Is The Mainstream Igniting Pedophilia With ‘Victoria Secret’-Style Lingerie Show Featuring 5yo Girls?

It’s no secret, pedophilia has been a topic of conversation in a big way over the last year. With the rise of investigations into elite pedophile rings, including the popularization of PizzaGate, many have begun to ask questions about how big of a problem this is in politics, government and hollywood.

In this new show that took place in China, we see 5 year old girls dressed in lingerie walking down the runway, looking quite uncomfortable. I’m not about to say putting a girl in lingeries at a fashion show is the same as pedophilia, but we need to ask why we are sexualizing young girls like this.

It becomes a very find line between acts like this and pushing the envelope to further see children as sex symbols.

FreeThoughtProject reports: The latest movement within media and Hollywood pop culture seems to be an agenda to normalize pedophilia and the sexualization of children. The latest example of this was a fashion show that many feel crossed the line from – with scantily clad girls, who appear to be as young as five-years-old, walking the runway in a Victoria’s Secret–style show.

The show, held at a shopping mall in China, revealed shocking images of young girls wearing nothing but lingerie, costume wings, and headpieces. This comes on the heels of Kim Kardashian sparking controversy last month after she posted images of her new children’s line, which included a bikini and lace slip dress.

What you see talking place is simply the latest manifestation of what is, without question, a creeping agenda within the mainstream of pop culture to normalize and force public acceptance of pedophilia.

FreeThoughtProject previously reported on the constant drive within pop culture to normalize pedophilia:

“In the current age of political correctness, some sects of society know no limits as to how far they will go to force acceptance to avoid offending others. In one extreme case of forcing such political correctness, Salon magazine implies that society must be accepting of pedophiles. In two separate articles, Salon refers to pedophilia as an ‘alternate sexual preference’ and suggests that society should embrace these differences by insinuating that this poor man is just misunderstood.

The article and video on Salon deal with pedophiles known as ‘non-offending’ — meaning while these individuals admit they are sexually attracted to prepubescent children, they claim they’ve never acted on it. However, the subject of one Salon article, Todd Nickerson admitted to seeking out jobs as a babysitter and noted that he “fell in love” with a five-year-old whom he babysat.”

The U.S. corporate mainstream media is, without a doubt, the most sophisticated propaganda operation in the history of humankind, according to political philosopher Noam Chomsky, author of Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of Mass Media.

The mainstream media works diligently to alter and shape our perceptions and values. It seems clear that the propagandists are attempting to engineer a society that is accepting of pedophilia as a normalized behaviour.

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2017/08/13/is-the-mainstream-igniting-pedophilia-with-victoria-secret-style-lingerie-show-featuring-5yo-girls/

And here: https://www.yahoo.com/style/little-girls-model-lingerie-victorias-secret-style-show-170545539.html

In my opinion its 100% wrong.
Apart from dressing little girls up to look like showgirls and having them sashay down a catwalk....it IS an invitation for paedophiles to ogle at them, no doubt fantasising as they do so.

I've never seen bras like that in Victoria's Secret.

Let them be kids. I always feel these things put way too much psychological pressure on children.

Raggamuffin wrote:I've never seen bras like that in Victoria's Secret.

They do some very elaborate ones...I have this one in pink.  

Syl wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:I've never seen bras like that in Victoria's Secret.

They do some very elaborate ones...I have this one in pink.  

Doesn't that tassel get in the way?

Raggamuffin wrote:

Syl wrote:

They do some very elaborate ones...I have this one in pink.  

Doesn't that tassel get in the way?

Yes...and it tickles.

Syl wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:I've never seen bras like that in Victoria's Secret.

They do some very elaborate ones...I have this one in pink.  

I've owned some spectacular bras. I'll dig out some photos.

Raggamuffin wrote:

Syl wrote:

They do some very elaborate ones...I have this one in pink.  

Doesn't that tassel get in the way?

I'm a sucker for a bit of bling. I just loved wearing rhinestones and sequins and I loved making them. I still sew now. Love it. Find it so relaxing.

Their bras only go up to a DDD apparently. M&S do much better than that.

I made this for myself and sold it on.   It was  a Marks and Spencer spandex slip, which I dyed emerald green, then constructed the beads and stones and sequins over the bra and made a belt to match.   I wanted a showgirl look to it and I think I achieved that.   It had 8mm swarovski rhinestones on the bodice and glittered beautifully under lights. Every single strand of bugle beads and swarovski beads were hand threaded. It took me months.

Wow! That's a bra and a half!

Raggamuffin wrote:Their bras only go up to a DDD apparently. M&S do much better than that.

Is there such a thing as a triple D? I thought they only went up to DD.

Raggamuffin wrote:Wow! That's a bra and a half!

The bra part was actually part of the slip so you took the whole thing off on one piece. The belt was separate.

HoratioTarr wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:Their bras only go up to a DDD apparently. M&S do much better than that.

Is there such a thing as  a triple D?   I thought they only went up to DD.

So did I but I think it's an American thing. I don't know if a DDD is the same as an E.

Difficult to gauge the cup size of Horatio, as she has a voluptuous figure.

I would guess though she has an e/f-cup bra size

I made this one out of an old wedding dress I found in a charity shop.  I cut up the cotton net under skirt to make the shrug and the lace skirt to make the skirt part and dyed them both scarlet.   I made the belt and bra to go with it.   One of the reasons I made my own is that the Egyptian costume bras are rock hard and have no give in the back straps.   You needed to be able to move your chest and breathe.

This was my favourite.  Sadly, it fell to bits as I used it so much.   You'd hear the beads clanging on the floor as they went.

And this one was made entirely from pearls and crystals.   I lined the belt with pointe shoe satin.   This was made for a friend.  

Okay, that's a another topic that turned into a fashion fest.  

Bloody hell girls!

They are lovely though, they certainly put my Bridget Jones bloomers to shame.

Syl wrote:They are lovely though, they certainly put my Bridget Jones bloomers to shame.

I'm thinking of doing a line in bling bloomers...

HoratioTarr wrote:

Syl wrote:They are lovely though, they certainly put my Bridget Jones bloomers to shame.

I'm thinking of doing a line in bling bloomers...

I love a bit of bling....it takes the eye away from the volume.

For the love of God...where do I go for serious debate?

eddie wrote:For the love of God...where do I go for serious debate?

The CBB debate is quite serious.

Syl wrote:

HoratioTarr wrote:

I'm thinking of doing a line in bling bloomers...

I love a bit of bling....it takes the eye away from the volume.

One could panels either side a nice shade of misty buff so that one's arse looks less wide.

HoratioTarr wrote:

Syl wrote:

I love a bit of bling....it takes the eye away from the volume.

One could panels either side a nice shade of misty buff so that one's arse looks less wide.

Optical illusion effect plus crystals....Yes, I like it.