Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

by Guest Thu May 14, 2015 8:09 am

The United Kingdom granted 14,605 asylum applications in 2014, according to figures from Eurostat, the European Commission's statistics body.

The figures show the number of positive asylum applications to the EU broken down according to member state (excluding Austria).
Taken as a whole, EU member states granted protection to over 185,000 asylum seekers in 2014.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/two-graphs-that-show-how-many-asylum-seekers-britain-really-accepts-10246302.html

by Tommy Monk Thu May 14, 2015 2:35 pm

And most of them passed through several safe countries to get here without making any claims and/or are Just economic migrants.

But they don't need to claim asylum here because we have an open door to half a billion people from across EU and a easy door to The rest of the world anyway.

by Guest Thu May 14, 2015 2:39 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:And most of them passed through several safe countries to get here without making any claims and/or are Just economic migrants.

But they don't need to claim asylum here because we have an open door to half a billion people from across EU and a easy door to The rest of the world anyway.

There is no law that states they have to stay in the first country, which has been pointed out to you before. many want to find sanctury to a country that has histroical significance to their own, like former parts of the British Empire. If you can speak English you are not going to stop in Italy or France are you and make things even more difficult for yourself. It shows why you are again clueless on the matter.
Blame the fact we had a large Empire, where again how many would even be heading for this country. You are just some uncaring wally at the end of the day.

by Tommy Monk Thu May 14, 2015 2:58 pm

I am a realist dodge while you live in some parallel fantasy land where all foreigners are immediately 100% straight up honest and above board and would never be trying to abuse our good nature in any way...

Most of these people are Just using our asylum system as a loophole to get into and stay in our country.

by Guest Thu May 14, 2015 3:01 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:I am a realist dodge while you live in some parallel fantasy land where all foreigners are immediately 100% straight up honest and above board and would never be trying to abuse our good nature in any way...
Most of these people are Just using our asylum system as a loophole to get into and stay in our country.

You are not a realist but a hate mongering prat.
Your claim to most people using the system as a loophole is sheer and utter gobbledygook and again based on your poor assumptions.

by Tommy Monk Thu May 14, 2015 3:20 pm

Under the 1951 Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, asylum seekers must show that they have a well-founded fear of persecution due to their race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership of a particular social group, and are unable or unwilling to seek protection from the authorities in their own country. The definition is forward-looking, so even if an asylum seeker has suffered terrible harm in the past, they will not get asylum if there is no risk of anything happening to them in the future.

...their claim may be harmed if they delayed claiming asylum without good reason, or if they have been convicted of a criminal offence such as using false travel documentation, or if they did not claim asylum in the first safe country they reached after leaving their own country (known as a ‘safe third country’)...

http://www.asylumaid.org.uk/the-asylum-process-made-simple/

I would say most don't fit this criteria...

by Guest Thu May 14, 2015 3:24 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:
Under the 1951 Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, asylum seekers must show that they have a well-founded fear of persecution due to their race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership of a particular social group, and are unable or unwilling to seek protection from the authorities in their own country. The definition is forward-looking, so even if an asylum seeker has suffered terrible harm in the past, they will not get asylum if there is no risk of anything happening to them in the future.

...their claim may be harmed if they delayed claiming asylum without good reason, or if they have been convicted of a criminal offence such as using false travel documentation, or if they did not claim asylum in the first safe country they reached after leaving their own country (known as a ‘safe third country’)...

http://www.asylumaid.org.uk/the-asylum-process-made-simple/

I would say most don't fit this criteria...

Wrong:

[*]There is nothing in international law to say that refugees must claim asylum in the first country they reach.
[*]It is recognised in the 1951 Convention that people fleeing persecution may have to use irregular means in order to escape and claim asylum in another country – there is no legal way to travel to the UK for the specific purpose of seeking asylum. (United Nations 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees)

http://www.refugeecouncil.org.uk/policy_research/the_truth_about_asylum/facts_about_asylum_-_page_4

by Tommy Monk Thu May 14, 2015 3:42 pm

"...there is no legal way to travel to the UK for the specific purpose of seeking asylum..."

From your own sort dodge...!!!

lol!

And in my post it shows that an asylum application may be harmed if they did not claim asylum in the first safe country they reached after leaving their own country (known as a ‘safe third country’)...

Why do you think this is if it wasn't in The rules...!!!???

lol!

by Guest Thu May 14, 2015 3:44 pm

PMSL so maybe harmed is subjective and not law

lol what a muppet

by Tommy Monk Thu May 14, 2015 4:09 pm

Harmed = unsuccessful

Why do you think it has any bearing on an asylum application if it is not part of the rules...!!!???

You are a tit...

by Guest Thu May 14, 2015 4:11 pm

No it is subjective, learn the difference because "maybe", is subjective.

by Tommy Monk Thu May 14, 2015 4:20 pm

Learn the difference between 'may be' and 'maybe' dodge you tit...!!!

I know the English language isn't your strong point but do try to keep up old chap...!!!

lol!

by Guest Thu May 14, 2015 4:38 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:Learn the difference between 'may be' and 'maybe' dodge you tit...!!!

I know the English language isn't your strong point but do try to keep up old chap...!!!

PMSL

So again still subjective what a fucking idiot

lol!

by Tommy Monk Thu May 14, 2015 4:43 pm

It says the asylum application may be harmed... that means it can be refused on those grounds...

Why do you think that is if it is not part of the rules...!!!???

You are a tit!!!

lol!

by Guest Thu May 14, 2015 4:46 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:It says the asylum application may be harmed... that means it can be refused on those grounds...

Why do you think that is if it is not part of the rules...!!!???

You are a tit!!!

You do understand that means a possibility.
May means
[*]:expressing possibility.

That is subjective.

PMSL

[*] Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts Tdxbz3

Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts Tdxbz3

by Tommy Monk Thu May 14, 2015 4:54 pm

Dodge... it is clearly in The rules that asylum applications can be refused if the applicant has travelled through other safe countries without making their claim for asylum.

You can wriggle on this as much as you want but it is obvious to every other idiot!!!

lol!

...their claim may be harmed if they delayed claiming asylum without good reason, or if they have been convicted of a criminal offence such as using false travel documentation, or if they did not claim asylum in the first safe country they reached after leaving their own country (known as a ‘safe third country’)...

http://www.asylumaid.org.uk/the-asylum-process-made-simple/

by Guest Thu May 14, 2015 4:56 pm

Never denied they can be refused, what is hilarious is you not understanding English either with the meaning of the word may. When you think where something is a possibility is not subjective.

That was just plain thicko time on your part

So you again end up with an omlette on your face

Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts Tdxbz3

Laters twatti, love this new meme, so perfect for you

lol!

So there is no law stating they must stop in the first country

Hee hee

by Tommy Monk Thu May 14, 2015 5:06 pm

It is in The rules dodge... that is clear...

An asylum application can be refused for a number of reasons... one of which is if The applicant has travelled through other safe countries before arriving here and not making their claim in one of the other safe countries.

That is clear in my earlier post.

You are Just showing how much you will twist and turn to avoid the truth.

Tit

by Sponsored content

Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

Re: Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

Re: Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

Re: Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

Re: Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

Re: Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

Re: Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

Re: Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

Re: Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

Re: Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

Re: Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

Re: Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

Re: Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

Re: Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

Re: Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

Re: Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

Re: Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

Re: Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts

Re: Two graphs that show how many asylum seekers Britain really accepts