Radio host shuts down Trump supporter defending ban on Muslims by citing rape of 1,400 white girls

Raggamuffin wrote:

4EVER2 wrote:
And that's why, you've had to explain 'SLANG' words that upset you to Ben; what you assume we know and understand over here is not the same as what our multicultural language based words are over there where you are.
 
And as often as Ragg's never contributes to most threads {like this one, except for a stupid smiley on page #1} her resolve to remain nothing but utterly ignorant about the 'MEXICAN' slang/verbiage and what I've stated numerous times is just as substantiated by her only appearance in this entire topic when there's a karfarckle and she's right in here with her BS and manure spoon to stir the pot!

You get upset with Ben's un-intentional banging away at the British, and he'll ask for clarification about 'what he'd said that blew you up?' ...I can't get the willful racist/pot stirrers to accept that they don't know - what they don't know and they'll keep tossing fuel onto the fire like they know IT ALL!  

It's not my fault if you're getting "spec" confused with "spic".

Spanglish	Hispanics	Spanish-Americans; English-speaking Hispanics, also the language they speak.
Spec	Hispanics	Baby Spic. See: Spic.
Speed Demon	Hispanics	Amphetamines are popular among Hispanics.
Spic	Hispanics	Short for Hispanic. Might also be acronym of SPanish, Indian, and Colored, coming from the mixed breeds that resulted from the union of Spanish colonists, Indian natives, and Black (colored) slaves. From the OED. spic A. n. a. A contemptuous and offensive name for a Spanish-speaking native of Central or South America or the Caribbean; a spiggoty. - It dates back (in print) to at least 1913. However, I understand it first applied to Italian immigrants in the late 1800s - More information: 1938 Amer. Speech XIII. 311/1 "Spiggoty" originated in Panama during Construction Days, and is assumed to be a corruption of 'spikee de' in the sentence 'No spikee de English'

http://www.rsdb.org/race/hispanics

4EVER2 wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

It's not my fault if you're getting "spec" confused with "spic".

5th time - in an attempt to educate the 'HOPELESS' =

Spanglish	Hispanics	Spanish-Americans; English-speaking Hispanics, also the language they speak.
Spec	Hispanics	Baby Spic. See: Spic.
Speed Demon	Hispanics	Amphetamines are popular among Hispanics.
Spic	Hispanics	Short for Hispanic. Might also be acronym of SPanish, Indian, and Colored, coming from the mixed breeds that resulted from the union of Spanish colonists, Indian natives, and Black (colored) slaves. From the OED. spic A. n. a. A contemptuous and offensive name for a Spanish-speaking native of Central or South America or the Caribbean; a spiggoty. - It dates back (in print) to at least 1913. However, I understand it first applied to Italian immigrants in the late 1800s - More information: 1938 Amer. Speech XIII. 311/1 "Spiggoty" originated in Panama during Construction Days, and is assumed to be a corruption of 'spikee de' in the sentence 'No spikee de English'

http://www.rsdb.org/race/hispanics

But your willfully pretending you've not been provided this those other 4 times is just plain ASININE - but so true to form; Racist and vulgar and on your shoulders posh/noble British snob!

Lord Foul wrote:oh and BTW 4ever......

a "spic" over here is a detective....CID type...especially an undercover one......not much used now, and a bit archaic...but is referenced to in a number of old-ish crime novels

Raggamuffin wrote:

4EVER2 wrote:
5th time - in an attempt to educate the 'HOPELESS' =




But your willfully pretending you've not been provided this those other 4 times is just plain ASININE - but so true to form; Racist and vulgar and on your shoulders posh/noble British snob!

I don't give a stuff about your sensitive nature. I've explained what Specsavers is, but you're too stupid to understand.

Lord Foul wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Don't slap each other on the back so hard over this that you knock out your dentures or anything -- you don't get why I posted that info in the first place. I wasn't trying to make white people look bad, I was proving that these pedophile rings have nothing to do with race or religion.

Sure, but it's not true to say that "a lot" of white people participated in grooming gangs is it?

I have all my own teeth by the way.

Again, not my point. My point is this:



These women are not Pakistani Muslim men.

Karen MacGregor, 58, lured two of the victims into her house, befriending them and behaving like a second mother but then forcing them into sexual relations with men who would hang around the house.

Yesterday she was convicted of conspiracy to rape, false imprisonment and procuring one of the women to become a common prostitute.

Shelley Davies lived with MacGregor for a time and was found guilty of false imprisonment and procuring one of the victims to become a common prostitute.

One of the victims described MacGregor’s house as akin to akin to the Hansel and Gretel fairy tale, inviting to begin with but soon descending into terrifying sexual crime.

She told the jury how she felt MacGregor was like a second mother, listening to her problems, buying her food and clothes. But within days she was assaulted. She was plied with vodka and after passing out awoke to find a man abusing her.

MacGregor allowed the girls to be abused and kept captive, telling them they needed to "earn their keep" by having sex with a succession of visiting men.

Did their Christian faith drive them to these crimes, or was it their deep-seated hatred of white people? Or were they just horrible people, and is fixating on their race and faith actually ... stupid?

wriggle all you want you pie eating crotch goblin....

but 17% of the perps came from 95% of the population  i.e the "white brigade"

and yet 83% of the perps came from just 3% of the population

your finding a couple of white (female???) abusers means what exactly...in the light of those figures???

I notice you have studiously evaded answering this........

maybe it ISNT their religion...maybe its a "cultural thing"???  but the problem doesnt change does it...clearly those from a particular group seem prone to tis habit

Victor wrote:I wonder if any of these "lefty's " will ever answer this....

its not the kind of figures they can handle...even when its THEIR figures

Victor wrote:"New topics that are obviously created to insult or provoke other members are not acceptable (action or discipline subject to moderator discretion)."

perhaps that escaped you....

YOU have a habit of disguising very real malice under a very thin veneer of "humour" at times....

beleive me....I'll be watching.......

Lord Foul wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:

wriggle all you want you pie eating crotch goblin....

but 17% of the perps came from 95% of the population  i.e the "white brigade"

and yet 83% of the perps came from just 3% of the population

your finding a couple of white (female???) abusers means what exactly...in the light of those figures???

I notice you have studiously evaded answering this........

maybe it ISNT their religion...maybe its a "cultural thing"???  but the problem doesnt change does it...clearly those from a particular group seem prone to tis habit

I wonder if any of these "lefty's " will ever answer this....

its not the kind of figures they can handle...even when its THEIR figures

Original Quill wrote:

Victor wrote:I wonder if any of these "lefty's " will ever answer this....

its not the kind of figures they can handle...even when its THEIR figures

                             
Don’t be goading, victor:

Victor wrote:"New topics that are obviously created to insult or provoke other members are not acceptable (action or discipline subject to moderator discretion)."

perhaps that escaped you....

YOU have a habit of disguising very real malice under a very thin veneer of "humour" at times....

beleive me....I'll be watching.......

As I said.

Lord Foul wrote:Quill...stick to what you do best, which is put up interesting , if at times controvertial points of view....

you are NOT good at these "forum intrigue" games.....

Lord Foul wrote:thats ok quill...BUT...it doesnt change the fact that

"
you are NOT good at these "forum intrigue" games....."



your reply above proves the point

Original Quill wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:thats ok quill...BUT...it doesnt change the fact that

"
you are NOT good at these "forum intrigue" games....."



your reply above proves the point

Look, I know you guys lull around on your Mod's office and chat about the members.  On Ministry I was a mod, myself.  Wolf will tell you...he was a mod there too.

paranoia too...tsk tsk

Of course I'm not good at the mod's "forum intrigue" games, having no key to the mod's room.  That's why, simply put, I don't try to play.  I just speak my mind, and go about my own business.  If there's anything I need to respond to, I speak up again.

There's nothing surreptitious about me.  I'm not trying to court anyone's favor.  And the endless back-and-forth games bore me.  I am what I yam.

eddie wrote:Quill, unless we have a specific topic to talk about we really don't chat about other members - none of us are actually like that.
We don't do that by PM either.

The person I chat to most in private on here is Ben and sometimes sassy and nems, and it's all personal stuff and chit chat.

I have to put the record straight here; that's simply not true and I hope another admin comes to back me on this.

eddie wrote:Quill, unless we have a specific topic to talk about we really don't chat about other members - none of us are actually like that.
We don't do that by PM either.

The person I chat to most in private on here is Ben and sometimes sassy and nems, and it's all personal stuff and chit chat.

I have to put the record straight here; that's simply not true and I hope another admin comes to back me on this.

Lord Foul wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Don't slap each other on the back so hard over this that you knock out your dentures or anything -- you don't get why I posted that info in the first place. I wasn't trying to make white people look bad, I was proving that these pedophile rings have nothing to do with race or religion.

Sure, but it's not true to say that "a lot" of white people participated in grooming gangs is it?

I have all my own teeth by the way.

Again, not my point. My point is this:



These women are not Pakistani Muslim men.

Karen MacGregor, 58, lured two of the victims into her house, befriending them and behaving like a second mother but then forcing them into sexual relations with men who would hang around the house.

Yesterday she was convicted of conspiracy to rape, false imprisonment and procuring one of the women to become a common prostitute.

Shelley Davies lived with MacGregor for a time and was found guilty of false imprisonment and procuring one of the victims to become a common prostitute.

One of the victims described MacGregor’s house as akin to akin to the Hansel and Gretel fairy tale, inviting to begin with but soon descending into terrifying sexual crime.

She told the jury how she felt MacGregor was like a second mother, listening to her problems, buying her food and clothes. But within days she was assaulted. She was plied with vodka and after passing out awoke to find a man abusing her.

MacGregor allowed the girls to be abused and kept captive, telling them they needed to "earn their keep" by having sex with a succession of visiting men.

Did their Christian faith drive them to these crimes, or was it their deep-seated hatred of white people? Or were they just horrible people, and is fixating on their race and faith actually ... stupid?

wriggle all you want you pie eating crotch goblin....

but 17% of the perps came from 95% of the population  i.e the "white brigade"

and yet 83% of the perps came from just 3% of the population

your finding a couple of white (female???) abusers means what exactly...in the light of those figures???

I notice you have studiously evaded answering this........

maybe it ISNT their religion...maybe its a "cultural thing"???  but the problem doesnt change does it...clearly those from a particular group seem prone to tis habit

I wonder if any of these "lefty's " will ever answer this....

its not the kind of figures they can handle...even when its THEIR figures

eddie wrote:

eddie wrote:Quill, unless we have a specific topic to talk about we really don't chat about other members - none of us are actually like that.
We don't do that by PM either.

The person I chat to most in private on here is Ben and sometimes sassy and nems, and it's all personal stuff and chit chat.

I have to put the record straight here; that's simply not true and I hope another admin comes to back me on this.

Apparently not.....

Lord Foul wrote:so...cultural or religious.....does it matter when, at least in the main, over here the two are so closely linked......

83%of the perps were???

Lord Foul wrote:83% of the perps came from 3% of the population overall

and 17% from 95%




i'd say that indicates a problem with the 3% wouldnt you?

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:83% of the perps came from 3% of the population overall

and 17% from 95%




i'd say that indicates a problem with the 3% wouldnt you?

No, my point was, what percent of the Muslim Pakistani population of the UK were involved in grooming gangs?

Lord Foul wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:83% of the perps came from 3% of the population overall

and 17% from 95%




i'd say that indicates a problem with the 3% wouldnt you?

No, my point was, what percent of the Muslim Pakistani population of the UK were involved in grooming gangs?

dunno...do the finite numbers actually matter???...
clearly they are far more predicated to this behaviour than the other 95%  

Lord Foul wrote:so whats YOUR theory then???

Lord Foul wrote:over 20 years?


oh and inreply to your assertion that it doesnt happen elsewhere.....

It does, and regularly..... in certain Muslim countries.....only they call it marriage then ....

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:

dunno...do the finite numbers actually matter???...
clearly they are far more predicated to this behaviour than the other 95%  

Nonsense.

You can't find a Muslim grooming gang problem in any other country -- I've looked. Islam was not what made them susceptible to doing this.