Austria becomes first Western country to resort to mandatory coronavirus vaccination

Austria has become the first Western democracy to resort to mandatory vaccination in response to a record-breaking surge in infections that has flooded its hospitals with critical COVID-19 patients.

Chancellor Alexander Schallenberg announced Friday that COVID-19 vaccination would be mandatory in the Alpine republic from February 2022.

That makes Austria the first European country — and one of the first in the world — to impose compulsory coronavirus vaccination.

“We have not managed to get enough unvaccinated people to get vaccinated. The most recent measures have increased daily vaccinations but not enough," Schallenberg said. "For a long time, it was consensus in the country that a vaccine mandate is not necessary, but we have to face reality."

Austria will also enter a nationwide lockdown for a maximum of 20 days from next Monday, Schallenberg added.

The decision by Schallenberg, who has only been in the job for just over a month after predecessor Sebastian Kurz stepped down amid a sleaze investigation, marks a dramatic escalation in Vienna’s policy response after Austria’s fourth coronavirus wave went ballistic.

The central European country is grappling with a surging infection rate, as more than 15,000 new cases were reported Thursday, up from 11,000 earlier this week.

Takeup of coronavirus vaccination by Austria’s nine million people has been relatively low by European standards, at 65.5 percent, despite ample availability of doses procured centrally for EU member states.

That reflects a more widespread skepticism in German-speaking countries — in particular in regions where parties of the political far right that have campaigned against pandemic restrictions enjoy strong support.

That, in turn, has left societies wide open to the Delta variant, which is more infectious than earlier iterations of the coronavirus and thrives in colder weather.

eddie wrote:

Syl wrote:My point was it is mandatory for some NHS workers to have the hepatitis B vaccine for the health of their patients....and of course themselves.

Same thing with Covid....

But you never answered my questions and I stuck to what YOU brought up and I stayed with YOUR point and YOU still didn't address the points I was asking, about a point that YOU made!

Oh well. Sleep well! See you soon.

Tommy Monk wrote:

Didgee wrote:


How does that pan out for those with low immunity?

natural immunity works best with vaccines

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02795-x

I already said, protect the vulnerable groups, let them have the vaccines if needed, and let everyone else carry on as normal.

Tommy Monk wrote:


I don't believe the figures...

gelico wrote:lets start at the beginning

a flu virus gets labelled as the most dangerous virus and everyone should be very scared (says the media) and protect the elderly and the vulnerable

info comes out that in fact the covid virus has a 99.9% survival rate for any person who is under 70 with no serious underlying conditions.

in fact even in the over 80s and with underlying conditions it was still 92% chance of survival

we also learned that boosting the immune, zinc supplements, ivermectim, hydrochloxychlorine, and other treatments which are effective and widely available got dismissed and banned

all FIO stats released show clearly that there was only a small increase of deaths throughout the whole of 2020 and that being the majority of over 80s and in hospitals or care homes.  Those reports have long since been released.

WHO stats also say that this covid vaccine has caused terrifyingly huge numbers of ADRs in only 10 months than every other vaccine put together over the last 40 years.

you can view it yourselves here

http://www.vigiaccess.org/

how in God's name can anyone on here justify getting this shit pumped into them

@Ben re your comment about ''people fighting to drink alchohol etc etc''

it comes down to 2 simple words

PERSONAL CHOICE

Eilzel wrote:

gelico wrote:lets start at the beginning

a flu virus gets labelled as the most dangerous virus and everyone should be very scared (says the media) and protect the elderly and the vulnerable

info comes out that in fact the covid virus has a 99.9% survival rate for any person who is under 70 with no serious underlying conditions.

in fact even in the over 80s and with underlying conditions it was still 92% chance of survival

we also learned that boosting the immune, zinc supplements, ivermectim, hydrochloxychlorine, and other treatments which are effective and widely available got dismissed and banned

all FIO stats released show clearly that there was only a small increase of deaths throughout the whole of 2020 and that being the majority of over 80s and in hospitals or care homes.  Those reports have long since been released.

WHO stats also say that this covid vaccine has caused terrifyingly huge numbers of ADRs in only 10 months than every other vaccine put together over the last 40 years.

you can view it yourselves here

http://www.vigiaccess.org/

how in God's name can anyone on here justify getting this shit pumped into them

@Ben re your comment about ''people fighting to drink alchohol etc etc''

it comes down to 2 simple words

PERSONAL CHOICE

Are we to assume the reactions of every major government on Earth are disproportionate to the risk of the virus?


yes, for the very reasons i've put up, and more.
It was all preplanned and preorganised.

I’m not a scientist, nor is anyone here. Stats can be thrown up by both sides to support one view or the others.

i've listened to doctors, scientists, virologists, immunologists, GPs, nurses all around the world. The ones who are not being paid by Bill Gates and risk (or have already lost) their livelihoods are saying this is not necessary.

Certain politicians and sage and Dr Hilary Jones etc etc most of whom have major shares and other vested interests in the trillion dollar pharmaceutical industry are saying it is.

I know which side i trust the most.



But what we do know is millions have died; and that in every country which has had a widespread vaccine rollout the numbers of deaths have fallen dramatically in a way they were not doing pre vaccine rollout.

Didgee wrote:

Ben Reilly wrote:Well, I think you can't compare abortion to vaccination, because abortion only affects a woman and her unborn baby, whereas an unvaccinated person can endanger their community and eventually the world in certain scenarios.

I don't mean to downplay anybody's feeling of a right to sovereignty over their bodies, and I do think that good information and logical persuasion is the best way to go. On the other hand, I understand why some people think vaccines should be mandatory, if only to take every possible measure to protect humanity at large.

You are missing the point:

We are talking about body autonomy here

You either support people to be pro choice or you do not

If you do not, in regards to vaccines, then you contradict yourself

It does not matter how far you span who or what it might effect in others.

You either support people to have a choice over what they do with their bodies or you do not

So which is it?

gelico wrote:''(Natural News) New research out of Sweden has found that post-vaccination “immunity” – if you can even call it that – from Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) injections is temporary at best, and completely gone within months.

Like most of the other plandemic paraphernalia, the injections are not all that popular in Sweden, and for good reason. Researchers there determined that the shots are completely useless after seven months.

Not only that, but the fake “immunity” the jabs procure actually goes negative after seven months, meaning the recipient’s immune system is worse off than prior to when they got injected.''


https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-11-01-swedish-study-covid-jabs-no-lasting-protection.html#

gelico wrote:LOLOLOL!!!!

Wikepedia is a pile of shite.  my son said they learned what wiki was guff back in year 10 at school.



''Antibody levels among fully vaccinated people wane faster than researchers previously thought, a major recent study performed in Sweden has concluded''.


wane faster than previously thought??

that says it all right there

They're not meant to wane at all.  The whole point of vaccinations are designed to build up antibodies in order to reject the disease should you come across it at any time in the future

this jab just causes it and a shit load of adverse reactions are mind blowing.  over 2.5 million adverse reactions to this useless fucking jab and you think that's normal and ok?

gelico wrote:

Eilzel wrote:

gelico wrote:lets start at the beginning

a flu virus gets labelled as the most dangerous virus and everyone should be very scared (says the media) and protect the elderly and the vulnerable

info comes out that in fact the covid virus has a 99.9% survival rate for any person who is under 70 with no serious underlying conditions.

in fact even in the over 80s and with underlying conditions it was still 92% chance of survival

we also learned that boosting the immune, zinc supplements, ivermectim, hydrochloxychlorine, and other treatments which are effective and widely available got dismissed and banned

all FIO stats released show clearly that there was only a small increase of deaths throughout the whole of 2020 and that being the majority of over 80s and in hospitals or care homes.  Those reports have long since been released.

WHO stats also say that this covid vaccine has caused terrifyingly huge numbers of ADRs in only 10 months than every other vaccine put together over the last 40 years.

you can view it yourselves here

http://www.vigiaccess.org/

how in God's name can anyone on here justify getting this shit pumped into them

@Ben re your comment about ''people fighting to drink alchohol etc etc''

it comes down to 2 simple words

PERSONAL CHOICE

Are we to assume the reactions of every major government on Earth are disproportionate to the risk of the virus?


yes, for the very reasons i've put up, and more.
It was all preplanned and preorganised.  

I’m not a scientist, nor is anyone here. Stats can be thrown up by both sides to support one view or the others.

i've listened to doctors, scientists, virologists, immunologists, GPs, nurses all around the world.  The ones who are not being paid by Bill Gates and risk (or have already lost) their livelihoods are saying this is not necessary.

Certain politicians and sage and Dr Hilary Jones etc etc most of whom have major shares and other vested interests in the trillion dollar pharmaceutical industry are saying it is.

I know which side i trust the most.



But what we do know is millions have died; and that in every country which has had a widespread vaccine rollout the numbers of deaths have fallen dramatically in a way they were not doing pre vaccine rollout.

Of course millions of people have died, les.  Millions of people die every year but we haven't had millions MORE than usual.

covid has such a high infection rate that pretty much everyone who died of anything (heart attack, stroke, old age, dementia, stabbed to death or whatever) would be highly likely to have covid in their system but they didn't die of it FFS! it was just present in the system.

we also know of the millions upon millions of pounds made in contracts given out from Boris to his chums for PPE, passes, testing centres etc etc

FFS!  open your eyes

why is it so difficult for you to believe that the governments of the world are a little bit dodgy?

you seriously think that any of them give a flying fuck about anyone's well being or health?

get a grip on reality, les

ps great to see you again

Syl wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:


I don't believe the figures...

That's because you are an ostrich, you prefer to bury your head in the sand than admit you are wrong now ,and you have been spreading misinformation from the beginning.

"Soaring cases on the continent underlined "how quickly things can go wrong", said Professor John Edmunds, who pointed out there were still "many millions" across Britain, who were still not fully vaccinated while some had not had any COVID-19 shots.

His comments came as a number of European countries wrestle with a resurgence of the coronavirus."


https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/covid-surge-in-europe-shows-critical-need-to-vaccinate-millions-still-not-jabbed-in-uk-sage-expert-warns/ar-AAQVY2p?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531

Eilzel wrote:

Syl wrote:

eddie wrote:

Syl wrote:

And I wonder how many NHS workers lost their jobs because they refused the Hepatitis B jab?.
My guess is probably none .

Here is my answer to your answer, (edited post), and in bold.
Read it and understand that this is the truth:


Hepatitis B.
It wasn’t in the news and there was no media scare, no daily figures, no threat, no daily media coverage, no lockdown. No....nothing.
Or was there and I missed it?

If so: Did any workers lose their jobs when they refused the Hepatitis B jab?  Was it in the news? Why was it in the news? Was there a pandemic? If there was, why wasn’t there a lockdown?  Was the hepatitis B pandemic only as big as its audience?

Confused.

There was no fuss about some NHS workers being required to have the Hepatitis B jab because people didn't make a big fuss about it. Just as kids have for decades, had all the regular shots to prevent childhood illnesses without parents kicking up a fuss.

Why the Covid vaccination has brought out all the antivax idiots, when no other vaccine in my memory has had the same effect.....is baffling to me.

The answer to me is simple - social media scaremongering. There’s so much disinformation on social media it is a travesty. If has affected other issues in the past, but imo none more so than the response to Covid and vaccines. From the off there were fear stories and over the top outrage. Had this been the 90s, people would’ve got on with it and there’d be no major controversy. Now, everything has to be a dividing line. Social media, which has its benefits, also has a lot to answer for.

Syl wrote:Nothing wrong in being sceptical.
So the answer is to do research, listen to people who have spent years studying viruses, the very ones who pass their knowledge on to the medics and  scientists, who then pass their research onto the government bodies, who make the decisions.....some right, some wrong.

.The more info you have the better informed you are to make the right decisions.

What I dont do is read and believe  conspiracy anti vax propaganda,  or think my uninformed opinion is right and the majority of the worlds experts  are  wrong.

Tommy Monk wrote:Heard this website mentioned on LBC a little while ago... It has this section on vaccine adverse reactions...

But of course these vaccines are really totally "safe and effective".


https://www.ukmedfreedom.org/resources/covid-19-vaccine-info#Adverse-Reactions


I normally go for Sunday lunch somewhere with a couple of people... One of the guys said yesterday that he probably won't be coming because he had his covid booster jab last week and it has made him feel terrible... He was proper rough after his 2nd jab too!


Thing is, he didn't really stop doing anything during the lockdowns, carried on working etc, always out and about and mixing with loads of different people etc, and thinks he's already had the virus and with no real ill effects.

Tommy Monk wrote:


He's a mechanic so had to work, dealing with customers and getting in and out of their cars etc... And he got the covid last Christmas and ended up staying home on his own rather than going to his daughters as he was planning.

Syl wrote:

Tommy Monk wrote:Heard this website mentioned on LBC a little while ago... It has this section on vaccine adverse reactions...

But of course these vaccines are really totally "safe and effective".


https://www.ukmedfreedom.org/resources/covid-19-vaccine-info#Adverse-Reactions


I normally go for Sunday lunch somewhere with a couple of people... One of the guys said yesterday that he probably won't be coming because he had his covid booster jab last week and it has made him feel terrible... He was proper rough after his 2nd jab too!


Thing is, he didn't really stop doing anything during the lockdowns, carried on working etc, always out and about and mixing with loads of different people etc, and thinks he's already had the virus and with no real ill effects.

If he carried on as normal during lockdowns, out and about mixing with loads of different people etc... he is an idiot.

So he had the virus and felt OK...good for him. I wonder how many people he infected if he didn't follow the proper quarantine guidelines?
I'm all right Jack.

gelico wrote:

Syl wrote:

If he carried on as normal during lockdowns, out and about mixing with loads of different people etc... he is an idiot.

So he had the virus and felt OK...good for him. I wonder how many people he infected if he didn't follow the proper quarantine guidelines?
I'm all right Jack.

syl, most people carried on as normal as per Boris Johnson's own instructions if you remember.

''it's very very serious, people should work from home, unless they can't in which case they should go to work.  People should avoid public transport, unless you need to use it in which case it's ok.  People should avoid going out unless you need to which is ok.''  The organised chaos and confusion was blatantly obvious from the start.

Furthermore, it was all those who did carry on as normal that kept the country going even a little bit such as all the supermarket staff, the drivers, etc etc who you are now labelling as idiots.

Added to that the frontline NHS staff who we were ordered to clap for have probably infected 10x as many people as your average worker because they couldn't help it.  carers were in and out of infected areas constantly and passing the virus on and the PCR tests have always been useless.

yet they kept going on and on working and now face the sack because they don't want this jab

but never mind that eh, fuck them.  like you said,,,,

I'm all right jack

Syl wrote:

gelico wrote:


syl, most people carried on as normal as per Boris Johnson's own instructions if you remember.

''it's very very serious, people should work from home, unless they can't in which case they should go to work.  People should avoid public transport, unless you need to use it in which case it's ok.  People should avoid going out unless you need to which is ok.''  The organised chaos and confusion was blatantly obvious from the start.

Furthermore, it was all those who did carry on as normal that kept the country going even a little bit such as all the supermarket staff, the drivers, etc etc who you are now labelling as idiots.

Added to that the frontline NHS staff who we were ordered to clap for have probably infected 10x as many people as your average worker because they couldn't help it.  carers were in and out of infected areas constantly and passing the virus on and the PCR tests have always been useless.

yet they kept going on and on working and now face the sack because they don't want this jab

but never mind that eh, fuck them.  like you said,,,,

I'm all right jack

I have never said °fuck them", I think it's sad that a minority of carers and NHS staff will face the sack, but it seems to me, it's them that have the I'm all Jack attitude, no one else.

No one carried on as normal during lockdown.......yes many people had to work, but everywhere was closed and deserted, some people didn't see a soul for months, almost everyone knew someone previously well who had caught Covid and died, ( I know 4  people) weddings, funerals, Christmas......all more or less cancelled, so no one could carry on as normal.

We will never agree on this, and tbh I have nothing new to add.

gelico wrote:


A new report in the medical journal shows Dr Vernon COleman why these jabs have to stop NOW.


https://www.bitchute.com/video/4ZuPPoyaP9rb/

gelico wrote:

Syl wrote:

I have never said °fuck them", I think it's sad that a minority of carers and NHS staff will face the sack, but it seems to me, it's them that have the I'm all Jack attitude, no one else.

No one carried on as normal during lockdown.......yes many people had to work, but everywhere was closed and deserted, some people didn't see a soul for months, almost everyone knew someone previously well who had caught Covid and died, ( I know 4  people) weddings, funerals, Christmas......all more or less cancelled, so no one could carry on as normal.

We will never agree on this, and tbh I have nothing new to add.

how is it you feel that the NHS carers have the i'm all right jack attitude?

in what way?

Syl wrote:

gelico wrote:


A new report in the medical journal shows Dr Vernon COleman why these jabs have to stop NOW.


https://www.bitchute.com/video/4ZuPPoyaP9rb/

Bitchute (where you garnered this latest gem from) review on Trustpilot.


"This site and service is a low-rent YouTube clone that carries an variety of hate-fueled material, including white nationalist podcasts, neo-Nazi propaganda and any number of such material.
During the Coronavirus pandemic, they have frequently published disinformation such as the banned video "Plandemic" that was riddled with false claims. As a rule of thumb, this a website that offers disinformation and offensive content. It is not credible on any level."

Syl wrote:

gelico wrote:


how is it you feel that the NHS carers have the i'm all right jack attitude?

in what way?

Gels, I have been through this since the vaccination was first introduced. Read back, all my answers are here.
We are going round in circles.
You believe what you want and act accordingly, as will I.

Next topic please.

Vintage wrote:I don't understand why people are happy to take chemicals as supplements when they too have known side effects and maybe long term effects we know nothing about yet but refuse a vaccination.
Zinc:
Nausea, vomiting, stomach pain, diarrhea, flu like symptoms, lowers good cholesterol, changes in taste, copper deficiency - can interfere with the body's ability to absorb copper, frequent infections - induce blood disorders.
Ivermectin: treatment for parasitic disorders:
eye pain severe skin rash with pus, fever, swollen glands, fast heart rate - can double, loss of bladder and bowel control, neck or back pain, light headedness.
Hydrochloxychlorine: (sounds like something you'd clean a public swimming pool out with)
Blurred vision, nausea, stomach pain, loss of apetite, diarrhea, headache, skin rash.

Vintage wrote:I don't understand why people are happy to take chemicals as supplements when they too have known side effects and maybe long term effects we know nothing about yet but refuse a vaccination.
Zinc:
Nausea, vomiting, stomach pain, diarrhea, flu like symptoms, lowers good cholesterol, changes in taste, copper deficiency - can interfere with the body's ability to absorb copper, frequent infections - induce blood disorders.
Ivermectin: treatment for parasitic disorders:
eye pain severe skin rash with pus, fever, swollen glands, fast heart rate - can double, loss of bladder and bowel control, neck or back pain, light headedness.
Hydrochloxychlorine: (sounds like something you'd clean a public swimming pool out with)
Blurred vision, nausea, stomach pain, loss of apetite, diarrhea, headache, skin rash.

gelico wrote:

Syl wrote:

Gels, I have been through this since the vaccination was first introduced. Read back, all my answers are here.
We are going round in circles.
You believe what you want and act accordingly, as will I.

Next topic please.

introduced isn't the same as forced though

Syl, all i'm saying is that these same dotors/nurses/carers worked all through the ''most serious and deadliest pandemic ever'' (as the government/media tried to imply) putting themselves at risk every single day to look after people and worked themselves almost into a standstill and making huge sacrifices with social contact as well.

On top of that they can see first hand the damage that the jab is doing and have declined.

they now are banned from doing everything they did (and were applauded for) last year

where does the ''i'm all right jack'' attitude fit into that?

that's all i'm asking

Tommy Monk wrote:


Why are those who have already had covid and therefore have a natural immunity from their own immune systems, being forced to have a vaccine that is neither totally safe or totally effective!?

gelico wrote:

Syl wrote:

Bitchute (where you garnered this latest gem from) review on Trustpilot.


"This site and service is a low-rent YouTube clone that carries an variety of hate-fueled material, including white nationalist podcasts, neo-Nazi propaganda and any number of such material.
During the Coronavirus pandemic, they have frequently published disinformation such as the banned video "Plandemic" that was riddled with false claims. As a rule of thumb, this a website that offers disinformation and offensive content. It is not credible on any level."

Ah, i predicted that one correctly.

somehow I just knew that you would ignore the content of what was being said and focus on the site.

the only reason you are hearing him on ''unreliable'' sites is because he is being silenced by mainstream media.

here's a really hard challenge for you

go back and listen again TO WHAT HE IS SAYING and just pretend it's BBC or sky news or some such main news outlet and try to take in what he is saying.

can you do it?

Vintage wrote:As Syl mentioned why is every country in the world working on the same thing, if there is no danger to the general population, why, for probably the first time ever, the world governments are on the same page regarding the virus? Is the NWO actually in power now everywhere?
What would happen if there was no vaccine? Wouldn't the hospitals be overflowing with people sick with covid, they don't have to die to make it a huge problem, staff at hospitals would get sick and all the rest of the people keeping a country going economically, keeping it secure and
law and order in place, there's the possibility of economic collapse and lawlessness.
The mDNA has been researched for decades every vaccine has side effects every treatment has side effects, heck, even being alive has side effects. It may be over 2 million people with side effects and even deaths in that number, how many deaths would there be if no one was vaccinated, how many long or short term side effects would there be, would you really want to find out..

Vintage wrote:. It may be over 2 million people with side effects and even deaths in that number, how many deaths would there be if no one was vaccinated, how many long or short term side effects would there be, would you really want to find out..

gelico wrote:

Vintage wrote:. It may be over 2 million people with side effects and even deaths in that number, how many deaths would there be if no one was vaccinated, how many long or short term side effects would there be, would you really want to find out..

i can't believe i even read that correctly

if no one was vaccinated there would have been very few deaths.  there was hardly a spike in deaths throughout the whole of 2020 compared with any other year.   This was supposedly during the worst and most dangerous virus ever and there was no vaccine available then was there?

you can watch the previous video regarding natural immunity and how it works.

that has now been totally compromised in anyone who has the vaccine in them

Syl wrote:

gelico wrote:

introduced isn't the same as forced though

Syl, all i'm saying is that these same dotors/nurses/carers worked all through the ''most serious and deadliest pandemic ever'' (as the government/media tried to imply) putting themselves at risk every single day to look after people and worked themselves almost into a standstill and making huge sacrifices with social contact as well.

On top of that they can see first hand the damage that the jab is doing and have declined.

they now are banned from doing everything they did (and were applauded for) last year

where does the ''i'm all right jack'' attitude fit into that?

that's all i'm asking

Figures show that 90% of NHS staff are already double jabbed, by April that figure is estimated to rise to 93%.

Of the 7% remaining, some of those will be exempt, others will decide to have the jab at the last minute, so the expected number to be either taken away from dealing with patients, or ultimately sacked, won't be as high as first expected.

Why I believe they have an 'I'm all right Jack attitude'..... it's been known from the start that Covid affects the old and vulnerable far more than the fit and healthy.
The majority of NHS workers are younger, fitter and healthier than the patients they are dealing with.....they have less chance of being seriously ill if they catch the virus, and in spite of all the anti Vax nonsense, they have more chance of catching the virus, thus passing it on, than the vaccinated.

I know nothing I say will change your opinion, but everything I say is backed up by research, facts and figures.