Muslims-Do You Really Want Them Here?

If you do say directly why, state the benefits they will bring to our island?

Let’s Go Dutch . . . but whatever you do, do not listen to Cameron!

The Netherlands, where six per cent of the population is now Muslim, is scrapping multiculturalism.

The Dutch government says it will abandon the long-standing model of multiculturalism that has encouraged Muslim immigrants to create a parallel society within the Netherlands.

A new integration bill, which Dutch Interior Minister Piet Hein Donner presented to parliament, on June 16, 2015 reads:

"The government shares the social dissatisfaction over the multicultural society model and plans to shift priority to the values of the Dutch people."

In the new integration system, the values of the Dutch society, play a central role.

With this change, the government steps away from the model of a multicultural society.

The letter continues: "A more obligatory integration is justified because the government also demands that from its own citizens."

It is necessary because otherwise the society gradually grows apart and eventually no one feels at home anymore in the Netherlands .

The new integration policy will place more demands on immigrants.

For example, immigrants will be required to learn the Dutch language, and the government will take a tougher approach to immigrants who ignore Dutch values or disobey Dutch law.

The government will also stop offering special subsidies for Muslim immigrants because,according to Donner;

"It is not the government's job to integrate immigrants." (How bloody true!!!)

The government will introduce new legislation that outlaws forced marriages and will also impose tougher measures against Muslim immigrants who lower their chances of employment by the way they dress.

More specifically, the government imposed a ban on face-covering, Islamic burqas as of January 1, 2016.

Holland has done that whole liberal thing, and realized - maybe too late - that creating a nationof tribes, will kill the nation itself.

The futureof Australia,the UK, USA, Canada and New Zealand may well be read here.

READERS NOTE: Muslim immigrants leave their countries of birth because of civil and political
unrest . . . "CREATED BY THE VERY NATURE OF THEIR CULTURE.”

Countries like Holland, Canada, USA, UK, Australia, and New Zealand have an established way of life that actually works, so why embrace the unworkable?

If Muslims do not wish to accept another culture, the answer is simple; "STAY WHERE YOU ARE!!!"

This gives a whole new meaning to the term, 'Dutch Courage' ... Unfortunately Australian, UK, USA,Canadian, and New Zealand politicians don't have the guts to do the same. There's a whole lot of truth here!!!

This is five-year-old "news."

2015 isn't five years ago.

Mind you, a link would have been nice.

But 2011 is:

Here's the link:   http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/2219/netherlands-abandons-multiculturalism

Raggamuffin wrote:2015 isn't five years ago.

Mind you, a link would have been nice.

The Netherlands to Abandon Multiculturalism
by Soeren Kern
June 23, 2011 at 5:00 am
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/2219/netherlands-abandons-multiculturalism

Send
1.1K
Comment (89)
The Dutch government says it will abandon the long-standing model of multiculturalism that has encouraged Muslim immigrants to create a parallel society within the Netherlands.

A new integration bill (covering letter and 15-page action plan), which Dutch Interior Minister Piet Hein Donner presented to parliament on June 16, reads: "The government shares the social dissatisfaction over the multicultural society model and plans to shift priority to the values of the Dutch people. In the new integration system, the values of the Dutch society play a central role. With this change, the government steps away from the model of a multicultural society."

The letter continues: "A more obligatory integration is justified because the government also demands that from its own citizens. It is necessary because otherwise the society gradually grows apart and eventually no one feels at home anymore in the Netherlands. The integration will not be tailored to different groups."

The new integration policy will place more demands on immigrants. For example, immigrants will be required to learn the Dutch language, and the government will take a tougher approach to immigrants to ignore Dutch values or disobey Dutch law.

The government will also stop offering special subsidies for Muslim immigrants because, according to Donner, "it is not the government's job to integrate immigrants." The government will introduce new legislation that outlaws forced marriages and will also impose tougher measures against Muslim immigrants who lower their chances of employment by the way they dress. More specifically, the government will impose a ban on face-covering Islamic burqas as of January 1, 2013.

Google is our friend ...

How could anyone have known what happened in 2015 in 2011?

A new integration bill, which Dutch Interior Minister Piet Hein Donner presented to parliament, on June 16, 2015 reads ...

Raggamuffin wrote:How could anyone have known what happened in 2015 in 2011?

A new integration bill, which Dutch Interior Minister Piet Hein Donner presented to parliament, on June 16, 2015 reads ...

How did this site know in April 2013?

A new integration bill, which Dutch Interior Minister Piet Hein Donner presented to parliament on June 16, reads: “The government shares the social dissatisfaction over the multicultural society model and plans to shift priority to the values of the Dutch people.

http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/04/29/hooray-the-netherlands-makes-good-on-its-promise-to-end-multiculturalism-christians-bending-over-for-Muslim-supremacists-and-entitlement-whores/

Or this one, in January 2013?

A new integration bill, which Dutch Interior Minister Piet Hein Donner presented to parliament on June 16, reads:

“The government shares the social dissatisfaction over the multicultural society model and plans to shift priority to the values of the Dutch people.

http://conservativepapers.com/news/2013/01/26/the-netherlands-to-abandon-multiculturalism/

Or this one, in June 2012?

A new integration bill, which Dutch Interior Minister Piet Hein
Donner presented to parliament on June 16, reads: "The government shares
the social dissatisfaction over the multicultural society model, and
plans to shift priority to the values of the Dutch people.

http://www.gt40s.com/forum/paddock/37394-any-one-holland-comment-true.html

(drum roll, please .... )

WELCOME to the world of right-wing Islamophobia, in which items like this are circulated as news for years and years.

We saw Smelly posting as "news" things that happened years ago as well. It's what they do in order to keep stoking the flame of hate.

So it wasn't presented on 16 June 2015 then?

Raggamuffin wrote:So it wasn't presented on 16 June 2015 then?

Not unless he presented it again on the five-year anniversary of the first time he presented it:

http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2011/06/multiculturalism_must_go_donne/

Donner doesn't even have that job anymore! He left in December 2011:

serving until 14 October 2010 when he became Minister of the Interior and Kingdom Relations in the Cabinet Rutte I. He resigned on 16 December 2011 after he was elected the new Vice President of the Council of State succeeding Herman Tjeenk Willink, he was replaced as Minister of the Interior and Kingdom Relations by fellow Christian Democratic Appeal party member Liesbeth Spies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piet_Hein_Donner

The right is so gullible, instantly believing anything that they agree with, without bothering to check if they're being deceived.

Ben_Reilly wrote:Donner doesn't even have that job anymore! He left in December 2011:

serving until 14 October 2010 when he became Minister of the Interior and Kingdom Relations in the Cabinet Rutte I. He resigned on 16 December 2011 after he was elected the new Vice President of the Council of State succeeding Herman Tjeenk Willink, he was replaced as Minister of the Interior and Kingdom Relations by fellow Christian Democratic Appeal party member Liesbeth Spies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piet_Hein_Donner

The right is so gullible, instantly believing anything that they agree with, without bothering to check if they're being deceived.

I think it's lefties who tend to believe what they see without checking it. They even sometimes quote from the Daily Mail if it suits them.

they probably use old news items like this in the SAME way as the left use ancient history to justify tgheir self loathing stance...


"oooh dahrlings, we were sooo nasty to these (who ever) 100 years ago, so we should give em everything we have and wear sack cloth and ashes forever in atonement"

at least te news items are only 5 / 10 years behind the times

Lord Foul wrote:they probably use old news items like this in the SAME way as the left use ancient history to justify tgheir self loathing stance...


"oooh dahrlings, we were sooo nasty to these (who ever) 100 years ago, so we should give em everything we have and wear sack cloth and ashes forever in atonement"  

at least te news items are only 5 / 10 years behind the times

Those unequal situations lasted till much more recently than what you're making out, and they haven't been completely fixed to this day. That's why we keep bringing them up.

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:they probably use old news items like this in the SAME way as the left use ancient history to justify tgheir self loathing stance...


"oooh dahrlings, we were sooo nasty to these (who ever) 100 years ago, so we should give em everything we have and wear sack cloth and ashes forever in atonement"  

at least te news items are only 5 / 10 years behind the times

Those unequal situations lasted till much more recently than what you're making out, and they haven't been completely fixed to this day. That's why we keep bringing them up.

Maybe the Dutch Integration bill hasn't fixed things, so it needed to be brought up again.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:Donner doesn't even have that job anymore! He left in December 2011:

serving until 14 October 2010 when he became Minister of the Interior and Kingdom Relations in the Cabinet Rutte I. He resigned on 16 December 2011 after he was elected the new Vice President of the Council of State succeeding Herman Tjeenk Willink, he was replaced as Minister of the Interior and Kingdom Relations by fellow Christian Democratic Appeal party member Liesbeth Spies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piet_Hein_Donner

The right is so gullible, instantly believing anything that they agree with, without bothering to check if they're being deceived.

I think it's lefties who tend to believe what they see without checking it. They even sometimes quote from the Daily Mail if it suits them.

While the righties don't seem to accept things they don't agree with even if it comes from something they trust, like the Daily Heil ...

Raggamuffin wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:they probably use old news items like this in the SAME way as the left use ancient history to justify tgheir self loathing stance...


"oooh dahrlings, we were sooo nasty to these (who ever) 100 years ago, so we should give em everything we have and wear sack cloth and ashes forever in atonement"  

at least te news items are only 5 / 10 years behind the times

Those unequal situations lasted till much more recently than what you're making out, and they haven't been completely fixed to this day. That's why we keep bringing them up.

Maybe the Dutch Integration bill hasn't fixed things, so it needed to be brought up again.

There's obviously a huge difference between bringing a bill up again and a six-year-old copypasta

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I think it's lefties who tend to believe what they see without checking it. They even sometimes quote from the Daily Mail if it suits them.

While the righties don't seem to accept things they don't agree with even if it comes from something they trust, like the Daily Heil ...

I don't know that they do trust the Daily Mail. The Daily Mail tends to have a lot of detail which other papers don't have, but it's worth checking out what it's saying. Lefties don't bother to do that if they like an article in the Mail though.

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Maybe the Dutch Integration bill hasn't fixed things, so it needed to be brought up again.

There's obviously a huge difference between bringing a bill up again and a six-year-old copypasta

Six years now? It just keeps getting longer ...

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:they probably use old news items like this in the SAME way as the left use ancient history to justify tgheir self loathing stance...


"oooh dahrlings, we were sooo nasty to these (who ever) 100 years ago, so we should give em everything we have and wear sack cloth and ashes forever in atonement"  

at least te news items are only 5 / 10 years behind the times

Those unequal situations lasted till much more recently than what you're making out, and they haven't been completely fixed to this day. That's why we keep bringing them up.

yeah yeah, we know ben....

< pats ben on head /

Raggamuffin wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I think it's lefties who tend to believe what they see without checking it. They even sometimes quote from the Daily Mail if it suits them.

While the righties don't seem to accept things they don't agree with even if it comes from something they trust, like the Daily Heil ...

I don't know that they do trust the Daily Mail. The Daily Mail tends to have a lot of detail which other papers don't have, but it's worth checking out what it's saying. Lefties don't bother to do that if they like an article in the Mail though.

Let me fix that for you:

I don't know that they do trust the Daily Mail. The Daily Mail tends to have a lot of detail right-wing spin which other papers don't have, but it's not worth checking out what it's saying. Lefties don't bother to do that even if they don't like an article in the Mail though.

Lord Foul wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:they probably use old news items like this in the SAME way as the left use ancient history to justify tgheir self loathing stance...


"oooh dahrlings, we were sooo nasty to these (who ever) 100 years ago, so we should give em everything we have and wear sack cloth and ashes forever in atonement"  

at least te news items are only 5 / 10 years behind the times

Those unequal situations lasted till much more recently than what you're making out, and they haven't been completely fixed to this day. That's why we keep bringing them up.

yeah yeah, we know ben....

< pats ben on head /

< kicks Vic in the balls (takes several tries to find them, finally kicking in the general area of the left knee) /

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I don't know that they do trust the Daily Mail. The Daily Mail tends to have a lot of detail which other papers don't have, but it's worth checking out what it's saying. Lefties don't bother to do that if they like an article in the Mail though.

Let me fix that for you:

I don't know that they do trust the Daily Mail. The Daily Mail tends to have a lot of detail right-wing spin which other papers don't have, but it's not worth checking out what it's saying. Lefties don't bother to do that even if they don't like an article in the Mail though.

Look, concentrate on your own newspapers instead of obsessing about the Mail.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Maybe the Dutch Integration bill hasn't fixed things, so it needed to be brought up again.

There's obviously a huge difference between bringing a bill up again and a six-year-old copypasta

Six years now? It just keeps getting longer ...

4 years and 8 months, there you go.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I don't know that they do trust the Daily Mail. The Daily Mail tends to have a lot of detail which other papers don't have, but it's worth checking out what it's saying. Lefties don't bother to do that if they like an article in the Mail though.

Let me fix that for you:

I don't know that they do trust the Daily Mail. The Daily Mail tends to have a lot of detail right-wing spin which other papers don't have, but it's not worth checking out what it's saying. Lefties don't bother to do that even if they don't like an article in the Mail though.

Look, concentrate on your own newspapers instead of obsessing about the Mail.

The Heil is my newspaper. If you want it to be just yours, get them to firewall it outside the UK.

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:

yeah yeah, we know ben....

< pats ben on head /

< kicks Vic in the balls (takes several tries to find them, finally kicking in the general area of the left knee) /

If I wanted to make a fight of it i would say......................

oh bugger it I'll say it


at least i have some to kick...and if they are haging that low they must be worth kicking......

unlike the gonad deficient lefty surrender monkeys who roll over and oblige instantly.....

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Six years now? It just keeps getting longer ...

4 years and 8 months, there you go.

That's not even five years!

OK, I'm going to start finding UK news from over four years ago and start posting it here. It should be lots of fun, and according to y'all's standard, it's not too old to be news.

Also, it's going to be news from other countries, but it's going to go in UK news.

But it won't be Muslim-bashing bile, so prepare to be disappointed ...

Lord Foul wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:

yeah yeah, we know ben....

< pats ben on head /

< kicks Vic in the balls (takes several tries to find them, finally kicking in the general area of the left knee) /

If I wanted to make a fight of it i would say......................

oh bugger it I'll say it


at least i have some to kick...and if they are haging that low they must be worth kicking......

unlike the gonad deficient lefty surrender monkeys who roll over and oblige instantly.....  

Come to think of it, I don't think I could bring myself to shove an old man off his walker, so forget it

Ben_Reilly wrote:OK, I'm going to start finding UK news from over four years ago and start posting it here. It should be lots of fun, and according to y'all's standard, it's not too old to be news.

Also, it's going to be news from other countries, but it's going to go in UK news.

If THATS whats bugging you...you have both the right(since its in the rules) and the means to move it to the relevant forum  

But it won't be Muslim-bashing bile, so prepare to be disappointed ...

do i detect a lefty hissy fit comming on

"I just got spanked...wahhhhhhhhh!!!!!"

   

Lord Foul wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:OK, I'm going to start finding UK news from over four years ago and start posting it here. It should be lots of fun, and according to y'all's standard, it's not too old to be news.

Also, it's going to be news from other countries, but it's going to go in UK news.

If THATS whats bugging you...you have both the right(since its in the rules) to move it to the relevant forum  

But it won't be Muslim-bashing bile, so prepare to be disappointed ...

do i detect a lefty hissy fit comming on

"I just got spanked...wahhhhhhhhh!!!!!"

   

Excuse me, but where did I get spanked? I proved that you swallowed whole a story from 2011 as news.

excuse you...not......

You proved sod all, since i didnt comment on the story per se,

my "contribution" was in reply to YOU comment about how the right use old news...whereas in fact the left are the PRIME architects of this....

as for "spanked" i think about 3 threads worth bears mentioning

Lord Foul wrote:excuse you...not......

You proved sod all, since i didnt comment on the story per se,

my "contribution" was in reply to YOU comment about how the right use old news...whereas in fact the left are the PRIME architects of this....

as for "spanked"  i think about 3 threads worth bears mentioning  

Old news is news that doesn't matter anymore, you willfully ignorant, brainwashed wordsmithing fascist.

so "old history" (which is after all the "oldest news") doesnt matter either

and i take that last string of epithets as a compliment, especially the last......


your response to this is amusing ben

tell me when I can put your dummy back in your pram....
or is this the level we can expect from the proponents of the left?
         

Lord Foul wrote:so "old history" (which is after all the "oldest news") doesnt matter either

and i take that last string of epithets as a compliment, especially the last......


your response to this is amusing ben

tell me when I can put your dummy back in your pram....
or is this the level we can expect from the proponents of the left?
         

No, idiot -- it's not old news if it still matters. Old news is irrelevant. Historical issues which affect modern issues are not irrelevant.

Ben_Reilly wrote:OK, I'm going to start finding UK news from over four years ago and start posting it here. It should be lots of fun, and according to y'all's standard, it's not too old to be news.

Also, it's going to be news from other countries, but it's going to go in UK news.

But it won't be Muslim-bashing bile, so prepare to be disappointed ...

I don't know who this "y'all" is you're referring to, but I was merely commenting on the changing timeline of the story. If you're referring to Victor yet again, then say so.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:OK, I'm going to start finding UK news from over four years ago and start posting it here. It should be lots of fun, and according to y'all's standard, it's not too old to be news.

Also, it's going to be news from other countries, but it's going to go in UK news.

But it won't be Muslim-bashing bile, so prepare to be disappointed ...

I don't know who this "y'all" is you're referring to, but I was merely commenting on the changing timeline of the story. If you're referring to Victor yet again, then say so.

The timeline IS NOT CHANGING, how hard is this to understand? Muslim-bashing sites keep changing the date to make this seem as though it's news.

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I don't know who this "y'all" is you're referring to, but I was merely commenting on the changing timeline of the story. If you're referring to Victor yet again, then say so.

The timeline IS NOT CHANGING, how hard is this to understand? Muslim-bashing sites keep changing the date to make this seem as though it's news.

It's changed in this thread. First it was last year, then it was five years ago, then it was six years ago, then it was four years and eight months ago.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I don't know who this "y'all" is you're referring to, but I was merely commenting on the changing timeline of the story. If you're referring to Victor yet again, then say so.

The timeline IS NOT CHANGING, how hard is this to understand? Muslim-bashing sites keep changing the date to make this seem as though it's news.

It's changed in this thread. First it was last year, then it was five years ago, then it was six years ago, then it was four years and eight months ago.

I first saw that it was originally reported in 2011, so I said "five years ago." Then I mistakenly said "six years ago." Precisely, it was four years, 8 months ago. But other sites are reporting it as having happened more recently -- falsely so.

I can tell you're just trying to piss me off.

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

It's changed in this thread. First it was last year, then it was five years ago, then it was six years ago, then it was four years and eight months ago.

I first saw that it was originally reported in 2011, so I said "five years ago." Then I mistakenly said "six years ago." Precisely, it was four years, 8 months ago. But other sites are reporting it as having happened more recently -- falsely so.

I can tell you're just trying to piss me off.

Well it's always worth a try ...

Raggamuffin wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

It's changed in this thread. First it was last year, then it was five years ago, then it was six years ago, then it was four years and eight months ago.

I first saw that it was originally reported in 2011, so I said "five years ago." Then I mistakenly said "six years ago." Precisely, it was four years, 8 months ago. But other sites are reporting it as having happened more recently -- falsely so.

I can tell you're just trying to piss me off.

Well it's always worth a try ...

Thanks, it's good to know that me having a bad time on my own site is funny to you. You must lead such a rich, rewarding life.

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Well it's always worth a try ...

Thanks, it's good to know that me having a bad time on my own site is funny to you. You must lead such a rich, rewarding life.

I thought you were enjoying yourself ...

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:so "old history" (which is after all the "oldest news") doesnt matter either

and i take that last string of epithets as a compliment, especially the last......


your response to this is amusing ben

tell me when I can put your dummy back in your pram....
or is this the level we can expect from the proponents of the left?
         

No, idiot -- it's not old news if it still matters. Old news is irrelevant. Historical issues which affect modern issues are not irrelevant.

only if it suits your agenda eh? (and that applies to both left and right equally)

and this is why Europe is a failure and need to be given freedom by the USA....
 

immigrants to create a parallel society

So they NEVER had Multiculturalism they had a failure.
they are not Scrapping what they never had!!! this is just an admission of their epic incompetence and uselessness in general.

veya_victaous wrote:and this is why Europe is a failure and need to be given freedom by the USA....
 

immigrants to create a parallel society

So they NEVER had Multiculturalism they had a failure.
they are not Scrapping what they never had!!! this is just an admission of their epic incompetence and uselessness in general.

Didn't you get the memo about this story being old news?

Islam and Britain

Queen Elizabeth I asked the Ottoman Sultan for assistance against the Spanish Armada ©


There are references to Islamic scholars in the prologue to Chaucer's Canterbury Tales (1386).

Following the Crusades against Islam, Britain became friendly with some Islamic countries. Queen Elizabeth I, for example, asked the Ottoman Sultan Murad for naval assistance against the Spanish Armada.

The first recorded Englishman to become a Muslim was John Nelson, who converted to Islam at some point in the 16th Century.

A 1641 document refers to "a sect of Mahomatens" being "discovered here in London". There were also a few conversions to Islam during the period, and a few years later, in 1649, came the first English version of the Qur'an, by Alexander Ross.

In the 18th and 19th Centuries there were a number of converts to Islam amongst the English upper classes, including Edward Montagu, son of the ambassador to Turkey.



The first large group of Muslims in Britain arrived about 300 years ago. They were sailors recruited in India to work for the East India Company, and so it's not surprising that the first Muslim communities were found in port towns.

Ships' cooks came too, many of them from Sylhet in what is now Bangladesh. There are records of Sylhetis working in London restaurants as early as 1873.

Some Muslim sailors decided to stay in Britain and simply left their ships without going through any formal immigration procedure.

The next wave of Muslim immigration to Britain followed the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869. The increase in trade caused a demand for men to work in ports and on ships.

Most of these immigrants came from the Yemen, probably because Aden was the main refuelling stop for ships between Britain and the Far East, and many of the seamen later settled in the port cities of Cardiff, Liverpool, South Shields, Hull, and London. There are now an estimated 70-80,000 Yemenis living in Britain, who form the longest-established Muslim group in Britain.

An example is the Yemeni community of South Shields, which began at the end of the 19th century when Yemenis working as stokers on steamships moved ashore and set up boarding houses in the dock area.

The first mosque in Britain is recorded as having been at 2 Glyn Rhondda Street, Cardiff, in 1860.

Tough shit Stormee lol

Raggamuffin wrote:

veya_victaous wrote:and this is why Europe is a failure and need to be given freedom by the USA....
 

immigrants to create a parallel society

So they NEVER had Multiculturalism they had a failure.
they are not Scrapping what they never had!!! this is just an admission of their epic incompetence and uselessness in general.

Didn't you get the memo about this story being old news?

But silly old Europeans are still acting the same.

We need to fix them with with more multicultralism......
and considering the events of the years inbetween the powers are taking that advice 

veya_victaous wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didn't you get the memo about this story being old news?

But silly old Europeans are still acting the same.

We need to fix them with with more multicultralism......
and considering the events of the years inbetween the powers are taking that advice 

You and whose army?  

Raggamuffin wrote:

veya_victaous wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Didn't you get the memo about this story being old news?

But silly old Europeans are still acting the same.

We need to fix them with with more multicultralism......
and considering the events of the years inbetween the powers are taking that advice 

You and whose army?  

the refugee one