Man arrested for publicly molesting his daughter in a restaurant.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3541966/Father-arrested-molesting-five-year-old-daughter-waitress-filmed-sickening-act-restaurant-online-manhunt-tracked-down.html

The video of him apparently sexually molesting his young daughter whilst eating in a restaurant went viral.
Waitresses filmed, him shared the film online and his arrest followed.

The little girl has been taken into care for the time being after undergoing medical checks.
The mans wife is now defending him saying a malicious person has caused all the trouble and her husband is innocent.

Deluded??

I read this, became quite angry and could not bring myself to raise it although it needed such.

Thanks Syl.

My first thoughs, after feeling disgust toward this animal, is:

WHY didn't the waitress call the police then and there, showed them the video and he could've been arrested straight away?
WHY did they upload to social media?

I thought the same Eddie, to show a film online of the actual molestation of a young child seems to be wrong on every level.

To ignore it would have been worse, at least the man was identified by police and arrested.

I don't understand why his wife is defending him online either.

Why do some people have to live their entire lives through the internet...it's very odd.

Stormee wrote:I read this, became quite angry and could not bring myself to raise it although it needed such.

Thanks Syl.

I know what you mean Stormee, some news stories are horrible.
I suppose we could ignore them and not read them (same debate went on about not looking at photos we find distressing)

There does seem quite a few wives and relatives who cannot or will not believe their husbands, relatives have committed such vile atrocities.
Where my FIL lived, in the next street a man lived with his mum, all the neighbours thought him a polite nice lad until he was prosecuted for being a paedo, twaz difficult for some to believe it until he was actually jailed.
Unfortunately his mother got the brunt of nastiness from the younger lads around there.

It sounds sad about the mans mother, she probably had no idea.

Sometimes the wives of child molesters are a different matter. We read of children who told their mums their dads were hurting them and they were not believed....or if they were the mothers kept quiet.
I find that hard to believe.....but it happens.

What sort of a world is it when a person witnessing the abuse of a child decides the priority is to get it online?!

I would not be abled to control myself if I witnessed such, I would not care if I got prosecuted for walloping such scum..

Stormee wrote:I would not be abled to control myself if I witnessed such, I would not care if I got prosecuted for walloping such scum..

You won't be the only one that feels that way.

Stormee wrote:I would not be abled to control myself if I witnessed such, I would not care if I got prosecuted for walloping such scum..

How would you get ahold of the birth certificate before walloping him?

Original Quill wrote:

Stormee wrote:I would not be abled to control myself if I witnessed such, I would not care if I got prosecuted for walloping such scum..

How would you get ahold of the birth certificate before walloping him?

I don't understand that??
The man (dad) looked old enough to be the little girls granddad in this case.

Syl wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

How would you get ahold of the birth certificate before walloping him?

I don't understand that??
The man (dad) looked old enough to be the little girls granddad in this case.

Just a chink in the chain.  With so much May-December dating, Stormee probably would get arrested for assault upon a perfectly innocent couple.  Without the birth certificate to prove the illicit relationship, could be a lot of trouble.

May December??...this child is 5 and the man (who happens to be the dad) is old.

Syl wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3541966/Father-arrested-molesting-five-year-old-daughter-waitress-filmed-sickening-act-restaurant-online-manhunt-tracked-down.html

The video of him apparently sexually molesting his young daughter whilst eating in a restaurant went viral.
Waitresses filmed, him shared the film online and his arrest followed.

You can't actually see what he's doing. So, I can't pass judgement on him.

Syl wrote:May December??...this child is 5 and the man (who happens to be the dad) is old.

Meh...speaking generally, not this particular instance.

eddie wrote:My first thoughs, after feeling disgust toward this animal, is:

WHY didn't the waitress call the police then and there, showed them the video and he could've been arrested straight away?
WHY did they upload to social media?

This took place in the country of Mexico, right?  Where the media have been filling our heads with all the stories of Mexico-mafia style justice and corruption by those very people that are supposed to 'serve & protect'--- I can understand the waitress using social media as a driving force ...maybe that wasn't her main agenda, but it certainly worked swiftly, in this situation!   Whose to know whether or not that the man she was filming wasn't a local politician...or one of those Mexican - mafia types!

Not all sexual deviant acts are handled the same way in foreign countries...despite the mega TV shows like CSI/ Criminal Minds...some forms of sexual abuse are considered a fathers RIGHT
As repulsive as that is to my mind...my deceased Mexican BIL was very much like that...and that's how his father was and his grandfather before him

HoratioTarr wrote:

Syl wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3541966/Father-arrested-molesting-five-year-old-daughter-waitress-filmed-sickening-act-restaurant-online-manhunt-tracked-down.html

The video of him apparently sexually molesting his young daughter whilst eating in a restaurant went viral.
Waitresses filmed, him shared the film online and his arrest followed.

You can't actually see what he's doing.    So, I can't pass judgement on him.

Thank goodness the images are now blurred.
When the video was first posted online it was graphic enough for the police to arrest him.

I would rather said vid be blurred.

Syl wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:

You can't actually see what he's doing.    So, I can't pass judgement on him.

Thank goodness the images are now blurred.
When the video was first posted online it was graphic enough for the police to arrest him.

Well, if the police arrested him, then he's obviously done something that warrants it.

HoratioTarr wrote:

Syl wrote:

Thank goodness the images are now blurred.
When the video was first posted online it was graphic enough for the police to arrest him.

Well, if the police arrested him, then he's obviously done something that warrants it.

Well, of course. We waste so much time and money on trials. Haha...take 'em out back and shoot him.

Must be guilty...cops arrested him!:

Original Quill wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:

Well, if the police arrested him, then he's obviously done something that warrants it.

Well, of course.  We waste so much time and money on trials.  Haha...take 'em out back and shoot him.

Must be guilty...cops arrested him!:

You don't half talk some right old funny sometimes Quill.

Original Quill wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:

Well, if the police arrested him, then he's obviously done something that warrants it.

Well, of course.  We waste so much time and money on trials.  Haha...take 'em out back and shoot him.

Must be guilty...cops arrested him!:

FFS the spoiler opens if you quote the post?
Great.

Miffs2 wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

Well, of course.  We waste so much time and money on trials.  Haha...take 'em out back and shoot him.

Must be guilty...cops arrested him!:

FFS the spoiler opens if you quote the post?
Great.

Did you see the actual photo? When I clicked on the quote button I could just see the URL of the photo.

"take him out the back and shoot him" is barbaric and not the sort of talk on forums.
Do it properly, TORTURE the evil vile filthy bast*** FIRST, make him scream in pain, then shoot him a couple of days later.

That is the proper way.

Miffs2 wrote:

Original Quill wrote:

Well, of course.  We waste so much time and money on trials.  Haha...take 'em out back and shoot him.

Must be guilty...cops arrested him!:

FFS the spoiler opens if you quote the post?
Great.

No, no...I put the photo in the spoiler as I knew there would be protests.

Our cops generally don't shoot people in the head when they arrest them....who was it that said we are not as civilised??

Raggamuffin wrote:

Miffs2 wrote:
FFS the spoiler opens if you quote the post?
Great.

Did you see the actual photo? When I clicked on the quote button I could just see the URL of the photo.

I just quoted but I cant see the pic....I only see it when I click on the spoiler.

Syl wrote:Our cops generally don't shoot people in the head when they arrest them....who was it that said we are not as civilised??

That was a picture of a Vietnam regular executing a Viet Cong soldier.  I posted it as a reference to an idea, not for any ethnic or national identity. I.e.: this is what it means if you believe a man guilty without a trial.

The man was executing the Viet Cong on the basis that if they caught him, he was ipso facto guilty.  The assumption of the argument. Of course it's not civilized...that was my point.

People have gotten used to dispensing with civil and criminal rights, willn-nilly.  If the newspaper article says he did it, that's good enough for them.  We even have some of those in this site, as is obvious.  It's the kind of thinking that has led to Guantanamo concentration camp.  The people therein have never even been charged, let alone tried.  But we assume they are guilty of something.  

It's the makings of a police state.  Remember...you heard it here first!

4EVER2 wrote:

eddie wrote:My first thoughs, after feeling disgust toward this animal, is:

WHY didn't the waitress call the police then and there, showed them the video and he could've been arrested straight away?
WHY did they upload to social media?

This took place in the country of Mexico, right?  Where the media have been filling our heads with all the stories of Mexico-mafia style justice and corruption by those very people that are supposed to 'serve & protect'--- I can understand the waitress using social media as a driving force ...maybe that wasn't her main agenda, but it certainly worked swiftly, in this situation!   Whose to know whether or not that the man she was filming wasn't a local politician...or one of those Mexican - mafia types!

Not all sexual deviant acts are handled the same way in foreign countries...despite the mega TV shows like CSI/ Criminal Minds...some forms of sexual abuse are considered a fathers RIGHT
As repulsive as that is to my mind...my deceased Mexican BIL was very much like that...and that's how his father was and his grandfather before him

They touched kids???