Universally Preferable Behaviour - One For Quill, Lord Foul, Veya, Eizel

veya_victaous wrote:I'm watching the video (it better be good... 20 mins )

and
 
LOL Pehaviour !!!!!!
You obviously copy and paste   (nothing wrong with that, unless you copy and paste a mistake )

veya_victaous wrote:Ok I didn't watch it all, I disagree with the concept of UPB .. i don't think it exists ..

for example to use their example
If you want to live you should eat ..... not if you're a plant or cybernetic being (which may not yet exists but it's still true ) ....  fucking plebs

UBP in relation to one species of erratic Hominid? seems a bit conceited in my opinion

Eilzel wrote:With you two on this. What is 'preferable behaviour' is entirely subjective based on time, place and culture. Watched another of this guy's videos rebuking Shapiro - he's very good!

Lord Foul wrote:molyneux's argument is flawed from the start  by his total lack of biological knowlege.

Take the argument around "eating" being UPB, a point touched on (badly) by veya....

the fact is Molyneux confused the biological "function" of nutrition (actually the function of nutrition) which is a biological IMPERATIVE (and thus not behaviour) with the "act" of eating (i.e whether you eat with chopsticks or knife and fork or gobble it off the floor like a dog.)

even plants and cybermen need to take on nutrition........

As Eil says there is NO universal preferable behaviour

nicko wrote:If I knew what you were all on about ,I'd say yes, so that's 5 !