UK papers tone down 'anti-Israel' coverage of Nebi Salah clashes

LONDON - Two of Britain's leading newspapers have changed their coverage of a violent clash between an IDF soldier and Palestinian women and children after claims arose that the family involved in the incident, and particularly a blonde girl photographed biting the soldier, are known provocateurs.
 

• Follow Ynetnews on Facebook and Twitter
  
  

 
On Friday, an IDF soldier trying to arrest a stone-throwing 13-year-old Palestinian boy drew international outrage after he was documented in a violent clash with Palestinian women and children.

 
Members of the Tamimi family, prominent Palestinian activists, physically attacked the soldier in an attempt to free son Muhammad Tamini, whose hand was in a cast.
 

[ltr]
Members of the Tamimi family struggle with IDF soldier (Photo: AFP)[/ltr]


 
According to the UK Media Watch, a pro-Israel website monitoring coverage of Israel in the British press, the girl who appears in the photos biting the soldier is Ahed Tamini, the daughter of Narimen and Bassem Tamini, who is known among Israeli supporters online as "Shirley Temper."
 

[ltr]
Ahed Tamini, also known as 'Shirley Temper,' biting the IDF soldier (Photo: Reuters)[/ltr]


 
The blonde-haired girl became a symbol of the Palestinian resistance in international media and is often documented in confrontations with Israeli soldiers. Muhammad Tamini is her brother.

 
The website quoted Tamar Sternthal from CAMERA (Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America) who said that the Palestinian village of Nebi Salah, where the incident occurred, is "where photographers gather every Friday to document repetitious scenes of Palestinian residents and international activists clashing with Israeli soldiers." The site noted this was where "activists often place their children in danger to score propaganda points."
 

[ltr]
IDF soldier has Muhammad Tamini in headlock (Photo: Reuters)[/ltr]


 
The UK Media Watch said major newspapers like The Daily Mail and The Telegraph realized the incident was staged by the Palestinians in order to cause provocation.

 
The Daily Mail's original headline read: "Extraordinary moment that desperate Palestinian women fought and BIT an Israeli soldier after he put boy with a broken arm in a headlock at gunpoint."
 

[ltr]
Screenshot: UK Media Watch[/ltr]
 

Later, however, the story was edited and given a different headline: "Questions raised over shocking West Bank image of boy with a broken arm being held at gunpoint by an Israeli soldier after girl, 13, seen biting attacker is revealed as prolific 'Pallywood star.'"
 

[ltr]
Screenshot: UK Media Watch[/ltr]


 
According to UK Media Watch, "the term 'Pallywood' refers to the staging of scenes by Palestinian journalists in order to present the Palestinians as hapless victims of Israeli aggression."

 
The British Telegraph initially ran the story with the headline "Palestinian women wrestle Israeli soldier off injured small boy."
 

[ltr]
Screenshot: UK Media Watch[/ltr]


 
Later, however, the story was removed entirely from the Telegraph's website.
 

[ltr]
Screenshot: UK Media Watch[/ltr]


 
Leading British newspapers The Times of London and The Guardian did not cover the story at all, while the UK Media Watch said Channel 4 News, The Independent and the Daily Mirror - a tabloid - reported it "and largely followed the Pallywood script (the latter going with the headline ‘West Bank Freedom Biter’)."

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4696553,00.html

Okay so im not getting something here....?
Did the soldier put that young boy in a headlock? Was that real?

I believe it was.
Was he wrong to do so?
Yes
Was it staged in the first place?
Yes 
Are the parents enticing the children to throw stones?
Yes
Is this dangereous and child abuse?
Yes
The same girl has been in another set up before.

Same girl seen here before, also staged

Yes Eddie, the soldier was real, the boy had a broken wrist and the family fought to get him back.

The reason why they have to pictured before is that the area where they live is targeted and there is a protest by the village every week about what Israel is doing to it and the daughter has stood up for her brother before.

The Palestinian family who fought off an Israeli soldier from arresting their boy

leave a comment »
The Tamimi family say the presence of journalists was key to them fighting off an Israeli soldier from arresting their 11-year-old Mohammed

Nawal Tamimi, seen tackling an Israeli soldier, is thankful journalists were there
NABI SALEH, West Bank – Nariman Tamimi says she and her son were watching the protest from afar when she noticed something was not right. The soldiers, who she says would usually block the protest before it could reach the steep hillside of her village, seemed to be encouraging protesters to descend down the slope.
By the time she had figured out why, it was too late. She says dozens of soldiers were hiding behind trees and boulders on the hillside, jumping out to capture unsuspecting protesters.
“We saw that the soldiers had my nephew and a foreign activist they were going to arrest, and everyone ran to help them,” Nariman says.
When the other demonstrators ran to the aid of the two protesters who were being arrested, Nariman’s son, Mohammed Tamimi, 11, stayed behind and continued to watch from a distance. That’s when he was captured alone.
What happened next was caught on camera in a series of photos depicting a young boy being pinned to the ground by an Israeli soldier, as the boy’s mother, aunt and sister struggle to pry the grown man off the child.

Going Viral

The photos and video of the incident spread rapidly across social media, catching the attention of international news outlets.
The Tamimi family, who are well-known Palestinian activists, were shocked at how quickly the photos spread.
Bilal Tamimi, an uncle of the boy who was being detained on camera, filmed the entire attack.
“[One of my videos] has reached over a million views just today,” Bilal tells Middle East Eye from his family home in the small village of Nabi Saleh just outside of Ramallah. “I can’t believe it, none of us can.”
Mohammed’s aunt, Nawal Tamimi, who was captured on film desperately pulling and hitting at the soldier’s face and body – trying with all her might to pull the soldier off her nephew – says she’s just thankful the cameras were there.
“These kinds of incidents aren’t uncommon for Nabi Saleh or for Palestine,” Nawal says. “We are thankful people are seeing these photos and seeing what is happening from the occupation, but worse than this happens all the time. If so many people with cameras weren’t there that day they very well could have just shot us and taken Mohammed, it wouldn’t be abnormal.”

The village of Nabi Saleh has organized a weekly demonstration every Friday –without exception – since 2009, in protest against the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory, and the confiscation of Nabi Saleh land by the nearby illegal Halamish settlement.
The village is known for the intensity of clashes at its protests and the organization of its popular resistance committee.
Nabi Saleh’s strong resistance movement means Israeli forces frequently carry out overnight home raids, and clashes there are common.

‘No safe place’

All of Nariman’s children, even her youngest son, 9, partake in Nabi Saleh’s demonstrations. She says she doesn’t keep her children home during the protests because even in their home they aren’t safe.
In the photos, the young boy being pinned down is wearing a cast on his arm, an injury his mother says was caused when Israeli forces attacked their home only two day before Friday’s incident.
“You can see in the photos he is wearing a cast,” Nariman says. “The soldiers shot tear gas into the house and broke our windows, one of the metal canisters that flew inside hit his arm and broke his wrist. Mohammed wasn’t protesting on Friday because his wrist had just been broken.”
“So, there is no safe place in Nabi Saleh inside or outside, but the children are less traumatized being out there facing their fears than in here hiding, it makes them feel better, psychologically,” Nariman insists.

‘If you love someone you protect them’

Photographers were the first to reach Mohammed, capturing the initial moments of the incident on Friday, while screaming at the soldier to release the boy and warning the soldier that the child’s arm had been broken.
Mohammed’s sister, Ahed, 14, was the first to physically come to his aid.
“At first I tried to speak with the soldier to get him to let Mohammed go, but he wouldn’t so I just did anything I could to get him off my brother. Anyone would do the same for their brother or for someone that they love, if you love someone you protect them” Ahed explained.
One of the most shared photos in the series of viral images shows Ahed biting the hand of the soldier during the struggle to free Mohammed.
“I didn’t know what I was doing, I was just doing anything to get my brother free,” she says.

One of the most shared photos showed Ahed biting the hand of a soldier during the struggle to free her brother
Ahed and Mohammed’s mother who can be seen clawing at the soldier’s face and mask shared the same sentiment.
Nariman arrived at the scene right after Ahed. In the video, before she reaches the struggle between her two children and the soldier, she can be heard screaming “My son, my son,” repeatedly.
“I wasn’t thinking about anything but getting that soldier off of my son, no matter what,” Nariman says when asked if she was at any point scared of possible consequences for getting physical with an Israeli soldier. “That soldier’s machine gun was just dangling there next to my son’s head and his hand was around his throat.”
When Nariman saw the photos for the first time she says she went through a whirlwind of emotions.
“I was laughing and I was crying. At first I was laughing when I saw me and my daughter’s faces when she was biting the soldier and I was pulling at him and at the look on that soldier’s face,” She exclaims. “But when I looked and realized the fear on Mohammed’s face I just cried. No mother wants to see their child’s face have that kind of fear.”
While Mohammed looks terrified in the photo, he quickly discounts the notion that the incident might have been the scariest moment of his eleven-year-old life.
“The scariest moment of my life was not on Friday,” Mohammed explains, picking at the frayed cloth on his casted arm. “It was when I was nine. The soldiers came to the village in the middle of the night and there weren’t any journalists to see and we ran from them, but the older kids were faster.”
Like on Friday, Mohammed and had been split off from the group, the rest of his older cousins had made it up a hill, but he and another cousin were still at the bottom, with soldiers closing in, he says.
“The soldiers were going to arrest us, but our cousins started throwing rocks and we got away, but when I got to the rest of the guys they shot my cousin right in front of me. That was the scariest time, not yesterday.”
Nariman is no stranger to intense situations, but she says any mother would do what she did out of instinct, regardless of the risks.
“If you are a mother you will protect your children without thinking. Even if a cat sees something hurting its young she will attack, and that is what I did,” Nariman insists with fervor. “They weren’t just trying to arrest him, the way the soldier’s hand was around my son’s neck he could have killed him.”

https://altahrir.wordpress.com/2015/08/30/the-palestinian-family-who-fought-off-an-israeli-soldier-from-arresting-their-boy/



The Israeli Government were so angry at the soldier's humiliation, one of them said that he should have shot the family, who were unarmed:

Israeli minister says IDF should have fired on unarmed Palestinian protesters for humiliating a soldier

leave a comment »

That video of Palestinian women protesters pulling down an Israeli soldier in Nabi Saleh on Friday when he was beating a boy has shocked the world. Well, it has shocked an Israeli leader too. Israel’s culture minister Miri Regev says that the unarmed protesters should have been shot.
Regev’s twitter account says she was shocked by the incident:

Our soldiers can’t be sent on missions with tied hands

This post is now updated to include a translation from Tali Shapira.
Regev said she wanted to change the army’s policy on the use of live-fire because of the “humiliation” the soldier endured.
“We need to decide immediately that a soldier that is attacked is permitted to return fire. Period. I call on the minister of security to put an end to the humiliation and change the open fire regulations immediately!” Regevwrote in a Facebook statement.
“Anyone who tries to harm Israeli civilians and soldiers needs to know his blood is in his head,”  Regev continued, using a Hebrew expression to convey that the Palestinians who assaulted the soldier are fair game for shooting.


https://altahrir.wordpress.com/2015/08/30/israeli-minister-says-idf-should-have-fired-on-unarmed-palestinian-protesters-for-humiliating-a-soldier/






So in her eyes, because an occupied people fought to protect a child, they (and she means the women and the daughter) should have been shot.

Of course Sassy still neglects this was Pallywood and a set up.

The evidence is there but we get a massive spam from non-discript source, which sums it up really.

It seems Israel ministers are part of Pallywood now.  DOH

Like I say Sassy ignores this same family have been involved in many set ups, which at least the British press saw through all the bullshit, the question is why is it that Sassy does not.
Says it all really

Note, Didge's screenshots etc are from UK Media Watch, NOT UK Media Watchdog.

The Israeli Government know that this soldier was utterly humilitated, he petulantly threw back a stun grenade as he left and the Israeli's are furious that they have been made to look stupid and in the wrong, so their propaganda machine is in overdrive:

UK Media Watch

Promoting fair and accurate coverage of Israel

Not fair, Not Accurate, Just Propaganda.

Notice what?
Did the British media change their headlines and stories after they saw it was a Pallywood set up?
Yes.
Again Sassy still excuse why they are teaching a 11 year old boy to throw stones.
Child abuse, plain and simple by teaching hate

eddie wrote:Okay so im not getting something here....?
Did the soldier put that young boy in a headlock? Was that real?  

Yes he did Eddie.

Didge is making excuses.

It's like saying a woman provoked a man to rape her. Absolutely disgusting for Didge to make such a comparison.

Never made any excuse, I stated it was wrong, so you are as per usual lying which is no surpise being as your religion teaches you to do so.

Anyway why is it nobody condemns the family for child abuse teaching the child to throw stones?

Cuchulain wrote:Never made any excuse, I stated it was wrong, so you are as per usual lying which is no surpise being as your religion teaches you to do so.

Anyway why is it nobody condemns the family for child abuse teaching the child to throw stones?

So now you're saying all Muslims are liars.

How's that not bigotry?

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Cuchulain wrote:Never made any excuse, I stated it was wrong, so you are as per usual lying which is no surpise being as your religion teaches you to do so.

Anyway why is it nobody condemns the family for child abuse teaching the child to throw stones?

So now you're saying all Muslims are liars.

How's that not bigotry?

Ignorance again it seems.
Where did I say all Muslims?
I stated one, that being you.
Never claimed all Muslims lie did I?
Does you religion teach to lie?
Yes or No?

So easy for me to wrap you up in knots

What ever the truth of the situation there is clearly a grown man, an armed man, forcibly restraining a child with a broken arm.
Also the thought occurs, if this is an organised weekly protest, exactly how stupid are the Israeli forces to allow themselves to be photographed doing it?!
Where were his fellow soldiers?

Standing back it seems.
Again to me why are parents teaching children such hate?
This family is part of the Pallywood brigade that is very evident

Cuchulain wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

So now you're saying all Muslims are liars.

How's that not bigotry?

Ignorance again it seems.
Where did I say all Muslims?
I stated one, that being you.
Never claimed all Muslims lie did I?
Does you religion teach to lie?
Yes or No?

So easy for me to wrap you up in knots

Lol! You said my religion teaches me to lie. That includes all Muslims - or are some taught not to lie.

You are a bigot.

And my religion only allows lying if your life is in direct danger. Otherwise, no.

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Cuchulain wrote:

Ignorance again it seems.
Where did I say all Muslims?
I stated one, that being you.
Never claimed all Muslims lie did I?
Does you religion teach to lie?
Yes or No?

So easy for me to wrap you up in knots

Lol! You said my religion teaches me to lie. That includes all Muslims - or are some taught not to lie.

You are a bigot.

And my religion only allows lying if your life is in direct danger. Otherwise, no.

Ignorance again it seems.
Where did I say all Muslims?
I stated one, that being you.
You clearly abuse your religion thinking you can lie all the time, that is obvious
Never claimed all Muslims lie did I?
Does you religion teach to lie?
Yes or No?

So easy for me to wrap you up in knots

Cuchulain wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Lol! You said my religion teaches me to lie. That includes all Muslims - or are some taught not to lie.

You are a bigot.

And my religion only allows lying if your life is in direct danger. Otherwise, no.

Ignorance again it seems.
Where did I say all Muslims?
I stated one, that being you.
You clearly abuse your religion thinking you can lie all the time, that is obvious
Never claimed all Muslims lie did I?
Does you religion teach to lie?
Yes or No?

So easy for me to wrap you up in knots

I answered your question. lol!

In your hysteria, you missed that.

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Cuchulain wrote:

Ignorance again it seems.
Where did I say all Muslims?
I stated one, that being you.
You clearly abuse your religion thinking you can lie all the time, that is obvious
Never claimed all Muslims lie did I?
Does you religion teach to lie?
Yes or No?

So easy for me to wrap you up in knots

I answered your question. lol!

In your hysteria, you missed that.

So I am telling the truth and your religion does teach to lie and as seen you distort that by lying all the time.
As seen I easily proved that.
Where did I claim all Muslims lie?
Never did.
You seem to have this daft notion that ideologies cannot be criticized.

The most telling part here is that I condemn the IDF soldier but both Sassy and Zack refuise to condemn the family for child abuse where they are teaching hate.
Now that is very telling as they clearly aprove of their methods of teaching hate as they would have condemned by now and yet have refused to do so.

Cuchulain wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

I answered your question. lol!

In your hysteria, you missed that.

So I am telling the truth and your religion does teach to lie and as seen you distort that by lying all the time.
As seen I easily proved that.
Where did I claim all Muslims lie?
Never did.
You seem to have this daft notion that ideologies cannot be criticized.

Lol! You keep saying it when you say 'my religion teaches me to lie'. What do you think it teaches all other Muslims? D'UH!

Never were very good a logic, were you.

And FYI - my life is not in danger. So I have no valid excuse to lie to you.

You are a bigot.

Cuchulain wrote:The most telling part here is that I condemn the IDF soldier but both Sassy and Zack refuise to condemn the family for child abuse where they are teaching hate.
Now that is very telling as they clearly aprove of their methods of teaching hate as they would have condemned by now and yet have refused to do so.

Like I said, that's like saying a woman provoked a guy to rape her.

Which means you blame women for being raped. You disgusting prick.

Telegraph and Daily Mail Retreat From Tamimis' Latest "Pallywood"

This article is cross-posted on CAMERA's UK Media Watch   As noted by CAMERA’s Tamar Sternthal, the Palestinian town of Nabi Saleh, near the Jewish community of Neveh Tzuf, is “where photographers gather every Friday to document repetitious scenes of Palestinian residents and international activists clashing with Israeli soldiers” and where activists often place their children in danger to score propaganda points. Nabi Saleh’s most popular Pallywood child star, known as “Shirley Temper” (aka Ahed. or A'hd, Tamimi), revived her recurring role as the symbol of Palestinian “resistance” on Friday, when she was seen attacking an Israeli soldier who had detained a rock-thrower during protests.Ahed is the daughter of Narimen and Bassem Tamimi, prominent activists in the Popular Resistance who evidently determine the girl’s protest “strategy.” As Sternthal noted, “rather than keeping their children at a safe distance from the often-violent clashes, the parents encourage their children to play highly visible roles in the confrontation with the army.” Here’s a photo of the young Tamimi from 2012, seen with her fist raised immediately to the left of the Israeli soldier.     In the latest incident, this past Friday, in photos from multiple wire services, Ahed Tamimi is one of several Palestinian civilians who attack a soldier in an attempt to prevent the arrest of a 13-year-old rock thrower.     Here’s a clip from the Pallywood production. (The term “Pallywood” refers to the staging of scenes by Palestinian journalists in order to present the Palestinians as hapless victims of Israeli aggression.)

What arguably stands out most about this video is the restraint shown by the Israeli soldier. He was shoved, hit and bitten and yet maintained his discipline throughout the incident until a commander called off the detention, citing the escalating violence.



 

Additionally, others may have missed the telling fact that the boy detained for throwing rocks Muhammad is Ahed's brother. (See here for a family photo, by Anadolu Agency. The caption reads:

Palestinian Muhammad Tamimi, 12, who was attacked by an Israeli soldier the day before, is seen with his mother Nariman, his father Bassem, his brother Salam and his sister Ahed at his family home in Nabi Saleh village, near the West Bank city of Ramallah on August 29, 2015. An Israeli soldier tried to detain 12 year-old Palestinian boy with a broken arm on Friday during the weekly protests against Israel’s land expropriation and separation wall in the occupied West Bank village of Nabi Saleh. Issam Rimawi / Anadolu Agency)

TheDaily Mail initially ran with the desired Pallywood tale of brutal Israeli soldiers attacking innocent Palestinian children, but later changed the headline and tone of the piece, presumably after a myriad of complaints. Remarkably, the DM’s revised headline explained that the girl had “been revealed” as a Pallywood star. 
Here’s the original headline:
 

 
Here's the updated version:
 

 
But, even more interesting is what occurred at The Telegraph, which initially ran with the headline "Palestinian women wrestle Israeli soldier off injured small boy," but later pulled the entire story from their website.
Here’s a screenshot of the Google search result for the Telegraph story by David Millward:
 


 
However, attempts to open the link yield the following result:
 

 
Though we weren’t able to find a cached version of the story, we did locate the text from Lexis-Nexis. As you can see, it completely bought into the Pallywood tale.
 

An Israeli solider [sic] who held pinned a Palestinian boy whose arm was in a sling to the floor at gunpoint was set upon by a young girl and two women.
The sight of the terrified child being held at gunpoint was too much those watching to bear.
A young girl sank her teeth into the balaclava-clad soldier’s right hand, forcing him to release his machine gun.
At one point the soldier shoves his hand into the girl’s face.
Two women, meanwhile, grabbed the soldier by the neck and soldier, succeeding in hauling him off the frightened young boy.
The soldier eventually fled and the boy was cradled in the girls arms.
What triggered the clash is unclear, though tension has been increasing between Palestinians and the Israelis in the area and it is not unknown for young children to throw stones at the occupying forces.
The Palestinians have been protesting at the confiscation of their land to enable the expansion of the Jewish Hallamish settlement at Nabi Saleh on the West Bank.

Thus far, neither The Guardian nor Times of London have covered the incident. Though Channel 4 News, The Independent and the tabloid Daily Mirror have reported it, and largely followed the "Pallywood" script (the latter going with the headline "West Bank Freedom Biter,") it’s nonetheless quite significant in the context of the British media’s institutional pro-Palestinian bias that both The Daily Mail and Telegraph retreated after initially parroting the desired Palestinian narrative.
 
See also:
 
Cheap shots: Palestinians put kids in the line of fire
 
Updated: B'Tselem Photographer Stages Scene
 
Cheap Shots: Tamimi Girl Ups the Ante
 
New York Times Magazine Cheerleads For Terror

http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=2&x_outlet=284&x_article=3095

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Cuchulain wrote:The most telling part here is that I condemn the IDF soldier but both Sassy and Zack refuise to condemn the family for child abuse where they are teaching hate.
Now that is very telling as they clearly aprove of their methods of teaching hate as they would have condemned by now and yet have refused to do so.

Like I said, that's like saying a woman provoked a guy to rape her.

Which means you blame women for being raped. You disgusting prick.

WTF

PMSL

So now you are equating rape to where parents teach hate to throw stones saying this is now acceptable?
What crimes was committed here which made it acceptable to teach hate and commit hate by throwing stones?
There is no comparrrison to the victim of rapePlease state this is your reasoning to teach children to hate

Seriously lets have you breakdown how it is acceptable to teach hate and attack people based off no attack happenning to the child, where they clearly staged this to happen.

You really have dug yourself a hole here you pathetic little runt lol

ven

Thanks for that Sassy and you clearly see how this was a set up and again no condemation from the two extremist Muslim supporters.
One equates rape to justifiy a boy being taught hate the other posts the evidence showing its a pallywood production

You obviously have your rose tinted specs on as the soldier grabs the boy who is just standing ther and starts to strangle him, and then continues shaking him about with a broken wrist.  I suppose the soldier went there to help filming rather than going to stop a protest from people trying to get justice.   What a vile little zionista you are.

And as usual Sassy defends child abuse

Oh BTW didge UK Media Watch is run by Adam Levick who you said elsewhere is a complete tit. Ok Didge, I agree with you, he is a complete tit. Carry on... lol

More pathetic excuses.
Its clear the whole thing was staged and as per usual you refuse to condemn parents teaching hate, which is child abuse.
That is disgusting, but am I surprised?
No
You moan about sites easily exposing a Pallywood production and still hold the belief its real.

What an idiot you are lol

So was the boy throwing stones or not? If he was, you can't expect the soldier to just ignore that.

Rags the whole thing was staged.
This is called Pallywood, they often do this, you should look them up

Cuchulain wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Like I said, that's like saying a woman provoked a guy to rape her.

Which means you blame women for being raped. You disgusting prick.

WTF

PMSL

So now you are equating rape to where parents teach hate to throw stones saying this is now acceptable?
What crimes was committed here which made it acceptable to teach hate and commit hate by throwing stones?
There is no comparrrison to the victim of rapePlease state this is your reasoning to teach children to hate

Seriously lets have you breakdown how it is acceptable to teach hate and attack people based off no attack happenning to the child, where they clearly staged this to happen.

You really have dug yourself a hole here you pathetic little runt lol

ven

http://vagisil.com/where-to-buy/

Fuzzy Zack wrote:

Cuchulain wrote:

WTF

PMSL

So now you are equating rape to where parents teach hate to throw stones saying this is now acceptable?
What crimes was committed here which made it acceptable to teach hate and commit hate by throwing stones?
There is no comparrrison to the victim of rapePlease state this is your reasoning to teach children to hate

Seriously lets have you breakdown how it is acceptable to teach hate and attack people based off no attack happenning to the child, where they clearly staged this to happen.

You really have dug yourself a hole here you pathetic little runt lol

ven

http://vagisil.com/where-to-buy/

I thinkl its you that needs to you it on your arse mate ha ha ha

Cuchulain wrote:Same girl seen here before, also staged

Someone should tell those kids to keep the noise down. They don't need to screech when they're standing a foot away from someone.

Why is someone shoving that young boy forward towards a soldier?

It's interesting that the soldiers seem amused by all that screeching and pushing. When those kids are older, they might not find it so amusing.

Cuchulain wrote:Rags the whole thing was staged.
This is called Pallywood, they often do this, you should look them up

So he did throw stones then? Did he do that in order to provoke the soldier?

It's not a good idea to chuck stones at someone who's carrying a gun.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Cuchulain wrote:Rags the whole thing was staged.
This is called Pallywood, they often do this, you should look them up

So he did throw stones then? Did he do that in order to provoke the soldier?

It's not a good idea to chuck stones at someone who's carrying a gun.

I agree its utterly wrong
Many children are taught this so to entice their arrest.
Its a disgusting tactic used by some Palestinians.
As I say this whole thing was staged by Pallywood

Cuchulain wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

So he did throw stones then? Did he do that in order to provoke the soldier?

It's not a good idea to chuck stones at someone who's carrying a gun.

I agree its utterly wrong
Many children are taught this so to entice their arrest.
Its a disgusting tactic used by some Palestinians.
As I say this whole thing was staged by Pallywood

Well they should be careful. They're kids and the soldiers don't seem to mind, but one day they might get themselves shot if they go too far. The soldier could have broken that girl's jaw if he wanted to when she bit him.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Cuchulain wrote:Same girl seen here before, also staged

Someone should tell those kids to keep the noise down. They don't need to screech when they're standing a foot away from someone.

Why is someone shoving that young boy forward towards a soldier?

It's interesting that the soldiers seem amused by all that screeching and pushing. When those kids are older, they might not find it so amusing.

I guess they are calm and laughing the IDF, as they know its a set up to see if they will react and its clear that shirley temple is a right little brat.
There is countless Pallywood productions but you never here the defenders of Hamas ever condemn them.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Cuchulain wrote:

I agree its utterly wrong
Many children are taught this so to entice their arrest.
Its a disgusting tactic used by some Palestinians.
As I say this whole thing was staged by Pallywood

Well they should be careful. They're kids and the soldiers don't seem to mind, but one day they might get themselves shot if they go too far. The soldier could have broken that girl's jaw if he wanted to when she bit him.

There have been people killed by throwing stones at cars, which causes crashes.
Civillians have died and yet others do not seem to think its that much a risk, when it certainly is and what is wrose is they are being taught this hate. Some of them do end up shot also, which shows further how those who teach this hate have little care for the lives of anyone.

So Didge, the guy in the video you posted thinks that the soldier was a Palestinian just dressed up as a soldier.

Do you agree with that?

It does seem strange that there are no other soldiers around to help him, and there are loads of people filming the event - completely ignoring the kid of course.

Raggamuffin wrote:So Didge, the guy in the video you posted thinks that the soldier was a Palestinian just dressed up as a soldier.

Do you agree with that?

It does seem strange that there are no other soldiers around to help him, and there are loads of people filming the event - completely ignoring the kid of course.

Bang on the money Rags, the whole thing is like a film set.
The soldier wars no Helmet, but a balaclava, very suspect in itself.
More likely to hide his true Palestinian identity.

Raggamuffin wrote:So Didge, the guy in the video you posted thinks that the soldier was a Palestinian just dressed up as a soldier.

Do you agree with that?

It does seem strange that there are no other soldiers around to help him, and there are loads of people filming the event - completely ignoring the kid of course.

That'll be why the Israeli minister was so angry about his humiliation, because he wasn't a soldier , and there were other soldiers about, one of them pulled him away and he thread back a stun grenade.  The soldiers are there every week because the people are protesting about their treatment, as an occupied people they have every right to do so.

lol I do laugh at Sassy's stupdity ha ha ha ha

She still defnds this staged bullshit

sassy wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:So Didge, the guy in the video you posted thinks that the soldier was a Palestinian just dressed up as a soldier.

Do you agree with that?

It does seem strange that there are no other soldiers around to help him, and there are loads of people filming the event - completely ignoring the kid of course.

That'll be why the Israeli minister was so angry about his humiliation, because he wasn't a soldier , and there were other soldiers about, one of them pulled him away and he thread back a stun grenade.  The soldiers are there every week because the people are protesting about their treatment, as an occupied people they have every right to do so.

Well either way, if those kids carry on they're going to get themselves shot. Look at the girl in previous videos and then this one. She's growing up fast, and one day she won't get away with pushing and shoving soldiers. Why provoke someone who's holding a gun?

Raggamuffin wrote:

sassy wrote:

That'll be why the Israeli minister was so angry about his humiliation, because he wasn't a soldier , and there were other soldiers about, one of them pulled him away and he thread back a stun grenade.  The soldiers are there every week because the people are protesting about their treatment, as an occupied people they have every right to do so.

Well either way, if those kids carry on they're going to get themselves shot. Look at the girl in previous videos and then this one. She's growing up fast, and one day she won't get away with pushing and shoving soldiers. Why provoke someone who's holding a gun?

They are an occupied people whose children get pulled out of bed in the middle of the night, locked up and tortured.  There is no safety for the children of Palestine, they have to learn to defend themselves, IDF abuse them daily.