Loser Trump trying to sue his way out losing

In the latest slate of ego-serving lawsuits filed by loser Donald J. Trump, the liar is suing to keep the people of the United States from having a legal say in the matter of whether he remains in charge of the most powerful nation on Earth.

Trump, perhaps the most lawsuit-happy American in world history, has decided to use the power of the courts to undermine the democratic process of the one nation that has made its mission in trying to persuade the oppressive dictatorships of the world of the merits of self-rule.

Trump has been nothing but a bore and a boor. He's a poison to the world. Or he would have been, if he wasn't such a losing piece of shit.

He has nothing to offer, nothing to show anyone. He is nothing but a self-obsessed boy.

I have seen a news report from Michigan where it was said that 75% of republican vote counting watchers/monitors were prevented from entering the building and being present while counting was taking place, and that there was a large number of irregularities taking place there regarding authenticity of numerous votes...

Trump learned from his first lawyer, Roy Cohn, that you don't need to win, or even go to trial, just file a lawsuit and see what shit sticks to the wall. Then prolong and delay, until something good happens.

Tommy Monk wrote:


I have seen a news report from Michigan where it was said that 75% of republican vote counting watchers/monitors were prevented from entering the building and being present while counting was taking place, and that there was a large number of irregularities taking place there regarding authenticity of numerous votes...

Ah, conspiracies. First port of all call for defeated RWers

Tommy Monk wrote:


I have seen a news report from Michigan where it was said that 75% of republican vote counting watchers/monitors were prevented from entering the building and being present while counting was taking place, and that there was a large number of irregularities taking place there regarding authenticity of numerous votes...

Suck it up! We lefties are done playing nice, we're all about power now, no matter what it takes!

Ben Reilly wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:


I have seen a news report from Michigan where it was said that 75% of republican vote counting watchers/monitors were prevented from entering the building and being present while counting was taking place, and that there was a large number of irregularities taking place there regarding authenticity of numerous votes...

Suck it up! We lefties are done playing nice, we're all about power now, no matter what it takes!

That's not really a new concept comrade.

Eilzel wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:


I have seen a news report from Michigan where it was said that 75% of republican vote counting watchers/monitors were prevented from entering the building and being present while counting was taking place, and that there was a large number of irregularities taking place there regarding authenticity of numerous votes...

Ah, conspiracies. First port of all call for defeated RWers

That's the problem with very tight races with millions of mail in ballots. There will be some irregularities and likely some fraud. Enough to make a difference? Who knows? Enough to cast some doubt? Yup.

There are posters on this forum that have never accepted the first count in Florids in 2000, or any subsequent count. And they may have a point.

Maybe we should spend the next month recounting votes in about a half dozen states?

The report I saw was by a BBC reporter who was inside the Michigan counting building .. she was asking a guy what was going on outside and he said that the republican count monitors were being denied access to the count and were being kept locked outside...


He also said it was clear that there were many irregularities going on which looked like widespread vote rigging...


One example he gave was a postal vote where the mans age was well over 100 but his voting registration date indicated he was 21...


Les is crying "RW conspiracy" and Ben thinks cheating and vote rigging is acceptable if it is his preferred candidates doing it...


Interesting...

This is making the rounds this morning.

Tommy Monk wrote:

The report I saw was by a BBC reporter who was inside the Michigan counting building .. she was asking a guy what was going on outside and he said that the republican count monitors were being denied access to the count and were being kept locked outside...


He also said it was clear that there were many irregularities going on which looked like widespread vote rigging...


One example he gave was a postal vote where the mans age was well over 100 but his voting registration date indicated he was 21...


Les is crying "RW conspiracy" and Ben thinks cheating and vote rigging is acceptable if it is his preferred candidates doing it...


Interesting...

I know fraud has happened in the past, and when it does it involves the mail in ballots. I know that one party is a huge fan of mail in ballots.

Did fraud tip this election? Beats me.

I do know that it's always very Democratic urban counties that have the hardest time counting ballots quickly and accurately. That's the way it was in Florida in 2000. All of the recounting was done in 3 counties because they had made such a mess of things.

Tommy Monk wrote:

The report I saw was by a BBC reporter who was inside the Michigan counting building .. she was asking a guy what was going on outside and he said that the republican count monitors were being denied access to the count and were being kept locked outside...


He also said it was clear that there were many irregularities going on which looked like widespread vote rigging...


One example he gave was a postal vote where the mans age was well over 100 but his voting registration date indicated he was 21...


Les is crying "RW conspiracy" and Ben thinks cheating and vote rigging is acceptable if it is his preferred candidates doing it...


Interesting...

(He was a Trump-supporting liar as well.)

Maddog wrote:


This is making the rounds this morning.

Pretty much sums it up...

That's what happens when you count the votes!

Ben Reilly wrote:That's what happens when you count the votes!

We need to keep counting for at least a month to be really sure dont we?

Tommy Monk wrote:The report I saw was by a BBC reporter who was inside the Michigan counting building .. she was asking a guy what was going on outside and he said that the republican count monitors were being denied access to the count and were being kept locked outside...

He also said it was clear that there were many irregularities going on which looked like widespread vote rigging...

One example he gave was a postal vote where the mans age was well over 100 but his voting registration date indicated he was 21...

Les is crying "RW conspiracy" and Ben thinks cheating and vote rigging is acceptable if it is his preferred candidates doing it...

Interesting...

Actually, RW'ers are the ones with the conspiracy theories. That Republican monitor-guy was outside catching a smoke, and saw a good opportunity to fook-up a foreign reporter's mind.

No... He was inside where the counting was going on...

Tommy Monk wrote:No... He was inside where the counting was going on...

But the rest is true, innit?

Well... It was the BBC reporter who was asking about something that was allegedly going on outside the main doors of the building... as it was said that there was a bit of noise going on from some people there... And the guy explained that a large number of republican vote monitors were being denied entry to watch the counting and they were quite unhappy about it...


I'm sure there must be plenty of witness accounts/proof and video/camera footage etc if this is true...

Sounds like one of them RW conspiracy blokes. Was he wearing a t-shirt that said Q-anon on the back?

So... It's ok for democrats to bang on about Trump fixing last election and "Russian collision" for 4 years, and for them to try every trick on the book to bring trump down, unsuccessfully of course because it was all made up bullshit...


But a legitimate concern about vote monitors being denied access to actually watch the counting is raised... And you dismiss it offhandedly and claim it is all "RW conspiracy"...!?


If you tests didn't have double standards... You wouldn't have any standards at all...

Tommy Monk wrote:So... It's ok for democrats to bang on about Trump fixing last election and "Russian collision" for 4 years, and for them to try every trick on the book to bring trump down, unsuccessfully of course because it was all made up bullshit...

But a legitimate concern about vote monitors being denied access to actually watch the counting is raised... And you dismiss it offhandedly and claim it is all "RW conspiracy"...!?

If you tests didn't have double standards... You wouldn't have any standards at all...

Toms, truth has something to do with it. The FBI had been watching Trump financial dealings with Russia long before the 2016 election. Trump was in financial trouble, and the FBI knew the Russians were trying to leverage that.

That investigation got caught up in the election campaigns when Trump decided to run for office, perhaps deliberately to duck the scrutiny. That was Trump's doing, not the Democrats or the FBI. He put himself on the tracks, and the train just happened to be coming. See, Harding, Luke, Collusion: Secret Meetings, Dirty Money, and How Russia Helped Donald Trump Win (2017).

It sounds like your election-monitor guy was just some RW freak (perhaps we saw him at Charlottesville) who decided to call himself a poll-watcher, and the cops wouldn't let him in because he didn't have the credentials...or, more likely, because he was carrying an AR-15 and guns are not allowed in polling places…donno. Simply put: I don’t believe his bullshite.

Just to expand a bit on something Quill said, these elections are conducted and tallied under the watch of official election monitors who are appointed by the Republicans and the Democrats.

It does seem that some Trump supporters are under the mistaken notion that anybody can stroll into a polling place and appoint him or herself an election monitor. Obviously, that isn't the case.

Extreme ignorance about a system can naturally lead to extreme distrust in a system.