Judge Orders Thousands of Detainee Abuse Photos to Be Disclosed After US Government Fails to Justify Secrecy
Page 1 of 1
Judge Orders Thousands of Detainee Abuse Photos to Be Disclosed After US Government Fails to Justify Secrecy
A federal district court judge will no longer accept the United States government’s secrecy arguments and has ruled that it must release thousands of photographs of detainee abuse and torture in Afghanistan and Iraq, including inhumane treatment at Abu Ghraib prison.
The government is “required to disclose each and all the photographs responsive” to the Freedom of Information Act request submitted by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU),” according to the order by Judge Alvin Hellerstein of the US District Court of the Southern District of New York.
Hellerstein found that the government still had failed to justify keeping each individual photograph secret. However, the judge stayed the order for 60 days so the Solicitor General could determine whether to file an appeal.
ACLU deputy legal director Jameel Jaffer reacted, “To allow the government to suppress any image that might provoke someone, somewhere, to violence would be to give the government sweeping power to suppress evidence of its own agents’ misconduct. Giving the government that kind of censorial power would have implications far beyond this specific context.”
“The photos are crucial to the public record,” Jaffer argued. “They’re the best evidence of what took place in the military’s detention centers, and their disclosure would help the public better understand the implications of some of the Bush administration’s policies. And the Obama administration’s rationale for suppressing the photos is both illegitimate and dangerous.”
The ACLU has pursued the release of records related to detainee treatment and “the death of prisoners in United States custody and abroad after September 11, 2001,” since October 2003.
In October 2009, the Protected National Security Documents Act amended the Freedom of Information Act to “provide that photographs could be made exempt from disclosure for a three-year certification by the Secretary of Defense to the effect that publication would endanger American lives.” Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki asked President Barack Obama not to release photographs of detainees abuse, for “fear of the consequences.” Secretary of Defense Robert Gates filed a certification to prevent the release of photographs and the court upheld that certification.
Three years later, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta renewed the certification, even though US troops had withdrawn and the war in Iraq had been declared over.
Hellerstein found that Panetta’s certification failed to show why the release of the photos would continue to “endanger the citizens of the United States, members of the United States Armed Forces or employees of the United States Government deployed outside the United States.” He contended different circumstances existed when Panetta renewed the certification in 2012. He also agreed with the ACLU that Panetta’s certification should have dealt with each individual photograph and not been a blanket certification to keep all photographs secret.
The government disagreed with Hellerstein’s decision on August 27, 2014, where he ruled the certification was inadequate and instructed them to individually review the photographs and inform him why each photograph could not be released. Attorneys maintained the government had already gone through each photo back in 2012 and did not have to do an individual review again.
Hellerstein did not buy the argument from the government that the Islamic State would pose a greater threat if the photographs were released. As Newsweek reported, he contended soldiers and citizens were as “exposed” as they were when the court favored release in 2005.
It had been over half of a year since Hellerstein ruled that the certification was “inadequate.” The government made a last-ditch attempt to thwart the judge’s order by pleading for more time to re-certify the photographs so they remain concealed. Hellerstein rejected the plea for more time and indicated the “government gives the court no reason to believe the 2015 certification” would be any better than the previous certification in 2012.
On February 4, Hellerstein told the government that it appeared the “government’s conduct reflected a ‘sophisticated ability to obtain a very substantial delay’” in order “to defeat FOIA’s purpose of prompt disclosure.”
The government has succeeded in keeping photographs of detainee abuse secret for about a decade. It is likely to appeal, which means more delays of the judicial process. It means more time passes as interrogators, officers and officials responsible for the depicted abuse and torture do not have to answer for their conduct.
Still, it is hard to diminish the significance of the judge finally giving up on the government and deciding to order the government to stop the secrecy games. Release the photographs now.
(The legal document ordering it on the link)
http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2015/03/20/judge-rules-us-government-has-failed-to-justify-keeping-thousands-of-detainee-abuse-photos-secret/
The government is “required to disclose each and all the photographs responsive” to the Freedom of Information Act request submitted by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU),” according to the order by Judge Alvin Hellerstein of the US District Court of the Southern District of New York.
Hellerstein found that the government still had failed to justify keeping each individual photograph secret. However, the judge stayed the order for 60 days so the Solicitor General could determine whether to file an appeal.
ACLU deputy legal director Jameel Jaffer reacted, “To allow the government to suppress any image that might provoke someone, somewhere, to violence would be to give the government sweeping power to suppress evidence of its own agents’ misconduct. Giving the government that kind of censorial power would have implications far beyond this specific context.”
“The photos are crucial to the public record,” Jaffer argued. “They’re the best evidence of what took place in the military’s detention centers, and their disclosure would help the public better understand the implications of some of the Bush administration’s policies. And the Obama administration’s rationale for suppressing the photos is both illegitimate and dangerous.”
The ACLU has pursued the release of records related to detainee treatment and “the death of prisoners in United States custody and abroad after September 11, 2001,” since October 2003.
In October 2009, the Protected National Security Documents Act amended the Freedom of Information Act to “provide that photographs could be made exempt from disclosure for a three-year certification by the Secretary of Defense to the effect that publication would endanger American lives.” Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki asked President Barack Obama not to release photographs of detainees abuse, for “fear of the consequences.” Secretary of Defense Robert Gates filed a certification to prevent the release of photographs and the court upheld that certification.
Three years later, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta renewed the certification, even though US troops had withdrawn and the war in Iraq had been declared over.
Hellerstein found that Panetta’s certification failed to show why the release of the photos would continue to “endanger the citizens of the United States, members of the United States Armed Forces or employees of the United States Government deployed outside the United States.” He contended different circumstances existed when Panetta renewed the certification in 2012. He also agreed with the ACLU that Panetta’s certification should have dealt with each individual photograph and not been a blanket certification to keep all photographs secret.
The government disagreed with Hellerstein’s decision on August 27, 2014, where he ruled the certification was inadequate and instructed them to individually review the photographs and inform him why each photograph could not be released. Attorneys maintained the government had already gone through each photo back in 2012 and did not have to do an individual review again.
Hellerstein did not buy the argument from the government that the Islamic State would pose a greater threat if the photographs were released. As Newsweek reported, he contended soldiers and citizens were as “exposed” as they were when the court favored release in 2005.
It had been over half of a year since Hellerstein ruled that the certification was “inadequate.” The government made a last-ditch attempt to thwart the judge’s order by pleading for more time to re-certify the photographs so they remain concealed. Hellerstein rejected the plea for more time and indicated the “government gives the court no reason to believe the 2015 certification” would be any better than the previous certification in 2012.
On February 4, Hellerstein told the government that it appeared the “government’s conduct reflected a ‘sophisticated ability to obtain a very substantial delay’” in order “to defeat FOIA’s purpose of prompt disclosure.”
The government has succeeded in keeping photographs of detainee abuse secret for about a decade. It is likely to appeal, which means more delays of the judicial process. It means more time passes as interrogators, officers and officials responsible for the depicted abuse and torture do not have to answer for their conduct.
Still, it is hard to diminish the significance of the judge finally giving up on the government and deciding to order the government to stop the secrecy games. Release the photographs now.
(The legal document ordering it on the link)
http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2015/03/20/judge-rules-us-government-has-failed-to-justify-keeping-thousands-of-detainee-abuse-photos-secret/
Guest- Guest
Similar topics
» FEDERAL JUDGE ORDERS 9/11 CASE RE-OPENED
» Donald Trump Vent Thread
» Judge orders special prosecutor to examine Jussie Smollett probe
» 4 USA Swimmers - got drunk & concocted a BS story in RIO
» Texas judge orders hospital to remove life support of pregnant brain-dead woman
» Donald Trump Vent Thread
» Judge orders special prosecutor to examine Jussie Smollett probe
» 4 USA Swimmers - got drunk & concocted a BS story in RIO
» Texas judge orders hospital to remove life support of pregnant brain-dead woman
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sat Mar 18, 2023 12:28 pm by Ben Reilly
» TOTAL MADNESS Great British Railway Journeys among shows flagged by counter terror scheme ‘for encouraging far-right sympathies
Wed Feb 22, 2023 5:14 pm by Tommy Monk
» Interesting COVID figures
Tue Feb 21, 2023 5:00 am by Tommy Monk
» HAPPY CHRISTMAS.
Sun Jan 01, 2023 7:33 pm by Tommy Monk
» The Fight Over Climate Change is Over (The Greenies Won!)
Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:59 pm by Tommy Monk
» Trump supporter murders wife, kills family dog, shoots daughter
Mon Dec 12, 2022 1:21 am by 'Wolfie
» Quill
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:28 pm by Tommy Monk
» Algerian Woman under investigation for torture and murder of French girl, 12, whose body was found in plastic case in Paris
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:04 pm by Tommy Monk
» Wind turbines cool down the Earth (edited with better video link)
Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:19 am by Ben Reilly
» Saying goodbye to our Queen.
Sun Sep 25, 2022 9:02 pm by Maddog
» PHEW.
Sat Sep 17, 2022 6:33 pm by Syl
» And here's some more enrichment...
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:46 pm by Ben Reilly
» John F Kennedy Assassination
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:40 pm by Ben Reilly
» Where is everyone lately...?
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:33 pm by Ben Reilly
» London violence over the weekend...
Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:19 pm by Tommy Monk
» Why should anyone believe anything that Mo Farah says...!?
Wed Jul 13, 2022 1:44 am by Tommy Monk
» Liverpool Labour defends mayor role poll after turnout was only 3% and they say they will push ahead with the option that was least preferred!!!
Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:11 pm by Tommy Monk
» Labour leader Keir Stammer can't answer the simple question of whether a woman has a penis or not...
Mon Jul 11, 2022 3:58 am by Tommy Monk
» More evidence of remoaners still trying to overturn Brexit... and this is a conservative MP who should be drummed out of the party and out of parliament!
Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:50 pm by Tommy Monk
» R Kelly 30 years, Ghislaine Maxwell 20 years... but here in UK...
Fri Jul 08, 2022 5:31 pm by Original Quill