Rapist Forces Girl To Smile While He Films Rape

Sassy wrote:Wouldn't surprise me if he wasn't already being watched.   I'm sure they would have been monitoring when it happened and probably flagged up.

Sassy wrote:Wouldn't surprise me if he wasn't already being watched.   I'm sure they would have been monitoring when it happened and probably flagged up.

heavenly father wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:



So is a Christian who kills a proper Christian by that logic then?

A Conquered enemy, Holy crap, where in the trial did it claim this as the reason?

I do believe the rules of the forum ask not to divert topics but if you would like to start a new discussion on the topic you raised feel free to do so. :D 

Catman wrote:

heavenly father wrote:

I do believe the rules of the forum ask not to divert topics but if you would like to start a new discussion on the topic you raised feel free to do so. :D 

Weren't you banned by Dean?

He let you back on again!

 ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: 

Where is V.O.D?

scrat wrote:

Catman wrote:

Weren't you banned by Dean?

He let you back on again!

 ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: ://?roflmao?/: 

Where is V.O.D?

I did enjoy the deranged god botherers, they are a vital component to the well being of any forum!

BigAndy9 wrote:31st January 2014

A sex attacker who ordered a student to smile for the camera as he filmed himself repeatedly raping her has been jailed for 17 years (Thurs). Mohammed Islam, 33, told the terrified victim he would show the videos to her family if she did not have sex with him again. He also threatened to post the films on YouTube and make a DVD to sell to 'someone like HMV'. Islam forced the student to give him thousands of pounds or he would post the video online with her phone number and claim she was a prostitute. He raped the woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, at least three times between 21 March 2010 and 28 February this year. - See more at: http://www.courtnewsuk.co.uk/newsgallery/#sthash.Es4pKTdl.dpuf

NemsAgain wrote:Lovely
Apart from FTL is all about the ethnicity of the perp or pointless drivel about other posters
No one gives a shit about the victim, only about their own agendas
  

ALLAKAKA wrote:

NemsAgain wrote:Lovely
Apart from FTL is all about the ethnicity of the perp or pointless drivel about other posters
No one gives a shit about the victim, only about their own agendas
  

WRONG , It is more to do with Various groups who have not only been allowed to carry out these crimes , but have been protected by various institutions to evade lawful punishment.

NemsAgain wrote:Lovely
Apart from FTL is all about the ethnicity of the perp or pointless drivel about other posters
No one gives a shit about the victim, only about their own agendas
  

NemsAgain wrote:

ALLAKAKA wrote:


WRONG , It is more to do with Various groups who have not only been allowed to carry out these crimes , but have been protected by various institutions to evade lawful punishment.

This piece of shit has just been jailed - how is that being protected or evading punishment?

Or are you referring to the rancid culture at the BBC that allowed wholesale sex offending over many years?

PhilDidge wrote:

NemsAgain wrote:Lovely
Apart from FTL is all about the ethnicity of the perp or pointless drivel about other posters
No one gives a shit about the victim, only about their own agendas
  

Bang on the money Nems!
Sadly here the victim is being used for an agenda by some.

The argument on protection by the law is also wrong, the law failed to act in the past because of poor excuses of which the Police force have also not helped with, when there are still problems within the Police force with racism. So on all counts there were plenty of wrongs done that did nothing to help the victims. The fact is now they do act and have acted, though it was far to late of which I think those involved in the mistakes should be accountable

ALLAKAKA wrote:

NemsAgain wrote:

This piece of shit has just been jailed - how is that being protected or evading punishment?

Or are you referring to the rancid culture at the BBC that allowed wholesale sex offending over many years?

The Catholic church systematically turned a blind eye to the child abuse that was going on within church establishments.

The BBC systematically turned a blind eye to the abuse and concealed what was going on.


The Labour Government turned a Blind eye to the Asian child grooming that was going on and concealed it , which also had the effect of non-asian grooming to be concealed.

PhilDidge wrote:

ALLAKAKA wrote:



The Catholic church systematically turned a blind eye to the child abuse that was going on within church establishments.

The BBC systematically turned a blind eye to the abuse and concealed what was going on.


The Labour Government turned a Blind eye to the Asian child grooming that was going on and concealed it , which also had the effect of non-asian grooming to be concealed.

Yes all the above have merits but in this case with the Police again as stated, they failed the children due to fear of their own making, racism, why they have a bad rep on this . It is not an excuse for their actions, it does explain why they did and why they let down many children. Thus they were in fear of further labels of racism, which is completely wrong to do, the safety of society should supersede any fears of being labeled racist .

ALLAKAKA wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:


Yes all the above have merits but in this case with the Police again as stated, they failed the children due to fear of their own making, racism, why they have a bad rep on this . It is not an excuse for their actions, it does explain why they did and why they let down many children. Thus they were in fear of further labels of racism, which is completely wrong to do, the safety of society should supersede any fears of being labeled racist .

I'll give you a hypothetical  situation : say a poster admitted to me that they had child porn on their PC , then another poster PMed me saying that they had found out about that person and were reporting it to the police, What would be your stance on me PMing the poster with the porn and warning them that the police were involved ,therefore giving them time to destroy the evidence ?

PhilDidge wrote:

ALLAKAKA wrote:



I'll give you a hypothetical  situation : say a poster admitted to me that they had child porn on their PC , then another poster PMed me saying that they had found out about that person and were reporting it to the police, What would be your stance on me PMing the poster with the porn and warning them that the police were involved ,therefore giving them time to destroy the evidence ?

That really shows you did not only not understand my replies but the fact I condemn the Police responsible and involved in the crimes for their excuses for not taking action.
I also said nothing should supersede ensuring the safety of our children and society, hence your hypothetical view point has no bearing to me

ALLAKAKA wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:



That really shows you did not only not understand my replies but the fact I condemn the Police responsible and involved in the crimes for their excuses for not taking action.
I also said nothing should supersede ensuring the safety of our children and society, hence your hypothetical view point has no bearing to me

That does not answer my question , would it be wrong of me to warn the culprit.

PhilDidge wrote:

ALLAKAKA wrote:


That does not answer my question , would it be wrong of me to warn the culprit.

What answer are you looking here for?

There is a poster who has admitted to find certain material, it has been reported to the Police, your view is now on whether you should inform the poster or not, that the Police has been called, talk about no comparison what so ever to the issue from before. The Police are now involved and it would be down to you if you believed your poster was innocent whether to tell that poster.
Personally you have mooted the need for any further involvement for yourself being as the Police are now involved, how do you fail to see that!

ALLAKAKA wrote:

PhilDidge wrote:






What answer are you looking here for?

There is a poster who has admitted to find certain material, it has been reported to the Police, your view is now on whether you should inform the poster or not, that the Police has been called, talk about no comparison what so ever to the issue from before. The Police are now involved and it would be down to you if you believed your poster was innocent whether to tell that poster.
Personally you have mooted the need for any further involvement for yourself being as the Police are now involved, how do you fail to see that!

It's easy to understand , would you condone the fact I was warning that poster of eminent  police action and therefore giving them time to DESTROY any incriminating evidence  ?????????????

PhilDidge wrote:

ALLAKAKA wrote:


It's easy to understand , would you condone the fact I was warning that poster of eminent  police action and therefore giving them time to DESTROY any incriminating evidence  ?????????????

Well as i condemn you as a racist and homophone already I really have no high regard of you anyway.

To answer your question, how could I condemn you before all the facts are known and it turns out that in fact this poster was innocent, that he did not destroy any evidence because by doing so would also remove the evidence that proves his innocence. I thus could only condemn you if your actions led to a person getting away with a crime.

ALLAKAKA wrote:

NemsAgain wrote:

This piece of shit has just been jailed - how is that being protected or evading punishment?

Or are you referring to the rancid culture at the BBC that allowed wholesale sex offending over many years?

The Catholic church systematically turned a blind eye to the child abuse that was going on within church establishments.

The BBC systematically turned a blind eye to the abuse and concealed what was going on.


The Labour Government turned a Blind eye to the Asian child grooming that was going on and concealed it , which also had the effect of non-asian grooming to be concealed.