Stratfor Thinks Israel Did 9/11?

Stratfor Thinks Israel Did 9/11?

Posted on 2013 08 29 by Jason Unruhe

I have a friend who often blames the Jews for pretty much every major incident that takes place. It is a source of strain on our friendship especially when he goes off on how Mao Tse-tung was a Jew, or at least controlled by the Jews. Now I understand that some people might not be happy with me being friends with an anti-Semite. However I feel that since he is my friend that I should try and help change him. I’d like to convince him to stop with the whole Jew blaming thing. Now to anyone who has ever tried to combat a person’s anti-Semitism, you how difficult a task it can be. It’s a very frustrating process that can often seem like it’s going backwards, not forwards. The task grows monumentally more difficult when something like this happens:

Actual evidence that Israel may have been behind the 9/11 attacks.

I know how that sounds. I know it seems very anti-Semitic, but this information comes from WikiLeaks. It comes from information released by the 5 million e-mails stolen from Stratfor. I’m sure we all remember when those got leaked to the public. Stratfor is a “global intelligence” company that fonts as “an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal’s Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency.” So this somewhat of a semi-legit source, take it or leave it.

According the release, British intelligence reported in 2002 that the Israeli Mossad actually ran the group of terrorists that were accused of carrying out the terrorist attacks of 9/11. It includes both the attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon. It also shockingly shows that the report was suppressed by the government of Tony Blair.

A Mossad unit consisting of six Egyptian- and Yemeni-born Jews infiltrated “Al Qaeda” cells in Hamburg (the Atta-Mamoun Darkanzali cell), south Florida, and Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates in the months before 9/11. The Mossad not only infiltrated cells but began to run them and give them specific orders that would eventually culminate in their being on board four regularly-scheduled flights originating in Boston, Washington Dulles, and Newark, New Jersey on 9/11.

The Mossad infiltration team comprised six Israelis, comprising two cells of three agents, who all received special training at a Mossad base in the Negev Desert in their future control and handling of the “Al Qaeda” cells. One Mossad cell traveled to Amsterdam where they submitted to the operational control of the Mossad’s Europe Station, which operates from the El Al complexat Schiphol International Airport. The three-man Mossad unit then traveled to Hamburg where it made contact with Mohammed Atta, who believed they were sent by Osama Bin Laden. In fact, they were sent by Ephraim Halevy, the chief of Mossad.

The second three-man Mossad team flew to New York and then to southern Florida where they began to direct the “Al Qaeda” cells operating from Hollywood, Miami, Vero Beach, Delray Beach, and West Palm Beach. Israeli “art students,” already under investigation by the Drug Enforcement Administration for casing the offices and homes of federal law enforcement officers, had been living among and conducting surveillance of the activities, including flight school training, of the future Arab “hijacker” cells, particularly in Hollywood and Vero Beach.

This is all very confusing because it’s quite something to actually seriously accuse Israel of being behind the events. There is no actual proof that Israel is responsible, but the source does lend some credibility to the claim. We do however know that Mossad agents were arrested on 9/11 and were held for some time for suspected involvement. The e-mail contains this fact and claims that they are the same one who coordinated the attacks. These men were seen by a witness celebrating the destruction of the towers. She also saw them with video recording equipment capturing the event. (See the arrest report here. See the witness statement here.)

If this isn’t suspicious enough, the men later appeared on television stating that their whole purpose of being there was to document the event. Their actual words were: “The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event.” This is after the arrest and after the attack. How could they have been there to document the event unless they knew it was going to happen? (See that video here.)

I don’t know what has happened here. I’m not the kind of person to blame 9/11 on Israel or Jews. What I do think however is that there is something here that has not been investigated, or at least not been properly investigated. I see no proof that Israel was behind the 9/11 terrorist attack, but I do see some pretty convincing evidence. You’ll have to be the judge until we have all the facts. That is assuming of course that we ever will.

https://search.wikileaks.org/gifiles/?viewemailid=1332210

[Analytical & Intelligence Comments] Mossad ran 9/11 Arab "hijacker" terrorist operation

http://www.scribd.com/doc/46173840/Dancing-Israelis-Police-Report
Witness Testimony and Israeli Television Interview
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRfhUezbKLw






http://maoistrebelnews.com/2013/08/29/stratfor-thinks-israel-did-911/

No doubt I'll accused by posting that as being nothing more than a terrorist supporting commie anti-semetic bitch.  Do I care? 

No just that you are nazi scum, who hates the Jews.
It certainly means you are an apologist for both Bin laden and Al-Qaeda




The Campaign Against Antisemitism will always be apolitical and non-partisan. However, we also must not fear to call out antisemitism wherever we see it. Jeremy Corbyn hails from the far-left, and whereas far-right antisemitism is anathema to the far-left, Jewish conspiracy myths and Islamist antisemitism are often accommodated.
In the past week we have been approached by the Daily Mail to comment on two separate stories revealing Corbyn’s association with antisemites. We wonder why Corbyn has failed to distance himself from antisemites and in some cases has even praised them. For a prospective Labour Party leader, we would have thought that any proximity to antisemites would be toxic. Left unaddressed, it would surely prove fatal to their candidacy; not so for Jeremy Corbyn, frontrunner to become Leader of the Opposition according to recent polls.
Paul Eisen, a self-professed Holocaust denier, claims close association with Corbyn over several years and even that Corbyn has donated to his work. When confronted by the Daily Mail last week, Corbyn’s spokesman condemned Eisen’s views, but declined to comment on Eisen’s claims that Corbyn has attended “every single” one of his events and donated towards his work.
In February, the reverend Stephen Sizer, was ordered by the Church of England to stop using social media after posting an antisemitic conspiracy myth that Israel planned 9/11. While the Church said the material Sizer posted was “clearly antisemitic”, on Sunday the Mailrevealed that Corbyn wrote to the Church defending Sizer, saying that he was being victimised because he “dared to speak out against Zionism”.
In April 2012, Corbyn warmly praised Ra’ed Salah, a prolific antisemite who claims that Israel planned 9/11 and who has, according to the Court of Appeal, even promoted the antisemitic blood libel that Jews bake bread using the blood of non-Jewish children. Yet Corbyn has said “Salah’s is a voice that must be heard” and publicly told Salah: “I look forward to giving you tea on the terrace because you deserve it!”
In July, the Telegraph revealed that Corbyn has accepted thousands of pounds in gifts from organisations closely-related to Hamas. This was particularly concerning following Corbyn’s 2009 speech to a conference at the House of Commons in which he said: “And I’ve also invited friends from Hamas to come and speak as well. Unfortunately the Israelis would not allow them to travel here. The idea that [Hamas] should be labelled as a terrorist organisation by the British government is really a big, big historical mistake and I would invite the government to reconsider its position on this matter and start talking directly to Hamas and Hezbollah.”
In its charter, Hamas openly calls for the genocide of all Jews: “our fight with the Jews is very extensive and very grave, and it requires all the sincere efforts… The hour of judgment shall not come until the Muslims fight the Jews and kill them.” The Hamas charter also rejects any form of negotiation intended to lead to a peace deal: “[Peace] initiatives, the so-called peaceful solutions, and the international conferences to resolve the Palestinian problem, are all contrary to the beliefs of the Islamic Resistance Movement,” it states. Hezbollah’s leader, Hassan Nasrallah has been quoted by the New York Times saying: “If Jews all gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of going after them worldwide.”
Perhaps more worrying than Corbyn’s association with antisemites is that this appears not to bother his supporters.

https://antisemitism.uk/jeremy-corbyn-and-antisemites/




Ten years after  9/11, anti-Semitic conspiracy theories surrounding the attacks are "alive and well" and fueled by an entrenched propaganda industry, according to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which today issued a new report showing how these theories have grown and evolved over the last decade.
In "Decade of Deceit: Anti-Semitic 9/11 Conspiracy Theories 10 Years Later," ADL looks at the individuals who continue to circulate distorted conspiracy theories about 9/11, including the claim that the Jews or Israel perpetrated the attacks instead of Al Qaeda.  A new chorus of voices , who claim not to be anti-Jewish but simply anti-Zionist, have become the most popular promoters of these ideas.
 "It is shocking that nearly a decade after 9/11 we are still confronted with those who continue to deny the historical record of 9/11 or who hold fast to anti-Semitic myths about that horrific day," said Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director.  "For ten years, the historical record has been warped and manipulated by anti-Semites intent on creating their false version of history.  One of the saddest outcomes of 9/11 is that despite the fact that this national tragedy that brought so Americans together, there remains this small group of vocal bigots who, nearly a decade later, are still seeking to promote and sell their own sinister agenda of blaming Jews and Israel."
The most prominent promoters of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories today are less often white supremacists and right-wing anti-Semites.  Rather they more commonly are members of a group of anti-Israel conspiracists who see the 9/11 attacks as one of a series of "false flag" operations that Israel has carried out to manufacture a war against its Muslim enemies.
According to the League's analysis, while the prevalence of certain conspiracy theories has changed over the last decade, one constant has been the penchant to accuse Jews and Israel of planning and executing the 9/11 attacks. 
The conspiracy theories, which surfaced immediately after 9/11, have continued to circulate widely on the Internet, where conspiracy-mongers and anti-Semites have found a built-in audience for their ideas.  These theories are promoted and shared on conspiracy-oriented web sites, social networking sites, and video sites.  In addition, there is a flood of books and DVDs that proclaim that Jews and/or Israelis were behind the 9/11 attacks.                           
Certain conspiracy theories have increased in popularity over the past decade, according to ADL.  The most prevalent anti-Semitic conspiracy theory that initially circulated following the attacks alleged that "4,000 Israelis" or Jews were forewarned and told to stay home from the World Trade Center on 9/11.  While this theory has largely receded into the background, other major anti-Semitic conspiracy theories have come to the forefront.
The most popular conspiratorial allegations include the following:

• Variations of this theory assert that the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, was behind the 9/11 attacks; the "proof" is in the "five dancing Israelis" arrested on 9/11 who were allegedly celebrating as the Twin Towers burned.  Today, the theory claims that the five Israelis were actually directing the attacks and began dancing when they realized that their mission of creating a "false flag" operation had been accomplished.
  
• Proponents of this theory claim that neo-conservative American officials of Jewish faith within the Bush Administration methodically worked out a plan, with the assistance of the Mossad, to carry out the attacks to benefit Israel.  This theory alleges that these officials orchestrated a plan well before 9/11, with the goal of invading Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries to allow the U.S. and Israel to seize control of resources in that area."
  
• The "truth" about Israeli and Jewish involvement in the 9/11 attacks will not be allowed to emerge, claim conspiracy theorists, since Jews are or were in charge of the 9/11 Commission report and control the media and government.
  

 

http://www.adl.org/anti-semitism/united-states/c/911-conspiracy-theories-2011.html?referrer=https://www.google.co.uk/#.VrNb-RiLSM8

This goes back to the point that thousands did not have to conspire to make 9/11 happen.

The Wikileaks:

According the release, British intelligence reported in 2002 that the Israeli Mossad actually ran the group of terrorists that were accused of carrying out the terrorist attacks of 9/11. It includes both the attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon. It also shockingly shows that the report was suppressed by the government of Tony Blair.

A Mossad unit consisting of six Egyptian- and Yemeni-born Jews infiltrated “Al Qaeda” cells in Hamburg (the Atta-Mamoun Darkanzali cell), south Florida, and Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates in the months before 9/11. The Mossad not only infiltrated cells but began to run them and give them specific orders that would eventually culminate in their being on board four regularly-scheduled flights originating in Boston, Washington Dulles, and Newark, New Jersey on 9/11.

The Mossad infiltration team comprised six Israelis, comprising two cells of three agents, who all received special training at a Mossad base in the Negev Desert in their future control and handling of the “Al Qaeda” cells. One Mossad cell traveled to Amsterdam where they submitted to the operational control of the Mossad’s Europe Station, which operates from the El Al complexat Schiphol International Airport. The three-man Mossad unit then traveled to Hamburg where it made contact with Mohammed Atta, who believed they were sent by Osama Bin Laden. In fact, they were sent by Ephraim Halevy, the chief of Mossad.

The second three-man Mossad team flew to New York and then to southern Florida where they began to direct the “Al Qaeda” cells operating from Hollywood, Miami, Vero Beach, Delray Beach, and West Palm Beach. Israeli “art students,” already under investigation by the Drug Enforcement Administration for casing the offices and homes of federal law enforcement officers, had been living among and conducting surveillance of the activities, including flight school training, of the future Arab “hijacker” cells, particularly in Hollywood and Vero Beach.

is quite something!

Does it not based on the claims made?

I think not

But mainly idiots would buy into them because they are motivated by other means they have to place that blame to make fit their mindset and in your case and sassy that is antisemitism

Fuzzy Zack wrote:This goes back to the point that thousands did not have to conspire to make 9/11 happen.

I am not sure who was responsible but it sure as hell doesn't need thousands of people! Jesus! I don't even understand why people can't grasp,that!

eddie wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:This goes back to the point that thousands did not have to conspire to make 9/11 happen.

I am not sure who was responsible but it sure as hell doesn't need thousands of people! Jesus! I don't even understand why people can't grasp,that!

9/11 did not take many Al-Qaeda to carry out

Its the absurd claims by the truthers which would require thousands to be involved, hence the absurdity of it not have coming out by now

I cannot understand why the truthers cannot grasp that

What I find disgusting is the motivation by some who are not bothered to know the truth, all they care is to spread disinformation in the view to promote hate, people like that are the scum of the earth as they not care of the consequences of their actions

eddie wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:This goes back to the point that thousands did not have to conspire to make 9/11 happen.

I am not sure who was responsible but it sure as hell doesn't need thousands of people! Jesus! I don't even understand why people can't grasp,that!

It would need a lot of people to cover it up - the airline, the people who were onboard the planes (or not), their families and friends, the flight crews, the air traffic controllers, the people who paid them all to lie, etc.

If none of the people on those planes actually exist, wouldn't someone have realised that by now?

eddie wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:This goes back to the point that thousands did not have to conspire to make 9/11 happen.

I am not sure who was responsible but it sure as hell doesn't need thousands of people! Jesus! I don't even understand why people can't grasp,that!

Lol! They "still" don't get it.

Raggamuffin wrote:

eddie wrote:

Fuzzy Zack wrote:This goes back to the point that thousands did not have to conspire to make 9/11 happen.

I am not sure who was responsible but it sure as hell doesn't need thousands of people! Jesus! I don't even understand why people can't grasp,that!

It would need a lot of people to cover it up - the airline, the people who were onboard the planes (or not), their families and friends, the flight crews, the air traffic controllers, the people who paid them all to lie, etc.

If none of the people on those planes actually exist, wouldn't someone have realised that by now?

Rags I can't say this enough: you need to think like a script writer for the plot and act like a powerful rich man for the means

I can't explain it any better but if I can think of how it could work then so can you

It’ a load of baloney but it certainly wouldn’t have been that difficult for a dedicated group with loads of dosh to attempt it. There was certainly lots of hardware available to do it. The US National Defense inspectorate carried out an audit in 2003 of the US Military inventory and they found that going back over a period of 7 years that they couldn’t account for over 50 aircraft, a couple of dozen tanks and weapons launching systems. They just sort of vanished.. Cruise missiles were also available at the right price and the right contacts.

The big boo boo in it all is of course what happened to the real aircraft and the passengers. What we have been told from all the data published is pretty much accurate and reflects the real truth.

This article s different though because it doesn't really dispute what happened - just who ran it and were responsible for it or knew about it and kept quiet about and said nothing will always be brought up.

Saying that Israel did it is very different to saying that the planes weren't real, or that they were military ones with nobody on them. Therefore, it depends on what kind of conspiracy people are talking about.

I see irn is making excuses for antisemitism again

Dear me, that rat-bot really cracks me up

I see he ducked out of the other debate I made he look a right tit on in regards to France under occupation, but glad he saw sense the poor little rat-boy

Raggamuffin wrote:Saying that Israel did it is very different to saying that the planes weren't real, or that they were military ones with nobody on them. Therefore, it depends on what kind of conspiracy people are talking about.

Very true Raggs and the point I was making

Irn Bru wrote:It’ a load of baloney but it certainly wouldn’t have been that difficult for a dedicated group with loads of dosh to attempt it. There was certainly lots of hardware available to do it. The US National Defense inspectorate carried out an audit in 2003 of the US Military inventory and they found that going back over a period of 7 years that they couldn’t account for over 50 aircraft, a couple of dozen tanks and weapons launching systems. They just sort of vanished.. Cruise missiles were also available at the right price and the right contacts.

The big boo boo in it all is of course what happened to the real aircraft and the passengers. What we have been told from all the data published is pretty much accurate and reflects the real truth.

This article s different though because it doesn't really dispute what happened - just who ran it and were responsible for it or knew about it and kept quiet about and said nothing will always be brought up.

Found it interesting that he didn't say they were guilty, just set out the evidence for others to judge.

Didge wrote:I see irn is making excuses for antisemitism again

Dear me, that rat-bot really cracks me up

I see he ducked out of the other debate I made he look a right tit on in regards to France under occupation, but glad he saw sense the poor little rat-boy

I never said Israel did it. You making things up again.

What debate did I duck out of. There is one that I haven't had the chance to respond to as I actually had some work to do.

Which one?

Irn Bru wrote:

Didge wrote:I see irn is making excuses for antisemitism again

Dear me, that rat-bot really cracks me up

I see he ducked out of the other debate I made he look a right tit on in regards to France under occupation, but glad he saw sense the poor little rat-boy

I never said Israel did it. You making things up again.

What debate did I duck out of. There is one that I haven't had the chance to respond to as I actually had some work to do.

Which one?

Oh dear epic fail the conspiracies in themselves are antisemitism, or did you not grasp that or in fact fail to condemn them?

In your own time rat-boy

Didge wrote:

Irn Bru wrote:

Didge wrote:I see irn is making excuses for antisemitism again

Dear me, that rat-bot really cracks me up

I see he ducked out of the other debate I made he look a right tit on in regards to France under occupation, but glad he saw sense the poor little rat-boy

I never said Israel did it. You making things up again.

What debate did I duck out of. There is one that I haven't had the chance to respond to as I actually had some work to do.

Which one?

Oh dear epic fail the conspiracies in themselves are antisemitism, or did you not grasp that or in fact fail to condemn them?

In your own time rat-boy

I said the conspiracy theory was a load of baloney. You never read what is written do you?

I see he's given up all pretence of not being abusive lol

Irn Bru wrote:

Didge wrote:



Oh dear epic fail the conspiracies in themselves are antisemitism, or did you not grasp that or in fact fail to condemn them?

In your own time rat-boy

I said the conspiracy theory was a load of baloney. You never read what is written do you?

Then condemn it as antisemitism rat-boy

Your lapdog, seems to hold that Israel was behind this

Which makes her very much antismitic

sassy wrote:I see he's given up all pretence of not being abusive lol

But the lad dis well keeping all that anger under wraps for the few weeks that it lasted. Credit where it is due I would say

Irn Bru wrote:

sassy wrote:I see he's given up all pretence of not being abusive lol

But the lad dis well keeping all that anger under wraps for the few weeks that it lasted. Credit where it is due I would say

It's a wonder he didn't have a stroke.  Hope he didn't take it out on anyone else.

ha ha how is rat-boy anger lol

Its very appropriate in your case Irn


Bless

Irn Bru wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:Saying that Israel did it is very different to saying that the planes weren't real, or that they were military ones with nobody on them. Therefore, it depends on what kind of conspiracy people are talking about.

 

Very true Raggs and the point I was making

Yes, I just sort of repeated it.

sassy wrote:

Irn Bru wrote:

sassy wrote:I see he's given up all pretence of not being abusive lol

But the lad dis well keeping all that anger under wraps for the few weeks that it lasted. Credit where it is due I would say

It's a wonder he didn't have a stroke.  Hope he didn't take it out on anyone else.

Obviously missed the golf with the MD today

Their actual words were: “The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event.” This is after the arrest and after the attack. How could they have been there to document the event unless they knew it was going to happen? (See that video here.)

I didn't hear any of them say that in the video, I only heard the guy who was doing the voiceover say it.

There was a claim from an unknown person via an email to Stratfor that British Intelligence reported that Mossad ran the cells that were blamed for 9/11. That email apparently came from an account called jetdrive@earthlink.net. Is that right? That's assuming that the email does actually exist of course.

Is there any evidence of this British Intelligence report from February 2002?

What does it have to do with Wayne Madsen?

Honestly, if people really want to claim that Mossad or anyone else was behind the attack, they really need to organise the information in an orderly fashion, and perhaps discuss each point rather than just link to a jumble of stuff.

Bump.

Any replies forthcoming?