Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

by Andy Tue Feb 25, 2014 6:32 pm

m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26337845

The editor of the most lying, sleazy and downright corrupt rag didn't realise hacking was wrong or illegal.
Perhaps she didn't realise that getting inseminated by Andy Coulson was not nice for her husband either.

by Fred Bloggs Tue Feb 25, 2014 6:34 pm

I wonder if The Daily Mirror thought the same.

Of course you won't be calling them.

by Andy Tue Feb 25, 2014 7:07 pm

Seig Heil, FB.

by Fred Bloggs Tue Feb 25, 2014 7:29 pm

Well is that it HA. Up the Motherland! Lets send another million to the Gulags.

Or wecould talk about your thread. I take it The Sun was wrong The Mirror was??? Fill the gap. It's easy there are only two possible answers.

by scrat Tue Feb 25, 2014 7:37 pm

The "slapper" does appear to be laying it on a tad too thick, but she's rather good at that, so credit where credit is due.

I like redheads, but you do get the impression that this particular gin-ger has seen more helmets than Hitler!

by Fred Bloggs Tue Feb 25, 2014 7:39 pm

scrat wrote:The "slapper" does appear to be laying it on a tad too thick, but she's rather good at that, so credit where credit is due.

I like redheads, but you do get the impression that this particular gin-ger has seen more helmets than Hitler!

Or indeed Stalin but back to the point.

by scrat Tue Feb 25, 2014 7:44 pm

Fred Bloggs wrote:
scrat wrote:The "slapper" does appear to be laying it on a tad too thick, but she's rather good at that, so credit where credit is due.

I like redheads, but you do get the impression that this particular gin-ger has seen more helmets than Hitler!

Or indeed Stalin but back to the point.

Hi Fred, someone elsewhere is complaining almost to the point of hysteria that you're really Drinky and that you have access to the Fred Bloggs ID, perhaps you're unaware of this?

by Andy Tue Feb 25, 2014 8:13 pm

Shirley Fred Bloggs isn't yet another of Deans legionnaires sent over here to spin th rw mantra?
And he tried to answer the question with another question.
Typical rw deflection.
Fred, did an editor of Brooks experience , and surrounded by corrupt henchmen, many of whom were to go to prison, really not know that hacking was illegal?
It is beyond credibility that she did not know.
She ordered them to hack, and she paid them I brown envelopes.
Then she tried to erase all records, unsuccessfully.

by Fred Bloggs Tue Feb 25, 2014 9:13 pm

scrat wrote:
Fred Bloggs wrote:

Or indeed Stalin but back to the point.
Hi Fred, someone elsewhere is complaining almost to the point of hysteria that you're really Drinky and that you have access to the Fred Bloggs ID, perhaps you're unaware of this?

I'm not but thanks. Where is this?

by Fred Bloggs Tue Feb 25, 2014 9:14 pm

The Mirrors leadership did more or less the same journalist are much the same each side.

by Andy Tue Feb 25, 2014 9:31 pm

Try to answer the question, it isn't a difficult one.
Is it possible for the editor of a modern day red top not to realise that phone hacking is illegal.
It is irrelevant really anyway as ignorance of the law isno defence.
She KNEW hacking went on during her watch, it stretches incredulity that she didn't know it was wrong.
Coulson the cnut would have told her whilst he was porking her.

by Andy Tue Feb 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Fred, whatever Mirror journos have or haven't done is irrelevent to this thread, they aren't in the dock at present.
No doubt if that happens the rw press will be all over them like a rash.
Then and only then will there be questions to answer,
The question is, does ANYONE in the UK, especially the jury, have a honestly held belief that the Bitch Brooks hadn't a clue that her journos hacked, and that hacking was illegal.

by Irn Bru Tue Feb 25, 2014 9:46 pm

I wonder of any pillow talk took place between the love cheats Brooks and Coulson and if any of that took place whilst Coulson was in No. 10.
And there was poor Dave showering her with LOLs whilst Coulson was poking her

LOL

by Andy Tue Feb 25, 2014 9:50 pm

It certainly paints a lurid and ugly web between Brooks , Coulson and Dave.
Perhaps Dave was slipping her one as well.
After all, he admitted "we are all in her together"!

by Irn Bru Tue Feb 25, 2014 9:53 pm

Handy Andy wrote:It certainly paints a lurid and ugly web between Brooks , Coulson and Dave.
Perhaps Dave was slipping her one as well.
After all, he admitted "we are all in her together"!

I really shoudn't Andy but

LOL

by Fred Bloggs Tue Feb 25, 2014 10:48 pm

Better perhaps than slipping it into kids as senior Labour party officials seem to think was a good thing to support.

by Irn Bru Tue Feb 25, 2014 11:18 pm

Fred Bloggs wrote:Better perhaps than slipping it into kids as senior Labour party officials seem to think was a good thing to support.

You better read this Fred.

Paedo brothel advertised in Tory leaflet: Party's gay link to guest house

Seems the Tories were up to their necks in it.

by Raggamuffin Tue Feb 25, 2014 11:20 pm

Very sexist thread this. As far as I know, she's not a prostitute, and calling her a "whore" is quite offensive to women.

by Fred Bloggs Tue Feb 25, 2014 11:24 pm

Irn Bru wrote:
Fred Bloggs wrote:Better perhaps than slipping it into kids as senior Labour party officials seem to think was a good thing to support.

You better read this Fred.

Paedo brothel advertised in Tory leaflet: Party's gay link to guest house

Seems the Tories were up to their necks in it.

Are they as high up as Harman?

Somehow I think and it's only my humble opinion of course, that Harman will have significantly more impact than that leaflet. I may be wrong but hey let's wait and see.

I had my money on Labour winning. Now Cameron has said he will not work with the liberals again and this little scandal I'm changing my view big style.

by Guest Tue Feb 25, 2014 11:38 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:Very sexist thread this. As far as I know, she's not a prostitute, and calling her a "whore" is quite offensive to women.

Why don't you point it out to admin, indeed you are very right.

by Irn Bru Tue Feb 25, 2014 11:44 pm

Fred Bloggs wrote:
Irn Bru wrote:
Fred Bloggs wrote:Better perhaps than slipping it into kids as senior Labour party officials seem to think was a good thing to support.

You better read this Fred.

Paedo brothel advertised in Tory leaflet: Party's gay link to guest house

Seems the Tories were up to their necks in it.

Are they as high up as Harman?

Somehow I think and it's only my humble opinion of course, that Harman will have significantly more impact than that leaflet. I may be wrong but hey let's wait and see.

I had my money on Labour winning. Now Cameron has said he will not work with the liberals again and this little scandal I'm changing my view big style.

It's only seniority that you are interested in then and not the fact that this group have been up their necks in child abuse.

Even worse is that you see this as nothing more than something that can be used as a weapon to try and get a win at the next general election. So much for the victims then.

I thought that all along and now you have just confirmed it.

Well done Fred.

by Guest Tue Feb 25, 2014 11:46 pm

Fred Bloggs wrote:
Irn Bru wrote:

You better read this Fred.

Paedo brothel advertised in Tory leaflet: Party's gay link to guest house

Seems the Tories were up to their necks in it.

Are they as high up as Harman?

Somehow I think and it's only my humble opinion of course, that Harman will have significantly more impact than that leaflet. I may be wrong but hey let's wait and see.

I had my money on Labour winning. Now Cameron has said he will not work with the liberals again and this little scandal I'm changing my view big style.

Minority governments rarely work, and are brought down in the end.

Minority governments lead to unstable governments, not that much legislation is ever brought through.....

I could try to expand on that, but i couldn't remember the next part, that i wrote, which contributed to my politics O level......It's been so many years!

...Or perhaps, i just can't be bothered to expand tonight, as i've got more important things to think about, and i can't be arsed! Razz

by Fred Bloggs Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:11 am

Irn Bru wrote:
Fred Bloggs wrote:

Are they as high up as Harman?

Somehow I think and it's only my humble opinion of course, that Harman will have significantly more impact than that leaflet. I may be wrong but hey let's wait and see.

I had my money on Labour winning. Now Cameron has said he will not work with the liberals again and this little scandal I'm changing my view big style.

It's only seniority that you are interested in then and not the fact that this group have been up their necks in child abuse.

Even worse is that you see this as nothing more than something that can be used as a weapon to try and get a win at the next general election. So much for the victims then.

I thought that all along and now you have just confirmed it.

Well done Fred.

No I said wait for the evidence that was simple enough. We already have it with Ms Holier than thou PC.

That isn't the same.

by Guest Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:18 am

That woman just oozes "I'm a clunt".

by Andy Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:00 am

BigAndy9 wrote:That woman just oozes "I'm a clunt".

For once Andy, totally agree. Vile bitch.

by Beekeeper Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:38 am

Fred Bloggs wrote:
Well is that it HA. Up the Motherland! Lets send another million to the Gulags.

Or we could talk about your thread. I take it The Sun was wrong The Mirror was??? Fill the gap. It's easy there are only two possible answers.

HEY THERE FreddyKrüger/Drinky/the 50kg cowardly lying maggot...

I heard that there's a lonely rock in the bottom corner of your wife's back garden that's desperately missing it's resident idiot..
::rfth::

by Guest Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:42 am

Beekeeper wrote:
Fred Bloggs wrote:
Well is that it HA. Up the Motherland! Lets send another million to the Gulags.

Or we could talk about your thread. I take it The Sun was wrong The Mirror was??? Fill the gap. It's easy there are only two possible answers.

HEY THERE FreddyKrüger/Drinky/the 50kg cowardly lying maggot...

I heard that there's a lonely rock in the bottom corner of your wife's back garden that's desperately missing it's resident idiot..
::rfth::

Beekeeper, please stop making such posts.

by Fred Bloggs Wed Feb 26, 2014 6:25 pm

BigAndy9 wrote:
Beekeeper wrote:

HEY THERE FreddyKrüger/Drinky/the 50kg cowardly lying maggot...

I heard that there's a lonely rock in the bottom corner of your wife's back garden that's desperately missing it's resident idiot..
::rfth::

Beekeeper, please stop making such posts.

Is he a congenital idiot?

by Sponsored content

Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.

Re: Rebekkah Brooks - the lying whore.