London imam jailed for life for murdering mosque rival and for possessing guns and explosives

Boney M singer's brother hired hitman to kill mosque rival


The brother of a Boney M singer has been jailed for life after hiring a hitman to kill his rival following a bitter dispute over control of a mosque.

Muslim convert Khalid Rashad, 63, is the brother of Liz Mitchell, lead singer in the 1970s band famous for disco hits such as Rivers of Babylon, Rasputin and Daddy Cool.

She appeared as a character witness in his trial, held in January this year, explaining how they had grown up in a large Christian family in Jamaica.

His conviction can finally be reported at the end of a second trial in which Rashad was found guilty of keeping military-grade plastic explosives and rounds of ammunition at his home, yards from Wembley Stadium.


http://news.sky.com/story/boney-m-singers-brother-hired-hitman-to-kill-mosque-rival-10623634



Supposed to be a religious leader and an example to Muslims...


That is islam for you though...

Wow, so much for being peaceful eh?

He got what he deserves, no murder is acceptable and harsh sentences must reflect this.

On another note, I loved Boney M. Brown Girl in the ring and Rivers of Babylon, I still play today!

Not sure why you got a red for posting a news story. Seems kinda stupid to me.

I thought you meant me lol. No I don't know either, it's news. Going to give a green one to balance it out

The Islamised lefties feel hurt when you present them with inconvenient truth... a red is all they got!!!

eddie wrote:Not sure why you got a red for posting a news story. Seems kinda stupid to me.

I gave it a red for the comment "that's islam for you," as though this one guy represents 1.6 billion people -- a line of argument that seems *extremely* stupid to me.

Ben Reilly wrote:

eddie wrote:Not sure why you got a red for posting a news story. Seems kinda stupid to me.

I gave it a red for the comment "that's islam for you," as though this one guy represents 1.6 billion people -- a line of argument that seems *extremely* stupid to me.

I kinda knew it was you anyway.

eddie wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:

eddie wrote:Not sure why you got a red for posting a news story. Seems kinda stupid to me.

I gave it a red for the comment "that's islam for you," as though this one guy represents 1.6 billion people -- a line of argument that seems *extremely* stupid to me.

I kinda knew it was you anyway.

So you're going to just hand-wave away the reasoning behind it? Am I "kinda stupid" for redding a post that bashes 1.6 billion people on the basis of the actions of one person?

Ben Reilly wrote:

eddie wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:

eddie wrote:Not sure why you got a red for posting a news story. Seems kinda stupid to me.

I gave it a red for the comment "that's islam for you," as though this one guy represents 1.6 billion people -- a line of argument that seems *extremely* stupid to me.

I kinda knew it was you anyway.

So you're going to just hand-wave away the reasoning behind it? Am I "kinda stupid" for redding a post that bashes 1.6 billion people on the basis of the actions of one person?

Noooo, they're your reasons and yours alone. He said "that's islam for you" not "that's all Muslims for you" (I'd have redded him for that) and he also pointed out that the guy was supposed to be an example to all Muslims.
Didn't think it deserved a red but hey, it's your red to red with.

And, to be fair, I thought he'd been redded for simply posting the story - it has been done before.

Islam is the religion that *all Muslims* subscribe to, is it not?

It's like reporting on the Catholic priest child abuse scandal and summarizing, "That's Christianity for you."

Ben Reilly wrote:Islam is the religion that *all Muslims* subscribe to, is it not?

It's like reporting on the Catholic priest child abuse scandal and summarizing, "That's Christianity for you."

Yes, I did notice.
Listen, if it makes you feel better you can give me a red if you like. I won't even moan about it.

Islam is the religion that all Muslims subscribe to... except when they are doing wrong... then the lefties proclaim that they aren't following proper islam...

Yes Tommy but we have had this all before. ISIS and those kind of groups twist the words of their holy book to suit their purpose.

Tommy Monk wrote:Islam is the religion that all Muslims subscribe to... except when they are doing wrong... then the lefties proclaim that they aren't following proper islam...

Let's say someone is raised as a Christian and commits a murder -- surely you would never argue that Christianity condones murder.

People of all religious faiths violate the rules of their religions, as nobody is infallible.

eddie wrote:Yes Tommy but we have had this all before.  ISIS and those kind of groups twist the words of their holy book to suit their purpose.

Wouldn't you agree with that Tommy?

No...

Tommy Monk wrote:No...

Nothing more than just "no"?

eddie wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:No...

Nothing more than just "no"?

He has said before, he believes ISIS and Islam to be one and the same.

Ben Reilly wrote:

eddie wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:No...

Nothing more than just "no"?

He has said before, he believes ISIS and Islam to be one and the same.

He makes me work very hard for an answer.

eddie wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:

eddie wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:No...

Nothing more than just "no"?

He has said before, he believes ISIS and Islam to be one and the same.

He makes me work very hard for an answer.

Well, he doesn't have much courage in his convictions, so he rarely just comes out and admits what he really thinks.

I dont suppose it has occured to any one that if he had explosives and guns...note multiple

in britain....then its not likely his intent was merely to take over a mosque

eddie wrote:

eddie wrote:Yes Tommy but we have had this all before.  ISIS and those kind of groups twist the words of their holy book to suit their purpose.

Wouldn't you agree with that Tommy?

Why would strictly religious Islamic groups be twisting the words of their guide books...?


Hasn't it occurred to you that they are doing things 'by the book'...!?

Lord Foul wrote:I dont suppose it has occured to any one that if he had explosives and guns...note multiple

in britain....then its not likely his intent was merely to take over a mosque

Yeah, what does that have to do with him representing all Muslims?

Tommy Monk wrote:

eddie wrote:

eddie wrote:Yes Tommy but we have had this all before.  ISIS and those kind of groups twist the words of their holy book to suit their purpose.

Wouldn't you agree with that Tommy?

Why would strictly religious Islamic groups be twisting the words of their guide books...?


Hasn't it occurred to you that they are doing things 'by the book'...!?

There it is. You bigot piece of shit.

Saudi Arabia chop off peoples hands for punishment for theft... ISIS chop off peoples hands for punishment for theft...


Are you saying one is carrying out the Islamic religiously proscribed punishment... and the other is just twisting the words of their guide book to justify this...!?


I

Tommy Monk wrote:Saudi Arabia chop off peoples hands for punishment for theft... ISIS chop off peoples hands for punishment for theft...

In this country, predominately Christian States still legally terminate people's lives.

In Muslim countries they terminate a lot more for less !!

I was talking about the Islamic proscribed punishment of chopping off hands...


Is Saudi Arabia twisting the words of their guide book to do this or are isis twisting the words...?

WHY did he have explosives and a gun????

He was acting illegally just by possessing
ing such.

Good sentence but the rope is my preference, cheaper.

Tommy Monk wrote:I was talking about the Islamic proscribed punishment of chopping off hands...


Is Saudi Arabia twisting the words of their guide book to do this or are isis twisting the words...?

Well...?