Fukushima Radiation hits San Francisco

Fukushima radiation hits San Francisco
By DNA | December 26, 2013

Can't post the video

This shocking video was taken December 23rd 2013 with a quality Geiger Counter at Pacifica State Beach (Surfers Beach), California.

Location:

http://bit.ly/1g26Zjm

Geiger Counter used:

http://www.geigercounters.com/Inspector.htm

Background radiation is 30 CPM. Near the ocean it’s 150 CPM. The fine mist coming from the ocean waves seems to be what makes the Geiger Counter jump.

Fukushima radiation disaster info:

http://www.rense.com

Massive starfish deaths on West Coast:

http://www.naturalnews.com/

We all must come to the realization that swimming in the Pacific Ocean (let alone eating anything out of it) is a thing in the past. And it’s only going to get worse, as it’s unstoppable. This is by far the worst man-made disaster in human history, and our garbage media and government say nothing.

http://topinfopost.com/2013/12/26/fukushima-radiation-hits-san-francisco


Fukushima is here: ‘ALL Bluefin Tuna Caught In California Are Radioactive’
By DNA | October 10, 2013 20 Comments

Radioactive Bluefin Tuna Caught Off California Coast

By: Ann Werner

Every bluefin tuna tested in the waters off California has shown to be contaminated with radiation that originated in Fukushima. Every single one.

Over a year ago, in May of 2012, the Wall Street Journal reported on a Stanford University study. Daniel Madigan, a marine ecologist who led the study, was quoted as saying, “The tuna packaged it up (the radiation) and brought it across the world’s largest ocean. We were definitely surprised to see it at all and even more surprised to see it in every one we measured.”

Another member of the study group, Marine biologist Nicholas Fisher at Stony Brook University in New York State reported, “We found that absolutely every one of them had comparable concentrations of cesium 134 and cesium 137.”

That was over a year ago. The fish that were tested had relatively little exposure to the radioactive waste being dumped into the ocean following the nuclear melt-through that occurred at the Fukushima Daiichi plant in March of 2011. Since that time, the flow of radioactive contaminants dumping into the ocean has continued unabated. Fish arriving at this juncture have been swimming in contaminants for all of their lives.

Radioactive cesium doesn’t sink to the sea floor, so fish swim through it and ingest it through their gills or by eating organisms that have already ingested it. It is a compound that does occur naturally in nature, however, the levels of cesium found in the tuna in 2012 had levels 3 percent higher than is usual. Measurements for this year haven’t been made available, or at least none that I have been able to find. I went looking for the effects of ingesting cesium. This is what I found:

When contact with radioactive cesium occurs, which is highly unlikely, a person can experience cell damage due to radiation of the cesium particles. Due to this, effects such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and bleeding may occur. When the exposure lasts a long time, people may even lose consciousness. Coma or even death may then follow. How serious the effects are depends upon the resistance of individual persons and the duration of exposure and the concentration a person is exposed to.

The half life of cesium 134 is 2.0652 years. For cesium 137, the half life is 30.17 years.

The Fukushima disaster is an ongoing battle with no signs that humans are gaining the upper hand. The only good news to come out of Japan has later been proven to be false and was nothing more than attempts by Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) to mislead the public and lull them into a sense of security while the company searched vainly for ways to contain the accident. This incident makes Three Mile Island and Chernobyl pale in comparison. Those were nuclear meltdowns. A nuclear melt-through poses a much more serious problem and is one that modern technology doesn’t have the tools to address. Two and a half years later and the contaminants are still flowing into the ocean and will continue to for the foreseeable future.

The FDA assures us that our food supply is safe, that the levels of radiation found in fish samples are within safe limits for consumption. But one has to question if this is true and, if it is true now, will it remain true? Is this, like the statements issued from TEPCO, another attempt to quell a public backlash in the face of an unprecedented event that, as yet, has no solution and no end in sight?

Source :

http://samuel-warde.com

http://topinfopost.com/2013/10/10/fukushima-is-here-all-bluefin-tuna-caught-in-california-are-radioactive

It can only get worse.

:D 

"Fukashima" radiation plumes, and now aerial borne !!!!

WHAT a load of pathetic and ridiculous scaremongering nonsense..

Anything from the conspiracy corners to sir up the anti-science brigades !     

Somebody tell those chronic liars on that "DNA" site that April 1st is still more than 3 months to go...

Was waiting for that, Bee the all knowing, another one who ignore evidence.

  

"Evidence" ?

What "evidence" would that be, then, sassy ???

YOUR pathetic links there DON'T contain one iota of actual genuine scientific "evidence" !

ALL that you have demonstrated is your OWN lack of any scientific understanding and education in your background, sassy..    

Oh, I see, they used a fake gieger counter.

And the marine biologist couldn't find cesium if he tried.

 

I hate to say I agree with Bee, it is radioactive I don't deny that but, how could they know it was from Fukashima. The Tuna are not a good example as the are migratory fish, which do migrate through Japanese waters.

Plus it is not that much of threat anyway, Chernobyl was over stated in terms of all those predicated deaths, those huge numbers in the headline, a lot of them should of occurred by now and.. they haven't. The massive Spike in cancer deaths simple hasn't occurred.

We are learning more about radiation everyday and it seems we are actually far more resilient to it that science thought at the time of the Chernobyl disaster.

People were using those for quite a while      

They can tell it came from Fukushima because of the type of radiation it is. And I doubt suppositories would make the sea radioactive lol

We've talked about this before -- if NaturalNews.com reported that the sky was blue, I couldn't help but look up

LOL. I happen to think the evidence is growing very rapidly, and this time next year, people won't be laughing.

BTW Veya, Chernobyl happened and stopped, Fukushima has been leaking an incredible amount into the sea for three years now.

I accept those points (but enough suppositories in a city with direct to sea sewerage  ::%:: ::%:: ::%:: )

I still think it wont be as disastrous as the claims, lets face it we will have probably killed all the tuna with factory trawlers before the half life of cesium 137.
         

   SASSY'S deliberate lies and scaremongering continue to flow, on and on...

1. Fukushima isn't yet the biggest nuclear accident in history, (Russia did better back in it's more secretive days..) ~ so HOW could it possibly be "the biggest.. disaster" in human history ?

2. THERE are no winds or currents that go direct from Japan to California ~ any radiation that has leaked from those three broken power stations in Japan will be dissipated via currents, wave motions, tides and storms before even travelling a few hundred miles. Let alone over 7 thousand miles !

3. THERE is already more radiation in California than in all of Japan, anyway..

4. A faux ghost "scientist" standing on a beach in California with a Geiger counter isn't going to read any residual radiation that apparently took over a year to reach there ~ it's simply too small and scattered; and Geiger counters DON'T identify the source of radiation, either - they simply measure the strength...

5. How did those "DNA"/'naturalness"/"topinfopost"/"samuel-wards" conspiracy site clods identify and confirm the radiation as coming from Japan anyway, considering they clearly don't even know how to create a believable conspiracy.        

6. OVER 35% of the world's known 'Yellowcake' reserves are in the Northern Territory, with the #2 and #3 producers being the USA and Russia ~ Japan is a customer, not a producer..

7. IF France failed to effectively irradiate the Pacific by bombing the crap out of it between 1953 and 2008, then a small fraction of that radiation leaking out of Japan over the past year certainly WON'T do it..

8. BRITAIN created more loose and free radiation in Oz with their tests in SA during the 1950s.

9. The Pacific Ocean is the BIGGEST body of water in the world, billions of times larger than the total amount of irradiated water that has ever leaked out of Japan ~ sassy should have checked that little fact up before accepting the nonsense being peddled by her fave' conspiracy sites..

10. IF a bit of stray radiation out of Japan were to create "the biggest man-made disaster in history", then we would have already seen much worse results from the accumulated nuclear testing from the USA, Britain, Russia, France and India from the 1940s through to the 1960s !  

ALL that sassy's deliberate attempts at scaremongering have proved, is that there is a BIG gap in sassy's education when it comes to matters of science and technology...    And WHERE is this non-existent phantom "evidence" that sassy keeps laying claim to ??

Now, hang on. I understand trying to correct the record, and I applaud it. But I don't see the need to bash someone who is obviously concerned that people are going to be harmed, do you, Bee?

If someone's wrong, it should be enough to say they're wrong -- no need to belittle somebody, especially when what the issue they're trying to raise is motivated by good intentions. There are certainly plenty of people trying to scare the world about what's going on at Fukushima, and I find it hard to fault someone for thinking that people need to be warned about it, based on these scaremongering attempts. Just my two cents.