Breivik whinging about only getting kids games in Prison

A MASS MURDERER’S DEMANDS NOT MET
Breivik planted a bomb in Oslo before travelling to the tiny island where a Norwegian Labour Party-run youth summer camp was underway.
The car bomb made partly with fertiliser was left outside the office of then-Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg. It killed eight people and injured more than 200.
On Utoya, dressed in a homemade police uniform, Breivik aimed to leave no survivors. He killed 69 people and injured 110 more.
It was a massacre on a scale Norway had never seen.
Breivik was arrested on Utoya and faced trial in April 2012. The self-styled extremist with a crusade against Islam and multiculturalism admitted his crimes but argued they were “necessary”.
He was found to be of sane mind and sentenced to just 21 years in prison. He smiled when Judge Wenche Elisabeth Arntzen read the ruling.
His sentence is the maximum allowed in Norway but it will likely be reviewed and extended.
From a single cell where he is isolated 23 hours a day, Breivik is free to write. He has started a political science course at the University of Oslo. But he says conditions are deteriorating.
In a letter obtained by Norwegian and Swedish media, Breivik said his tiny cell was too small for him to work.
He complained about being given less time with prison staff and only communicating through a hole in the door.
“Studying and corresponding is not humanly possible under such circumstances, and this applies to anyone who is isolated under such conditions,” he wrote in the letter.
“Unless the (situation) is reversed, I will eventually continue the hunger strike until death. I cannot stand any more.”
Breivik demanded a couch to sit on, a weekly allowance and said he wanted his typewriter to be upgraded to a PC.
His victims say he deserves exactly what he’s got.

‘I HAVE NO SYMPATHY FOR HIM’
In her blog in 2011, Ms Martinovic wrote about her ordeal.
When chaos broke out and Breivik started shooting, she and three others were on the opposite side of the island. First she hid, then she fled, but not before stumbling upon the body of her friend at the water’s edge.
“I dragged the boy’s body back to land and when I pulled back his jacket hood I saw it was a friend of mine, and I saw the wound to his head. There was no time to react. I kissed him on the cheek and returned to my rock face,” she wrote.
She decided the only way to survive way to swim for her life.
“It was cold, I felt the chill in my bones, but focused on keeping my head above water. Behind me some of the others were starting to panic, so I shouted to them: ‘Keep your head above water, get away from land.”
It wasn’t long before Breivik spotted those trying to flee. She kept swimming.
“It looked as if he was aiming at us. One of the other swimmers was shot, I saw the blood stream out, so I started to swim even faster. Then I turned on my back again and saw he was aiming at those who still hadn’t started swimming from land yet.
“I saw one of my friends about to leap into the water, but in a second he was shot. Even at a distance I could see and hear the two shots, straight to the head.
“Panic spread like wildfire among those on land. I wanted to be among them, urging them to get away, by land or water.”

smelly-bandit wrote:humans rights veya

gotta love them

Ben_Reilly wrote:

smelly-bandit wrote:humans rights veya

gotta love them

Better games to play is a human right?

smelly-bandit wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

smelly-bandit wrote:humans rights veya

gotta love them

Better games to play is a human right?

yes ben , its a multicultural world remember??

if Muslims convicted of terrorist offences are allowed to demand, yes - DEMAND halal food at the tax payers expense and are entitled to brand new sheets, after their cells are searched - at the tax payers expense, then breivik is entitled to better video games at the tax payers expense

id rather pay for better games for breivik  then halaal food for muhhamad

victorismyhero wrote:why should there be any requirement to pander to "special religious diets"

AFTER ALL.......both jewish AND Muslim faiths allow the eating of no kosher/non halal food ...IF THERE IS NO OTHER CHOICE

why should prisons have to go to extra expense to "make available" other chioces?????

as for brevik...he should be shoved into a dark hole 24/7 and left to rot....

Cuchulain wrote:

victorismyhero wrote:why should there be any requirement to pander to "special religious diets"

AFTER ALL.......both jewish AND Muslim faiths allow the eating of no kosher/non halal food ...IF THERE IS NO OTHER CHOICE

why should prisons have to go to extra expense to "make available" other chioces?????

as for brevik...he should be shoved into a dark hole 24/7 and left to rot....

So would you deny a prisoner a vegitarian diet?

unless medically required...yes

you are in gaol...here's your slop...eat it or starve....


All you are doing is making a very silly point.
Is it really go to spoil your day if people have different diets, whether religious or not?

not really, but why pander to it?

these are naughty people...and naughty people should be gratefull we are so nice these days
No, its just you being antsy over something very trivial.

Cuchulain wrote:They are in prison denied their freedom, it does not mean they should be denied some basic food rights.
Unless you think now food is a privildige?

victorismyhero wrote:

Cuchulain wrote:They are in prison denied their freedom, it does not mean they should be denied some basic food rights.
Unless you think now food is a privildige?

erm....."specific diets" (unless medically required) ARE a privilidge

food sufficient for adequate bodily nutrition is a right...


simple enough for you?

victorismyhero wrote:besides...if they are in prison ...CLEARLY they have broken the law...ergo they are NOT "true" Muslims/christians/jews/whatever, so therefore they dont "require " those privilidges...?????

Cuchulain wrote:

victorismyhero wrote:


erm....."specific diets" (unless medically required) ARE a privilidge

food sufficient for adequate bodily nutrition is a right...


simple enough for you?

So you are saying people should have to eat food they are against eating or do not like?

Yes...beggars (and criminals) cant be choosers

boild lentil gruel every meal....simple..cheap and easy..... and....maybe they wont be so keen to go back there in the future.....

Sorry that is absurd, when we can accomadate such food requirements.

just becasue we can...does NOT mean we "should"

The fact is that halal meats is often cheaper, so maybe we should swing the argument around then and base this on costs then victor and serve all prisoners Halal meat?

I would imagine they are in any case didge...its near on impossible to avoid the stuff these days......unless you live on a diet of pork, which I dont think comes in halal flavour does it???????

Would you then object to the methodology you have of stated, that they are given what they are given?

feelthelove wrote:

victorismyhero wrote:besides...if they are in prison ...CLEARLY they have broken the law...ergo they are NOT "true" Muslims/christians/jews/whatever, so therefore they dont "require " those privilidges...?????

Have to admit I'm with you on this Victor, break the law and face the reality of the consequences. Without consequence where is the deterrent?  

victorismyhero wrote:

Cuchulain wrote:

So you are saying people should have to eat food they are against eating or do not like?

Yes...beggars (and criminals) cant be choosers

boild lentil gruel every meal....simple..cheap and easy.....  and....maybe they wont be so keen to go back there in the future.....

Sorry that is absurd, when we can accomadate such food requirements.

just becasue we can...does NOT mean we "should"

The fact is that halal meats is often cheaper, so maybe we should swing the argument around then and base this on costs then victor and serve all prisoners Halal meat?

I would imagine they are in any case didge...its near on impossible to avoid the stuff these days......unless you live on a diet of pork, which I dont think comes in halal flavour does it???????

Would you then object to the methodology you have of stated, that they are given what they are given?

Cuchulain wrote:

victorismyhero wrote:

But again you made the point on they should be given what they are given.
Fine, the cheapest meat is given to them, which is halal.
So now all everyone has to eat quality very cheap halal meat.
Do you have any objections and are you going to say the other prisoners have to lump it?
That they have to eat it or go without?
That is what I want to know, as I am going off your reasoning here not to have privilidges, but to just obtain the cheapest meat

Cuchulain wrote:Again all I am asking if you have any objections to where this is the cheapest food and then all prisoners, no matter their objections then have to eat halal food.
So again would you object to the non_muslims having to then have halal, based on your reasoning here?

Irn Bru wrote:My nephew was a prison officer at Saughton Prison in Edinburgh and has said that a menu of food is available that takes into consideration the requirements of many cultures. It's mentioned in this article

British Prison Cuisine Today

http://www.foodreference.com/html/british-prison-cuisine-2.html

veya_victaous wrote:

Irn Bru wrote:My nephew was a prison officer at Saughton Prison in Edinburgh and has said that a menu of food is available that takes into consideration the requirements of many cultures. It's mentioned in this article

British Prison Cuisine Today

http://www.foodreference.com/html/british-prison-cuisine-2.html

Now Irn that seems entirely too reasonable

victorismyhero wrote:

veya_victaous wrote:

Irn Bru wrote:My nephew was a prison officer at Saughton Prison in Edinburgh and has said that a menu of food is available that takes into consideration the requirements of many cultures. It's mentioned in this article

British Prison Cuisine Today

http://www.foodreference.com/html/british-prison-cuisine-2.html

Now Irn that seems entirely too reasonable

why should we be "reasonable" to the "unreasonable"?????????


bear in mind a sizeable proportion of these naughty people are alive today ONLY becasue we have all collectively gone soft in the head.......

victorismyhero wrote:see irn...I do like SOME "foreign food"