The Fuckwit Left Wing PC Authortarian Strikes again - Iceland’s Banned TV Christmas Advert... Say hello to Rang-tan. #NoPalmOilChristmasont

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

"Left wing" attacking that advert'  ???
I don't think so  !!!

The people wanting that ad' banned aren't the overly "p/c"  twits,  but rather the corporate shills --  i.e.  those greedy twats protecting the palm oil industry, and lobbying the gov't and the TV networks to bad such exposes..

That advert' itself would be supported by most of the worlds "left wingers".

One only has to "follow the money trail", in these cases..    

Phildidge wrote:

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

"Left wing" attacking that advert'  ???
I don't think so  !!!

The people wanting that ad' banned aren't the overly "p/c"  twits,  but rather the corporate shills --  i.e.  those greedy twats protecting the palm oil industry, and lobbying the gov't and the TV networks to bad such exposes..

That advert' itself would be supported by most of the worlds "left wingers".

One only has to "follow the money trail", in these cases..    

A.K.A

Left wing

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

Phildidge wrote:

A.K.A

Left wing

I've said it before on here, Didge :  "Actions speak louder than words !"

In this case  ==  Any person/group/authority  defending  a business that blatantly damages the environment and deliberately puts peoples health at risk (in this case the Palm Oil industry in South East Asia..)  has lost any right to be considered genuine "left wing" in their idealogy,  but rather --  having now "sold their soul to the devil" --  I would call it corporate fascism, and those banning that ad' corporate shills.

Eilzel wrote:This is not about LW PC culture didge. This is about a particular department of regulation going too far in its interpretation of a rule.

As wolf says, no LWer would oppose this ad:

-it highlights corporate abuse of the environment
-it puts the lives of endangered animals at the forefront
-it asks people to more aware and less self interested
-it ONLY risks damaging corporate interests

SO pretty much EVERYTHING a Leftie would WANT in an ad

So again, nothing to do with the Left at all.

Phildidge wrote:

Eilzel wrote:This is not about LW PC culture didge. This is about a particular department of regulation going too far in its interpretation of a rule.

As wolf says, no LWer would oppose this ad:

-it highlights corporate abuse of the environment
-it puts the lives of endangered animals at the forefront
-it asks people to more aware and less self interested
-it ONLY risks damaging corporate interests

SO pretty much EVERYTHING a Leftie would WANT in an ad

So again, nothing to do with the Left at all.

So why did the left ban this then mate?

If the left would not oppose this, why did they and ban this?

Eilzel wrote:

Phildidge wrote:

So why did the left ban this then mate?

If the left would not oppose this, why did they and ban this?

Point to the EXACT quote where it says 'The Left' banned this.

Phildidge wrote:

Eilzel wrote:

Phildidge wrote:

So why did the left ban this then mate?

If the left would not oppose this, why did they and ban this?

Point to the EXACT quote where it says 'The Left' banned this.

Who is in Government mate?

Eilzel wrote:

Phildidge wrote:

Who is in Government mate?

Right now the Conservatives, a RW party don't you know?

And a tonne of different departments that take their jobs too far some times.

So where is it 'the Left'?

Phildidge wrote:

Eilzel wrote:

Phildidge wrote:

Who is in Government mate?

Right now the Conservatives, a RW party don't you know?

And a tonne of different departments that take their jobs too far some times.

So where is it 'the Left'?

Its not in this country

You see the difference between you and me is I see about applying left and right to form a governement, but you want to suck Corbyns cock mate

Good luck with that

Eilzel wrote:

Phildidge wrote:

Its not in this country

You see the difference between you and me is I see about applying left and right to form a governement, but you want to suck Corbyns cock mate

Good luck with that

What do you mean not in this country? Of course it is. The Act they talk about is a UK act. Iceland is a UK supermarket chain. Please don't tell me you thought Iceland meant the country

So it is a UK story.
Our government is RW.
Regardless, the department is acting in neither RW or LW interests (though would be RW if any, considering the pro-corporate government) it is just acting like an overbearing government department.

Phildidge wrote:

Eilzel wrote:

Phildidge wrote:

Its not in this country

You see the difference between you and me is I see about applying left and right to form a governement, but you want to suck Corbyns cock mate

Good luck with that

What do you mean not in this country? Of course it is. The Act they talk about is a UK act. Iceland is a UK supermarket chain. Please don't tell me you thought Iceland meant the country

So it is a UK story.
Our government is RW.
Regardless, the department is acting in neither RW or LW interests (though would be RW if any, considering the pro-corporate government) it is just acting like an overbearing government department.

It never happened in this country and then you cl;aim its not left wing?
What interest are they acting in to ban this?

Come on fuck wuck wit, you claims I should never talk about antisemitsm, as it may leave you in a difficult situation?

Eilzel wrote:

Phildidge wrote:

It never happened in this country and then you cl;aim its not left wing?
What interest are they acting in to ban this?

Come on fuck wuck wit, you claims I should never talk about antisemitsm, as it may leave you in a difficult situation?

Your post does not make sense.

THIS story IS is the UK.
The UK has a RW govt.
Their interest is either a) RW interest of protecting businesses interests OR (more likely) b) a govt. dept. taking its rules too far.

And I've never been called a 'fuck wuck wit' before, so thanks for that 1st

PS: you thought they meant the country Iceland, didn't you? It's OK, nothing wrong in admitting a mistake

Phildidge wrote:

Eilzel wrote:

Phildidge wrote:

It never happened in this country and then you cl;aim its not left wing?
What interest are they acting in to ban this?

Come on fuck wuck wit, you claims I should never talk about antisemitsm, as it may leave you in a difficult situation?

Your post does not make sense.

THIS story IS is the UK.
The UK has a RW govt.
Their interest is either a) RW interest of protecting businesses interests OR (more likely) b) a govt. dept. taking its rules too far.

And I've never been called a 'fuck wuck wit' before, so thanks for that 1st

PS: you thought they meant the country Iceland, didn't you? It's OK, nothing wrong in admitting a mistake

Well I call someome that who threatens me over debate when antisemitism is on the books

You ar so thick

How is this about the uk government?

Seriously

Do you know how arrogant you are?

You make me want to stand against you,but as much as you are an arrogant dick. |I wont because I respect homosexuls. Unlike how you wish to stop any debate when it involves Jews

Maybe Tommy was right on fascism

Phildidge wrote:

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:


I've said it before on here, Didge :  "Actions speak louder than words !"

In this case  ==  Any person/group/authority  defending  a business that blatantly damages the environment and deliberately puts peoples health at risk (in this case the Palm Oil industry in South East Asia..)  has lost any right to be considered genuine "left wing" in their idealogy,  but rather --  having now "sold their soul to the devil" --  I would call it corporate fascism, and those banning that ad' corporate shills.

Actions do speak louder than words, so who was behind banning this?

There waqs seriously nothing here mate and it was all down to PC

Phildidge wrote:

Eilzel wrote:

What do you mean not in this country? Of course it is. The Act they talk about is a UK act. Iceland is a UK supermarket chain. Please don't tell me you thought Iceland meant the country

So it is a UK story.
Our government is RW.
Regardless, the department is acting in neither RW or LW interests (though would be RW if any, considering the pro-corporate government) it is just acting like an overbearing government department.

It never happened in this country and then you cl;aim its not left wing?

Raggamuffin wrote:This thread did prompt me to find out more about the Government of Iceland.

I have no idea what products palm oil is in, and I had no idea that using it was causing such damage.  The ad is all over the place now, so maybe everyone saw it anyway. If the ad hadn't been banned I wouldn't have seen it as I don't watch the TV much.

eddie wrote:https://secure.greenpeace.org.uk/page/s/rang-tan-video?source=GA&subsource=FOIDPOPEGA01LK&utm_source=gpeace&utm_medium=GA&utm_campaign=FOIDPOPEGA01LK&gclid=EAIaIQobChMItd7F3qXM3gIVxYjVCh2I7g0CEAAYASAAEgI9vfD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds

Eilzel wrote:

eddie wrote:https://secure.greenpeace.org.uk/page/s/rang-tan-video?source=GA&subsource=FOIDPOPEGA01LK&utm_source=gpeace&utm_medium=GA&utm_campaign=FOIDPOPEGA01LK&gclid=EAIaIQobChMItd7F3qXM3gIVxYjVCh2I7g0CEAAYASAAEgI9vfD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds

Signed.

This really does require more high up action, and petitions are at least one way of trying to get things noticed.

As individuals we can only do so much. I will actively avoid products if I know they use palm oil, but I don't always know.

It is will be too late soon

eddie wrote:

Eilzel wrote:

eddie wrote:https://secure.greenpeace.org.uk/page/s/rang-tan-video?source=GA&subsource=FOIDPOPEGA01LK&utm_source=gpeace&utm_medium=GA&utm_campaign=FOIDPOPEGA01LK&gclid=EAIaIQobChMItd7F3qXM3gIVxYjVCh2I7g0CEAAYASAAEgI9vfD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds

Signed.

This really does require more high up action, and petitions are at least one way of trying to get things noticed.

As individuals we can only do so much. I will actively avoid products if I know they use palm oil, but I don't always know.

It is will be too late soon

If there are more than four ingredients listed on any product, you can guarantee that it shouldn’t really be called “food”.

Ready meals are just full of absolute crap.
Anything that can last in your cupboards a long time - crap.
Anything sweet that says it’s low-sugar - crap.


Nestle is a massive company that lots of people won’t buy from. They’re horrible. I don’t know how they get away with what they do.