‘Oh, for crying out loud, what century is this?’: Kan. lawmaker slammed over dress code for female witnesses
Page 1 of 1
‘Oh, for crying out loud, what century is this?’: Kan. lawmaker slammed over dress code for female witnesses
A Kansas lawmaker is under fire for imposing a dress code on women testifying before the state senate that would ban “low-cut necklines and mini-skirts,” the Capitol-Journal is reporting.
Sen. Mitch Holmes (R-St. Johns) said Rule No. 2 of his 11-point code of conduct for witnesses appearing before his Senate Ethics and Elections Committee, was intended to make certain each participant is dressed in a respectful manner.
Holmes did not make any mention over what men must wear — saying they should already be aware that a coat and tie is expected — but he did offer more detailed fashion tips to the ladies as to what he regards as “professional attire.”
“For ladies,” the rule states, “low-cut necklines and mini-skirts are inappropriate.” Holmes did not specify how high a skirt may be worn or how low a neckline might plunge before it raises his ire.
“It’s one of those things that’s hard to define,” Holmes said, describing his rule. “Put it out there and let people know we’re really looking for you to be addressing the issue rather than trying to distract or bring eyes to yourself.”
Female lawmakers from both of sides of the aisle, were not amused or pleased.
“Oh, for crying out loud, what century is this?” said Sen. Laura Kelly (D-Topeka), while fellow Topeka State Sen. Vicki Schmidt (R) added, “Who’s going to define low-cut? Does it apply to senators?”
Four female state senators — representing both parties — agreed that the committee chairman was out of line telling female Kansans what they can and cannot wear.
“I am more interested in what they have to say about the direction our state should go than what they’re wearing that day,” Sen. Carolyn McGinn, a Sedgwick Republican said.
Wichita Sen. Oletha Faust-Goudeau, the ranking Democrat on the committee, said she spoke with Holmes about the dress code, before telling reporters, “In my 13 years in the Legislature, that’s the first time I’ve ever read anything like that. I thought it was a little strange.”
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/01/oh-for-crying-out-loud-what-century-is-this-kan-lawmaker-slammed-over-dress-code-for-female-witnesses/
Sen. Mitch Holmes (R-St. Johns) said Rule No. 2 of his 11-point code of conduct for witnesses appearing before his Senate Ethics and Elections Committee, was intended to make certain each participant is dressed in a respectful manner.
Holmes did not make any mention over what men must wear — saying they should already be aware that a coat and tie is expected — but he did offer more detailed fashion tips to the ladies as to what he regards as “professional attire.”
“For ladies,” the rule states, “low-cut necklines and mini-skirts are inappropriate.” Holmes did not specify how high a skirt may be worn or how low a neckline might plunge before it raises his ire.
“It’s one of those things that’s hard to define,” Holmes said, describing his rule. “Put it out there and let people know we’re really looking for you to be addressing the issue rather than trying to distract or bring eyes to yourself.”
Female lawmakers from both of sides of the aisle, were not amused or pleased.
“Oh, for crying out loud, what century is this?” said Sen. Laura Kelly (D-Topeka), while fellow Topeka State Sen. Vicki Schmidt (R) added, “Who’s going to define low-cut? Does it apply to senators?”
Four female state senators — representing both parties — agreed that the committee chairman was out of line telling female Kansans what they can and cannot wear.
“I am more interested in what they have to say about the direction our state should go than what they’re wearing that day,” Sen. Carolyn McGinn, a Sedgwick Republican said.
Wichita Sen. Oletha Faust-Goudeau, the ranking Democrat on the committee, said she spoke with Holmes about the dress code, before telling reporters, “In my 13 years in the Legislature, that’s the first time I’ve ever read anything like that. I thought it was a little strange.”
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/01/oh-for-crying-out-loud-what-century-is-this-kan-lawmaker-slammed-over-dress-code-for-female-witnesses/
Guest- Guest
Similar topics
» Dad blasts school for 'dress code shaming' his 5-year-old daughter over this dress
» Dress Code At Work
» School Superintendent is Pervert hiding behind dress code.
» Teenage girl sent home for violating school dress code - by showing her collarbones
» Iranian women flout strict dress code by posting photos of themselves without hijab scarf; moments of ‘stealthy freedom’
» Dress Code At Work
» School Superintendent is Pervert hiding behind dress code.
» Teenage girl sent home for violating school dress code - by showing her collarbones
» Iranian women flout strict dress code by posting photos of themselves without hijab scarf; moments of ‘stealthy freedom’
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sat Mar 18, 2023 12:28 pm by Ben Reilly
» TOTAL MADNESS Great British Railway Journeys among shows flagged by counter terror scheme ‘for encouraging far-right sympathies
Wed Feb 22, 2023 5:14 pm by Tommy Monk
» Interesting COVID figures
Tue Feb 21, 2023 5:00 am by Tommy Monk
» HAPPY CHRISTMAS.
Sun Jan 01, 2023 7:33 pm by Tommy Monk
» The Fight Over Climate Change is Over (The Greenies Won!)
Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:59 pm by Tommy Monk
» Trump supporter murders wife, kills family dog, shoots daughter
Mon Dec 12, 2022 1:21 am by 'Wolfie
» Quill
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:28 pm by Tommy Monk
» Algerian Woman under investigation for torture and murder of French girl, 12, whose body was found in plastic case in Paris
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:04 pm by Tommy Monk
» Wind turbines cool down the Earth (edited with better video link)
Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:19 am by Ben Reilly
» Saying goodbye to our Queen.
Sun Sep 25, 2022 9:02 pm by Maddog
» PHEW.
Sat Sep 17, 2022 6:33 pm by Syl
» And here's some more enrichment...
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:46 pm by Ben Reilly
» John F Kennedy Assassination
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:40 pm by Ben Reilly
» Where is everyone lately...?
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:33 pm by Ben Reilly
» London violence over the weekend...
Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:19 pm by Tommy Monk
» Why should anyone believe anything that Mo Farah says...!?
Wed Jul 13, 2022 1:44 am by Tommy Monk
» Liverpool Labour defends mayor role poll after turnout was only 3% and they say they will push ahead with the option that was least preferred!!!
Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:11 pm by Tommy Monk
» Labour leader Keir Stammer can't answer the simple question of whether a woman has a penis or not...
Mon Jul 11, 2022 3:58 am by Tommy Monk
» More evidence of remoaners still trying to overturn Brexit... and this is a conservative MP who should be drummed out of the party and out of parliament!
Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:50 pm by Tommy Monk
» R Kelly 30 years, Ghislaine Maxwell 20 years... but here in UK...
Fri Jul 08, 2022 5:31 pm by Original Quill