Home
Gallery
Search
Register
Log in
About Us & RulesSell, Sell, Sell! Maximus Share Prices Could Tumble After Welfare To Work Scandal Rocks Australia
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Sell, Sell, Sell! Maximus Share Prices Could Tumble After Welfare To Work Scandal Rocks Australia
by Guest Mon Mar 02, 2015 12:55 pm
A damning documentary exposing the shoddy behaviour of Maximus and the welfare-to-work sector in Australia could lead to a drop in the company’s share price according to one stockmarlet analyst.
The programme, produced by ABC (and still viewable here), tells a story which will be familiar to all those in the UK forced to attend outsourced schemes such as Iain Duncan Smith’s Work Programme. Claimants had their benefits stopped for no reason, signatures on paperwork were faked and the most marginalised claimants were parked – meaning abandoned completely by the companies who saw no profit in helping them. Maximus dominate the welfare-to-work sector in Australia, and have several contracts running similar schemes in the UK.
According to an analyst on finance website Seeking Alpha, Maximus earn 10% of their revenue in Australia and that could now be under threat due to a ‘short term negative news cycle’. They haven’t fucking seen anything yet.
Tomorrow (2nd March 2015) over 30 towns and cities in the UK will hold protests against the company due to their upcoming involvement in the despised Work Capability Assessment (WCA). These are the shoddy tests used to strip benefits from sick and disabled people by declaring them ‘fit for work’. Previous contractor Atos were chased out of the assessments after their corporate reputation was destroyed by five years of ferocious campaigning by claimants. Maximus take over this week.
The DWP think the main problem with the WCA is how it is perceived. Amusingly new contractors Maximus boasted they would not face protests like their predecessors because they were going to carry out the assessments in a ‘timely manner’. Speaking to the BBC a representative of the company said: “There is a need to better explain to people that they’re not coming to an exam, they’re coming to an interview.”
They must think we are fucking idiots. The stated intention of the WCA, when it was first launched by Labour in 2008, was to strip out of work sickness benefits from one million people. No amount of scatter cushions in assessment centres or nicely worded letters will change that. Just like Atos, Maximus have been employed to stop people’s benefits and everybody knows it. And just like Atos, that process will lead to suicides, deterioration in people’s health and desperate poverty.
The Work Capability Assessment is based on three flawed assumptions. The first is the ludicrous medical consensus which claims that work is good for you in almost any circumstances despite evidence which shows poor quality jobs can be worse for your health than unemployment. The second is that there is plenty of work to go round if people just try hard enough, yet there are only 700,000 vacancies currently available and just short of two million unemployed people desperate for a job – a figure which does not include and additional two and a half million sickness benefit claimants. And the third and perhaps most toxic is that large numbers of people on out of work sickness or disability benefits are scroungers, workshy, fraudulent or faking their health condition.
The UK does not have significantly more people on out of work sickness or disability benefits than countries with comparable economies. Every single claimant has already been signed off as unable to work by their own GP – a pre-condition of claiming sickness benefits. Most sickness benefit claims are temporary, when people get better they leave benefits and go back to work. The amount of fraud in the system is tiny because it’s just not worth the risk of faking an illness and risking increasingly severe criminal penalties for the sake of an extra £30 odd quid a week compared to Jobseeker’s Allowance.
Because the entire process is based on lies, these assessments cannot be reformed, improved, or made fair. The WCA is driving people to despair and even their deaths in some tragic cases, all to save trivial amounts of money. It needs to be scrapped, immediately. Since neither of the main politial parties are prepared to do that it needs to be made unprofitable. That is all that sinister corporate bastards like Maximus understand. And it can be made unprofitable, as Atos recently found out to their cost. So let’s do it again. Relentlessly and starting tomorrow.
https://johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/2015/03/01/sell-sell-sell-maximus-share-prices-could-tumble-after-welfare-to-work-scandal-rocks-australia/
The programme, produced by ABC (and still viewable here), tells a story which will be familiar to all those in the UK forced to attend outsourced schemes such as Iain Duncan Smith’s Work Programme. Claimants had their benefits stopped for no reason, signatures on paperwork were faked and the most marginalised claimants were parked – meaning abandoned completely by the companies who saw no profit in helping them. Maximus dominate the welfare-to-work sector in Australia, and have several contracts running similar schemes in the UK.
According to an analyst on finance website Seeking Alpha, Maximus earn 10% of their revenue in Australia and that could now be under threat due to a ‘short term negative news cycle’. They haven’t fucking seen anything yet.
Tomorrow (2nd March 2015) over 30 towns and cities in the UK will hold protests against the company due to their upcoming involvement in the despised Work Capability Assessment (WCA). These are the shoddy tests used to strip benefits from sick and disabled people by declaring them ‘fit for work’. Previous contractor Atos were chased out of the assessments after their corporate reputation was destroyed by five years of ferocious campaigning by claimants. Maximus take over this week.
The DWP think the main problem with the WCA is how it is perceived. Amusingly new contractors Maximus boasted they would not face protests like their predecessors because they were going to carry out the assessments in a ‘timely manner’. Speaking to the BBC a representative of the company said: “There is a need to better explain to people that they’re not coming to an exam, they’re coming to an interview.”
They must think we are fucking idiots. The stated intention of the WCA, when it was first launched by Labour in 2008, was to strip out of work sickness benefits from one million people. No amount of scatter cushions in assessment centres or nicely worded letters will change that. Just like Atos, Maximus have been employed to stop people’s benefits and everybody knows it. And just like Atos, that process will lead to suicides, deterioration in people’s health and desperate poverty.
The Work Capability Assessment is based on three flawed assumptions. The first is the ludicrous medical consensus which claims that work is good for you in almost any circumstances despite evidence which shows poor quality jobs can be worse for your health than unemployment. The second is that there is plenty of work to go round if people just try hard enough, yet there are only 700,000 vacancies currently available and just short of two million unemployed people desperate for a job – a figure which does not include and additional two and a half million sickness benefit claimants. And the third and perhaps most toxic is that large numbers of people on out of work sickness or disability benefits are scroungers, workshy, fraudulent or faking their health condition.
The UK does not have significantly more people on out of work sickness or disability benefits than countries with comparable economies. Every single claimant has already been signed off as unable to work by their own GP – a pre-condition of claiming sickness benefits. Most sickness benefit claims are temporary, when people get better they leave benefits and go back to work. The amount of fraud in the system is tiny because it’s just not worth the risk of faking an illness and risking increasingly severe criminal penalties for the sake of an extra £30 odd quid a week compared to Jobseeker’s Allowance.
Because the entire process is based on lies, these assessments cannot be reformed, improved, or made fair. The WCA is driving people to despair and even their deaths in some tragic cases, all to save trivial amounts of money. It needs to be scrapped, immediately. Since neither of the main politial parties are prepared to do that it needs to be made unprofitable. That is all that sinister corporate bastards like Maximus understand. And it can be made unprofitable, as Atos recently found out to their cost. So let’s do it again. Relentlessly and starting tomorrow.
https://johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/2015/03/01/sell-sell-sell-maximus-share-prices-could-tumble-after-welfare-to-work-scandal-rocks-australia/
Guest- Guest
Re: Sell, Sell, Sell! Maximus Share Prices Could Tumble After Welfare To Work Scandal Rocks Australia
by Guest Mon Mar 02, 2015 6:12 pm
Well, we know you live in the back of beyond and don't seem to hear anything that other Australians do.
Maximus in Australia: Fraud, Forgery & Abuse
Australian broadcaster ABC’s Four Corner’s ‘The Job Game’ investigation into Maximus, article here, full transcript below:
The Jobs Game, 23 February 2015
KERRY O’BRIEN, PRESENTER: Welcome to Four Corners.
As unemployment rises in Australia, so too does the money the Abbott Government pays out to job agencies, ostensibly to help people find work – something like $5 billion in the next three years.
But there’s one fundamental problem: there are many more unemployed people than there are available jobs.
When the National Employment Service was privatised 17 years ago, it spawned a big industry run by both commercial and not-for-profit agencies. Some people have become very wealthy off fees charged for various re-training and job search programs.
There are credible claims of widespread rorting by some agencies but the relevant minister has declined to discuss the problems with us.
We have now completed an investigation, with the help of whistleblowers, which suggests that significant fraud – criminality – is going on.
This should not surprise the Government because a top-level audit by the Federal Department of Employment in 2012 discovered that only 40 per cent of fees paid to agencies were verifiable.
There are changes underway – but will they stop the fraud?
Tonight, Linton Besser reports on the true state of this multi-billion dollar, taxpayer-funded industry.
KYM DEVLIN, JOBSEEKER: And I see all these people on the train, all going to work and it’s: why is it hard for me? It makes me wonder why, why, why is it easier for them to get a job and not me? What makes me different? Why can’t I have that? Why can’t I have the help I need to get a job? It’s demeaning; depressing, even.
LINTON BESSER, REPORTER: Does it ever just get too much…?
KYM DEVLIN: Every day. Every day.
LINTON BESSER: Elizabeth. The northern suburbs of Adelaide, home to the most extreme urban unemployment in the country: almost one in three people. This is what life looks like when the jobs run out.
KYM DEVLIN: I want to work and I want to get back in the workforce, but it’s hard to get a job with an eight-year gap in your résumé. Centrelink is not the ideal pay cheque. It’s not something you choose, so…
LINTON BESSER: Unemployment hasn’t been this high in Australia for 12 years and the Government has a program to get people back into work. It’s called Job Services Australia and it costs $1.3 billion a year.
But does it work?
Tonight on Four Corners we reveal the corruption at the heart of a scheme designed to help some of our most vulnerable – and how it’s turning the unemployed into a commodity.
BILL MITCHELL, PROF., ECONOMIST, UNI. OF NEWCASTLE: It started to reveal corruption and, you know, fraud.
RUPERT TAYLOR-PRICE, CEO, JN SOLUTIONS: Hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not more – millions of dollars in some cases -, has been reclaimed by the Government. No-one that I know of has ever had their business sanctioned, even when they have found systemic fraud.
DAVID KEMP, EMPLOYMENT MINISTER (December 1997): Mr Speaker, today marks the start of the most significant reforms in 50 years to improve services for job seekers and employers and get more unemployed people into jobs.
LINTON BESSER: In 1998, the Commonwealth Employment Service – or CES as it was known – was effectively privatised.
PETER SHERGOLD, DR, FMR SECRETARY, DEPT. OF EMPLOYMENT: I think it was probably the most innovative measure in terms of public administration that happened during the Howard years.
ANNOUNCER (TV ad, 1998): On May 1st, the CES will be replaced with a better way to help get unemployed people jobs. Over 300 private, community and government organisations competing to connect the right person to the right job. The new Job Network.
LINTON BESSER: Today it’s called Job Services Australia and it boils down to this: when you’re on the dole, it’s compulsory to report to an employment agency. They’re owned by charities as well as for-profit operators.
When you arrive, you’re classified by your level of disadvantage. If you didn’t finish school, don’t have access to transport, have a mental illness or a substance abuse problem, or if you’re Indigenous, you’re deemed harder to place in work.
The worse off you are, the more your agency makes.
When you walk in the door, it’s paid up to $587. Find a job and the agency claims up to $385. Stay in the job for three months: up to $2,900. Hit the six month mark: up to $2,900 more.
Along the way, the Government allocates up to $1,100 to improve your chances of getting a job. This covers things like learning to drive a car, new clothes for a job interview or even wage subsidies to make you more attractive to an employer. There are funds for marketing and training – and on it goes.
In all, the program has cost taxpayers almost $18 billion since 1998.
DAVID THOMPSON, CEO, JOBS AUSTRALIA: A system that’s got so many billions of dollars floating around in it, so many billions of taxpayers’ dollars, there will always be – or at least the possibility – that opportunists will be there, trying to push the barriers.
LINTON BESSER: The incentive to push these barriers is exacerbated by a simple arithmetic: there are just not enough jobs for the unemployed.
In Australia there are about 780,000 unemployed people competing for only 150,000 job vacancies.
BILL MITCHELL: It’s an impossible task. There’s not enough jobs to go around. You can’t make people search for jobs that aren’t there – and that’s the dilemma of the whole system.
PETER SANDEMAN, REV., CEO, ANGLICARE SA: Well, Job Services Australia: the whole system presumes that there are jobs available for people. And, of course, in many parts of Australia that’s just not true.
LINTON BESSER: Here in Elizabeth, there are whole streets where they say no one has worked for a generation.
KYM DEVLIN: My Mum didn’t work, but I’m one of five siblings. She was a single mum too. My Dad and my Mum split up before I was born, so my Mum did the best she could.
Like I said, I’m one of five, so I guess my Mum didn’t really have the opportunity to get out there and show us, you know, teach us even confidence and what you need to… the skills to work.
LINTON BESSER: Established in the 1950s for a booming manufacturing sector, 60 years later these areas of Adelaide have fallen by the wayside as the global economy has found cheaper labour elsewhere.
KYM DEVLIN: I’ve thrown myself back out there and tried to pick my life back up and make it for the better. I have my daughter. You know, I don’t want her to live a horrible life. I want her to have better than what I had.
LINTON BESSER: Kym Devlin hasn’t had a job in eight years and is signed up with Max Employment. Kym has been obligated to visit Max roughly every fortnight for the past two-and-a-half years.
Despite this, she says she hasn’t been put forward for a single job interview.
KYM DEVLIN: It’s so frustrating because it’s been going on for a couple of years. You get treated like you don’t matter. You know, you’re just… you’re just another name on their list that they get to cross off so that when it comes down to it, they can hand back and say, “Yep, look, I’ve filled my quota,” whether you get help or not. It’s, it’s… it’s demeaning. It’s… it’s frustrating.
LINTON BESSER: Today Kym is going into Max Employment for another meeting, hoping for a breakthrough.
But what is Max?
The agency is actually one arm of a giant multinational that is traded on the US stock market. Despite a controversial history in the welfare sector in America, it has come to dominate Australia’s jobs program.
In her meeting, Kym discovered the résumé Max sends out on her behalf was riddled with errors.
(to Kym Devlin) So what happened? Did you have to tell your story again?
KYM DEVLIN: Yeah. Update a résumé. My name was spelt wrong.
LINTON BESSER: Really?
KYM DEVLIN: Oh yeah. Um, there’s jobs in here that – wrong years. Some of them weren’t even added. It had my Grandma on there, which – she passed away last year – as a reference. So, a mess. My Business Admin and Business Cert II and III weren’t even on my résumé.
LINTON BESSER: So, sorry: the courses they helped put you through…
KYM DEVLIN: Yeah, they put me through…
LINTON BESSER: They hadn’t put on your résumé and…?
KYM DEVLIN: Nope. There was nothing on my résumé about them and that- I finished those last year.
LINTON BESSER: Is there any evidence at all that they have put you forward for jobs in that area?
KYM DEVLIN: Nope. Nope.
Oh, I’ve been trying to get them to transfer me…
LINTON BESSER: Kym doesn’t realise it but she has been “parked.”
In employment parlance, this is what happens to thousands of jobseekers when agencies put them in the “too-hard basket.”
BILL MITCHELL: They would take their first fee from the Government for taking them on and then they would quickly work out that it was going to be, cost them too much resources to get them skilled, so they’d just park them and forget about them.
RUPERT TAYLOR-PRICE: In the industry it’s called “parking”, where you get a jobseeker in, you don’t think there’s much prospects of getting them an outcome, so you essentially try and do the minimum amount of compliance activities that are required with them.
LINTON BESSER: So how many people are being parked and how many are getting real help?
Rupert Taylor-Price is in a unique position to answer these questions. As a software provider to many agencies, he has access to the vast volumes of data that flow between the Government and its contractors.
RUPERT TAYLOR-PRICE: I’d say probably about one in 10 people have sort of a significant interaction with the system that results in them… in a better chance of gaining employment. It’s a bit of luck, really. It’s if you get the right service provider at the right time, you get the right consultant.
Sometimes, ah, someone will feel very passionate about a jobseeker and put a lot of energy in, but naturally the contract doesn’t give the resource required in many cases to, to reform someone’s life back to employment.
LINTON BESSER: There may not be the money to reform the lives of the long-term unemployed, but maybe that’s not the point anyway.
If an unemployed person fails to attend a meeting at their agency or fulfil other obligations, their payments are suspended.
It’s what they call “breaching” and some argue that this is the scheme’s true purpose.
BILL MITCHELL: That’s been a scandal in Australian history: the breaching, where, where an unemployed person is fined. That is, they lose their income support if they don’t satisfy certain, ah, attendance rules and documentation rules and what- and, you know, record keeping and all of that.
There’s a whole industry of punishment and coercion and monitoring of the unemployed when there’s not enough jobs anyway.
LINTON BESSER: This is exactly what’s happened to Kym. But in her case, she says she’s been breached unfairly many times – including when her consultant failed to show up for their scheduled appointment.
KYM DEVLIN: Half the time, my payment gets cut off because they say I haven’t attended and get marked down as though I haven’t attended. And Centrelink will call through and see what’s happened and I’ll, I’ll tell them I’ve been there and it has just come down to a case of a few times that the secretary hasn’t handed in the sign-in sheet. You know, like they literally barely even notice you’re there.
LUKE HARTSUYKER, ASSISTANT MINISTER FOR EMPLOYMENT: We as a nation need to get more Australians into work…
LINTON BESSER: Four Corners requested an interview with the Minister who oversees the scheme, Luke Hartsuyker. He declined. But the public servant who ushered in the program 16 years ago, Peter Shergold, says that despite its flaws, he believes the program is working.
PETER SHERGOLD: I know many fine members of Job Services Australia who are working very hard to find people employment. But overall there is no doubt to me that it has been pretty effective at helping people get into work.
LINTON BESSER: Ninety minutes out of Sydney, we meet another jobseeker who went through Job Services Australia.
His employment agency was the for-profit company called ORS Group. It’s a Perth-based outfit with more than 60 offices around the country. Last year its turnover was $66 million.
LINTON BESSER: Can you list for me the number of job interviews that ORS organised for you in the time that you were there?
ADAM MATCHETT: Yeah, well I can list it: um, there was none. They didn’t give me one job interview.
LINTON BESSER: In 2010, Adam Matchett was a young carpenter living on the New South Wales central coast. But one night tragedy struck when he was hit by a car.
In a coma for 19 days, Adam was lucky to survive. But when he woke up, everything had changed.
ADAM MATCHETT: I had everything planned out. But that all of a sudden was just taken away in an instant. I was in hospital for around about three to four months. Then I was in a rehab centre for brain injuries. I was in there for about six months. And then after that I tried to go back to work as a carpenter, but couldn’t do that from the physical injuries.
I couldn’t do a lot of things. Holding a bit of timber up there for architraves or something, I couldn’t, I didn’t have enough strength to hold the gun up there, so I’d swap hands and hold the timber up there, but I didn’t have enough strength to hold the timber up there either.
LINTON BESSER: Adam was forced onto unemployment benefits. He had to rebuild his life and find a new career.
ADAM MATCHETT: It’s like, yeah, starting again from scratch. Well, I’d never been on Newstart or Centrelink or anything like that and it was sort of a bit depressing getting help for the first time. But I wanted to have a go and, um, I had no skills, so I needed help.
They sent me to this job a-agency, ORS, and I thought that was a great thing. I thought they were going to help me to get new skills and all that sort of stuff.
LINTON BESSER: But that didn’t happen.
After 10 months with ORS, Adam found himself a job at a wine bar called BPO.
Although ORS had not found him the position, it was still entitled to claim fees as a result of Adam’s success – but it had to obtain his signature to do so.
LINTON BESSER: When is the last time you think you ever signed any documents with ORS Group?
ADAM MATCHETT (sighs): Um… the last time… well, I know I spoke to them after I had a job but the last time I would’ve sat down with them and signed anything would’ve been before the date that I got the job because now that I had a job I didn’t have any reason to go in there.
LINTON BESSER: So can I show you this document? Have a look at that. That’s a form that’s dated six months after you started at BPO. Do you recognise that document?
ADAM MATCHETT: I remember filling out a form like this but I can’t say it was six months later.
The thing is: they’d send me these forms. I’d fill out the parts, like I’d put me name and BPO and my signature. They’d say, “Oh, don’t worry about the rest. We’ll do that.”
LINTON BESSER: So they were asking you to sign blank forms?
ADAM MATCHETT: Pretty much yes. Well, yeah, they were.
LINTON BESSER: The confusion in Adam’s paperwork is not an isolated case.
His form was among a suite of internal documents obtained by Four Corners that ORS has used to claim thousands of dollars from the taxpayer.
We tracked down some of those former ORS clients whose signatures appeared on the documents.
LINTON BESSER: So do you think you signed that?
MONICA KOPP: It doesn’t really look like me. Jesus, I don’t know, to be honest. I don’t think so.
LINTON BESSER: Is that your signature?
MONICA KOPP: I don’t think so.
LINTON BESSER (to Linda Edwards): Linda, have a look at that…
LINTON BESSER: In some cases, the job details appeared completely fabricated.
LINDA EDWARDS: It says, “I, Linda Edwards, confirm I commenced employment with…” and I don’t know who these, this…
LINTON BESSER: What does it say? It says…
LINDA EDWARDS: Samaritans Accommodation – is that what it says? I’ve never heard of Samaritans Accommodation, so I’m not really sure what that means.
AIMEE TESTER: Yeah, that’s not my writing.
LINTON BESSER: So do you think…
AIMEE TESTER: At all. Yeah, I don’t write like that. I don’t write in running writing. The dates are definitely wrong, ’cause I was working already. And the company name’s spelt wrong. Don’t even think that’s actually my signature, ’cause I don’t write it like that.
LINTON BESSER: Do you want to show me one? Here, why don’t you do a signature on here.
(Aimee writes her signature in a notebook)
LINTON BESSER: Wow. That’s completely different.
AIMEE TESTER: Yep. (laughs) Yeah.
LINTON BESSER: So they’ve forged your signature?
AIMEE TESTER: Yeah.
LINTON BESSER: So the whole thing is a complete forgery?
AIMEE TESTER: Yeah.
LINTON BESSER (to Arwen Norbury): Just have a look at that. Do you recognise that document?
ARWEN NORBURY (reads): Really! Really?
LINTON BESSER: What do you think’s happened there?
Arwen Norbury: I’m shocked, ’cause I didn’t fill this in. And you know what? That’s how I do my signature but that’s not even on the line. I cross over on the line so they’ve, they’ve Photoshopped that in.
And that is my signature, but it doesn’t hit the line and I can tell you for a fact that I write over the line, how my “A” goes, so they’ve, that’s fraud.
LINTON BESSER: Dozens of ORS claims have been examined by Four Corners and more than 70 per cent of them relied on suspect paperwork, with clients repeatedly disputing the company’s records.
Hours were bumped up, wages were inflated and, in several cases, the claim forms appear to have been forged.
Now a company whistleblower says such fraud is rampant and that ORS routinely lodges false claims worth millions of dollars.
We can’t reveal his identity and have replaced his voice.
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): I would say about 80 per cent of claims that came through had some sort of manipulation on them, from a forged signature with everything completely falsified to manipulation of a date or the hours worked.
LINTON BESSER: How many wage tables have you seen manipulated or that you know have been manipulated?
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): I couldn’t even give you a number. It’d be in the thousands.
LINTON BESSER: He says details are regularly whited out and altered; that signatures are cut and pasted from one form to the next. The photocopied documents are uploaded to the company’s server and the originals are destroyed.
LINTON BESSER: And to what extent does the management of the company know this is happening?
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): They know. It’s called the “grey area.”
LINTON BESSER: He says ORS promotes staff willing to do whatever it takes to earn fees for the company.
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): It seems to become normalised throughout the organisation, so when you have staff members that come – brand new staff members – it’s drilled into them from the very beginning, because they see everyone else doing it, that it is normal culture throughout ORS to white something out, to manipulate a document that a jobseeker has signed.
LINTON BESSER: He says he was driven to speak out after a particularly disturbing incident.
An older unemployed man had his Centrelink payments cut off and he was forced on to the street, all thanks to a false claim lodged by ORS.
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): He had to actually pay back money to the Government because he had supposedly worked when he actually hadn’t. The jobseeker subsequently couldn’t pay his rent so he became homeless. He actually came to our office with a trolley with as much belongings as he could fit in it, because he actually had nowhere else to go.
When he rocked up into the office it was gut-wrenching, because it was… it actually hit home that we had actually done that to a particular person.
LINTON BESSER: These stories should come as no surprise to the Federal Government. In 2008, another ORS whistleblower came forward with almost exactly the same story.
LINTON BESSER (to Brooke Purvis): So what shocked you the most about working at ORS?
BROOKE PURVIS, FMR ORS CONSULTANT: Um, the fact that we didn’t help the jobseeker; we tended to hinder them a lot more.
LINTON BESSER: Brooke Purvis was working for ORS on the NSW central coast and realised something was wrong when the company scrambled to prepare for a Government audit.
BROOKE PURVIS: You know, that I guess caused alarm bells for me. Um, there were things that should have been there: um, you know, claims that have been claimed, signatures that weren’t on them.
Um, and we were sort of told, you know, if the signature’s not on it, get it in any way that you can. It’s a little bit of an office joke: you know, you go away for the night and you come back and all your files are fat.
LINTON BESSER: And what does that mean?
BROOKE PURVIS: A fairy’s been in them and added whatever needs to go in to get through an audit.
LINTON BESSER: And the jobseekers didn’t put them on?
BROOKE PURVIS: Not unless they come in at night when no one’s there to see them.
LINTON BESSER: The Department of Employment decided not to investigate Brooke’s claims, citing a lack of evidence.
But three years later, ORS staff in Tasmania made similar allegations and, mid-way through last year, the Department conducted inspections of ORS offices around the country.
LINTON BESSER: What proportion of claims for fees made by ORS that you were aware of do you think were suspect in one way or another?
BROOKE PURVIS: I- With my caseload that I know, at least half. I don’t know how they’re still open. I really don’t.
LINTON BESSER: Periodically, ORS prepares for Government audits that check the validity of claims already made by the company.
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): An email is sent out once a month to all the managers highlighting “yes” if they’re correct and “no” if they’re not. And if they’re not correct, we need to get new evidence.
LINTON BESSER: Four Corners has obtained one such email from July 2013.
In it, an ORS manager reminds the company’s senior employees that they should not be claiming fees…
ORS MANAGER EMAIL (voiceover): Unless all evidence requirements are met.
LINTON BESSER: But then she asks:
ORS MANAGER EMAIL (voiceover): Could all sites that did not achieve 100 per cent please forward through the correct and updated documentary evidence. I will then review and upload… and remove the old evidence. Just to reiterate, I will delete the old evidence and upload the new.
LINTON BESSER: In a statement, ORS said it deleted information only when it was incorrect, extraneous or redundant.
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): Some of the times, the evidence has already been disposed of or has disappeared, so they just need to – they literally will just print off the one that they’ve got up on the internet, fill in the changes that they’ve recommended, whiting it out or manipulating it somehow and then upload it.
LINTON BESSER: And it looks perfect.
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): It does look perfect.
LINTON BESSER: It’s a falsehood.
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): Yeah.
LINTON BESSER: Jobseekers who have found work aren’t often interested in returning to their job agency to fill in forms.
So at ORS gift cards are used to entice them back.
BROOKE PURVIS: Gift vouchers were used as bait. So if we needed a client to do anything, you’d dangle the bait in front of them, which was a gift voucher, and say, “Well, look, if you could just come in, sign for your gift voucher and, you know, you’re on your way.” They just thought they were signing for their gift voucher but three-quarters of the time the paper they were signing was the evidence that we needed them to sign off on to say that they agreed that this had been undertaken.
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): The jobseekers: they’re in hardship. They’re going through a hard time. They haven’t got the financial resources to pay for fuel. A Coles Myer gift card can be beneficial for them. So when that is shown to them, they’re more focused on the gift card – the fuel that’s going to assist them with buying food or buying petrol and getting them to work – than that form they’re actually signing.
LINTON BESSER: Industry insiders say there are many loopholes in the program.
RUPERT TAYLOR-PRICE: I think one of the problems is that the Government assesses whether people are inside the confines of the contract, rather than whether they’ve gamed things successfully. When you optimise the contract within the rules in a way that isn’t necessarily best for the citizens, your performance is left intact. The Government will reward the provider that successfully gamed the system.
LINTON BESSER: A common practice is for agencies to push their clients into a category of greater disadvantage because it attracts a higher fee.
BROOKE PURVIS: You were kind of digging in their past to see if there was something that may come up that may help ORS get them re-classified. We were told to make sure that we re-classified as many people and sent them off for… for this, ’cause we’d get, ORS’d get paid for it. So they kind of double-dipped and, and that was a big pushing point. We had to push anyone that we thought that may have something that could get them re-classified.
LINTON BESSER: The biggest loophole is when agencies put jobseekers into training courses run by their own registered training organisations.
In just four years to 2013, these courses cost taxpayers almost $600 million. The unemployed are poured into them.
RUPERT TAYLOR-PRICE: It’s certainly prevalent that, um, people are put into, er, training, ah, that the jobseeker may not have necessarily found beneficial, um, but the provider will receive a payment from the Government for, for conducting.
(footage of Catherine O’Rourke conducting a jobseeker training class)
CATHERINE O’ROURKE: So what we’re looking at this morning is customer service. When we’re dealing with, um, jobseekers…
LINTON BESSER: Catherine O’Rourke used to be the national training manager for Max Employment. It too has its own training arm.
CATHERINE O’ROURKE: Communication is…
(footage ends)
LINTON BESSER (to Catherine O’Rourke): Were job seekers being funnelled into at times irrelevant training so that Max’s registered training organisation arm could gain a fee?
CATHERINE O’ROURKE: It was within the best interests of, of Max to place the maximum amount of people in there, so they would, um, then get the, the funding placement dollars. Um, and then as I said it would be backfilled in other areas. But the main objective was to get as many of our Max clients into the different courses as needed to. Yeah.
LINTON BESSER: Because then Max Employment could, they could cop a fee two times, couldn’t they?
CATHERINE O’ROURKE: Yep.
LINTON BESSER: In 2009, Government investigators were alerted to an obvious training scam at one of Max Employment’s offices in Sydney.
Four Corners has obtained a copy of their confidential case report. They discovered Max was enrolling vastly more people into training programs than was physically possible.
One hundred and forty-one jobseekers were receiving training onsite at Max Employment in a training room that could fit only 15 jobseekers at a time.
But the investigation went nowhere because a senior department official told Max they could go ahead and claim fees for the students anyway.
DEWR CASE ASSESSMENT REPORT (voiceover): I did specifically advise them that they could claim for… commencements even though there was no prospect of the client completing (or in the case of very late June, perhaps even commencing) the training.
CATHERINE O’ROURKE: And then the, you know, employment service officer would’ve gone back and said, “Yes, they’ve attended.” How long they attended for: might be two minutes, might be two hours, might be, you know, never. But they would’ve had evidence of some sort of signature and an acknowledgement to say that they would’ve been there.
LINTON BESSER: Is it real training?
CATHERINE O’ROURKE: No!
LINTON BESSER: So it’s become big business in a way?
BROOKE PURVIS: Big business. It’s not about the jobseeker; it’s about the employment networks. Look how big they’ve got…
LINTON BESSER: Poor quality training has long plagued Job Services Australia.
BROOKE PURVIS: It just looks like a graveyard of employment places.
LINTON BESSER: Brooke Purvis says the taxpayer money funnelled into training at ORS Group should have been spent elsewhere.
BROOKE PURVIS: Attendance was shocking. People didn’t want to come. It could have been spent a lot better i-in a lot of other ways. It would have been exceptional to have that funding available, um, you know, to get them a driver’s licence which would give them a bigger chance of employment than it would sitting in a classroom, swinging around off a chair.
LINTON BESSER: If it would have helped to spend that money on driver’s licences, why was it not?
BROOKE PURVIS: ‘Cause ORS don’t own a driving school.
LINTON BESSER: Another way the system is exploited is through the use of wage subsidies, where the Government pays companies to take on the unemployed. It’s an effective tool, because employers are suddenly offered cheap labour.
But the problem is this: when a person’s subsidy expires, they can be simply replaced. And so the cycle begins again.
CATHERINE O’ROURKE: And they will well and truly shaft that person and say, “Well, you know, see you later” and, and then apply for the next person. So they can do that because, you know, it’s, it’s a trial period. And that’s why the milestone is 12, you know, or 26 weeks.
LINTON BESSER: And they’ll, as in your words, “shaft that person” because the next person has a wage subsidy?
CATHERINE O’ROURKE: Correct. Correct. But, you know, to, to, pump them in and pump them out: it was, it was just so sad when you’d have them on a high and all of a sudden it’s: “Sorry, we haven’t got the hours anymore.” And, and, you know, that- it would be like popping a balloon and be deflating them. And tha- and that was really sad.
TONY ABBOTT, EMPLOYMENT MINISTER (December 1998): Mr Speaker, the second criticism…
LINTON BESSER: But it’s not only the for-profit agencies pushing the envelope.
TONY ABBOTT: The organisations which provide the heart of the Job Network – organisations like Mission Employment, the Salvation Army, Centacare and the Brotherhood of St Laurence – are completely dedicated to the welfare of the unemployed. And the idea that those organisations would rip anyone off is simply wrong.
LINTON BESSER: It was a bold assertion, but a questionable one.
Some of the country’s most venerated charities have also gamed the system. The Salvation Army and the Catholic Church are among the not-for-profits that have had to repay millions of dollars for making false claims.
LINTON BESSER (to Peter Sandeman): Peter, how widespread is the understanding in the charity sector that this contract – the Job Services Australia contract – is heavily gamed with misleading or false claims for fees?
PETER SANDEMAN: I was around for Job Network one, two and three in Mission Australia. And certainly at that stage there were a number of perverse incentives available to organisations who could then, er, make quite, quite large and substantial surpluses from, from the Network.
LINTON BESSER: In 2005 a major Government investigation targeted the Salvation Army in Victoria. During a taped interview, a staff member made admissions of:
DEWR REPORT (voiceover): Unethical and criminal behaviour relating to fraudulently upgrading jobseekers to the highly disadvantaged classification, thereby increasing payments and bonuses for staff.
LINTON BESSER: The charity had to repay $9 million but the Government would not say whether anyone was ever prosecuted.
This is despite investigators concluding that:
DEWR REPORT (voiceover): Criminal offences, including falsifying documents and forgery, have been committed by Salvation Army Employment Plus recruitment consultants.
LINTON BESSER: Peter Sandeman has refused to involve Anglicare SA in the jobs program.
PETER SANDEMAN: Well, it’s really a matter of whether you’re going to support the families and the individuals, er, in their aspiration and, er, developing them, as opposed to being, er, the person who decides that they should have their unemployment benefit cut off.
So on the one hand you’re trying to be their friend and supporter; on the other hand you’re an agent of the State. You’re the, you’re the cop on the beat. And the two roles are, are very incompatible.
DAVID THOMPSON: The department constantly claims that they, they think they are still getting better, better results.
LINTON BESSER: For David Thompson, who runs the peak body for non-profit agencies, Jobs Australia, it’s a familiar dilemma.
DAVID THOMPSON: And you get this dreadful irony that can happen, in theory at least, where a major charity operating an employment service will, ah, breach someone, um, for failure to do something and then send them round the corner to get some emergency relief from another part of the same agency.
LINTON BESSER: Sandeman says charities are being forced to behave increasingly like commercial operators in a race for Government contracts.
PETER SANDEMAN: The entrance of for-profit organisations into some of the traditional welfare sector is a spectre that’s been looming over Australia for some time.
And if you look at the international experience, often it means that the welfare agencies who operate for no profit – we plough our resources back into our services – are supplanted by large, er, international organisations who have a very strong profit motive.
LINTON BESSER: After the Catholic Church’s employment arm was exposed rorting the contract in 2011, the Government instituted an industry-wide inquiry.
It examined the extent to which one particular job placement fee was being abused.
DAVID THOMPSON: That audit identified a large number of cases where providers had inappropriately claimed a higher outcome fee.
RUPERT TAYLOR-PRICE: There’s been some reports with up to an 80 per cent failure rate, ah, but, but that includes the soft fraud which is where people are including, er, administrative mistakes.
LINTON BESSER: The inquiry examined only one type of fee and just six months’ worth of claims, but it still clawed back more than $6 million.
But the extent of the rorts did not surprise this man.
Ian Whitchurch used to be a departmental auditor. Way back in 1999, he warned the Government that fraud was rife.
IAN WHITCHURCH, FMR AUDITOR, DEPT. OF EMPLOYMENT: We found that about a third of Job Network job-matching claims in that period, in fact the Job Network member had had no involvement in getting the person a job, something which they’d claimed money off the Commonwealth for. Probably about 50,000 of the Job Network job-matching claims in the first year were probably rorted.
LINTON BESSER: Whitchurch prepared a scathing report about his concerns for Peter Shergold, then the head of the Department.
PETER SHERGOLD: I can’t remember that report but I certainly can remem- There were two sep- there are two separate issues. There were… There was, I think, a provider – one provider I can think of – who, in your language, I would say was rorting the system. There’s a difference, if you will, between gaming a contract and rorting. Rorting is taking funds for a false outcome which hasn’t been achieved. I’ve seen truly minimal evidence o-of that.
NEIL ANDREW, LOWER HOUSE SPEAKER (June 2001): The Minister for Employment Services.
LINTON BESSER: Just two years after Whitchurch’s report, another major company, Leonie Green & Associates, was accused of shovelling thousands of people into phony jobs.
When the scandal erupted, the Government moved to defend the system.
MAL BROUGH, EMPLOYMENT SERVICES MINISTER (June 2001): This Department, this Government, does not accepting placing anyone into phony jobs, phantom jobs or whatever you care to mention. The fact is we have no problems with Job Network companies utilising the services of, ah, labour hire companies as long as those jobs are real.
LINTON BESSER: An inquiry found no evidence of fraud by Leonie Green & Associates, but they were forced to repay $70,000.
Fifteen years after first voicing his concerns, and despite repeated changes to the jobs program, Whitchurch says it remains vulnerable.
IAN WHITCHURCH: I’m reading the latest Job Network contract and I’m seeing so much material in it that we identified back in 1998, 1999, as these rorts are legal under the contract. And they are still legal under the contract.
So I would ask any secretary of the Department of Employment: have you looked at how the system can be rorted? And have you attempted to prevent those rorts? Because we keep seeing the same problems.
BROOKE PURVIS: There are plenty of things, I think, you know, that really should be brought to attention. You know, the jobseeker’s meant to be getting the help but it, it was more so, um, they, they didn’t get the help that they needed. It was: we got the help that we needed to give them to get our company further ahead.
DAVID THOMPSON: We need to foster and develop a culture that says that kind, any kind of behaviour that’s untoward, that’s pushing the envelope or the boundaries, will not be acceptable. Not on the part of the Government and not on a, on the part of the people like me and not on the part of the taxpayer either.
LINTON BESSER: Four Corners wanted to put these allegations of fraud and rorting to the Minister, Luke Hartsuyker, Max Employment, ORS Group, the Salvation Army and the Catholic Church. But all of them refused to give an interview.
ORS told Four Corners it had a relatively low rate of errors and it was not familiar with allegations of doctored records but would be concerned if they were correct.
In the latest iteration of the jobs program, which begins in July, the Government has made some changes. But these changes don’t address the fundamental economic dilemma at the heart of the program: there are too many people and not enough jobs.
And they cut away some of the red tape that providers say is a major problem.
DAVID THOMPSON: There were nearly 3,000 A4 pages of guidelines, rules, contracts, et cetera, and 146 different types of outcomes. And a system that was so extraordinarily complex and focussed on accounting for all of these micro-transactions that it was getting in the way of, um, its real job, which was helping, ah, people to get really good job outcomes.
RUPERT TAYLOR-PRICE: The Government has essentially been removing audit requirements rather than increasing them, even though they know that this is going on.
LINTON BESSER: And why is that a problem?
RUPERT TAYLOR-PRICE: ‘Cause in, in a free market, red tape, er, is generally a bad thing. This isn’t a free market. This is a Government contract. Red tape in this industry is regulation and it’s making sure that public funds are accounted for.
DAVID THOMPSON: The longer somebody remains unemployed, the more damaged and scarred and disadvantaged they become. And the prospects of their getting back to work get smaller and smaller and smaller.
If we can sort of spread that around a bit, so that we’ve got people that are more likely to take jobs when things turn better, th-then we will have created, ah, a set of circumstances that’s better for them and better for the country en-entirely.
The alternative would be to say, “Well, we can’t do anything for those people. We’ll just let them rot.” And I don’t think that’s much of an option either.
LINTON BESSER: Back in Adelaide, Kym and eight-year-old Mia have recently become homeless. They stay with friends or, when they can, family.
KYM DEVLIN: Just… I’ve been through a lot in my life and Max Employment may not seem like a big thing to miss appointments or have your consultant not show up, but when you’ve survived what I have and… Things like that, little tiny things are, are huge. It’s a little, tiny weight that’s there, ends up being the world.
(Mia and Kym are colouring an illustration)
MIA: I can do it.
KYM DEVLIN: Yeah, shade. Just do it lightly.
KYM DEVLIN: God, I hope she never has to go on Centrelink. This is why I’m trying to get out there and get a job. I’m trying to better her chances and, and bring her up as in seeing me work and, and the rewards from working.
It’s hard enough living as it is. It’s hard enough getting up, even waking up in the morning and getting out of bed. It’s, it’s… It’s not easy but I have a daughter, so I have to. I can’t imagine what it’s like for people that don’t have kids that have to do this, because that’s the only thing that keeps me going. That’s the only thing that makes me think, “Well, no. I have to get up today. I have to face today.”
KERRY O’BRIEN: So how many people who genuinely want and desperately need a job is the Government really helping to face the day and get a real one?
There are statements on our website from the Minister, Luke Hartsuyker, Max Employment, the Salvation Army and the Catholic Church.
Before we go, a brief update on last week’s story of scandal in the greyhound industry: there are official enquiries being conducted in Queensland, NSW and Victoria and we understand more than 30 greyhound trainers down the east coast have now been suspended with the prospect of more to come.
Next week: the mighty Apple is the most valued brand on the planet but how does it treat its workers? A special undercover investigation.
Until then, good night.
http://newapproachuk.org/2015/03/02/maximus-in-australia-fraud-forgery-abuse/
There you go, brought you up to date of something happening in Australia lol
Maximus in Australia: Fraud, Forgery & Abuse
Australian broadcaster ABC’s Four Corner’s ‘The Job Game’ investigation into Maximus, article here, full transcript below:
The Jobs Game, 23 February 2015
KERRY O’BRIEN, PRESENTER: Welcome to Four Corners.
As unemployment rises in Australia, so too does the money the Abbott Government pays out to job agencies, ostensibly to help people find work – something like $5 billion in the next three years.
But there’s one fundamental problem: there are many more unemployed people than there are available jobs.
When the National Employment Service was privatised 17 years ago, it spawned a big industry run by both commercial and not-for-profit agencies. Some people have become very wealthy off fees charged for various re-training and job search programs.
There are credible claims of widespread rorting by some agencies but the relevant minister has declined to discuss the problems with us.
We have now completed an investigation, with the help of whistleblowers, which suggests that significant fraud – criminality – is going on.
This should not surprise the Government because a top-level audit by the Federal Department of Employment in 2012 discovered that only 40 per cent of fees paid to agencies were verifiable.
There are changes underway – but will they stop the fraud?
Tonight, Linton Besser reports on the true state of this multi-billion dollar, taxpayer-funded industry.
KYM DEVLIN, JOBSEEKER: And I see all these people on the train, all going to work and it’s: why is it hard for me? It makes me wonder why, why, why is it easier for them to get a job and not me? What makes me different? Why can’t I have that? Why can’t I have the help I need to get a job? It’s demeaning; depressing, even.
LINTON BESSER, REPORTER: Does it ever just get too much…?
KYM DEVLIN: Every day. Every day.
LINTON BESSER: Elizabeth. The northern suburbs of Adelaide, home to the most extreme urban unemployment in the country: almost one in three people. This is what life looks like when the jobs run out.
KYM DEVLIN: I want to work and I want to get back in the workforce, but it’s hard to get a job with an eight-year gap in your résumé. Centrelink is not the ideal pay cheque. It’s not something you choose, so…
LINTON BESSER: Unemployment hasn’t been this high in Australia for 12 years and the Government has a program to get people back into work. It’s called Job Services Australia and it costs $1.3 billion a year.
But does it work?
Tonight on Four Corners we reveal the corruption at the heart of a scheme designed to help some of our most vulnerable – and how it’s turning the unemployed into a commodity.
BILL MITCHELL, PROF., ECONOMIST, UNI. OF NEWCASTLE: It started to reveal corruption and, you know, fraud.
RUPERT TAYLOR-PRICE, CEO, JN SOLUTIONS: Hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not more – millions of dollars in some cases -, has been reclaimed by the Government. No-one that I know of has ever had their business sanctioned, even when they have found systemic fraud.
DAVID KEMP, EMPLOYMENT MINISTER (December 1997): Mr Speaker, today marks the start of the most significant reforms in 50 years to improve services for job seekers and employers and get more unemployed people into jobs.
LINTON BESSER: In 1998, the Commonwealth Employment Service – or CES as it was known – was effectively privatised.
PETER SHERGOLD, DR, FMR SECRETARY, DEPT. OF EMPLOYMENT: I think it was probably the most innovative measure in terms of public administration that happened during the Howard years.
ANNOUNCER (TV ad, 1998): On May 1st, the CES will be replaced with a better way to help get unemployed people jobs. Over 300 private, community and government organisations competing to connect the right person to the right job. The new Job Network.
LINTON BESSER: Today it’s called Job Services Australia and it boils down to this: when you’re on the dole, it’s compulsory to report to an employment agency. They’re owned by charities as well as for-profit operators.
When you arrive, you’re classified by your level of disadvantage. If you didn’t finish school, don’t have access to transport, have a mental illness or a substance abuse problem, or if you’re Indigenous, you’re deemed harder to place in work.
The worse off you are, the more your agency makes.
When you walk in the door, it’s paid up to $587. Find a job and the agency claims up to $385. Stay in the job for three months: up to $2,900. Hit the six month mark: up to $2,900 more.
Along the way, the Government allocates up to $1,100 to improve your chances of getting a job. This covers things like learning to drive a car, new clothes for a job interview or even wage subsidies to make you more attractive to an employer. There are funds for marketing and training – and on it goes.
In all, the program has cost taxpayers almost $18 billion since 1998.
DAVID THOMPSON, CEO, JOBS AUSTRALIA: A system that’s got so many billions of dollars floating around in it, so many billions of taxpayers’ dollars, there will always be – or at least the possibility – that opportunists will be there, trying to push the barriers.
LINTON BESSER: The incentive to push these barriers is exacerbated by a simple arithmetic: there are just not enough jobs for the unemployed.
In Australia there are about 780,000 unemployed people competing for only 150,000 job vacancies.
BILL MITCHELL: It’s an impossible task. There’s not enough jobs to go around. You can’t make people search for jobs that aren’t there – and that’s the dilemma of the whole system.
PETER SANDEMAN, REV., CEO, ANGLICARE SA: Well, Job Services Australia: the whole system presumes that there are jobs available for people. And, of course, in many parts of Australia that’s just not true.
LINTON BESSER: Here in Elizabeth, there are whole streets where they say no one has worked for a generation.
KYM DEVLIN: My Mum didn’t work, but I’m one of five siblings. She was a single mum too. My Dad and my Mum split up before I was born, so my Mum did the best she could.
Like I said, I’m one of five, so I guess my Mum didn’t really have the opportunity to get out there and show us, you know, teach us even confidence and what you need to… the skills to work.
LINTON BESSER: Established in the 1950s for a booming manufacturing sector, 60 years later these areas of Adelaide have fallen by the wayside as the global economy has found cheaper labour elsewhere.
KYM DEVLIN: I’ve thrown myself back out there and tried to pick my life back up and make it for the better. I have my daughter. You know, I don’t want her to live a horrible life. I want her to have better than what I had.
LINTON BESSER: Kym Devlin hasn’t had a job in eight years and is signed up with Max Employment. Kym has been obligated to visit Max roughly every fortnight for the past two-and-a-half years.
Despite this, she says she hasn’t been put forward for a single job interview.
KYM DEVLIN: It’s so frustrating because it’s been going on for a couple of years. You get treated like you don’t matter. You know, you’re just… you’re just another name on their list that they get to cross off so that when it comes down to it, they can hand back and say, “Yep, look, I’ve filled my quota,” whether you get help or not. It’s, it’s… it’s demeaning. It’s… it’s frustrating.
LINTON BESSER: Today Kym is going into Max Employment for another meeting, hoping for a breakthrough.
But what is Max?
The agency is actually one arm of a giant multinational that is traded on the US stock market. Despite a controversial history in the welfare sector in America, it has come to dominate Australia’s jobs program.
In her meeting, Kym discovered the résumé Max sends out on her behalf was riddled with errors.
(to Kym Devlin) So what happened? Did you have to tell your story again?
KYM DEVLIN: Yeah. Update a résumé. My name was spelt wrong.
LINTON BESSER: Really?
KYM DEVLIN: Oh yeah. Um, there’s jobs in here that – wrong years. Some of them weren’t even added. It had my Grandma on there, which – she passed away last year – as a reference. So, a mess. My Business Admin and Business Cert II and III weren’t even on my résumé.
LINTON BESSER: So, sorry: the courses they helped put you through…
KYM DEVLIN: Yeah, they put me through…
LINTON BESSER: They hadn’t put on your résumé and…?
KYM DEVLIN: Nope. There was nothing on my résumé about them and that- I finished those last year.
LINTON BESSER: Is there any evidence at all that they have put you forward for jobs in that area?
KYM DEVLIN: Nope. Nope.
Oh, I’ve been trying to get them to transfer me…
LINTON BESSER: Kym doesn’t realise it but she has been “parked.”
In employment parlance, this is what happens to thousands of jobseekers when agencies put them in the “too-hard basket.”
BILL MITCHELL: They would take their first fee from the Government for taking them on and then they would quickly work out that it was going to be, cost them too much resources to get them skilled, so they’d just park them and forget about them.
RUPERT TAYLOR-PRICE: In the industry it’s called “parking”, where you get a jobseeker in, you don’t think there’s much prospects of getting them an outcome, so you essentially try and do the minimum amount of compliance activities that are required with them.
LINTON BESSER: So how many people are being parked and how many are getting real help?
Rupert Taylor-Price is in a unique position to answer these questions. As a software provider to many agencies, he has access to the vast volumes of data that flow between the Government and its contractors.
RUPERT TAYLOR-PRICE: I’d say probably about one in 10 people have sort of a significant interaction with the system that results in them… in a better chance of gaining employment. It’s a bit of luck, really. It’s if you get the right service provider at the right time, you get the right consultant.
Sometimes, ah, someone will feel very passionate about a jobseeker and put a lot of energy in, but naturally the contract doesn’t give the resource required in many cases to, to reform someone’s life back to employment.
LINTON BESSER: There may not be the money to reform the lives of the long-term unemployed, but maybe that’s not the point anyway.
If an unemployed person fails to attend a meeting at their agency or fulfil other obligations, their payments are suspended.
It’s what they call “breaching” and some argue that this is the scheme’s true purpose.
BILL MITCHELL: That’s been a scandal in Australian history: the breaching, where, where an unemployed person is fined. That is, they lose their income support if they don’t satisfy certain, ah, attendance rules and documentation rules and what- and, you know, record keeping and all of that.
There’s a whole industry of punishment and coercion and monitoring of the unemployed when there’s not enough jobs anyway.
LINTON BESSER: This is exactly what’s happened to Kym. But in her case, she says she’s been breached unfairly many times – including when her consultant failed to show up for their scheduled appointment.
KYM DEVLIN: Half the time, my payment gets cut off because they say I haven’t attended and get marked down as though I haven’t attended. And Centrelink will call through and see what’s happened and I’ll, I’ll tell them I’ve been there and it has just come down to a case of a few times that the secretary hasn’t handed in the sign-in sheet. You know, like they literally barely even notice you’re there.
LUKE HARTSUYKER, ASSISTANT MINISTER FOR EMPLOYMENT: We as a nation need to get more Australians into work…
LINTON BESSER: Four Corners requested an interview with the Minister who oversees the scheme, Luke Hartsuyker. He declined. But the public servant who ushered in the program 16 years ago, Peter Shergold, says that despite its flaws, he believes the program is working.
PETER SHERGOLD: I know many fine members of Job Services Australia who are working very hard to find people employment. But overall there is no doubt to me that it has been pretty effective at helping people get into work.
LINTON BESSER: Ninety minutes out of Sydney, we meet another jobseeker who went through Job Services Australia.
His employment agency was the for-profit company called ORS Group. It’s a Perth-based outfit with more than 60 offices around the country. Last year its turnover was $66 million.
LINTON BESSER: Can you list for me the number of job interviews that ORS organised for you in the time that you were there?
ADAM MATCHETT: Yeah, well I can list it: um, there was none. They didn’t give me one job interview.
LINTON BESSER: In 2010, Adam Matchett was a young carpenter living on the New South Wales central coast. But one night tragedy struck when he was hit by a car.
In a coma for 19 days, Adam was lucky to survive. But when he woke up, everything had changed.
ADAM MATCHETT: I had everything planned out. But that all of a sudden was just taken away in an instant. I was in hospital for around about three to four months. Then I was in a rehab centre for brain injuries. I was in there for about six months. And then after that I tried to go back to work as a carpenter, but couldn’t do that from the physical injuries.
I couldn’t do a lot of things. Holding a bit of timber up there for architraves or something, I couldn’t, I didn’t have enough strength to hold the gun up there, so I’d swap hands and hold the timber up there, but I didn’t have enough strength to hold the timber up there either.
LINTON BESSER: Adam was forced onto unemployment benefits. He had to rebuild his life and find a new career.
ADAM MATCHETT: It’s like, yeah, starting again from scratch. Well, I’d never been on Newstart or Centrelink or anything like that and it was sort of a bit depressing getting help for the first time. But I wanted to have a go and, um, I had no skills, so I needed help.
They sent me to this job a-agency, ORS, and I thought that was a great thing. I thought they were going to help me to get new skills and all that sort of stuff.
LINTON BESSER: But that didn’t happen.
After 10 months with ORS, Adam found himself a job at a wine bar called BPO.
Although ORS had not found him the position, it was still entitled to claim fees as a result of Adam’s success – but it had to obtain his signature to do so.
LINTON BESSER: When is the last time you think you ever signed any documents with ORS Group?
ADAM MATCHETT (sighs): Um… the last time… well, I know I spoke to them after I had a job but the last time I would’ve sat down with them and signed anything would’ve been before the date that I got the job because now that I had a job I didn’t have any reason to go in there.
LINTON BESSER: So can I show you this document? Have a look at that. That’s a form that’s dated six months after you started at BPO. Do you recognise that document?
ADAM MATCHETT: I remember filling out a form like this but I can’t say it was six months later.
The thing is: they’d send me these forms. I’d fill out the parts, like I’d put me name and BPO and my signature. They’d say, “Oh, don’t worry about the rest. We’ll do that.”
LINTON BESSER: So they were asking you to sign blank forms?
ADAM MATCHETT: Pretty much yes. Well, yeah, they were.
LINTON BESSER: The confusion in Adam’s paperwork is not an isolated case.
His form was among a suite of internal documents obtained by Four Corners that ORS has used to claim thousands of dollars from the taxpayer.
We tracked down some of those former ORS clients whose signatures appeared on the documents.
LINTON BESSER: So do you think you signed that?
MONICA KOPP: It doesn’t really look like me. Jesus, I don’t know, to be honest. I don’t think so.
LINTON BESSER: Is that your signature?
MONICA KOPP: I don’t think so.
LINTON BESSER (to Linda Edwards): Linda, have a look at that…
LINTON BESSER: In some cases, the job details appeared completely fabricated.
LINDA EDWARDS: It says, “I, Linda Edwards, confirm I commenced employment with…” and I don’t know who these, this…
LINTON BESSER: What does it say? It says…
LINDA EDWARDS: Samaritans Accommodation – is that what it says? I’ve never heard of Samaritans Accommodation, so I’m not really sure what that means.
AIMEE TESTER: Yeah, that’s not my writing.
LINTON BESSER: So do you think…
AIMEE TESTER: At all. Yeah, I don’t write like that. I don’t write in running writing. The dates are definitely wrong, ’cause I was working already. And the company name’s spelt wrong. Don’t even think that’s actually my signature, ’cause I don’t write it like that.
LINTON BESSER: Do you want to show me one? Here, why don’t you do a signature on here.
(Aimee writes her signature in a notebook)
LINTON BESSER: Wow. That’s completely different.
AIMEE TESTER: Yep. (laughs) Yeah.
LINTON BESSER: So they’ve forged your signature?
AIMEE TESTER: Yeah.
LINTON BESSER: So the whole thing is a complete forgery?
AIMEE TESTER: Yeah.
LINTON BESSER (to Arwen Norbury): Just have a look at that. Do you recognise that document?
ARWEN NORBURY (reads): Really! Really?
LINTON BESSER: What do you think’s happened there?
Arwen Norbury: I’m shocked, ’cause I didn’t fill this in. And you know what? That’s how I do my signature but that’s not even on the line. I cross over on the line so they’ve, they’ve Photoshopped that in.
And that is my signature, but it doesn’t hit the line and I can tell you for a fact that I write over the line, how my “A” goes, so they’ve, that’s fraud.
LINTON BESSER: Dozens of ORS claims have been examined by Four Corners and more than 70 per cent of them relied on suspect paperwork, with clients repeatedly disputing the company’s records.
Hours were bumped up, wages were inflated and, in several cases, the claim forms appear to have been forged.
Now a company whistleblower says such fraud is rampant and that ORS routinely lodges false claims worth millions of dollars.
We can’t reveal his identity and have replaced his voice.
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): I would say about 80 per cent of claims that came through had some sort of manipulation on them, from a forged signature with everything completely falsified to manipulation of a date or the hours worked.
LINTON BESSER: How many wage tables have you seen manipulated or that you know have been manipulated?
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): I couldn’t even give you a number. It’d be in the thousands.
LINTON BESSER: He says details are regularly whited out and altered; that signatures are cut and pasted from one form to the next. The photocopied documents are uploaded to the company’s server and the originals are destroyed.
LINTON BESSER: And to what extent does the management of the company know this is happening?
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): They know. It’s called the “grey area.”
LINTON BESSER: He says ORS promotes staff willing to do whatever it takes to earn fees for the company.
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): It seems to become normalised throughout the organisation, so when you have staff members that come – brand new staff members – it’s drilled into them from the very beginning, because they see everyone else doing it, that it is normal culture throughout ORS to white something out, to manipulate a document that a jobseeker has signed.
LINTON BESSER: He says he was driven to speak out after a particularly disturbing incident.
An older unemployed man had his Centrelink payments cut off and he was forced on to the street, all thanks to a false claim lodged by ORS.
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): He had to actually pay back money to the Government because he had supposedly worked when he actually hadn’t. The jobseeker subsequently couldn’t pay his rent so he became homeless. He actually came to our office with a trolley with as much belongings as he could fit in it, because he actually had nowhere else to go.
When he rocked up into the office it was gut-wrenching, because it was… it actually hit home that we had actually done that to a particular person.
LINTON BESSER: These stories should come as no surprise to the Federal Government. In 2008, another ORS whistleblower came forward with almost exactly the same story.
LINTON BESSER (to Brooke Purvis): So what shocked you the most about working at ORS?
BROOKE PURVIS, FMR ORS CONSULTANT: Um, the fact that we didn’t help the jobseeker; we tended to hinder them a lot more.
LINTON BESSER: Brooke Purvis was working for ORS on the NSW central coast and realised something was wrong when the company scrambled to prepare for a Government audit.
BROOKE PURVIS: You know, that I guess caused alarm bells for me. Um, there were things that should have been there: um, you know, claims that have been claimed, signatures that weren’t on them.
Um, and we were sort of told, you know, if the signature’s not on it, get it in any way that you can. It’s a little bit of an office joke: you know, you go away for the night and you come back and all your files are fat.
LINTON BESSER: And what does that mean?
BROOKE PURVIS: A fairy’s been in them and added whatever needs to go in to get through an audit.
LINTON BESSER: And the jobseekers didn’t put them on?
BROOKE PURVIS: Not unless they come in at night when no one’s there to see them.
LINTON BESSER: The Department of Employment decided not to investigate Brooke’s claims, citing a lack of evidence.
But three years later, ORS staff in Tasmania made similar allegations and, mid-way through last year, the Department conducted inspections of ORS offices around the country.
LINTON BESSER: What proportion of claims for fees made by ORS that you were aware of do you think were suspect in one way or another?
BROOKE PURVIS: I- With my caseload that I know, at least half. I don’t know how they’re still open. I really don’t.
LINTON BESSER: Periodically, ORS prepares for Government audits that check the validity of claims already made by the company.
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): An email is sent out once a month to all the managers highlighting “yes” if they’re correct and “no” if they’re not. And if they’re not correct, we need to get new evidence.
LINTON BESSER: Four Corners has obtained one such email from July 2013.
In it, an ORS manager reminds the company’s senior employees that they should not be claiming fees…
ORS MANAGER EMAIL (voiceover): Unless all evidence requirements are met.
LINTON BESSER: But then she asks:
ORS MANAGER EMAIL (voiceover): Could all sites that did not achieve 100 per cent please forward through the correct and updated documentary evidence. I will then review and upload… and remove the old evidence. Just to reiterate, I will delete the old evidence and upload the new.
LINTON BESSER: In a statement, ORS said it deleted information only when it was incorrect, extraneous or redundant.
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): Some of the times, the evidence has already been disposed of or has disappeared, so they just need to – they literally will just print off the one that they’ve got up on the internet, fill in the changes that they’ve recommended, whiting it out or manipulating it somehow and then upload it.
LINTON BESSER: And it looks perfect.
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): It does look perfect.
LINTON BESSER: It’s a falsehood.
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): Yeah.
LINTON BESSER: Jobseekers who have found work aren’t often interested in returning to their job agency to fill in forms.
So at ORS gift cards are used to entice them back.
BROOKE PURVIS: Gift vouchers were used as bait. So if we needed a client to do anything, you’d dangle the bait in front of them, which was a gift voucher, and say, “Well, look, if you could just come in, sign for your gift voucher and, you know, you’re on your way.” They just thought they were signing for their gift voucher but three-quarters of the time the paper they were signing was the evidence that we needed them to sign off on to say that they agreed that this had been undertaken.
ORS WHISTLEBLOWER (voiceover): The jobseekers: they’re in hardship. They’re going through a hard time. They haven’t got the financial resources to pay for fuel. A Coles Myer gift card can be beneficial for them. So when that is shown to them, they’re more focused on the gift card – the fuel that’s going to assist them with buying food or buying petrol and getting them to work – than that form they’re actually signing.
LINTON BESSER: Industry insiders say there are many loopholes in the program.
RUPERT TAYLOR-PRICE: I think one of the problems is that the Government assesses whether people are inside the confines of the contract, rather than whether they’ve gamed things successfully. When you optimise the contract within the rules in a way that isn’t necessarily best for the citizens, your performance is left intact. The Government will reward the provider that successfully gamed the system.
LINTON BESSER: A common practice is for agencies to push their clients into a category of greater disadvantage because it attracts a higher fee.
BROOKE PURVIS: You were kind of digging in their past to see if there was something that may come up that may help ORS get them re-classified. We were told to make sure that we re-classified as many people and sent them off for… for this, ’cause we’d get, ORS’d get paid for it. So they kind of double-dipped and, and that was a big pushing point. We had to push anyone that we thought that may have something that could get them re-classified.
LINTON BESSER: The biggest loophole is when agencies put jobseekers into training courses run by their own registered training organisations.
In just four years to 2013, these courses cost taxpayers almost $600 million. The unemployed are poured into them.
RUPERT TAYLOR-PRICE: It’s certainly prevalent that, um, people are put into, er, training, ah, that the jobseeker may not have necessarily found beneficial, um, but the provider will receive a payment from the Government for, for conducting.
(footage of Catherine O’Rourke conducting a jobseeker training class)
CATHERINE O’ROURKE: So what we’re looking at this morning is customer service. When we’re dealing with, um, jobseekers…
LINTON BESSER: Catherine O’Rourke used to be the national training manager for Max Employment. It too has its own training arm.
CATHERINE O’ROURKE: Communication is…
(footage ends)
LINTON BESSER (to Catherine O’Rourke): Were job seekers being funnelled into at times irrelevant training so that Max’s registered training organisation arm could gain a fee?
CATHERINE O’ROURKE: It was within the best interests of, of Max to place the maximum amount of people in there, so they would, um, then get the, the funding placement dollars. Um, and then as I said it would be backfilled in other areas. But the main objective was to get as many of our Max clients into the different courses as needed to. Yeah.
LINTON BESSER: Because then Max Employment could, they could cop a fee two times, couldn’t they?
CATHERINE O’ROURKE: Yep.
LINTON BESSER: In 2009, Government investigators were alerted to an obvious training scam at one of Max Employment’s offices in Sydney.
Four Corners has obtained a copy of their confidential case report. They discovered Max was enrolling vastly more people into training programs than was physically possible.
One hundred and forty-one jobseekers were receiving training onsite at Max Employment in a training room that could fit only 15 jobseekers at a time.
But the investigation went nowhere because a senior department official told Max they could go ahead and claim fees for the students anyway.
DEWR CASE ASSESSMENT REPORT (voiceover): I did specifically advise them that they could claim for… commencements even though there was no prospect of the client completing (or in the case of very late June, perhaps even commencing) the training.
CATHERINE O’ROURKE: And then the, you know, employment service officer would’ve gone back and said, “Yes, they’ve attended.” How long they attended for: might be two minutes, might be two hours, might be, you know, never. But they would’ve had evidence of some sort of signature and an acknowledgement to say that they would’ve been there.
LINTON BESSER: Is it real training?
CATHERINE O’ROURKE: No!
LINTON BESSER: So it’s become big business in a way?
BROOKE PURVIS: Big business. It’s not about the jobseeker; it’s about the employment networks. Look how big they’ve got…
LINTON BESSER: Poor quality training has long plagued Job Services Australia.
BROOKE PURVIS: It just looks like a graveyard of employment places.
LINTON BESSER: Brooke Purvis says the taxpayer money funnelled into training at ORS Group should have been spent elsewhere.
BROOKE PURVIS: Attendance was shocking. People didn’t want to come. It could have been spent a lot better i-in a lot of other ways. It would have been exceptional to have that funding available, um, you know, to get them a driver’s licence which would give them a bigger chance of employment than it would sitting in a classroom, swinging around off a chair.
LINTON BESSER: If it would have helped to spend that money on driver’s licences, why was it not?
BROOKE PURVIS: ‘Cause ORS don’t own a driving school.
LINTON BESSER: Another way the system is exploited is through the use of wage subsidies, where the Government pays companies to take on the unemployed. It’s an effective tool, because employers are suddenly offered cheap labour.
But the problem is this: when a person’s subsidy expires, they can be simply replaced. And so the cycle begins again.
CATHERINE O’ROURKE: And they will well and truly shaft that person and say, “Well, you know, see you later” and, and then apply for the next person. So they can do that because, you know, it’s, it’s a trial period. And that’s why the milestone is 12, you know, or 26 weeks.
LINTON BESSER: And they’ll, as in your words, “shaft that person” because the next person has a wage subsidy?
CATHERINE O’ROURKE: Correct. Correct. But, you know, to, to, pump them in and pump them out: it was, it was just so sad when you’d have them on a high and all of a sudden it’s: “Sorry, we haven’t got the hours anymore.” And, and, you know, that- it would be like popping a balloon and be deflating them. And tha- and that was really sad.
TONY ABBOTT, EMPLOYMENT MINISTER (December 1998): Mr Speaker, the second criticism…
LINTON BESSER: But it’s not only the for-profit agencies pushing the envelope.
TONY ABBOTT: The organisations which provide the heart of the Job Network – organisations like Mission Employment, the Salvation Army, Centacare and the Brotherhood of St Laurence – are completely dedicated to the welfare of the unemployed. And the idea that those organisations would rip anyone off is simply wrong.
LINTON BESSER: It was a bold assertion, but a questionable one.
Some of the country’s most venerated charities have also gamed the system. The Salvation Army and the Catholic Church are among the not-for-profits that have had to repay millions of dollars for making false claims.
LINTON BESSER (to Peter Sandeman): Peter, how widespread is the understanding in the charity sector that this contract – the Job Services Australia contract – is heavily gamed with misleading or false claims for fees?
PETER SANDEMAN: I was around for Job Network one, two and three in Mission Australia. And certainly at that stage there were a number of perverse incentives available to organisations who could then, er, make quite, quite large and substantial surpluses from, from the Network.
LINTON BESSER: In 2005 a major Government investigation targeted the Salvation Army in Victoria. During a taped interview, a staff member made admissions of:
DEWR REPORT (voiceover): Unethical and criminal behaviour relating to fraudulently upgrading jobseekers to the highly disadvantaged classification, thereby increasing payments and bonuses for staff.
LINTON BESSER: The charity had to repay $9 million but the Government would not say whether anyone was ever prosecuted.
This is despite investigators concluding that:
DEWR REPORT (voiceover): Criminal offences, including falsifying documents and forgery, have been committed by Salvation Army Employment Plus recruitment consultants.
LINTON BESSER: Peter Sandeman has refused to involve Anglicare SA in the jobs program.
PETER SANDEMAN: Well, it’s really a matter of whether you’re going to support the families and the individuals, er, in their aspiration and, er, developing them, as opposed to being, er, the person who decides that they should have their unemployment benefit cut off.
So on the one hand you’re trying to be their friend and supporter; on the other hand you’re an agent of the State. You’re the, you’re the cop on the beat. And the two roles are, are very incompatible.
DAVID THOMPSON: The department constantly claims that they, they think they are still getting better, better results.
LINTON BESSER: For David Thompson, who runs the peak body for non-profit agencies, Jobs Australia, it’s a familiar dilemma.
DAVID THOMPSON: And you get this dreadful irony that can happen, in theory at least, where a major charity operating an employment service will, ah, breach someone, um, for failure to do something and then send them round the corner to get some emergency relief from another part of the same agency.
LINTON BESSER: Sandeman says charities are being forced to behave increasingly like commercial operators in a race for Government contracts.
PETER SANDEMAN: The entrance of for-profit organisations into some of the traditional welfare sector is a spectre that’s been looming over Australia for some time.
And if you look at the international experience, often it means that the welfare agencies who operate for no profit – we plough our resources back into our services – are supplanted by large, er, international organisations who have a very strong profit motive.
LINTON BESSER: After the Catholic Church’s employment arm was exposed rorting the contract in 2011, the Government instituted an industry-wide inquiry.
It examined the extent to which one particular job placement fee was being abused.
DAVID THOMPSON: That audit identified a large number of cases where providers had inappropriately claimed a higher outcome fee.
RUPERT TAYLOR-PRICE: There’s been some reports with up to an 80 per cent failure rate, ah, but, but that includes the soft fraud which is where people are including, er, administrative mistakes.
LINTON BESSER: The inquiry examined only one type of fee and just six months’ worth of claims, but it still clawed back more than $6 million.
But the extent of the rorts did not surprise this man.
Ian Whitchurch used to be a departmental auditor. Way back in 1999, he warned the Government that fraud was rife.
IAN WHITCHURCH, FMR AUDITOR, DEPT. OF EMPLOYMENT: We found that about a third of Job Network job-matching claims in that period, in fact the Job Network member had had no involvement in getting the person a job, something which they’d claimed money off the Commonwealth for. Probably about 50,000 of the Job Network job-matching claims in the first year were probably rorted.
LINTON BESSER: Whitchurch prepared a scathing report about his concerns for Peter Shergold, then the head of the Department.
PETER SHERGOLD: I can’t remember that report but I certainly can remem- There were two sep- there are two separate issues. There were… There was, I think, a provider – one provider I can think of – who, in your language, I would say was rorting the system. There’s a difference, if you will, between gaming a contract and rorting. Rorting is taking funds for a false outcome which hasn’t been achieved. I’ve seen truly minimal evidence o-of that.
NEIL ANDREW, LOWER HOUSE SPEAKER (June 2001): The Minister for Employment Services.
LINTON BESSER: Just two years after Whitchurch’s report, another major company, Leonie Green & Associates, was accused of shovelling thousands of people into phony jobs.
When the scandal erupted, the Government moved to defend the system.
MAL BROUGH, EMPLOYMENT SERVICES MINISTER (June 2001): This Department, this Government, does not accepting placing anyone into phony jobs, phantom jobs or whatever you care to mention. The fact is we have no problems with Job Network companies utilising the services of, ah, labour hire companies as long as those jobs are real.
LINTON BESSER: An inquiry found no evidence of fraud by Leonie Green & Associates, but they were forced to repay $70,000.
Fifteen years after first voicing his concerns, and despite repeated changes to the jobs program, Whitchurch says it remains vulnerable.
IAN WHITCHURCH: I’m reading the latest Job Network contract and I’m seeing so much material in it that we identified back in 1998, 1999, as these rorts are legal under the contract. And they are still legal under the contract.
So I would ask any secretary of the Department of Employment: have you looked at how the system can be rorted? And have you attempted to prevent those rorts? Because we keep seeing the same problems.
BROOKE PURVIS: There are plenty of things, I think, you know, that really should be brought to attention. You know, the jobseeker’s meant to be getting the help but it, it was more so, um, they, they didn’t get the help that they needed. It was: we got the help that we needed to give them to get our company further ahead.
DAVID THOMPSON: We need to foster and develop a culture that says that kind, any kind of behaviour that’s untoward, that’s pushing the envelope or the boundaries, will not be acceptable. Not on the part of the Government and not on a, on the part of the people like me and not on the part of the taxpayer either.
LINTON BESSER: Four Corners wanted to put these allegations of fraud and rorting to the Minister, Luke Hartsuyker, Max Employment, ORS Group, the Salvation Army and the Catholic Church. But all of them refused to give an interview.
ORS told Four Corners it had a relatively low rate of errors and it was not familiar with allegations of doctored records but would be concerned if they were correct.
In the latest iteration of the jobs program, which begins in July, the Government has made some changes. But these changes don’t address the fundamental economic dilemma at the heart of the program: there are too many people and not enough jobs.
And they cut away some of the red tape that providers say is a major problem.
DAVID THOMPSON: There were nearly 3,000 A4 pages of guidelines, rules, contracts, et cetera, and 146 different types of outcomes. And a system that was so extraordinarily complex and focussed on accounting for all of these micro-transactions that it was getting in the way of, um, its real job, which was helping, ah, people to get really good job outcomes.
RUPERT TAYLOR-PRICE: The Government has essentially been removing audit requirements rather than increasing them, even though they know that this is going on.
LINTON BESSER: And why is that a problem?
RUPERT TAYLOR-PRICE: ‘Cause in, in a free market, red tape, er, is generally a bad thing. This isn’t a free market. This is a Government contract. Red tape in this industry is regulation and it’s making sure that public funds are accounted for.
DAVID THOMPSON: The longer somebody remains unemployed, the more damaged and scarred and disadvantaged they become. And the prospects of their getting back to work get smaller and smaller and smaller.
If we can sort of spread that around a bit, so that we’ve got people that are more likely to take jobs when things turn better, th-then we will have created, ah, a set of circumstances that’s better for them and better for the country en-entirely.
The alternative would be to say, “Well, we can’t do anything for those people. We’ll just let them rot.” And I don’t think that’s much of an option either.
LINTON BESSER: Back in Adelaide, Kym and eight-year-old Mia have recently become homeless. They stay with friends or, when they can, family.
KYM DEVLIN: Just… I’ve been through a lot in my life and Max Employment may not seem like a big thing to miss appointments or have your consultant not show up, but when you’ve survived what I have and… Things like that, little tiny things are, are huge. It’s a little, tiny weight that’s there, ends up being the world.
(Mia and Kym are colouring an illustration)
MIA: I can do it.
KYM DEVLIN: Yeah, shade. Just do it lightly.
KYM DEVLIN: God, I hope she never has to go on Centrelink. This is why I’m trying to get out there and get a job. I’m trying to better her chances and, and bring her up as in seeing me work and, and the rewards from working.
It’s hard enough living as it is. It’s hard enough getting up, even waking up in the morning and getting out of bed. It’s, it’s… It’s not easy but I have a daughter, so I have to. I can’t imagine what it’s like for people that don’t have kids that have to do this, because that’s the only thing that keeps me going. That’s the only thing that makes me think, “Well, no. I have to get up today. I have to face today.”
KERRY O’BRIEN: So how many people who genuinely want and desperately need a job is the Government really helping to face the day and get a real one?
There are statements on our website from the Minister, Luke Hartsuyker, Max Employment, the Salvation Army and the Catholic Church.
Before we go, a brief update on last week’s story of scandal in the greyhound industry: there are official enquiries being conducted in Queensland, NSW and Victoria and we understand more than 30 greyhound trainers down the east coast have now been suspended with the prospect of more to come.
Next week: the mighty Apple is the most valued brand on the planet but how does it treat its workers? A special undercover investigation.
Until then, good night.
http://newapproachuk.org/2015/03/02/maximus-in-australia-fraud-forgery-abuse/
There you go, brought you up to date of something happening in Australia lol
Guest- Guest
Re: Sell, Sell, Sell! Maximus Share Prices Could Tumble After Welfare To Work Scandal Rocks Australia
by Guest Mon Mar 02, 2015 6:48 pm
Who said there weren't other things? This happens to be just one of many scandals involving the Right Wing all over the world.
Guest- Guest
Re: Sell, Sell, Sell! Maximus Share Prices Could Tumble After Welfare To Work Scandal Rocks Australia
by veya_victaous Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:22 pm
yeah no one here actually cares about this issue there are so many bigger ones At the Moment.. that are affecting more people like the privatisation of everything and selling out our national interests. Basically the gov't is actively trying to screw everyone in the middle and lower classes and giving it all away to a few super rich. we can literally see Billions given to a handful of individuals under Abbott and everyone else suffering and being told we have to have less.
AND To be fair there is a lot of people that could should be working that aren't it is not like the UK where we had a recession Unemployment now is the highest in 25 years at 6.4%
So there are a lot of dole bludgers I know several of them that could and should be working it is only that they have made themselves unemployable because they don't want to work (or have completely unrealistic expectations) .. they may be my friends but they deserve to have nothing as they have never done anything to earn anything and squander what they have been given...
There are people that have worked there whole lives that have Only the slightest bit more AND that is a much bigger problem than individuals that are nothing but a burden on society.
AND To be fair there is a lot of people that could should be working that aren't it is not like the UK where we had a recession Unemployment now is the highest in 25 years at 6.4%
So there are a lot of dole bludgers I know several of them that could and should be working it is only that they have made themselves unemployable because they don't want to work (or have completely unrealistic expectations) .. they may be my friends but they deserve to have nothing as they have never done anything to earn anything and squander what they have been given...
There are people that have worked there whole lives that have Only the slightest bit more AND that is a much bigger problem than individuals that are nothing but a burden on society.
veya_victaous- The Mod Loki, Minister of Chaos & Candy, Emperor of the Southern Realms, Captain Kangaroo
- Posts : 19114
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 41
Location : Australia
Re: Sell, Sell, Sell! Maximus Share Prices Could Tumble After Welfare To Work Scandal Rocks Australia
by Sponsored content
Sponsored content
Similar topics» Welfare reform and work bill: "I would swim through vomit"
» 'Sell alcohol and pork or we will shut you down': Halal supermarket in Paris is ordered to sell 'French groceries' or face closure
» THE Grand Mufti of Australia and Islamic leaders have united to reject the fatwa issued against Australia
» New Health and Work Service to get long-term sick back to work
» Markets Tumble As Ukraine Tensions Escalate
» 'Sell alcohol and pork or we will shut you down': Halal supermarket in Paris is ordered to sell 'French groceries' or face closure
» THE Grand Mufti of Australia and Islamic leaders have united to reject the fatwa issued against Australia
» New Health and Work Service to get long-term sick back to work
» Markets Tumble As Ukraine Tensions Escalate
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
» TOTAL MADNESS Great British Railway Journeys among shows flagged by counter terror scheme ‘for encouraging far-right sympathies
» Interesting COVID figures
» HAPPY CHRISTMAS.
» The Fight Over Climate Change is Over (The Greenies Won!)
» Trump supporter murders wife, kills family dog, shoots daughter
» Quill
» Algerian Woman under investigation for torture and murder of French girl, 12, whose body was found in plastic case in Paris
» Wind turbines cool down the Earth (edited with better video link)
» Saying goodbye to our Queen.
» PHEW.
» And here's some more enrichment...
» John F Kennedy Assassination
» Where is everyone lately...?
» London violence over the weekend...
» Why should anyone believe anything that Mo Farah says...!?
» Liverpool Labour defends mayor role poll after turnout was only 3% and they say they will push ahead with the option that was least preferred!!!
» Labour leader Keir Stammer can't answer the simple question of whether a woman has a penis or not...
» More evidence of remoaners still trying to overturn Brexit... and this is a conservative MP who should be drummed out of the party and out of parliament!
» R Kelly 30 years, Ghislaine Maxwell 20 years... but here in UK...