REPUBLICANS: Fast Times with the US Constitution
Page 1 of 1
REPUBLICANS: Fast Times with the US Constitution
The Republicans are denigrating the death of US Supreme Court Justice A ntonin Scalia by turning his funeral into a political battle.
It has long been known that the US Supreme Court is a RW force in American politics, as it is 5—4 Republican. The Court was author of the Bush v. Gore decision, which removed the election of a president from the choice of voters. It was also responsible for the demise of democracy in America, holding the voting rights provision of the 1964 Civil Rights Act unconstitutional. Likewise it was responsible for overturning numerous gun control measures of the various states and municipalities.
The latest Republican assault on the US Constitution comes from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell—yes, the same man who co-authored the McConnell-Boehner doctrine, providing for a government shutdown during the tenure of any black president—who says the President should not appoint a replacement for Justice Scalia, but leave it to the next President.
Article II of the United States Constitution defines the power of any given president to make appointments. It says:
And goes on to say:
It is important to note, for purposes of this discussion, that the Constitution of the United States does not say the next President “shall nominate…and appoint.” The next president is not even mentioned in the Constitution. I am sure that the Constitution contemplates a next president will come along, but it provides no role for him or her.
It is absurd to assign a role for an imaginary individual who is not yet even known. Why not provide for the third or forth president down the road to make Supreme Court appointments? The US Constitution is a system of expressed and delegated powers. Under the Constitution you don't make express provisions for imprecise and inexact persons. Yet that is the very thing that Mitch McConnell is attempting to sell to the American public.
In the end, the Republicans have no respect for the political system of the United States. This is consistent with the party that refuses to govern, and refuses to meet their responsibilities even while collecting a paycheck--or is it welfare?
We hear so much about the dysfunction in Washington today, but it is dysfunction of Republicans. Even Republican candidates cry and caw about 'the establishment' inside the beltway. They complain about 'not reaching across the aisle', but will they be the ones who do so? No...for them it's all take, and no give. When we get down to specifics, we are only talking about Republican dysfunction. Republicans are running Congress and the US Senate, and the Republican 'do-nothing' style of government is the source of the dysfunction.
It has long been known that the US Supreme Court is a RW force in American politics, as it is 5—4 Republican. The Court was author of the Bush v. Gore decision, which removed the election of a president from the choice of voters. It was also responsible for the demise of democracy in America, holding the voting rights provision of the 1964 Civil Rights Act unconstitutional. Likewise it was responsible for overturning numerous gun control measures of the various states and municipalities.
The latest Republican assault on the US Constitution comes from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell—yes, the same man who co-authored the McConnell-Boehner doctrine, providing for a government shutdown during the tenure of any black president—who says the President should not appoint a replacement for Justice Scalia, but leave it to the next President.
Article II of the United States Constitution defines the power of any given president to make appointments. It says:
Article II, US Constitution wrote:The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.
And goes on to say:
Article II, US Constitution wrote:...he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint ... Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law..."
It is important to note, for purposes of this discussion, that the Constitution of the United States does not say the next President “shall nominate…and appoint.” The next president is not even mentioned in the Constitution. I am sure that the Constitution contemplates a next president will come along, but it provides no role for him or her.
It is absurd to assign a role for an imaginary individual who is not yet even known. Why not provide for the third or forth president down the road to make Supreme Court appointments? The US Constitution is a system of expressed and delegated powers. Under the Constitution you don't make express provisions for imprecise and inexact persons. Yet that is the very thing that Mitch McConnell is attempting to sell to the American public.
In the end, the Republicans have no respect for the political system of the United States. This is consistent with the party that refuses to govern, and refuses to meet their responsibilities even while collecting a paycheck--or is it welfare?
We hear so much about the dysfunction in Washington today, but it is dysfunction of Republicans. Even Republican candidates cry and caw about 'the establishment' inside the beltway. They complain about 'not reaching across the aisle', but will they be the ones who do so? No...for them it's all take, and no give. When we get down to specifics, we are only talking about Republican dysfunction. Republicans are running Congress and the US Senate, and the Republican 'do-nothing' style of government is the source of the dysfunction.
Original Quill- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 59
Location : Northern California
Similar topics
» Impeachment? Is the Constitution Unconstitutional?
» Does the U.S. constitution grant a right to lie? That's what Exxon is arguing in court
» Federal Judge Nominee Claims Bible Precedes Constitution
» California college student teaches school $50,000 lesson on Constitution
» FIRE’s Spotlight Database will tell you if your college or university denies students and faculty the rights they are granted by the Constitution and/or by institutional promises.
» Does the U.S. constitution grant a right to lie? That's what Exxon is arguing in court
» Federal Judge Nominee Claims Bible Precedes Constitution
» California college student teaches school $50,000 lesson on Constitution
» FIRE’s Spotlight Database will tell you if your college or university denies students and faculty the rights they are granted by the Constitution and/or by institutional promises.
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sat Mar 18, 2023 12:28 pm by Ben Reilly
» TOTAL MADNESS Great British Railway Journeys among shows flagged by counter terror scheme ‘for encouraging far-right sympathies
Wed Feb 22, 2023 5:14 pm by Tommy Monk
» Interesting COVID figures
Tue Feb 21, 2023 5:00 am by Tommy Monk
» HAPPY CHRISTMAS.
Sun Jan 01, 2023 7:33 pm by Tommy Monk
» The Fight Over Climate Change is Over (The Greenies Won!)
Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:59 pm by Tommy Monk
» Trump supporter murders wife, kills family dog, shoots daughter
Mon Dec 12, 2022 1:21 am by 'Wolfie
» Quill
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:28 pm by Tommy Monk
» Algerian Woman under investigation for torture and murder of French girl, 12, whose body was found in plastic case in Paris
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:04 pm by Tommy Monk
» Wind turbines cool down the Earth (edited with better video link)
Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:19 am by Ben Reilly
» Saying goodbye to our Queen.
Sun Sep 25, 2022 9:02 pm by Maddog
» PHEW.
Sat Sep 17, 2022 6:33 pm by Syl
» And here's some more enrichment...
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:46 pm by Ben Reilly
» John F Kennedy Assassination
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:40 pm by Ben Reilly
» Where is everyone lately...?
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:33 pm by Ben Reilly
» London violence over the weekend...
Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:19 pm by Tommy Monk
» Why should anyone believe anything that Mo Farah says...!?
Wed Jul 13, 2022 1:44 am by Tommy Monk
» Liverpool Labour defends mayor role poll after turnout was only 3% and they say they will push ahead with the option that was least preferred!!!
Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:11 pm by Tommy Monk
» Labour leader Keir Stammer can't answer the simple question of whether a woman has a penis or not...
Mon Jul 11, 2022 3:58 am by Tommy Monk
» More evidence of remoaners still trying to overturn Brexit... and this is a conservative MP who should be drummed out of the party and out of parliament!
Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:50 pm by Tommy Monk
» R Kelly 30 years, Ghislaine Maxwell 20 years... but here in UK...
Fri Jul 08, 2022 5:31 pm by Original Quill