Have you ever

First topic message reminder :

See poll

Tommy Monk wrote:
But... Gelico... it's on 'infowars'... so it can't be true... only the stuff shown on the main stream media is true...

the laughable thing is i dont even watch infowars i just pick up the links from media sites

that is what i mean about the laziness of some folk

ignore the content and slate the source

kinda typical, but boring dont you think?

Didn't the woman speak for herself in the video clip...?

And I don't read 'infowars' either...!


Bang on again Gelico!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:Didn't the woman speak for herself in the video clip...?

What video?

gelico wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:
But... Gelico... it's on 'infowars'... so it can't be true... only the stuff shown on the main stream media is true...

the laughable thing is i dont even watch infowars i just pick up the links from media sites

that is what i mean about the laziness of some folk

ignore the content and slate the source

kinda typical, but boring dont you think?

Your video was Fox news, not that it matters and yes I do watch and read many articles from all sides

I asked if you did

But you again fail to answer

The reailty is infowars is known as a conspiracy and fake news site

That is based off articles it has published and if you had bothered to read outside your small limited viewing, you would actually know this

It shows its you that has a very limited viewing of stories in the real world

Was there a video clip of a woman speaking for herself...!?


Should that be judged on its own merits...?

Tommy Monk wrote:Didn't the woman speak for herself in the video clip...?

Just watched the video and she cares more about money and materialism, than she does about social issues.

That means she ignores his wrongs, because she supports his economic policies

In other words, she is driven by greed

Didge... you are projecting your own irrelevant sensitivities again... give it a rest please...!

Tommy Monk wrote:Didge... you are projecting your own irrelevant sensitivities again... give it a rest please...!

There you have it again, Tommy trying to censur me 

Apparantly everyone is entittled to an opinion, except me, with Tommy. lol

So what is even worse is how they poorly tried to downplay racism from whites.

Nobody denies black people can be racist, but they completely whitewashed whites being racist, which shows how they are again driven by the brainwashing of Trump on money.

Didge... she speaks for herself... you insult her...

Tommy Monk wrote:Didge... she speaks for herself... you insult her...

So you think criticism, is now insulting?

Are you claiming she is a snowflake?

The video was put up, of which I then made comments on this.

If you disagree then counter my views.

Simple

Her opinion still stands...!!!


Try just sticking to giving your own opinion on a topic... instead of trying to give your opinion of other posters and their opinions...


You are not the high and mighty moral PC arbiter here... and have no business here trying to harass/bully/insult other posters into conforming to your made up set of PC beliefs...!!!

Tommy Monk wrote:Her opinion still stands...!!!


Try just sticking to giving your own opinion on a topic... instead of trying to give your opinion of other posters and their opinions...


You are not the high and mighty moral PC arbiter here... and have no business here trying to harass/bully/insult other posters into conforming to your made up set of PC beliefs...!!!

I can say as I please and there is nothing you can do to stop me

So that is numeroeus posts you have made, without making a single point

You liked the video and I demolished it in seconds

Game over

are you talking about the first one from infowars? niece of MLK Jr.?

gelico wrote:


are you talking about the first one from infowars?  niece of MLK Jr.?

Your fox news video.

Never watched the Republican one yet, did you read the civil rights hero article?

gelico wrote:


are you talking about the first one from infowars?  niece of MLK Jr.?

I thought I was, geli...!

So all she did was praise Trump, again, and again, and again.

She then claimed he was not being racist, and then claims he respects the people, even though his views was about these people coming from these countries to America.

Thus not being honest over what he actually said

So that is two videos down

Anything else?

Someone licking Trumps butt, by any chance?

Her opinion is more important than your 'opinion of her and her opinion'...

Tommy Monk wrote:Her opinion is more important than your 'opinion of her and her opinion'...

Why, because she is the niece of someone who was great?

Big deal, she is Not her Uncle, that is for sure. I mean what has she ever done?

She is not here, and if you want me to debate videos, that is fine

If you do not like my views

That is tough

Didge wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:Didn't the woman speak for herself in the video clip...?

Just watched the video and she cares more about money and materialism, than she does about social issues.

That means she ignores his wrongs, because she supports his economic policies

In other words, she is driven by greed

i have no idea what you're talking about here

driven by greed?

wtf?

Didge wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:Her opinion still stands...!!!


Try just sticking to giving your own opinion on a topic... instead of trying to give your opinion of other posters and their opinions...


You are not the high and mighty moral PC arbiter here... and have no business here trying to harass/bully/insult other posters into conforming to your made up set of PC beliefs...!!!

I can say as I please and there is nothing you can do to stop me

So that is numeroeus posts you have made, without making a single point

You liked the video and I demolished it in seconds

Game over

sorry to ruin your fantasy didge but you didn't

gelico wrote:

Didge wrote:


Just watched the video and she cares more about money and materialism, than she does about social issues.

That means she ignores his wrongs, because she supports his economic policies

In other words, she is driven by greed

i have no idea what you're talking about here

driven by greed?

wtf?

The two ladies, she said the only colour that Trump cares about is green, the colour of money.

That to her was more important than any racial issues. Of the two ladies. Who as stated, misdirected from racism by whites and downplayed this, by going off blacks who are racist.

When you talk about racism, you talk about the problem as a whole, they misdirected.

So I watched both your videos and you have not made a comment ffrom my article

Like I said, closed minded to what you only want to read and watch

gelico wrote:

Didge wrote:


I can say as I please and there is nothing you can do to stop me

So that is numeroeus posts you have made, without making a single point

You liked the video and I demolished it in seconds

Game over

sorry to ruin your fantasy didge but you didn't

Yes I did, because as off yet and after many posts, you and Tommy collectivelly have failed to counter my points

Its a tad like the Battle of Cannae, a demonstration of a total annihilation of your videos

Tommy Monk wrote:

gelico wrote:


are you talking about the first one from infowars?  niece of MLK Jr.?

I thought I was, geli...!

oh ok, yeah, me too, was just wondering due to the remarks of didge. didnt make much sense to me but she was talking about how throwing the word racism around cheapens everything her uncle fought against.

she has spent some time with him and talked about historic MLK site being now a National Park and how she supports him in MAGA in order to help not just those in america but genuinely in these ''shithole'' countries as well

she talks about him helping with prison reform etc, she didnt have enough time to say everything.

i have no idea how that would be perceived to be driven by greed

Didge wrote:

gelico wrote:


i have no idea what you're talking about here

driven by greed?

wtf?

The two ladies, she said the only colour that Trump cares about is green, the colour of money.

That to her was more important than any racial issues. Of the two ladies. Who as stated, misdirected from racism by whites and downplayed this, by going off blacks who are racist.

When you talk about racism, you talk about the problem as a whole, they misdirected.

So I watched both your videos and you have not made a comment ffrom my article

Like I said, closed minded to what you only want to read and watch

you're missing the point they are making

and John Lewis who worked with trump on the MLK park was upset that he cried

ok so if that's how he feels, that's how he feels

his opinion is also valid

Quite right geli...!


Didge was waffling bollocks... again...!

gelico wrote:

Didge wrote:


The two ladies, she said the only colour that Trump cares about is green, the colour of money.

That to her was more important than any racial issues. Of the two ladies. Who as stated, misdirected from racism by whites and downplayed this, by going off blacks who are racist.

When you talk about racism, you talk about the problem as a whole, they misdirected.

So I watched both your videos and you have not made a comment ffrom my article

Like I said, closed minded to what you only want to read and watch

you're missing the point they are making

and John Lewis who worked with trump on the MLK park was upset that he cried

ok so if that's how he feels, that's how he feels

his opinion is also valid

Missing what point?

You claim a view is valid when it supports a view demeaning people cominng from countries in Africa?

How is that a valid view?

Didge wrote:

gelico wrote:


you're missing the point they are making

and John Lewis who worked with trump on the MLK park was upset that he cried

ok so if that's how he feels, that's how he feels

his opinion is also valid

Missing what point?

You claim a view is valid when it supports a view demeaning people cominng from countries in Africa?

How is that a valid view?

what are you babbling about now?

I'm talking about the video that you yourself put up

i'm saying his view is also valid

gelico wrote:

Didge wrote:


Missing what point?

You claim a view is valid when it supports a view demeaning people cominng from countries in Africa?

How is that a valid view?

what are you babbling about now?

I'm talking about the video that you yourself put up

i'm saying his view is also valid

Good for you, I do not count the two videos you posted as valid views, just a very poor defense of a very prejudice person. They were sucking up to Trump

So again and calm down petal, how was there views valid, when they support a President who demeaned people coming from countries in Africa?

Take as long as you like to think about this

Tommy Monk wrote:

i know right

Didge wrote:

gelico wrote:

what are you babbling about now?

I'm talking about the video that you yourself put up

i'm saying his view is also valid

Good for you, I do not count the two videos you posted as valid views, just a very poor defense of a very prejudice person. They were sucking up to Trump

So again and calm down petal, how was there views valid, when they support a President who demeaned people coming from countries in Africa?

Take as long as you like to think about this

no he didn't

have you seen recent pictures of haiti?

Ah bless Tommy and Gelico both avoid and need to hug each other

One moment



Talk about being weighed, measured and left found wanting.

gelico wrote:

Didge wrote:


Good for you, I do not count the two videos you posted as valid views, just a very poor defense of a very prejudice person. They were sucking up to Trump

So again and calm down petal, how was there views valid, when they support a President who demeaned people coming from countries in Africa?

Take as long as you like to think about this

no he didn't

have you seen recent pictures of haiti?

Do they show all of Haiti?

Yes he did demean

Here why not read this Gelico

http://www.newsfixboard.com/t23168-trumps-shithole-comment-is-right-out-of-the-anti-semites-playbook

Here again is what Trump said


But his comments stand for themselves. "What do we want Haitians here for?" the president reportedly asked. "Why do we want all these people from Africa here? Why do we want all these people from shithole countries?" Then he added: "We should have people from places like Norway."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=60&v=8EQAwrDwE6Y

Didge wrote:Here again is what Trump said


But his comments stand for themselves. "What do we want Haitians here for?" the president reportedly asked. "Why do we want all these people from Africa here? Why do we want all these people from shithole countries?" Then he added: "We should have people from places like Norway."

Someone said someone said...


"reportedly"


Ok...

Tommy Monk wrote:

Didge wrote:Here again is what Trump said


But his comments stand for themselves. "What do we want Haitians here for?" the president reportedly asked. "Why do we want all these people from Africa here? Why do we want all these people from shithole countries?" Then he added: "We should have people from places like Norway."

Someone said someone said...


"reportedly"


Ok...

Of course he said it.

He is that much of an idiot

I have no doubt he said it

...reportedly... allegedly... so someone said... waffle...!

gelico wrote:

Cass wrote:Infowars? Oh dear god...

you could possibly listen to what she is saying rather than slating the source

but of course slating the source is just so much easier than actually having to listen to what she is saying

silly me

sorry for the tone cass

was feeling a bit snarky

x

Tommy Monk wrote:
...reportedly... allegedly... so someone said... waffle...!

Yet we have a whole thread about people thinking its okay around saying shithole countries.

Odd, so you believe that part, which makes little sense without the rest where he demeans the people rom these countries

Go figure

Tommy Monk wrote:
...reportedly... allegedly... so someone said... waffle...!

i dont doubt he said it actually tommy

just enjoying all the hysteria that comes with it

Someone said someone said... bullshit...!

gelico wrote:

gelico wrote:


you could possibly listen to what she is saying rather than slating the source

but of course slating the source is just so much easier than actually having to listen to what she is saying

silly me

sorry for the tone cass

was feeling a bit snarky

x

It’s ok, we all have our moments.

I have seen Alveda King speak on many occasions. I do not agree at all with her views on most issues. Dr. King’s late wife and children have disavowed her views in the past. But she is entitled to her own opinions.

As to infowars. Part of my professional life is teaching information literacy. It is not a reliable source at all. I’m not going to try and convince you, but please bear that in mind ok? I know we don’t see eye to eye on a lot of topics but I would never ever lie to you.

I hope you’re ok. We need a good chat about all things Geli and Cass x

Ps something to make you laugh. We were just in the cinema watching Darkest Hour when I leaned forward and boing, my underwire breaks on my favorite Marks and Spencer bra. Luckily we were in the back row as I discreetly struggled to take the damn thing off under my shirt while trying not to poke my eye out. Lucky again that I had my big purse with me so I could shove it in there. Found some popcorn down there so it all ended well. X

Cass wrote:

gelico wrote:

sorry for the tone cass

was feeling a bit snarky

x

It’s ok, we all have our moments.

I have seen Alveda King speak on many occasions. I do not agree at all with her views on most issues. Dr. King’s late wife and children have disavowed her views in the past. But she is entitled to her own opinions.  

As to infowars. Part of my professional life is teaching information literacy. It is not a reliable source at all. I’m not going to try and convince you, but please bear that in mind ok? I know we don’t see eye to eye on a lot of topics but I would never ever lie to you.

I hope you’re ok. We need a good chat about all things Geli and Cass x

Ps something to make you laugh. We were just in the cinema watching Darkest Hour when I leaned forward and boing, my underwire breaks on my favorite Marks and Spencer bra. Luckily we were in the back row as I discreetly struggled to take the damn thing off under my shirt while trying not to poke my eye out. Lucky again that I had my big purse with me so I could shove it in there. Found some popcorn down there so it all ended well. X

You have to admit, Infowars is entertaining.

Cass wrote:

gelico wrote:

sorry for the tone cass

was feeling a bit snarky

x

It’s ok, we all have our moments.

I have seen Alveda King speak on many occasions. I do not agree at all with her views on most issues. Dr. King’s late wife and children have disavowed her views in the past. But she is entitled to her own opinions.  

As to infowars. Part of my professional life is teaching information literacy. It is not a reliable source at all. I’m not going to try and convince you, but please bear that in mind ok? I know we don’t see eye to eye on a lot of topics but I would never ever lie to you.

I hope you’re ok. We need a good chat about all things Geli and Cass x

Ps something to make you laugh. We were just in the cinema watching Darkest Hour when I leaned forward and boing, my underwire breaks on my favorite Marks and Spencer bra. Luckily we were in the back row as I discreetly struggled to take the damn thing off under my shirt while trying not to poke my eye out. Lucky again that I had my big purse with me so I could shove it in there. Found some popcorn down there so it all ended well. X

Did you enjoy the film Cass?

Maddog wrote:

Cass wrote:

It’s ok, we all have our moments.

I have seen Alveda King speak on many occasions. I do not agree at all with her views on most issues. Dr. King’s late wife and children have disavowed her views in the past. But she is entitled to her own opinions.  

As to infowars. Part of my professional life is teaching information literacy. It is not a reliable source at all. I’m not going to try and convince you, but please bear that in mind ok? I know we don’t see eye to eye on a lot of topics but I would never ever lie to you.

I hope you’re ok. We need a good chat about all things Geli and Cass x

Ps something to make you laugh. We were just in the cinema watching Darkest Hour when I leaned forward and boing, my underwire breaks on my favorite Marks and Spencer bra. Luckily we were in the back row as I discreetly struggled to take the damn thing off under my shirt while trying not to poke my eye out. Lucky again that I had my big purse with me so I could shove it in there. Found some popcorn down there so it all ended well. X

You have to admit, Infowars is entertaining.

Perhaps but far too many people believe it’s for real for my entertainment.

Didge wrote:

Cass wrote:

It’s ok, we all have our moments.

I have seen Alveda King speak on many occasions. I do not agree at all with her views on most issues. Dr. King’s late wife and children have disavowed her views in the past. But she is entitled to her own opinions.  

As to infowars. Part of my professional life is teaching information literacy. It is not a reliable source at all. I’m not going to try and convince you, but please bear that in mind ok? I know we don’t see eye to eye on a lot of topics but I would never ever lie to you.

I hope you’re ok. We need a good chat about all things Geli and Cass x

Ps something to make you laugh. We were just in the cinema watching Darkest Hour when I leaned forward and boing, my underwire breaks on my favorite Marks and Spencer bra. Luckily we were in the back row as I discreetly struggled to take the damn thing off under my shirt while trying not to poke my eye out. Lucky again that I had my big purse with me so I could shove it in there. Found some popcorn down there so it all ended well. X

Did you enjoy the film Cass?

It was excellent. Outstanding performances from Gary Oldman, Kristin Scott Thomas and Stephen Dillane (Halifax). In fact the whole cast were great. Going to see The Post tomorrow.

Now at home watching Dunkirk on DVD. So far so good.

@OP
whenever the Uk is mentioned