surprise, suprise!

nicko wrote:Imagine
being virtually on your own in that country,
and what would happen to you if caught.

Home of the BRAVE,      BRITAIN,   AND FUCK QUILL AND VEYA.

nicko wrote:Imagine
being virtually on your own in that country,
and what would happen to you if caught.

Home of the BRAVE,      BRITAIN,   AND FUCK QUILL AND VEYA.

veya_victaous wrote:

nicko wrote:Imagine
being virtually on your own in that country,
and what would happen to you if caught.

Home of the BRAVE,      BRITAIN,   AND FUCK QUILL AND VEYA.

it is probably the bravest state in the DIS-United States of Europe (and long may it continue as such)



Besides everyone knows that the SAS are the Best
Aussie SAS First of course but the brits aren't far behind

In Vietnam the Vietcong called them Ma Rung — the “phantoms of the jungle” — and later admitted they were the only troops they genuinely feared. But the Defence chiefs in Canberra didn’t all share the enemy’s hard-won respect for the dark and deadly arts of intelligent guerilla warfare.


http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/film-shows-what-makes-the-australian-sas-special/news-story/2d727391cdfcc2c0c140d484014837c2

veya_victaous wrote:

In Vietnam the Vietcong called them Ma Rung — the “phantoms of the jungle” — and later admitted they were the only troops they genuinely feared. But the Defence chiefs in Canberra didn’t all share the enemy’s hard-won respect for the dark and deadly arts of intelligent guerilla warfare.


http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/film-shows-what-makes-the-australian-sas-special/news-story/2d727391cdfcc2c0c140d484014837c2

the Real difference is that Even Our enemies Admit that Our SAS are the Best. only Britain ever claim the quality of British troops

the most feared troops in Afghanistan where the Aussie SAS Camel mounted snipers. the enemy is dead before they realise it is not a caravan of Bedouin

“The Australian SAS are shit-hot and our people love to work with them.”

veya_victaous wrote:http://deadliestfiction.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Sith_Venator/British_SAS_vs_Australian_SAS




http://americasinterests.blogspot.com.au/2008/02/australian-special-air-service-regiment.html

Former U.S. Secretary of State and Special Forces officer himself, Richard Armitage and former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, also a decorated former soldier noted that the regiment is as good as any such formations the world, said Armitage,

“The Australian SAS are shit-hot and our people love to work with them.”

Didge wrote:The poingt being missed here:

British SAS



Fact - Nearly ALL the worlds Special Forces base their military model on the British SAS. In fact, the USA's Delta Force was set up after the founder spent time attached to the SAS. The Delta Forces even uses an SAS organisational structure using troops and squadrons. It's often remarked that the sand beret is also worn by US Rangers but this was a recent development and in any case the Rangers are NOT the same kind of unit. It can be said with confidence that the world's most professional special forces is that belonging to Britain.
The Special Air Service is the number one fighting force in the world it is trained to perform equally well in all the fields listed for the SEALs, but is also trained by MI-5 and MI-6 for in-depth counter-espionage, more so than the SEALs. Physical competency must be of equal stature to the SEALs, to the degree that both special forces work closely together when necessary (Iraq and Afghanistan) and have good camaraderie.
The original special forces, all others are based off them. Should definitely be above the SEAL's.
They have different hen the seals


http://www.thetoptens.com/most-well-trained-special-forces/

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:The poingt being missed here:

British SAS



Fact - Nearly ALL the worlds Special Forces base their military model on the British SAS. In fact, the USA's Delta Force was set up after the founder spent time attached to the SAS. The Delta Forces even uses an SAS organisational structure using troops and squadrons. It's often remarked that the sand beret is also worn by US Rangers but this was a recent development and in any case the Rangers are NOT the same kind of unit. It can be said with confidence that the world's most professional special forces is that belonging to Britain.
The Special Air Service is the number one fighting force in the world it is trained to perform equally well in all the fields listed for the SEALs, but is also trained by MI-5 and MI-6 for in-depth counter-espionage, more so than the SEALs. Physical competency must be of equal stature to the SEALs, to the degree that both special forces work closely together when necessary (Iraq and Afghanistan) and have good camaraderie.
The original special forces, all others are based off them. Should definitely be above the SEAL's.
They have different hen the seals


http://www.thetoptens.com/most-well-trained-special-forces/

Special forces have been recorded throughout the history of warfare -- and NOBODY beats ninjas

Didge wrote:The poingt being missed here:

British SAS



Fact - Nearly ALL the worlds Special Forces base their military model on the British SAS. In fact, the USA's Delta Force was set up after the founder spent time attached to the SAS. The Delta Forces even uses an SAS organisational structure using troops and squadrons. It's often remarked that the sand beret is also worn by US Rangers but this was a recent development and in any case the Rangers are NOT the same kind of unit. It can be said with confidence that the world's most professional special forces is that belonging to Britain.
The Special Air Service is the number one fighting force in the world it is trained to perform equally well in all the fields listed for the SEALs, but is also trained by MI-5 and MI-6 for in-depth counter-espionage, more so than the SEALs. Physical competency must be of equal stature to the SEALs, to the degree that both special forces work closely together when necessary (Iraq and Afghanistan) and have good camaraderie.
The original special forces, all others are based off them. Should definitely be above the SEAL's.
They have different hen the seals


http://www.thetoptens.com/most-well-trained-special-forces/

Didge wrote:lol 317 people voted out of 8 billion on the planet

Score ha ha ha ha


Again what would be credible is how each world armed forces view each other, not what some individuals think, which shows why and how you know little about Military armed forces

When the Axis forces retreated to regroup, the Australians didn't wait in a siege mentality. Instead they went on the offensive; attacking enemy positions, stealing German artillery and then retreating back into the city like thieves in the night. Subsequently, the stolen artillery (known as 'bush artillery') was used against its creators.

The conviction of the Diggers even won them the respect of the Nazis. Major Ballerstedt, C.O. 2nd Battalion, 115th Motorized Infantry Regiment, wrote to his superiors:

" The Australian, who are the men our troops have had opposite them so far, are extraordinarily tough fighters. The German is more active in the attack, but the enemy stakes his life in the defence and fights to the last with extreme cunning."

The thoughts were echoed by a captured German officer struggling to explain how he found himself a prisoner of war:

" I cannot understand you Australians. In Poland , France and Belgium once the tanks got through the soldiers took it for granted they were beaten. But you are like demons. The tanks break through and your infantry keeps fighting."

The fighting style of the Australians made it very difficult for Rommel's co-ordinated attacks to integrate effectively. The Australians just weren't behaving as expected, and they took little time in noting how this was confusing their enemy.

In the words of Chester Wilmot: ' Berlin Radio made a fatal mistake in trying to jibe and scare the Australian soldier into surrender. The longer the odds Lord Haw Haw offered against the Diggers chance of getting out, the more heavily the digger backed himself."

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Didge wrote:The poingt being missed here:

British SAS



Fact - Nearly ALL the worlds Special Forces base their military model on the British SAS. In fact, the USA's Delta Force was set up after the founder spent time attached to the SAS. The Delta Forces even uses an SAS organisational structure using troops and squadrons. It's often remarked that the sand beret is also worn by US Rangers but this was a recent development and in any case the Rangers are NOT the same kind of unit. It can be said with confidence that the world's most professional special forces is that belonging to Britain.
The Special Air Service is the number one fighting force in the world it is trained to perform equally well in all the fields listed for the SEALs, but is also trained by MI-5 and MI-6 for in-depth counter-espionage, more so than the SEALs. Physical competency must be of equal stature to the SEALs, to the degree that both special forces work closely together when necessary (Iraq and Afghanistan) and have good camaraderie.
The original special forces, all others are based off them. Should definitely be above the SEAL's.
They have different hen the seals


http://www.thetoptens.com/most-well-trained-special-forces/

Special forces have been recorded throughout the history of warfare -- and NOBODY beats ninjas