was once looked up to as the standard. Comey has introduced the possibility that anything that the FBI does now, might be politically motivated...or, at the very least, disingenuous.
Another mole he has broken is, he has broken the tradition of law enforcement only going public with cases pre-trial; the tradition has always been to be silent and stoic, unless going public advances the purposes of the investigation (compare: the silence of the prosecutors before the Christie trial).
Finally, Comey's release of partial information reveals the partisan nature of his action: he creates the appearance of Clinton wrongdoing, when in fact the only person who could possibly face indictment would be the owner/user of the computer, Huma Abedin.
Remember, the search is for violations of the Espionage Act. Hillary Clinton has no more input for what is on a third-party's computer, than she would have for what is on your computer. If the Abedin computer sent or received emails to or from Hillary, then the FBI already has them since it searched all of the Clinton computers. If Hillary was neither the sender nor the receiver, then she is not implicated whatsoever.
It's just noise, and fodder for Trump.
Original Quill- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 59
Location : Northern California
Similar topics
» Whats with those stupid
» Whoa whats going on!?
» Donald Trump Vent Thread
» Whats the difference?
» Bush-appointed U.S. judge sent hundreds of bigoted e-mails
» Whoa whats going on!?
» Donald Trump Vent Thread
» Whats the difference?
» Bush-appointed U.S. judge sent hundreds of bigoted e-mails
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sat Mar 18, 2023 12:28 pm by Ben Reilly
» TOTAL MADNESS Great British Railway Journeys among shows flagged by counter terror scheme ‘for encouraging far-right sympathies
Wed Feb 22, 2023 5:14 pm by Tommy Monk
» Interesting COVID figures
Tue Feb 21, 2023 5:00 am by Tommy Monk
» HAPPY CHRISTMAS.
Sun Jan 01, 2023 7:33 pm by Tommy Monk
» The Fight Over Climate Change is Over (The Greenies Won!)
Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:59 pm by Tommy Monk
» Trump supporter murders wife, kills family dog, shoots daughter
Mon Dec 12, 2022 1:21 am by 'Wolfie
» Quill
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:28 pm by Tommy Monk
» Algerian Woman under investigation for torture and murder of French girl, 12, whose body was found in plastic case in Paris
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:04 pm by Tommy Monk
» Wind turbines cool down the Earth (edited with better video link)
Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:19 am by Ben Reilly
» Saying goodbye to our Queen.
Sun Sep 25, 2022 9:02 pm by Maddog
» PHEW.
Sat Sep 17, 2022 6:33 pm by Syl
» And here's some more enrichment...
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:46 pm by Ben Reilly
» John F Kennedy Assassination
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:40 pm by Ben Reilly
» Where is everyone lately...?
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:33 pm by Ben Reilly
» London violence over the weekend...
Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:19 pm by Tommy Monk
» Why should anyone believe anything that Mo Farah says...!?
Wed Jul 13, 2022 1:44 am by Tommy Monk
» Liverpool Labour defends mayor role poll after turnout was only 3% and they say they will push ahead with the option that was least preferred!!!
Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:11 pm by Tommy Monk
» Labour leader Keir Stammer can't answer the simple question of whether a woman has a penis or not...
Mon Jul 11, 2022 3:58 am by Tommy Monk
» More evidence of remoaners still trying to overturn Brexit... and this is a conservative MP who should be drummed out of the party and out of parliament!
Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:50 pm by Tommy Monk
» R Kelly 30 years, Ghislaine Maxwell 20 years... but here in UK...
Fri Jul 08, 2022 5:31 pm by Original Quill