U.S. just admitted that cannabis DOES kill cancer cells

Tommy Monk wrote:

Never had morphine...


And yes I have read that cancer cells can be destroyed by cannabis oils...

Lord Foul wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:

Never had morphine...


And yes I have read that cancer cells can be destroyed by cannabis oils...

its not actually that thrilling.....

Cass wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:

Never had morphine...


And yes I have read that cancer cells can be destroyed by cannabis oils...

its not actually that thrilling.....

Yup. Messes with your digestion and other body systems. Only to be used at the end.

Lord Foul wrote:

Cass wrote:

Yup. Messes with your digestion and other body systems. Only to be used at the end.

or if you are lying at the road side with your shoulder ripped out of its socket.....after trying a flying tackle on a 8 legger whilst on your motorbike.......

4EVER2 wrote:I wish we had so many of these holistic cannabis oils available when my husband was in dire need...back when he was first diagnosed and then for his 2nd round---well that all ended not as planned.  
Part of me rages with frustration at my own governments asinine labeling cannabis as a hallucinogenic narcotic back in the early 30's---where we could have been so far into the future with natural plant.  
About dam time ...but if it hadn't been for all the other countries forging ahead and publishing there medical advancements ...I don't think that we'd be seeing the states that have changed there POV regarding the legalities of marijuana!

Lord Foul wrote:a bloody great wagon drove across a junction (I was on the major road with right of way) straight across my path...I hit one of the back wheels fortunately...ended up with my shoulder ball down around my ribs....

the medic that attended gave me a shot of morphine (I guess to stop me swearing quite so much)

eddie wrote:

4EVER2 wrote:I wish we had so many of these holistic cannabis oils available when my husband was in dire need...back when he was first diagnosed and then for his 2nd round---well that all ended not as planned.  
Part of me rages with frustration at my own governments asinine labeling cannabis as a hallucinogenic narcotic back in the early 30's---where we could have been so far into the future with natural plant.  
About dam time ...but if it hadn't been for all the other countries forging ahead and publishing there medical advancements ...I don't think that we'd be seeing the states that have changed there POV regarding the legalities of marijuana!

I wish too, that this had been abailable for your husband 4ever, and also for my dad.

My friend has some on order.

I will let you all know how she gets on with it. Her first round of chemo is Monday - 10 hours of it.

Cass wrote:

eddie wrote:

4EVER2 wrote:I wish we had so many of these holistic cannabis oils available when my husband was in dire need...back when he was first diagnosed and then for his 2nd round---well that all ended not as planned.  
Part of me rages with frustration at my own governments asinine labeling cannabis as a hallucinogenic narcotic back in the early 30's---where we could have been so far into the future with natural plant.  
About dam time ...but if it hadn't been for all the other countries forging ahead and publishing there medical advancements ...I don't think that we'd be seeing the states that have changed there POV regarding the legalities of marijuana!

I wish too, that this had been abailable for your husband 4ever, and also for my dad.

My friend has some on order.

I will let you all know how she gets on with it. Her first round of chemo is Monday - 10 hours of it.

Much love to her eds x

Gupta: 'I am doubling down' on medical marijuana - CNN.com

www.cnn.com/2014/03/05/health/gupta-medical-marijuana/index.html
Mar 06, 2014 · Video embedded · It's been eight months since I last wrote about medical marijuana, apologizing for having not dug deeply into the beneficial effects of …

Cass wrote:
Thank you Cass X
She said she's going to ask for a boob lift from her doctor. Her words "If I've got to have cancer at least can I have nice boobs?"

4EVER2 wrote:ATTA GIRL...

BTW, I'd forgotten about my 1½" thick humorous file folder with all those printed copies of jokes - jokes and more jokes.  Risqué and off the wall, that corporations and many of our commercial accounts/family and friends and sent to me to show to hubby. 
Thought I'd lost him a couple of times for his LOL'ing so dam hard tears would stream down his face...but those jokes and humorous stories gave him something to read while he was seated in there having his CHEMO...and soon he was sharing them with the entire room of patients too.
Nurses & doctors taking them away to make photo copies for the group or for their own private file. 

Paul Ettinger wrote:Cospiracy theorists.
Please.
The NHS and many medical researches have been working on this for years and the reason they do not declare anything, is because it takes years of testing.
Sorry Eddie to use this as a means to claim conspiracists are right using the plight of cancer I find appalling in the extreme. Just because some people guess rightly something may end up working does not make conspircies then be right on every claim. Some conspiracies have been right, but the amount claimed and wrong does not equate to making use of the plight og people suffering as a means to champion your conspiracy crap as is they are always right.
Sorry this is a new low for you Eddie
This should have been a thread on the fact it has properties to help, not post thinking this then makes all your looney claims right
What now, is this the green light to try all claims so called "natural cures" based off no years of testing, based off this one works.
This is the danger people like yourself fail to realize what you promote, as now this will give you a misleading belief on other claims.
Everything requires proper testing.   DUHHHHH, genius - pure genius

4EVER2 wrote:

Paul Ettinger wrote:]

Not a huge surprise that you'd stoop so low as too attack/jab/at Eddie during a period when she's got a life long friend in 'NEED' but as your usual lame - 'can't read the links or watch the video to see the number of nations that have been doing the test for 10+years'...
Well, that is as per your NORMAL; BS and what Didgey-Dooer does best: lies and attacks and if some dumb-ass blogger doesn't hand you your daily thoughts --- you don't have any! 

How is the view from the GUTTER LEVEL...calling Eddie a "looney" and you've proven what a liar you are and certifiable too!

4EVER2 wrote:

Paul Ettinger wrote:Cospiracy theorists.
Please.
The NHS and many medical researches have been working on this for years and the reason they do not declare anything, is because it takes years of testing.
Sorry Eddie to use this as a means to claim conspiracists are right using the plight of cancer I find appalling in the extreme. Just because some people guess rightly something may end up working does not make conspircies then be right on every claim. Some conspiracies have been right, but the amount claimed and wrong does not equate to making use of the plight og people suffering as a means to champion your conspiracy crap as is they are always right.
Sorry this is a new low for you Eddie
This should have been a thread on the fact it has properties to help, not post thinking this then makes all your looney claims right
What now, is this the green light to try all claims so called "natural cures" based off no years of testing, based off this one works.
This is the danger people like yourself fail to realize what you promote, as now this will give you a misleading belief on other claims.
Everything requires proper testing.   DUHHHHH, genius - pure genius

Not a huge surprise that you'd stoop so low as too attack/jab/at Eddie during a period when she's got a life long friend in 'NEED' but as your usual lame - 'can't read the links or watch the video to see the number of nations that have been doing the test for 10+years'...
Well, that is as per your NORMAL; BS and what Didgey-Dooer does best: lies and attacks and if some dumb-ass blogger doesn't hand you your daily thoughts --- you don't have any! 

How is the view from the GUTTER LEVEL...calling Eddie a "looney" and you've proven what a liar you are and certifiable too!

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:
EDDIE'S making claims not covered in the quotes in the O/P...
And she knows it..
That report says that cannabinoids may kill some cancer cells..
AND it relieves a lot of the signs, symptons and side effects..

BUT nowhere does it offer any actual "cures" for cancers.

OTHERS here are just adding their hopes and dreams on top of that report, and claiming some links that just aren't shown there -- as yet..

eddie wrote:I'm not understanding why people don't know that they've been testing this for years????

eddie wrote:Chemo is pushed here too 4ever.

I think we may see the day when chemo is not used at all anymore. I'm a great believer in nature being able to tackle most diseases, even if it's not a cure as such.

eddie wrote:Didge would you like to contact The National Cancer institute?
Read the OP.

When you're proved wrong, and it seems you're among the very few in the world who are still in the dark about cancer cells and cannibis - then you may come back and say "oops"

Have you seen the actual footage of cannibis oil attacking cancer cells and leaving healthy cells alone?

It's on YouTube

And I take it, you're calling the NCI a bunch of loonies?

sassy wrote:

4EVER2 wrote:
Not a huge surprise that you'd stoop so low as too attack/jab/at Eddie during a period when she's got a life long friend in 'NEED' but as your usual lame - 'can't read the links or watch the video to see the number of nations that have been doing the test for 10+years'...
Well, that is as per your NORMAL; BS and what Didgey-Dooer does best: lies and attacks and if some dumb-ass blogger doesn't hand you your daily thoughts --- you don't have any! 

How is the view from the GUTTER LEVEL...calling Eddie a "looney" and you've proven what a liar you are and certifiable too!

FGS!!!   She's going through hell with her friend at the moment, has he no shame.

Paul Ettinger wrote:

eddie wrote:Didge would you like to contact The National Cancer institute?
Read the OP.

When you're proved wrong, and it seems you're among the very few in the world who are still in the dark about cancer cells and cannibis - then you may come back and say "oops"

Have you seen the actual footage of cannibis oil attacking cancer cells and leaving healthy cells alone?

It's on YouTube

And I take it, you're calling the NCI a bunch of loonies?

Maybe you should read what I have written as I am not disputing the claim as I know it has been through years of medical research.
Its your idiocy to claim this is down to conspiracy theorists who had nothing to do with it or any of the research or for you then to believe this makes any conspiracy theory. To the point you will make claims to other so called sures

So again at no point have a I disputed the claim, my beef is you disgustingly going off and bringing into this conspircay idiots

eddie wrote:U.S. just admitted that cannabis DOES kill cancer cells


Conspiracy theorists have been saying it all along – but cannabis does apparently kill cancer cells.

That’s according to the US government, which has added a page on the use of cannabis and cannabinoids to their official cancer advice website.

The National Cancer Institute, part of the US Department of Health, now advises that ‘cannabinoids may be useful in treating the side effects of cancer and cancer treatment’ by smoking, eating it in baked products, drinking herbal teas or even spraying it under the tongue.

The site also lists other uses including: Anti-inflammatory activity, blocking cell growth, preventing the growth of blood vessels that supply tumours, antiviral activity and relieving muscle spasms caused by multiple sclerosis.

The information page also explains how cancer cells in mice were killed when exposed to cannabis.

Several scientific studies have suggested this in the past, and in April this year the US government’s National Institute on Drug Abuse revised their publications to suggest cannabis could shrink brain tumours by killing off cancer cells.

There are now two FDA approved medications for cancer patients available in the US which contain cannabinoids.

In the UK THC is in prescribed drug Sativex but is not yet considered useful on a wider basis for medical purposes.

eddie wrote:You mean this article that I still never wrote?

http://worldhealthsupport.com/u-s-just-admitted-that-cannabis-does-kill-cancer-cells/

eddie wrote:I've just added the link to my OP as I never put one.

But I do accept your apology that yes, it wasn't me that wrote the article, so therefore you jumped the gun.

eddie wrote:Hahahahahaha now you don't like the publication so you will sit and say you don't think it is a cure when you never argued that before?

Oops. It's Friday night.
You're pished, I'm off.

Your apology is noted.
Enjoy.

Sections

• Overview
  
• Questions and Answers About Cannabis
  
• Current Clinical Trials
  
• About This PDQ Summary
  
• General CAM Information
  
• Evaluation of CAM Approaches
  
• Questions to Ask Your Health Care Provider About CAM
  
• To Learn More About CAM
  
• View All Sections
  

Overview

• Cannabis , also known as marijuana, is a plant grown in many parts of the world which produces a resin containing compounds called cannabinoids. Some cannabinoids are psychoactive (acting on the brain and changing mood or consciousness) (see Question 1).
  
• The use of Cannabis for medicinal purposes dates back to ancient times (see Question 3).
  
• By federal law, the possession of Cannabis is illegal in the United States outside of approved research settings. However, a growing number of states, territories, and the District of Columbia have enacted laws to legalize medical marijuana (see Question 1).
  
• In the United States, Cannabis is a controlled substance requiring special licensing for its use (see Question 1 and Question 3).
  
• Cannabinoids are active chemicals in Cannabis that cause drug -like effects throughout the body, including the central nervous system and the immune system (see Question 2).
  
• The main active cannabinoid in Cannabis is delta-9-THC. Another active cannabinoid is cannabidiol (CBD), which may relieve pain, lower inflammation, and decrease anxiety without causing the "high" of delta-9-THC (see Question 2).
  
• Cannabinoids can be taken by mouth, inhaled, or sprayed under the tongue (see Question 5).
  
• Cannabis and cannabinoids have been studied in the laboratory and the clinic for relief of pain, nausea and vomiting, anxiety, and loss of appetite (see Question 6 and Question 7).
  
• Cannabis and cannabinoids may have benefits in treating the symptoms of cancer or the side effects of cancer therapies. There is growing interest in treating children for symptoms such as nausea with Cannabis and cannabinoids, although studies are limited (see Question 7).
  
• Two cannabinoids (dronabinol and nabilone) are drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the prevention or treatment of chemotherapy -related nausea and vomiting (see Question 7 and Question 10).
  
• Cannabis has been shown to kill cancer cells in the laboratory(see Question 6).
  
• At this time, there is not enough evidence to recommend that patients inhale or ingest Cannabis as a treatment for cancer-related symptoms or side effects of cancer therapy (see Question 7).
  
• Cannabis is not approved by the FDA for use as a cancer treatment (see Question 9).
  

eddie wrote:It's not about smoking it Tommy.
You get Cannibis oil and you take a tiny drop - size of a grain of rice, once a day.