Which candidate do you side with? (quiz)

eddie wrote:Clinton 86
Stein 84


I tried to answer to the best of my knowledge but had to sometimes click the "more options" thing to gain a better insight into what I was answering.

What does my answer mean? Don't know much about Stein.

Ben Reilly wrote:

eddie wrote:Clinton 86
Stein 84


I tried to answer to the best of my knowledge but had to sometimes click the "more options" thing to gain a better insight into what I was answering.

What does my answer mean? Don't know much about Stein.

That you should vote for Clinton, if you were an American, but that the Green Party candidate would have considerable appeal to you as well.

Any righties want to jump in on this? Or weirdos like LF?

Veya, I'd have thought you'd side with Stein more than I did ...

veya_victaous wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:

eddie wrote:Clinton 86
Stein 84


I tried to answer to the best of my knowledge but had to sometimes click the "more options" thing to gain a better insight into what I was answering.

What does my answer mean? Don't know much about Stein.

That you should vote for Clinton, if you were an American, but that the Green Party candidate would have considerable appeal to you as well.

Any righties want to jump in on this? Or weirdos like LF?

Veya, I'd have thought you'd side with Stein more than I did ...

I can't see the difference in their stated policies
But I'd add it is not her 'currently stated' policies that make me opposed to Hilliary        

But I'm not 100% on the Questions...
On topics like Gay Marriage the question is explictly on the gay component and not on the marriage component.
there is was no option to Improve health care further, just keep the current Obamacare or get rid of it.

eddie wrote:Veya try it again but expand the options

I think my answers wobbled on military and space spending - I either don't know enough or I simply don't care about those issues...?

I really care about social issues and gay issues and crime.

Don't tell 4ever that I scored so high with Hilary - she will beat me over the head with it

Pssst > Eddie, I noticed and it made me giggle; but then I wondered if you'd opened up all of the continued pages or if you'd marked the 'importance' for each question as you made your way down the quiz -   because I really thought you'd be more leaning towards Chump-Trumps agenda then HRC or Steins for sure

And 4 eva is silly enough to think i don't like women leaders  

& this gem >>>
 
I don't argue for women rights...... I argue for AI rights

Now it's a lack of trustworthiness that is 'emanating from her' ...geeze having a     sensation all the way down under in Auzzie Land    AMAZING! LOL

eddie wrote:4ever, I hate trump!! No way do I agree with anything he says?!!
My only like for him - if you can even call it a "like" - is his bluntness. I do like a blunt politician. After years of having stuffy English toffee-nosed Tories ruling our roost, sometimes people like Trump and Farage are refreshing, for entertainment value.

I've never scored on any political quiz as a RW although Quill would have you believe otherwise

Oh, I know 'YOU DISLIKE HIM' but you and you    's have so very many like minded agenda items on that check list; it's almost identical to what you and the ILK around here keep flag waving/screeching about daily!  That's the ability to separate the 'Repugnant Humanoid' from his ranting/vitriolic agenda and see just how closely his ranting ideology will fall in line with your own POV. 

eddie wrote:I do see what you mean - I can understand why you may think that, but I'll try to explain.

I like a balance. If something swings too far one way I don't feel happy, it's not right. Politics and life and countries should be run like the balancing of scales.

That's why, I dislike extreme RW and extreme LW. I sit comfortably in the middle. Always have done.

I'm more prone to voting liberal (middle ground - or used to be!) or green. As voting right or left, isn't my idea of balance.

It's afforded me with the ability to have a panoramic vision/unbiased as humanly possible/pick & choose my responsible candidate that as closely matches my agenda {if I'm lucky - not that this happens often} I might get the one I voted for and I might actually have some of my top agenda hot button items actually get pushed through during that term POTUS for our very F'd up political system that seems geared against MY GENDER! 

Not only all of that    I don't get all of the political trash mail cluttering up my mail box as an 'undeclared' because they don't want to waste the mailer and they do not do those HORRID AUTO DIALER PHONE CALLER EITHER. 

Undeclared ...it's the only way to roll

eddie wrote:Well I'm awaiting a political party that suits all my needs. I've a feeling I'll be dead before that happens.

But then again ...my mom and I both used to say the same thing about: we'd never live long enough to see a 'Non-White POTUS' or then it was we won't ever live long enough to see a 'WOMAN as our POTUS' ...so I guess it just goes to show --- all things are possible, and we shouldn't give up HOPE!

sassy wrote:Sorry but it's rigged.   I put every answer as the greenest leftist I could, including opening out the questions, and still got Hillary not Jill Stein!

sassy wrote:I simply do not know how a RWer would answer lol

sassy wrote:OK, did the opposite to everything I think and got TRUMP AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Now go take a shower, Sassy and scrub that 'Cheeto-Jesus' freaky dude out of your hair!  A couple glasses of fine wine wouldn't hurt to wash him down with either

eddie wrote:Admit it, you like his Straw-like hair

I give a little  salute in his HONOR!

4EVER2 wrote:I'm wondering if you all did both sections of the quiz:
the main section and then the L-section > barely visible for what degree of intensity did that issue rate for importance in your life L-side of the main genre boxed area?

Pssst > Eddie, I noticed and it made me giggle; but then I wondered if you'd opened up all of the continued pages or if you'd marked the 'importance' for each question as you made your way down the quiz -   because I really thought you'd be more leaning towards Chump-Trumps agenda then HRC or Steins for sure   

Veya:

And 4 eva is silly enough to think i don't like women leaders  

& this gem >>>
 
I don't argue for women rights...... I argue for AI rights

When nothing else floats into your line of vision, just slap a 'GENERALIZATION' on it that quantifies a solution in your own MIND!  Never - Ever thought that - never crossed my mind; because you can't apply what & how you were raised in Australia {being a MALE} to what it's like being a woman raised in America and all of the biased mentally that we still struggle with over here = YOU ARE CLUELESS TO OUR ISSUES, yet you ASSume that you can rationalize it all out and tuck it into your quaint little box of GENERALIZATIONS to make you feel good!

HRC's 2016 POTUS agenda isn't any different then all of her political predecessors: list the top '10 IMPORTANT ISSUES' for every American going to vote {makes that agenda a remarkably loooooong one} and as with every elected POTUS they may be successful and most ARE NOT!  It's the REALITY that we live with --- you foreigners just keep getting your tidy-whities all in a bunch about that 'looooooon What If List'  and we're like 'MEH' what the hell are you all ranting on about?

Now it's a lack of trustworthiness that is 'emanating from her' ...geeze having a     sensation all the way down under in Auzzie Land    AMAZING! LOL

4EVER2 wrote:  

eddie wrote:Admit it, you like his ??? Straw-like hair

veya_victaous wrote:D is exactly what Nicko Says About the UK?
Stop pretending you are any different from the Hillshepherds 4ever.

and the fact you think any of that is off the deep end show you are not left wing at all. Your ability to debate is actually Less than tommys as You dont post anything but party hack nonsense. just like Him, you 2 are peas in the pod just the braindead left and braindead right

Yes hilliary is saying in the Advertizement to you today she wants this, but that is not what she said 2 years ago.

And the women thing Again is just YOUR COP OUT. You're last generation, OLD like Nicko and too obsolete to be allowed to vote in a fair system.
You been around for long enough and voted enough times If you had A sibngle idea of merit or Moral fibre than the issue WOULD NOT STILL BE THE SAME!!!

AND Only Sexist wankers use the Women Excuse.

Plus Take an interest in international affairs and maybe you might learn something More that the brain dead propoganda you seem to think is real

@C
who said Australia? We are one of the few that like the USA and even that is barely when we see the supposed Left side being as Equally Hillshepherd like as the Rigth Wing Brits!!!

Good Night ~ Veya

LET IT GOOOOOO, VEYA your just making yourself sound very OBSESSED 

Let me reiterate: you aren't a woman - you don't live in AMERICA - don't deal with our issues - you've proven & keep proving that you haven't a CLUE and it's just futile to allow you to blow a gasket/blood vessel/increase your blood pressure when YOU DON'T GET A FUCKING VOTE AND YET YOU KEEP WANTING TO RANT AND RAVE LIKE A FUCKING LUNATIC ABOUT NOTHING - ABSOLUTELY NOTHING YOU CAN DO ANYTHING ABOUT!

Ben Reilly wrote:

eddie wrote:Admit it, you like his ??? Straw-like hair

Fixed that for you.

eddie wrote:Veya, as you know I'm kinda with you on the Clinton mind-change thing - but isn't is possible she has, actually changed her mind about these issues after having had a good old think?
People do change their minds you know!

Yahoo News wrote:‘Is Donald Trump plain crazy?’
Big-name writers now questioning GOP nominee’s sanity

Dylan Stableford, Senior editor
August 2, 2016

Is Donald Trump insane?

That’s the question being asked in recent days by prominent columnists, both liberal and conservative, about the Republican presidential nominee.

“During the primary season, as Donald Trump’s bizarre outbursts helped him crush the competition, I thought he was being crazy like a fox,” Eugene Robinson wrote in an op-ed (“Is Donald Trump just plain crazy?”) published Tuesday in the Washington Post.

“Now I am increasingly convinced that he’s just plain crazy,” Robinson continued. “I’m serious about that. Leave aside for the moment Trump’s policies, which in my opinion range from the unconstitutional to the un-American to the potentially catastrophic. At this point, it would be irresponsible to ignore the fact that Trump’s grasp on reality appears to be tenuous at best.”

Robinson was not the only newspaper writer to recently ask such a blunt question about Trump’s fitness for office.

“One wonders if Republican leaders have begun to realize that they may have hitched their fate and the fate of their party to a man with a disordered personality,” Robert Kagan, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, wrote in a separate Washington Post editorial on Monday. “We can leave it to the professionals to determine exactly what to call it. Suffice to say that Donald Trump’s response to the assorted speakers at the Democratic National Convention has not been rational.”

Vox founder Ezra Klein made a similar observation following Trump’s press conference the day after last month’s Republican National Convention. Instead of focusing on a unifying message, Trump resurfaced the debunked conspiracy theory that Texas Sen. Ted Cruz’s father was linked to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

“Have we stopped to appreciate how crazy Donald Trump has gotten recently?” Klein asked.

“There was no reason for Trump to say any of this,” Klein wrote. “Trump had just accepted the Republican Party’s nomination for president. Cruz had been vanquished, booed off the stage. Trump’s opponent, now, was Hillary Clinton. But he couldn’t help himself. He couldn’t stay on message, he couldn’t suppress the crazy, for 24 hours.”

“Yes, Donald Trump is crazy,” Steven Hayes added last week in the conservative Weekly Standard. “And, yes, the Republican party owns his insanity.”

“I almost don’t blame Trump,” David Brooks wrote in the New York Times on July 29. “He is a morally untethered, spiritually vacuous man who appears haunted by multiple personality disorders. It is the ‘sane’ and ‘reasonable’ Republicans who deserve the shame.”

It’s not just op-ed columnists questioning Trump’s sanity.

Bloomberg uses billionaire status to bash Trump at the DNC
Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg spoke at the Democratic National Convention Wednesday and made his independent-voter case for supporting Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

At last week’s Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg endorsed Hillary Clinton while suggesting his fellow billionaire is not of sound mind.

“Let’s elect a sane, competent person,” Bloomberg said.

Another billionaire, Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, also questioned Trump’s sanity.

“Donald initially — I really hoped he would be something different, that as a businessperson, I thought there was an opportunity there,” Cuban told CNN while campaigning with Clinton in his hometown of Pittsburgh on Saturday. “But then he went off the reservation and went bats*** crazy.”

“We can gloss over it, laugh about it, analyze it,” Stuart Stevens, chief strategist to Mitt Romney’s 2012 campaign, wrote on Twitter. “But Donald Trump is not a well man.”

Trump biographer Michael D’Antonio, though, argues that Trump is not crazy but instead “sees the world as a constant struggle for victory and lacks a moral compass.”

“The word ‘crazy’ conjures up a person who is so plagued by delusions, or perhaps hallucinations, that he makes no sense at all,” D’Antonio wrote in an op-ed for CNN.com. “Consider his success, both before and during his pursuit of the presidency, and it’s hard to argue that Trump suffers from such a profoundly distorted view of reality. In fact he has long demonstrated a keen awareness of how our society worships celebrity and rewards those who can attract the limelight and hold its focus.”