Tory minister said homeless poll tax exemption would spur rough sleeping
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Tory minister said homeless poll tax exemption would spur rough sleeping
No 10 files reveal Peter Walker, minister in Margaret Thatcher’s cabinet, opposed exemption on grounds it would be abused
A move to exempt homeless rough sleepers from paying the poll tax was opposed by one of Margaret Thatcher’s cabinet ministers on the grounds that it would “encourage them to sleep on the streets”, according to newly released Downing Street files.
Peter Walker, the then Welsh secretary, argued that creating an exemption for those who sleep rough “would put an enormous loophole into the system and would be abused”.
He added: “Moreover, it would act as an incentive to people to sleep rough simply to make sure that they escaped having to pay at least 20% of the charge. While I appreciate that in practice it is highly unlikely that local authorities would be able either to track down people who sleep rough or to get any payment of the charge from them, a specific exemption could be seen as encouraging them to sleep on the street rather than in a hostel.”
He voiced his objection in June 1988 when Nicholas Ridley, then environment secretary, was trying to get the final stages of the poll tax legislation, with its principle that everyone should pay for local government services, through the House of Lords.
Ridley had told Thatcher: “We have always had a presentational difficulty in seeking to make people who sleep rough liable for the personal community charge ... We have had to admit that, whatever the position in theory, it would be very difficult to ensure that these people were registered for and paid the community charge [poll tax].”
Walker reluctantly dropped his objection after Downing Street backed Ridley in not wanting to collect the poll tax from rough sleepers if only because of the “unwelcome publicity” it would attract.
The Downing Street files released on Friday show that earlier in its history Ridley himself voiced strong doubts to Thatcher about the impact of the poll tax and called for a major rethink.
On 29 July 1987 a confidential note on the poll tax file records that Ridley saw Thatcher to express his “growing concern about opposition to the community charge. This would be increased by the decision to have a transition rather than to abolish rates immediately. He showed some inclination to want to rethink quite major aspects of the community charge,” reported a No 10 official.
Facebook [url=https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Tory minister said homeless poll tax exemption would spur rough sleeping&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgu.com%2Fp%2F4gzm7%2Fstw%23img-2] Twitter [/url] Pinterest
Police officers attend to one of the casualties of the riot that developed out of a demonstration against the poll tax in Trafalgar Square. Photograph: PA
“The prime minister discouraged this firmly,” it went on. “But she agreed that it would be sensible for Mr Ridley to begin to think about minor changes which backbenchers might propose and which could then be accepted by the government.” Her decision to press on regardless came despite her own Downing Street policy unit telling her earlier that month that it was vital to mount a campaign to sell the policy because it was “receiving virtually no support in parliament, in the press or even from Conservative-controlled councils”.
Thatcher also ignored renewed warnings from her own chancellor, Nigel Lawson, who two years before had warned the poll tax would be “completely unworkable and politically catastrophic”. He objected to the decision to scrap a transitional system of dual running of the rates topped up by the poll tax, saying it “would leave us exposed to unacceptable political risks”. He warned that a couple with an elderly parent living in Cambridge would face a 50% increase – £250 – in their local tax bill and that the “outcry from the losers” would lead to a severe political fallout.
The papers reveal unpublished exemplifications from 1987 showing that there were expected to be 8 million losers from the poll tax even with average bills of £100 a head. In the event when the tax was introduced in 1990 the average bill was closer to £400 a head, triggering not only the Trafalgar Square poll tax riot but also a revolt in the Conservative party that was to oust Thatcher from Downing Street.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/feb/19/tory-minister-thatcher-cabinet-homeless-poll-tax-exemption-encourage-rough-sleeping
How bloody disgusting were they!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And Thatcher in particular. Whinging and whining when she was ousted but happy to tax people who had nothing and were living on the street. Utter Bitch.
A move to exempt homeless rough sleepers from paying the poll tax was opposed by one of Margaret Thatcher’s cabinet ministers on the grounds that it would “encourage them to sleep on the streets”, according to newly released Downing Street files.
Peter Walker, the then Welsh secretary, argued that creating an exemption for those who sleep rough “would put an enormous loophole into the system and would be abused”.
He added: “Moreover, it would act as an incentive to people to sleep rough simply to make sure that they escaped having to pay at least 20% of the charge. While I appreciate that in practice it is highly unlikely that local authorities would be able either to track down people who sleep rough or to get any payment of the charge from them, a specific exemption could be seen as encouraging them to sleep on the street rather than in a hostel.”
He voiced his objection in June 1988 when Nicholas Ridley, then environment secretary, was trying to get the final stages of the poll tax legislation, with its principle that everyone should pay for local government services, through the House of Lords.
Ridley had told Thatcher: “We have always had a presentational difficulty in seeking to make people who sleep rough liable for the personal community charge ... We have had to admit that, whatever the position in theory, it would be very difficult to ensure that these people were registered for and paid the community charge [poll tax].”
Walker reluctantly dropped his objection after Downing Street backed Ridley in not wanting to collect the poll tax from rough sleepers if only because of the “unwelcome publicity” it would attract.
The Downing Street files released on Friday show that earlier in its history Ridley himself voiced strong doubts to Thatcher about the impact of the poll tax and called for a major rethink.
On 29 July 1987 a confidential note on the poll tax file records that Ridley saw Thatcher to express his “growing concern about opposition to the community charge. This would be increased by the decision to have a transition rather than to abolish rates immediately. He showed some inclination to want to rethink quite major aspects of the community charge,” reported a No 10 official.
Facebook [url=https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Tory minister said homeless poll tax exemption would spur rough sleeping&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgu.com%2Fp%2F4gzm7%2Fstw%23img-2] Twitter [/url] Pinterest
Police officers attend to one of the casualties of the riot that developed out of a demonstration against the poll tax in Trafalgar Square. Photograph: PA
“The prime minister discouraged this firmly,” it went on. “But she agreed that it would be sensible for Mr Ridley to begin to think about minor changes which backbenchers might propose and which could then be accepted by the government.” Her decision to press on regardless came despite her own Downing Street policy unit telling her earlier that month that it was vital to mount a campaign to sell the policy because it was “receiving virtually no support in parliament, in the press or even from Conservative-controlled councils”.
Thatcher also ignored renewed warnings from her own chancellor, Nigel Lawson, who two years before had warned the poll tax would be “completely unworkable and politically catastrophic”. He objected to the decision to scrap a transitional system of dual running of the rates topped up by the poll tax, saying it “would leave us exposed to unacceptable political risks”. He warned that a couple with an elderly parent living in Cambridge would face a 50% increase – £250 – in their local tax bill and that the “outcry from the losers” would lead to a severe political fallout.
The papers reveal unpublished exemplifications from 1987 showing that there were expected to be 8 million losers from the poll tax even with average bills of £100 a head. In the event when the tax was introduced in 1990 the average bill was closer to £400 a head, triggering not only the Trafalgar Square poll tax riot but also a revolt in the Conservative party that was to oust Thatcher from Downing Street.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/feb/19/tory-minister-thatcher-cabinet-homeless-poll-tax-exemption-encourage-rough-sleeping
How bloody disgusting were they!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And Thatcher in particular. Whinging and whining when she was ousted but happy to tax people who had nothing and were living on the street. Utter Bitch.
Guest- Guest
Re: Tory minister said homeless poll tax exemption would spur rough sleeping
thatcher the greatest peacetime PM the country has ever seen.
Time to put her on the £20 note me thinks. If only to cause leftists to have apoplexy
Time to put her on the £20 note me thinks. If only to cause leftists to have apoplexy
The Devil, You Know- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 3966
Join date : 2015-05-11
Location : Room 101 (which does not exist)
Re: Tory minister said homeless poll tax exemption would spur rough sleeping
how can you tax people who have nothing? 20% of nothing is nothing you silly silly woman
The Devil, You Know- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 3966
Join date : 2015-05-11
Location : Room 101 (which does not exist)
Re: Tory minister said homeless poll tax exemption would spur rough sleeping
Nobody liked the poll tax though, except perhaps landlords.
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: Tory minister said homeless poll tax exemption would spur rough sleeping
yes it was so terrible expecting everybody who used the services to actually pay for them. What has it got to do with landlords. they would not be paid any of the money.Raggamuffin wrote:Nobody liked the poll tax though, except perhaps landlords.
The Devil, You Know- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 3966
Join date : 2015-05-11
Location : Room 101 (which does not exist)
Re: Tory minister said homeless poll tax exemption would spur rough sleeping
The Devil, You Know wrote:yes it was so terrible expecting everybody who used the services to actually pay for them. What has it got to do with landlords. they would not be paid any of the money.Raggamuffin wrote:Nobody liked the poll tax though, except perhaps landlords.
They included a charge for rates in rent, and then didn't reduce the rent when the poll tax came in.
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: Tory minister said homeless poll tax exemption would spur rough sleeping
I was a tenant during that time and I paid my rates separately,a s I did my poll tax and community chargeRaggamuffin wrote:The Devil, You Know wrote:
yes it was so terrible expecting everybody who used the services to actually pay for them. What has it got to do with landlords. they would not be paid any of the money.
They included a charge for rates in rent, and then didn't reduce the rent when the poll tax came in.
The Devil, You Know- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 3966
Join date : 2015-05-11
Location : Room 101 (which does not exist)
Re: Tory minister said homeless poll tax exemption would spur rough sleeping
The Devil, You Know wrote:I was a tenant during that time and I paid my rates separately,a s I did my poll tax and community chargeRaggamuffin wrote:
They included a charge for rates in rent, and then didn't reduce the rent when the poll tax came in.
I didn't pay rates separately though.
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Similar topics
» 'It's a sign of the times that a soldier is left to die on our streets': Veterans blast support for ex-forces as a former soldier dies while sleeping rough in Edinburgh
» Is this the solution to UK's homeless crisis? Emergency pods with bed, toilet and key-coded door could help rough-sleepers amid rise in violence
» Every single beggar in one city is a FRAUD! Police say rough sleepers only claim to be homeless and are making 'substantial amounts of money'
» Ex-Apprentice winner Michelle Dewberry catches council worker on video as he confiscated homeless man's sleeping bag
» Disabled people 'sleeping in their clothes and surviving on biscuits' due to Tory cuts
» Is this the solution to UK's homeless crisis? Emergency pods with bed, toilet and key-coded door could help rough-sleepers amid rise in violence
» Every single beggar in one city is a FRAUD! Police say rough sleepers only claim to be homeless and are making 'substantial amounts of money'
» Ex-Apprentice winner Michelle Dewberry catches council worker on video as he confiscated homeless man's sleeping bag
» Disabled people 'sleeping in their clothes and surviving on biscuits' due to Tory cuts
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sat Mar 18, 2023 12:28 pm by Ben Reilly
» TOTAL MADNESS Great British Railway Journeys among shows flagged by counter terror scheme ‘for encouraging far-right sympathies
Wed Feb 22, 2023 5:14 pm by Tommy Monk
» Interesting COVID figures
Tue Feb 21, 2023 5:00 am by Tommy Monk
» HAPPY CHRISTMAS.
Sun Jan 01, 2023 7:33 pm by Tommy Monk
» The Fight Over Climate Change is Over (The Greenies Won!)
Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:59 pm by Tommy Monk
» Trump supporter murders wife, kills family dog, shoots daughter
Mon Dec 12, 2022 1:21 am by 'Wolfie
» Quill
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:28 pm by Tommy Monk
» Algerian Woman under investigation for torture and murder of French girl, 12, whose body was found in plastic case in Paris
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:04 pm by Tommy Monk
» Wind turbines cool down the Earth (edited with better video link)
Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:19 am by Ben Reilly
» Saying goodbye to our Queen.
Sun Sep 25, 2022 9:02 pm by Maddog
» PHEW.
Sat Sep 17, 2022 6:33 pm by Syl
» And here's some more enrichment...
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:46 pm by Ben Reilly
» John F Kennedy Assassination
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:40 pm by Ben Reilly
» Where is everyone lately...?
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:33 pm by Ben Reilly
» London violence over the weekend...
Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:19 pm by Tommy Monk
» Why should anyone believe anything that Mo Farah says...!?
Wed Jul 13, 2022 1:44 am by Tommy Monk
» Liverpool Labour defends mayor role poll after turnout was only 3% and they say they will push ahead with the option that was least preferred!!!
Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:11 pm by Tommy Monk
» Labour leader Keir Stammer can't answer the simple question of whether a woman has a penis or not...
Mon Jul 11, 2022 3:58 am by Tommy Monk
» More evidence of remoaners still trying to overturn Brexit... and this is a conservative MP who should be drummed out of the party and out of parliament!
Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:50 pm by Tommy Monk
» R Kelly 30 years, Ghislaine Maxwell 20 years... but here in UK...
Fri Jul 08, 2022 5:31 pm by Original Quill