Outrage As Notorious WHITE Member of UK Pedophile Gang Back On The Streets

One of Britain's most notorious paedophiles is back on the streets, it has emerged.

Robert Oliver, 58, was part of a gang led by Sidney Cooke that allegedly killed 25 boys.

He was sentenced to 15 years in prison for his part in the killing of 14-year-old Jason Swift in 1985 but was released in 1997 after serving just eight years.

Last July, he was jailed again for letting children into his home despite a ban.

However, Oliver - who now goes by the name Karl Curtis - has been relocated to an open bail hostel where he is free to roam the streets.

The move has enraged child protection campaigners, warning he needs to be monitored around the clock.

This week, the killer was spotted in Guildford, Surrey, walking past families just 500 yards from a primary school, the Sun on Sunday reported.

He is being monitored by Mappa, a serious offenders probation agency, but not by police.

Didge wrote:

victorisnotamused wrote:Does your whole life revole around SOLEY what people "need"?

or is it rather what YOU consider they should need...

University lecture John Molyneux also disagrees with the gollywog boom because of it’s imperialistic past “This is very much to be regretted as the golly or the golliwog has very strong racist connotations, they were a crude stereotypes repeated in children’s stories

victorisnotamused wrote:

Didge wrote:



University lecture John Molyneux also disagrees with the gollywog boom because of it’s imperialistic past “This is very much to be regretted as the golly or the golliwog has very strong racist connotations, they were a crude stereotypes repeated in children’s stories

another "intellectual"    sometimes I despair....perhaps pol pot was right after all....(thats tongue in cheek BTW....just in case your humour isnt working)

victorisnotamused wrote:but ou didnt answer my question so I'll rephrase it

Does your whole life revole around SOLEY what people "need"?

or is it rather what YOU consider they should need...conditioned by the intellecual leftie propaganda you read

victorisnotamused wrote:you still havnt answered the question......

you answered a different one.....

victorisnotamused wrote:no choice given at all... said nothing about helping people at all

I only ask because you repeatedly use this "need" argument

you dont need this or that or whatever(unless of course it is somethig that YOU also need.)

victorisnotamused wrote:I'd love a society where everyone "got on" Didge....but clearly it aint going to happen is it?
Lets face it, firstly we are by nature "creatures of our experiences" so yes I have a poor view of some peoples.
It time I believe very much it will happen that people evolve to such levels, it is not a case of whether it will, but when, because as seen humans alreay have the capability to do so

Bad...well tough...... those "peoples" should police their own and make em behave
Own? We are all one biological race, as humans, your views are one that is selfish to your own needs, some people are happy to help  others

FOR INSTANCE...I trust "true" Romany gysies(though I dont know if there are any left in Britain, I havnt seen their way marks for a while now)ButI dont trust "new age travellers"...not one bit...

and so on...

secondly we have the "we know beter than you brigade" always telling us his or that or something is wrong with what we are doing, more over that whole bunch is an incestuous mess of imature plonkers with nothing better to do than spout emotive but appealing rubbish..

vis shooting v's the antis

NOW how do you expect people to get along when the idioy of that argument rages
The same can be said about the car owner vs the anti car owner

and many many more such arguments over which one side or the other claims some sort of moral ascendency

Oh yes, a society where everyone gets along would be great....but it aint going to happen

Didge wrote:

victorisnotamused wrote:I'd love a society where everyone "got on" Didge....but clearly it aint going to happen is it?
Lets face it, firstly we are by nature "creatures of our experiences" so yes I have a poor view of some peoples.
It time I believe very much it will happen that people evolve to such levels, it is not a case of whether it will, but when, because as seen humans alreay have the capability to do so

give it a few hundreds of years then....


Bad...well tough...... those "peoples" should police their own and make em behave
Own? We are all one biological race, as humans, your views are one that is selfish to your own needs, some people are happy to help  others

listen didge....them there travellers MAY WELL be "biologically identical" but they are most certainly NOT morally or ethically identical...NOW...I have to admit I dont know how many of a given "tribe" (or however they describe their groups) are theives...but what is a given is that when they turn up in our village on their pillgrimage to the horsefair the rate of break ins theft from sheds and workshops etc rockets....so I'd much rather they were banned from being here...what I do know is that by and large they consider us "house livers" to be fair targets for their thievery....(and the next one who breaks into my work shop is in for an awful shock believe me..)

Sadly didge part of the problem is that the "contract" between state an people has been brocken...by the state....

we in this country gave up our unconditional right to bear arms in exchange for protection by the state in the form of a police force...unfortunately the state did not give guarantees about this...and still it was accepted as a "good thing", yet as we see it is actually NO protection against anything from theft to murder....The exchange should have been conditional upon the state guaranteeing such protection.....if nothing else the state should be responsible for the losses incurred at every theft...rather than us having to pay through the nose for "insurance"

FOR INSTANCE...I trust "true" Romany gysies(though I dont know if there are any left in Britain, I havnt seen their way marks for a while now)ButI dont trust "new age travellers"...not one bit...

and so on...

secondly we have the "we know beter than you brigade" always telling us his or that or something is wrong with what we are doing, more over that whole bunch is an incestuous mess of imature plonkers with nothing better to do than spout emotive but appealing rubbish..

vis shooting v's the antis

NOW how do you expect people to get along when the idioy of that argument rages
The same can be said about the car owner vs the anti car owner

and many many more such arguments over which one side or the other claims some sort of moral ascendency

Oh yes, a society where everyone gets along would be great....but it aint going to happen

It will happen, as people can get along, it is reaching a level where people put aside poor differences, because lets face it, the differences come from views, for example, religious, political. Religious views will fade over time or to a point where all are in harmony, society will one day get past political differences for the greater good of society, all these things happen already but in a limited sphere. So it has nothing to do with the "I know better than you brigade" that is also absurd, just understanding morals is the key to society getting along, not allowing outside influences to distort these morals. You see you are very defeatist, I am both a realist and opportunistic! You biggest problem is trust, which is something you yourself needs to resolve


nah didge ...you are an idealist...very commendable indeed but unrealistic in any sensible time frame.....

as for trust....that is there when trustworthyness is proved....not given first with a hope that it gets repaid......only a fool trusts the unknown....

Anyway have to go so night

victorisnotamused wrote:NODDY was removed from the shelves bcause the golliwogs were baddies and kinapped noddy and bigears...

so Enid Blyton was thenceforth a raving racist....

victorisnotamused wrote:I think you will find it was because the golliwogs were baddies....just like they got made redundant on the marmalade jars....

Didge wrote:Sorry what a load of garbage from Victor again on the biology of one human race, show me where the brains are biologically different in each race that we use to classify people ?
Humans all have the same capabilities to be morally good unless they have a metal health condition, so you are talking utter balderdash. Influences can play a part onto people, but again these is again only with some, you still find within societies people different and morally different, thus it shows all have a capability for good.

I fail to see the need to bear arms, it is not something that is a need of all people to have, especially when murder and violent crimes are relatively low, it is just some copout for gun nuts to have their way, when they can be maintained through strict clubs, these are lethal weapons we are talking about.

Again it is a matter of time, not if when society evolves to get all along!

victorisnotamused wrote:yer ...well the sooner the better as far as them bloody travellers are concerned....how would you like to come along next time they camp here and "educate" them....I suspect you may find it a difficult and more than likely impossible...if not altogether downright dangerous mission......

Ben_Reilly wrote:Victor, why do you think "those people" should "police their own"? Do you think it's fair to ask you to police other people with the same color skin or the same religion as yourself?

Tesstacious wrote:Isn't the title of this thread racist?

Oh no I forgot, whites don't count.

Sassy wrote:

victorisnotamused wrote:NODDY was removed from the shelves bcause the golliwogs were baddies and kinapped noddy and bigears...

so Enid Blyton was thenceforth a raving racist....

I think you will find that Noddy was banned because his relationship to Big Ears was considered a bit strange those years ago lol

Didge wrote:

eddie wrote:

Ok I read it.
But let's race it didge, are we going to keep on getting rid if things because they seem to offend people???

They sell black dolls now, "babies" to mousy in prams, they're black, what if sinker shouts "n---er!" In the street when a child of any colour is carrying one???
Do we get rid of those too???

Shall we get rid of tea-towels because people call them turbans??

Where do you wanna race Eddie   

Again these caricatures were invented based upon a poor stereotype though, where as a tea towel is designed for a purpose. The reality is when these were invented these caricatures, it was the accepted norm, where today such things rightly are seen as in poor taste, because racially people looked badly upon black people.


Read he link, there is many different posts on this subject

eddie wrote:

Didge wrote:


Where do you wanna race Eddie   

Again these caricatures were invented based upon a poor stereotype though, where as a tea towel is designed for a purpose. The reality is when these were invented these caricatures, it was the accepted norm, where today such things rightly are seen as in poor taste, because racially people looked badly upon black people.


Read he link, there is many different posts on this subject

Hahahahaha well I raced, where were you?   

I understand that Golliwogs possibly offend black people, but the Noddy books - did they really have to be banned because of it??

nicko wrote:Iused to worry about Andy Pandy getting in a box with Teddy.

Joy Division wrote:

eddie wrote:

Hahahahaha well I raced, where were you?   

I understand that Golliwogs possibly offend black people, but the Noddy books - did they really have to be banned because of it??

If there was a book out about a little white man , named ' white trash' ..would you agree with that?..

You may well say you would have no problem with that, but only because there are no kids books referring to a little man as white trash.

Joy Division wrote:

eddie wrote:

Hahahahaha well I raced, where were you?   

I understand that Golliwogs possibly offend black people, but the Noddy books - did they really have to be banned because of it??

If there was a book out about a little white man , named ' white trash' ..would you agree with that?..

You may well say you would have no problem with that, but only because there are no kids books referring to a little man as white trash.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:Victor, why do you think "those people" should "police their own"? Do you think it's fair to ask you to police other people with the same color skin or the same religion as yourself?

I think that the widespread use of the word "community" has a lot to answer for. It's used extensively in the press and by spokespersons for the Government, police, councils, etc. We have the "black community", the "gay community", the "Muslim community", the "travelling community", and it always sounds as if everyone in these "groups" know each other or even live in the same street.  

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I think that the widespread use of the word "community" has a lot to answer for. It's used extensively in the press and by spokespersons for the Government, police, councils, etc. We have the "black community", the "gay community", the "Muslim community", the "travelling community", and it always sounds as if everyone in these "groups" know each other or even live in the same street.  

I think that's pretty accurate; it creates this impression that all the black people, or whatever, in a town get together for weekly meetings to talk about all things black.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

I think that the widespread use of the word "community" has a lot to answer for. It's used extensively in the press and by spokespersons for the Government, police, councils, etc. We have the "black community", the "gay community", the "Muslim community", the "travelling community", and it always sounds as if everyone in these "groups" know each other or even live in the same street.  

I think that's pretty accurate; it creates this impression that all the black people, or whatever, in a town get together for weekly meetings to talk about all things black.

Exactly! When 7/7 happened, some people called for the "Muslim community" to do something, but what could each individual Muslim do?

The press etc don't really talk about the "white community" or even the "Christian community", so I don't think they get lumped together so much - outside of forums anyway.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Ben_Reilly wrote:

I think that's pretty accurate; it creates this impression that all the black people, or whatever, in a town get together for weekly meetings to talk about all things black.

Exactly! When 7/7 happened, some people called for the "Muslim community" to do something, but what could each individual Muslim do?

The press etc don't really talk about the "white community" or even the "Christian community", so I don't think they get lumped together so much - outside of forums anyway.

Sassy wrote:Guess you missed this then Shady:

UK Muslims to march in memory of Lee Rigby

by Newswire    
11:43 am - May 29th 2013

      Share on Tumblr

British Muslim groups are organising marches and rally in memory of the soldier Lee Rigby, who died last week in Woolwich.

A silent march will be held tomorrow afternoon from 5pm in Ilford, starting at Ilford Junction.

A Facebook page for the event is here.

A coalition of Muslim and anti-racist groups are organising a separate event for Friday afternoon, to be held in Woolwich.

The second march will be held in advance of a BNP demonstration also in Woolwich on Saturday. Details of this event should be finalised and released today.

Both events are seeking police permission.

The poster for the event on Thursday

Sassy wrote:They were all over the country, and of course you would say they were 'token', I wouldn't expect anything else.

Ben_Reilly wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:

Exactly! When 7/7 happened, some people called for the "Muslim community" to do something, but what could each individual Muslim do?

The press etc don't really talk about the "white community" or even the "Christian community", so I don't think they get lumped together so much - outside of forums anyway.

This attempt to talk about the "white community" is, I think, a very eye-opening look at how weird it really is to talk about a "black community," "Muslim community," etc.:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWmWS7b1bDI