FBI Transcript Shows Nobody Died in Orlando Shooting Until SWAT Teams Entered the Building: Judge Napolitano

FBI Transcript Shows Nobody Died in Orlando Shooting Until SWAT Teams Entered the Building: Judge Napolitano


“Here’s what is news in the summary – nobody died until 05:13 in the morning, when the SWAT team entered. Prior to that no one had been killed. The 53 that were injured, and the 49 that were murdered all met their fates at the time of, and during, the police entry into the building,” Judge Napolitano said

What should have been front page news everywhere, somehow got buried amid the official narrative we were given about the Orlando shooting.

Judge Andrew Napolitano told FOX News that an FBI transcript indicated that no one died until 05:13am Sunday morning when the police SWAT teams entered the building.


It's well worth watching the full video

Full video of what Judge NapolitNo on TV: http://www.globalresearch.ca/fbi-transcript-shows-nobody-died-in-orlando-shooting-until-swat-teams-entered-the-building-judge-napolitano/5533563

Dear me, not only is that hilariously dumb and again shows how guillible people are to conspiracy bullshit.
All you have is a claim made by a Judge, where on the actual FBI trascript, it makes no such claim that nobody died before 05:13 and in fact they state the first times he did shoot, where countless witnesses, including many of those wounded kniow for a facr most were killed and wounded within the first minutes. Also they were not in control of the situation during the seige and would thus have no idea how many had been killed or wounded.
For fuck sake

http://www.globalresearch.ca/fbi-transcript-shows-nobody-died-in-orlando-shooting-until-swat-teams-entered-the-building-judge-napolitano/5533563

And if people really want to be pendantic, the look up the many Post Mortens carried out on those who were murdered and see the time of death. Which some wiill have been killed instantaneous when they were shot and others dying over a short time, due to their wounds. The Post Mortems, will be able to clarify the witness testimonies on the times of death.

Yet again another load of gibberish posted that did no9t even bother to question the claims made

Wow

What I have put up is the PRESS RELEASE (remember how you told me that they can get things wrong if they're given the wrong info?)
What the judge saw (apparently) was an FBI TRANSCRIPT.

So we can wait and see if we, the public, get to see the FBI TRANSCRIPT as we have already seen the PRESS RELEASE (see above)

If that clip of the judge made it onto BBC news tonight/huffington post/daily telegraph/other media outlet that you like, what do you think you would say?

So as seen you are going off hearsay, where even then as seen its so stupid to then even go off the trascript, being as the FBI, during the seige would not be able to collect accurate data on times of deaths of those inside the club.
If the bases for your claim is one judge and you are then blatantly ignoring how a post mortom and the countless witness can verify when most people were killed.

Its that simple Eddie

So your whole arguments hinges on a poor claim to something being ommited from the FBI Transcript. Which is then going to have no bearing on the times of death being known, as the dead and dying, apart from a couple of the Police outside, they were inside the Club when they were killed and wounded. So you tell me Eddie

Over two hundred witnesses, including the wounded, Post mortems that will varify the time of death, are to you all lying and that those who survived the ordeal in the club are lying over people they knew close to them, that lost their lives.

Your argument is based on a Judge, who p;laces defending he second ammenent as a priority and that means he is then Politically motivated on defending guns


Please do your research as its clear to me, what the truth is here and the fact you disbelieve the survivors is applaing

Eddie... even in the telephone transcript he says he did the shootings... and that was well before swat team went in...

Tommy Monk wrote:Eddie... even in the telephone transcript he says he fiddle the shootings... and that was well before swat team went in...

Did he?

Which is another part being overlooked by Eddie, is what the gunman himself stated in the transcript.

"I did the shootings"

That is again clarification that clearly people are dead and woiunded.

Bloody predictive text!!!


Not 'fiddle'...


I was typing 'did'...!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:




Bloody predictive text!!!


Not 'fiddle'...


I was typing 'did'...!!!

Ha ha, no worries Tommy

I've changed it now...

Andrew Napolitano | Fox News

www.foxnews.com/person/n/andrew-napolitano.html
Andrew P. Napolitano joined Fox News Channel (FNC) in January 1998 and currently serves as the senior judicial analyst. He provides legal analysis on both FNC and Fox ...

Combine that buffoon {he's no longer a JUDGE}  with the ever over blown - rarely factual William Blum blogger page that you've now used as a 'reliable source 3 times this morning' and you've just proven that the old age of - 'some people will fall for something no matter how crazy it seems or how off the mark for truth!' 

SERIOUSLY - Eddie, take the FBI report out of that ridiculous blog BS post and just read the FBI report; it's nothing but stating what they FBI has stated in their TIME LINE of events! Nothing more - Nothing less!

Tommy Monk wrote:Eddie... even in the telephone transcript he says he did the shootings... and that was well before swat team went in...

Yes Tommy. I know.

I am simply, putting up something I found interesting and I am wondering why this judge, went on TV and said what he saw.

I would like to know why he said that.

Maybe he is just saying nothing was confirmed until police entered the building...

eddie wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:Eddie... even in the telephone transcript he says he did the shootings... and that was well before swat team went in...

Yes Tommy. I know.

I am simply, putting up something I found interesting and I am wondering why this judge, went on TV and said what he saw.

I would like to know why he said that.

Because he's {no longer is a real JUDGE} is a paid HACK for 'Faux News' and your wondering why he'd make crap up?

Tommy Monk wrote:Maybe he is just saying nothing was confirmed until police entered the building...

Well watch it and then you'll know what he said.
If what he says isn't true someone needs to correct it. What he said was said on live TV.

eddie wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:Eddie... even in the telephone transcript he says he did the shootings... and that was well before swat team went in...

Yes Tommy. I know.

I am simply, putting up something I found interesting and I am wondering why this judge, went on TV and said what he saw.

I would like to know why he said that.

That part is simple to work out

His view to claim the killings and people wounded did not happen until the Swat team entered is again done so due to his support of the gun lobby. What better way to deflect away from the killer himself, to then claim that actually, it was not the guns bought by the terrorist that killed and wounded most of the victims. Now he can claim it was the Police. His motivated intent from the start is to divert away from the killer being able to obtain guns. As now he can falsify that it was not the sale of guns that caused the number of fatalitiesd and wounded at Orlando, but the gung ho shooting Police. That is why you should research things Eddie. Anyway his claim is utterly ridiculous to say that not one person was injured or killed, whilst we know many shots were exchanged and fired and heard to have been fired and seen by many people. For him to make such a claim, is clearly from a bases to defend the right to bear arms. As he as seen is attempting to claim that the gunman walked in the club, was able to hold they in abject fear by not even wounding or killing anyone. Which os why i can smell through a load of gibberish when i read it.
The Judge has a reason to lie.
The victims have lost those close to them and thus would not lie over when people were killed and there is simply no reason at all why you think they would


Have a good evening

eddie wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:Maybe he is just saying nothing was confirmed until police entered the building...

Well watch it and then you'll know what he said.
If what he says isn't true someone needs to correct it. What he said was said on live TV.

Skipping over my posts ...amusing and yet rather telling; but it doesn't change the fact {yes FACT} that you place far too much faith on a 'Faux News' program and it's paid talking heads that only has an 8% value for keeping their news program on the TRUTH METER.