Kelvin MacKenzie

Tory pond life.

Yet another abhorrent post by this tory supporting turd.

Labour has responded to the comments by former Sun editor Kelvin MacKenzie, [url=x-gu://item/mobile.guardianapis.com/items/politics/live/2017/may/03/general-election-2017-official-campaign-begins-politics-live?page=with:block-59091db1e4b0f5c69fe5db32#block-59091db1e4b0f5c69fe5db32]reported below,[/url] in which he told the New York Timesthat the “perfect headline” would be “Jeremy Corbyn knifed to death by an asylum seeker”.
A party sources told the Mirror:

Kelvin MacKenzie’s disgusting language incites violence and hatred and makes him unfit to work for any media outlet. This sort of disgusting language should not be tolerated by anyone in the media, politics or any walk of life.

HA can you please provide a proper link so I may know what this thread is about?
The title tells me nothing and the OP is a bit of a mess, no offence.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/anger-kelvin-mackenzie-reportedly-says-10343858#ICID=sharebar_twitter

it's almost as if labour have forgotten the years of wishing death on maggie and others.
you reap what you sow it might seem

then of course there is all the violence directed by their own side to their own mp's
https://www.ft.com/content/442f13f2-4a7c-11e6-b387-64ab0a67014c

is what mackenzie said any worse than this said by labours shadow chancellor?
Labour MP refuses to apologise for joking about 'lynching' a female Tory minister at sick alternative poppy day 'comedy' night

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2832286/Labour-MPs-cheered-jokes-lynching-Tory-minister-killing-royal-sick-alternative-poppy-day-comedy-night.html#ixzz4g1Lj0euR
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

at least mackenzie apologised

There's none so blind etc

Has been sacked by the Scum.

Watch him pitch up up at the Daily Fail, alongside the harlot of Fleet street Katie Flopkins.

I saw this on the BBC and thought you should see it:

Kelvin Mackenzie to leave The Sun after Ross Barkley column - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39854061

You need to slow down Andy, you take life far too seriously. The way you get worked up over politics will give you a Stroke or Heart attack soon.
Nothing you say will alter the way of the world, so what's the point of being ANGRY?

Thanks for your kind thoughts Nicko. But we should be more concerned for those who have had strokes and heart attacks, attending underfunded and understaffed NHS hospitals whilst fatcats and Lords live it up with massive pay rises and huge tax cuts.
And don't believe everything you read that comes from.papers owned by Murdock, Rathsmere and Desmond. They have an agenda. And it isn't for the benfit of Britain.

nicko wrote:You need to slow down Andy, you take life far too seriously.  The way you get worked up over politics will give you a Stroke or Heart attack soon.
Nothing you say will alter the way of the world, so what's the point of being ANGRY?

you forget the only speech that can be free is what the faithful say, they can be as hateful as they like and that is perfectly fine. But then their whole ethos is based on hatred

WTF are you on about , Dick?

Angry Andy wrote:Thanks for your kind thoughts Nicko. But we should be more concerned for those who have had strokes and heart attacks, attending underfunded and understaffed NHS hospitals whilst fatcats and Lords live it up with massive pay rises and huge tax cuts.
And don't believe everything you read that comes from.papers owned by Murdock, Rathsmere and Desmond. They have an agenda. And it isn't for the benfit of Britain.

are you suggesting that the mirror and grauniad or even the morning star do not have agenda's?

admittedly the grauniads agenda these days appears to be screw money out of their readers rather than spend any of the millions squirrelled away offshore by their parent company.

Angry Andy wrote:Thanks for your kind thoughts Nicko. But we should be more concerned for those who have had strokes and heart attacks, attending underfunded and understaffed NHS hospitals whilst fatcats and Lords live it up with massive pay rises and huge tax cuts.
And don't believe everything you read that comes from.papers owned by Murdock, Rathsmere and Desmond. They have an agenda. And it isn't for the benfit of Britain.

Can't make you wrong there.

Angry Andy wrote:Thanks for your kind thoughts Nicko. But we should be more concerned for those who have had strokes and heart attacks, attending underfunded and understaffed NHS hospitals whilst fatcats and Lords live it up with massive pay rises and huge tax cuts.
And don't believe everything you read that comes from.papers owned by Murdock, Rathsmere and Desmond. They have an agenda. And it isn't for the benfit of Britain.

Would those "living it up..." Lords include Labour, Independent Labour and LibDem peers sitting in the House of Lords as a largely Left grouping, Andy?

If so, they outnumber Conservative peers by a considerable margin.

Most national newspapers, with the exception of those such as the Daily Sport whose "agenda" is centred largely on female mammary glands, have "agendas." They are known as editorial policies.

The Daily Mail has a long tradition of editorial support for the Conservative and Unionist Party, but people who actually read it rather than base their opprobrium on what they read online in Left wing forums and anti-Mail blogs will know that its not infrequent editorial opposition to a Conservative government as opposed to the Conservative Party can be awesomely fierce.

The Daily Mirror, on the other hand, has a traditional policy of support for the Labour Party which has been known to spill over into lucrative jobs for writers deemed by the party to be particularly enthusiastic supporters. Example: Former political editor Alastair Campbell.

And from what I remember of the Mirror's approach to party politics, being "negative" about Labour is not regarded as being at all helpful to one's journalistic career.

The only mainstream news media outlet which is supposedly barred from having or showing any party political allegiance or bias is the BBC, and this is included in its founding Charter.

One has to question, however, whether Lord Reith's original diktat is regarded among BBC staff as still being obligatory given a recent Director General's cheerful admission that the newsgathering and disseminating organisation - the so-called Voice of the Nation funded by a mandatory tax, the evasion or avoidance of which is deemed to be a criminal offence - was "overwhelmingly Left wing."

Lords are Lords are Lords, Fred. Politics dont xmcomre into.the equation when you trouser £300 for doing nothing but turn up and sleep. And most conduct outside business whilst at Westminster. And many are millionaires. They do not represent, nor do they empathise with the common man.
Of the press, only the Mirror is properly Labour supporting, The Guardian is left leaning but is not wholly behind Corbyn. I feel it would prefer a more moderate at the helm.
The rest of the press are conservative right or UKIP right supporting and donating. 
Labour has an uphill battle against the media.
And if I am not mistaken, David Dimbleby, Nick Robinson and Andrww Neill are fully paid up members of the Conservative party and find it difficult to conduct interviews impartially.

Angry Andy wrote:Lords are Lords are Lords, Fred. Politics dont xmcomre into.the equation when you trouser £300 for doing nothing but turn up and sleep. And most conduct outside business whilst at Westminster. And many are millionaires. They do not represent, nor do they empathise with the common man.
Of the press, only the Mirror is properly Labour supporting, The Guardian is left leaning but is not wholly behind Corbyn. I feel it would prefer a more moderate at the helm.
The rest of the press are conservative right or UKIP right supporting and donating. 
Labour has an uphill battle against the media.
And if I am not mistaken, David Dimbleby, Nick Robinson and Andrww Neill are fully paid up members of the Conservative party and find it difficult to conduct interviews impartially.

I wouldn't know what, if any, political party any of them subscribe to. All I know is that I don't subscribe to any.