Metropolitan Police removes 250,000 online extremist items

by scrat Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:19 am

"We are seeing more and more material being put out by terrorist and extreme right-wing groups on the internet," he told the BBC.

"They are looking to spread extremism and radicalise others.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38419969

As I'm treated to a daily warning, I thought I might warn them one back!

by Tommy Monk Sat Dec 24, 2016 1:51 am

Sorry scrat... but if you actually read the article properly and filter out the spin... it is clearly saying that the overwhelming vast majority of terrorist material they are seeing is Muslim Islamist terrorist origin...

"... Specialist Met officers dealing with internet extremism say... their core task [is] of dealing with radical Islamist propaganda..."

by Guest Sat Dec 24, 2016 11:48 am

Never let it be said ...that we collectively allowed a linked article to be translated via the mind of Tommykins; :no-no:
As many times as he's been Metropolitan Police removes 250,000 online extremist items 2581891615

Metropolitan Police removes 250,000 online extremist items 2581891615

just by his own links, it pays to read - view the actual article and do your own reading!
Just say'n Metropolitan Police removes 250,000 online extremist items 202592697

Metropolitan Police removes 250,000 online extremist items 202592697

The Met says it has removed almost 250,000 items since it began focusing on the problem in 2010.
The right-wing items include videos of meetings and demonstrations, and there were videos posted by so-called Islamic State designed to attract recruits.
Det Ch Supt Clarke Jarrett said the removal of the material was "crucial".
"We are seeing more and more material being put out by terrorist and extreme right-wing groups on the internet," he told the BBC.

"They are looking to spread extremism and radicalise others.
"We think it is really important to remove that material where we can from the internet and to stop vulnerable people finding it easily on social media sites."
Referrals from the public via an anonymous site have doubled since 2012, and 2,000 items are removed every week on average.
Public tip-offs
Specialist Met officers dealing with internet extremism say racist videos and social media posts - including content by the group National Action, which was banned by the government this month - are adding to their core task of dealing with radical Islamist propaganda.
The Met's Counter Terrorism Internet Referral Unit team makes requests to 300 internet companies around the world to take down material which is illegal under UK law.
Officers say their relationships with social media services are generally good, but declined to name companies which prove more difficult to persuade.
They would like more of an international effort to tackle the problem, senior officers say.
The Met team was the first of its kind, but the European policing authority Europol has also set up its own unit.
Counter-terrorism officers said videos posted by so-called Islamic State also included "hearts and minds" propaganda aimed at the families of those it hopes to attract.
The biggest risk is that vulnerable or mentally-ill internet users will find extremist material online, encouraging them to carry out attacks, police said.
Journalists were shown one video in which a jihadist speaking English urged viewers who were unable to get hold of an assault rifle to buy a knife instead.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38419969

Excellent article, TY ...Scrat for putting it out here; I see a employment opportunity for many disabled vets &/or any disabled person needing a job. And with today's technology, these types of jobs could be managed from the comfort of their own homes too!

by Tommy Monk Sat Dec 24, 2016 11:54 am

4EVER2 wrote:Never let it be said ...that we collectively allowed a linked article to be translated via the mind of Tommykins; :no-no:
As many times as he's been just by his own links, it pays to read - view the actual article and do your own reading!
Just say'n

The Met says it has removed almost 250,000 items since it began focusing on the problem in 2010.
The right-wing items include videos of meetings and demonstrations, and there were videos posted by so-called Islamic State designed to attract recruits.
Det Ch Supt Clarke Jarrett said the removal of the material was "crucial".
"We are seeing more and more material being put out by terrorist and extreme right-wing groups on the internet," he told the BBC.

"They are looking to spread extremism and radicalise others.
"We think it is really important to remove that material where we can from the internet and to stop vulnerable people finding it easily on social media sites."
Referrals from the public via an anonymous site have doubled since 2012, and 2,000 items are removed every week on average.
Public tip-offs

Specialist Met officers dealing with internet extremism say racist videos and social media posts - including content by the group National Action, which was banned by the government this month - are adding to their core task of dealing with radical Islamist propaganda.
The Met's Counter Terrorism Internet Referral Unit team makes requests to 300 internet companies around the world to take down material which is illegal under UK law.
Officers say their relationships with social media services are generally good, but declined to name companies which prove more difficult to persuade.
They would like more of an international effort to tackle the problem, senior officers say.
The Met team was the first of its kind, but the European policing authority Europol has also set up its own unit.
Counter-terrorism officers said videos posted by so-called Islamic State also included "hearts and minds" propaganda aimed at the families of those it hopes to attract.
The biggest risk is that vulnerable or mentally-ill internet users will find extremist material online, encouraging them to carry out attacks, police said.
Journalists were shown one video in which a jihadist speaking English urged viewers who were unable to get hold of an assault rifle to buy a knife instead.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38419969
Excellent article, TY ...Scrat for putting it out here; I see a employment opportunity for many disabled vets &/or any disabled person needing a job. And with today's technology, these types of jobs could be managed from the comfort of their own homes too!

by scrat Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:08 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:

Sorry scrat... but if you actually read the article properly and filter out the spin... it is clearly saying that the overwhelming vast majority of terrorist material they are seeing is Muslim Islamist terrorist origin...

"... Specialist Met officers dealing with internet extremism say... their core task [is] of dealing with radical Islamist propaganda..."

Recently we had a spate of private Piles posting graphic anti Muslim, anti halal slaughterhouse vids, "Britain first" were being paid to promote them, like rats, you're never far from RW racist terrorists.

What I find peculiar is why anyone would wish to defend them, which in itself points to the activity of far right nut jobs online.

by Tommy Monk Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:11 pm

Would these 'far right nut jobs' be warning against the threat of Islamist terrorists by any chance...?

by scrat Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:15 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:

Would these 'far right nut jobs' be warning against the threat of Islamist terrorists by any chance...?

No the state, the media and social networks have us on defcom 1, RW nut jobs are after your soul Tommy, perhaps they already own it and you're simply utilised as a repeating station.

by Tommy Monk Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:19 pm

I don't see any far right nut job propaganda online scat...

But your article clearly says that core task of the specialist police officers online is of dealing with radical Islamist propaganda!

by Guest Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:32 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:I don't see any far right nut job propaganda online scat... Oh, please don't tell me you've gone into a search engine and tried to find them??? OMG
But your article clearly says that core task of the specialist police officers online is of dealing with radical Islamist propaganda!

Tommykins, SWEET JESUS - Dude; that's how the FBI tracks people that want to find 'Child Porn' ...they attach KEY WORDS to their search engines/web sights/filters systems and find people that troll the internet looking for such specific genre!

You could be your own worst nightmare via your own fingers and misguided stupidity, GOOD GRIEF!!!

by Tommy Monk Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:34 pm

No... I have not been trying to look up any far right nut job propaganda...

by Andy Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:38 pm

Is there a difference between far right Islamic terrorists and the Alt-Right nut jobs?
Only a fag paper of difference really.
Both sets are the arse of society and need wiping off the face of the earth.

by Tommy Monk Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:40 pm

I don't know... I know what the Islamists are all about... what do the so called 'alt right' go on about...?

by Andy Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:57 pm

They aren't good people Tom.
Definitely a group worth avoiding.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.telegraph.co.uk/news/0/richard-spencer-white-nationalist-leading-alt-right-movement/amp/

by Guest Sat Dec 24, 2016 1:01 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:
I don't know... I know what the Islamists are all about... what do the so called 'alt right' go on about...?

Given what we know you don't know, just from your many months of befuddlement and topic confusion on around here ...you need to find some educated Islam's and become informed.
What you react to around here is just more amoeba type assumptions from your PACK. Twisted Evil

You seem so easily swayed by more MISINFORMATION then you ever do with FACTUAL INFORMATION.

by Tommy Monk Sat Dec 24, 2016 1:02 pm

But people on here often call me 'far right' etc...

by Andy Sat Dec 24, 2016 1:07 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:
But people on here often call me 'far right' etc...

Just once in a blue moon you do give that impression..
You aren't a loon like the banned one, though.

by Guest Sat Dec 24, 2016 1:35 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:But people on here often call me 'far right' etc...

Perhaps you've missed/overlooked the topic that Ben posted up regarding this very issue >

You get the picture. These aren’t good people trying to save the lives of their political enemies. They are racist, anti-Semitic homophobes who would like to these groups of people to die but don’t want to get in trouble over it, so they’ll settle for trying to shut down safe spaces and hopefully have all these “degenerates” thrown out onto the streets in the middle of winter.
https://medium.com/defiant/neo-nazis-are-shutting-down-community-centers-with-code-complaints-4a83a30dabfa#.lhhnh4j4q

'ALT-RIGHT' and you being called 'Far Right' aren't necessarily one and the same! And as always, you speak in grand generalities that need specificity genre to explain your continued confusion about these issues.
You often jump in and cheer on your PACK members when they've posted something really ugly/vile/and anti humanistic for anyone that isn't up to their coded bar of acceptable living and in so doing that ...yes, Tommykins - you'll garner the same reaction as the originator of the post! Rolling Eyes

Guilty by association!

Could that stem from your lack of reading the entire thread and original post - certainly.

Could that stem from your lack of comprehension ...absolutely!

Could that stem from your need to be liked and afraid of having a Free Will thought, plausible!

by Tommy Monk Sat Dec 24, 2016 1:40 pm

As I said before... i don't see any far right nut job propaganda online...

But the article clearly says that core task of the specialist police officers online is of dealing with radical Islamist propaganda!

by scrat Mon Dec 26, 2016 10:28 am

Tommy Monk wrote:As I said before... i don't see any far right nut job propaganda online...

But the article clearly says that core task of the specialist police officers online is of dealing with radical Islamist propaganda!

Calm your life Tommo,
Their core task is to monitor extremist propaganda that could lead to an "event", if you visited fanatical Islamist sites and could read Arabic, there's no doubt in my mind you would agree with much of their warped far right view of the world, the similarity is frightening.

On this forum we've been subject to the fanatical far right doctrines of the NF BNP EDL and more recently the murdering scum supporting "Britain first".

Every single one of these creatures post in various guises on monkey boys, (where you're encouraged to call black people "apes"), it is there that they're fully loaded with hatred, and then they're pointed in this direction to ply that hatred on here, the fact that you yourself appear not to post on that site, is perhaps your one and only redeeming feature.

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 10:42 am

So why does the press publish videos made by Islamic extremists? Isn't that what they want? If they were quietly removed from the internet, it would starve them of publicity.

by Guest Mon Dec 26, 2016 12:49 pm

Often our many media sources will mention/have a segment about a ISIS incident and they'll show a still image from the ISIS provided video ...they rarely show the actual video clip.
But if anyone is in need of seeing what those terrorist are filming ...there are a plethora of Arab based Al Jazeera news media sites that will & do provide the entire video and what is being said. And then those are picked up and shown around via FB.

I'm not well versed in what is available in the UK, or how responsible the media stations are for allowing such things to be shown in Europe; I'd hope that they would not do that but the bottom line is such things do make an audience and that's the bottom line!

by Tommy Monk Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:16 pm

scrat wrote:
Tommy Monk wrote:As I said before... i don't see any far right nut job propaganda online...

But the article clearly says that core task of the specialist police officers online is of dealing with radical Islamist propaganda!
Calm your life Tommo,
Their core task is to monitor extremist propaganda that could lead to an "event", if you visited fanatical Islamist sites and could read Arabic, there's no doubt in my mind you would agree with much of their warped far right view of the world, the similarity is frightening.

On this forum we've been subject to the fanatical far right doctrines of the NF BNP EDL and more recently the murdering scum supporting "Britain first".

Every single one of these creatures post in various guises on monkey boys, (where you're encouraged to call black people "apes"), it is there that they're fully loaded with hatred, and then they're pointed in this direction to ply that hatred on here, the fact that you yourself appear not to post on that site, is perhaps your one and only redeeming feature.

Yes .. Islamist material...!

by scrat Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:28 pm

Tommy Monk wrote:
scrat wrote:
Calm your life Tommo,
Their core task is to monitor extremist propaganda that could lead to an "event", if you visited fanatical Islamist sites and could read Arabic, there's no doubt in my mind you would agree with much of their warped far right view of the world, the similarity is frightening.

On this forum we've been subject to the fanatical far right doctrines of the NF BNP EDL and more recently the murdering scum supporting "Britain first".

Every single one of these creatures post in various guises on monkey boys, (where you're encouraged to call black people "apes"), it is there that they're fully loaded with hatred, and then they're pointed in this direction to ply that hatred on here, the fact that you yourself appear not to post on that site, is perhaps your one and only redeeming feature.

Yes .. Islamist material...!

And far right material, you are peas in a pod!

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:31 pm

So are Islamic extremists right wing or left wing? Perhaps one of the lefties could clarify?

by Guest Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:33 pm

Oh, Tommykins is starting that 'duck/dodge/squiming' again ...so just keep bringing forward the section from the actual link that I've provided! Tommykins selective memory seems to humor him and his lame rational that it's acceptable to keep playing that game with the adults during a discussion!

The Met says it has removed almost 250,000 items since it began focusing on the problem in 2010.
The right-wing items include videos of meetings and demonstrations, and there were videos posted by so-called Islamic State designed to attract recruits.
Det Ch Supt Clarke Jarrett said the removal of the material was "crucial".
"We are seeing more and more material being put out by terrorist and extreme right-wing groups on the internet," he told the BBC.

"They are looking to spread extremism and radicalise others.
"We think it is really important to remove that material where we can from the internet and to stop vulnerable people finding it easily on social media sites."
Referrals from the public via an anonymous site have doubled since 2012, and 2,000 items are removed every week on average.
Public tip-offs
Specialist Met officers dealing with internet extremism say racist videos and social media posts - including content by the group National Action, which was banned by the government this month - are adding to their core task of dealing with radical Islamist propaganda.
The Met's Counter Terrorism Internet Referral Unit team makes requests to 300 internet companies around the world to take down material which is illegal under UK law.
Officers say their relationships with social media services are generally good, but declined to name companies which prove more difficult to persuade.
They would like more of an international effort to tackle the problem, senior officers say.
The Met team was the first of its kind, but the European policing authority Europol has also set up its own unit.
Counter-terrorism officers said videos posted by so-called Islamic State also included "hearts and minds" propaganda aimed at the families of those it hopes to attract.
The biggest risk is that vulnerable or mentally-ill internet users will find extremist material online, encouraging them to carry out attacks, police said.
Journalists were shown one video in which a jihadist speaking English urged viewers who were unable to get hold of an assault rifle to buy a knife instead.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38419969

by Tommy Monk Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:37 pm

" ..The Specialist police officers... their core task of dealing with radical Islamist propaganda.."

How many more times do I have to keep pointing this out to the idiot...?

by scrat Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:56 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:So are Islamic extremists right wing or left wing? Perhaps one of the lefties could clarify?

You are all far right extremists, if we don't accept your doctrine, mothers are shot in the street for not ranting about immigrants, beheaded for being an infidel, God hates fags and throws them off the highest towers, silenced for pointing out the greed and corruption, cursed for being poor, sick or disabled!

Those of us left of centre moderates, don't think people should be murdered because they hold a different view, don't believe that all should follow one faith, regard homosexuals as equal human beings and as a normal process of nature, think that those with the means to pay more should pay more for a fair and decent society, help, assist and encourage the poor, the sick and disabled to better themselves with free education, give the sick all the assistance they need and ensure that the government provide free health care, and encourage the disabled to lead the best possible life they can, properly funded and functional.

The MSM want us to believe that spending billions of tax payer funds, on war, on banks and on tax cuts for the rich are in our best interest for the common good, but anyone with an ounce of sense would consider that BS.

For the first time in my life we now have a party leader who could take Britain to the next level, steal a march on the rest, put us out there as the "state of the art" nation, that puts the interests of all the people first.

by scrat Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:56 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:So are Islamic extremists right wing or left wing? Perhaps one of the lefties could clarify?

You are all far right extremists, if we don't accept your doctrine, mothers are shot in the street for not ranting about immigrants, beheaded for being an infidel, God hates fags and throws them off the highest towers, silenced for pointing out the greed and corruption, cursed for being poor, sick or disabled!

Those of us left of centre moderates, don't think people should be murdered because they hold a different view, don't believe that all should follow one faith, regard homosexuals as equal human beings and as a normal process of nature, think that those with the means to pay more should pay more for a fair and decent society, help, assist and encourage the poor, the sick and disabled to better themselves with free education, give the sick all the assistance they need and ensure that the government provide free health care, and encourage the disabled to lead the best possible life they can, properly funded and functional.

The MSM want us to believe that spending billions of tax payer funds, on war, on banks and on tax cuts for the rich are in our best interest for the common good, but anyone with an ounce of sense would consider that BS.

For the first time in my life we now have a party leader who could take Britain to the next level, steal a march on the rest, put us out there as the "state of the art" nation, that puts the interests of all the people first.

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 2:05 pm

scrat wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:So are Islamic extremists right wing or left wing? Perhaps one of the lefties could clarify?
You are all far right extremists, if we don't accept your doctrine, mothers are shot in the street for not ranting about immigrants, beheaded for being an infidel, God hates fags and throws them off the highest towers, silenced for pointing out the greed and corruption, cursed for being poor, sick or disabled!

Those of us left of centre moderates, don't think people should be murdered because they hold a different view, don't believe that all should follow one faith, regard homosexuals as equal human beings and as a normal process of nature, think that those with the means to pay more should pay more for a fair and decent society, help, assist and encourage the poor, the sick and disabled to better themselves with free education, give the sick all the assistance they need and ensure that the government provide free health care, and encourage the disabled to lead the best possible life they can, properly funded and functional.

The MSM want us to believe that spending billions of tax payer funds, on war, on banks and on tax cuts for the rich are in our best interest for the common good, but anyone with an ounce of sense would consider that BS.

For the first time in my life we now have a party leader who could take Britain to the next level, steal a march on the rest, put us out there as the "state of the art" nation, that puts the interests of all the people first.

I'm not a far right extremist.

by Tommy Monk Mon Dec 26, 2016 2:07 pm

Neither am I... although I am sometimes called a far right extremist for being against Islamists and their violence, and for being against the allowance of them into our country...

by scrat Mon Dec 26, 2016 2:13 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
scrat wrote:
You are all far right extremists, if we don't accept your doctrine, mothers are shot in the street for not ranting about immigrants, beheaded for being an infidel, God hates fags and throws them off the highest towers, silenced for pointing out the greed and corruption, cursed for being poor, sick or disabled!

Those of us left of centre moderates, don't think people should be murdered because they hold a different view, don't believe that all should follow one faith, regard homosexuals as equal human beings and as a normal process of nature, think that those with the means to pay more should pay more for a fair and decent society, help, assist and encourage the poor, the sick and disabled to better themselves with free education, give the sick all the assistance they need and ensure that the government provide free health care, and encourage the disabled to lead the best possible life they can, properly funded and functional.

The MSM want us to believe that spending billions of tax payer funds, on war, on banks and on tax cuts for the rich are in our best interest for the common good, but anyone with an ounce of sense would consider that BS.

For the first time in my life we now have a party leader who could take Britain to the next level, steal a march on the rest, put us out there as the "state of the art" nation, that puts the interests of all the people first.

I'm not a far right extremist.

Yes Raggs, I suppose your denial is simply another factor that exposes your cognitive dissonance in full bloom, the views you display are far right and extremist just like those you surround yourself with and support.

Openly racist folk are rightly shunned in real life, and yet online they bring out the worst in some.

by Guest Mon Dec 26, 2016 2:20 pm

Scrat stated > Yes Raggs, I suppose your denial is simply another factor that exposes your cognitive dissonance in full bloom, the views you display are far right and extremist just like those you surround yourself with and support.

Openly racist folk are rightly shunned in real life, and yet online they bring out the worst in some.

**BINGO** Dude, what they preach - what they post - who they support just proves the opposite from what they CLAIM! 5

Metropolitan Police removes 250,000 online extremist items Dancing-happy-star-smiley-emoticon

4 U mister!
Very obvious to those of 'US' that support humanity straight across the spectrum ...not so easy for those that use their special tinted glasses to select the right type of humans for equality treatment by ALL of us!

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 2:20 pm

scrat wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

I'm not a far right extremist.
Yes Raggs, I suppose your denial is simply another factor that exposes your cognitive dissonance in full bloom, the views you display are far right and extremist just like those you surround yourself with and support.

Openly racist folk are rightly shunned in real life, and yet online they bring out the worst in some.

My denial is a matter of fact. If you can prove that I'm a far-right extremist, please do so. If you give examples of these views, please do so. If you can't, I'll just have to assume that you're trolling and that you have no idea what you're talking about.

by scrat Mon Dec 26, 2016 2:26 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
scrat wrote:
Yes Raggs, I suppose your denial is simply another factor that exposes your cognitive dissonance in full bloom, the views you display are far right and extremist just like those you surround yourself with and support.

Openly racist folk are rightly shunned in real life, and yet online they bring out the worst in some.

My denial is a matter of fact. If you can prove that I'm a far-right extremist, please do so. If you give examples of these views, please do so. If you can't, I'll just have to assume that you're trolling and that you have no idea what you're talking about.

You whimper like a bitch on heat for a racist prick, I'm somewhat surprised that you haven't attempted to ban yourself (again) just to be with him, if either of you acted in the fashion of your online manner in real life, you'd be banged up and tagged!

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 2:29 pm

scrat wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

My denial is a matter of fact. If you can prove that I'm a far-right extremist, please do so. If you give examples of these views, please do so. If you can't, I'll just have to assume that you're trolling and that you have no idea what you're talking about.
You whimper like a bitch on heat for a racist prick, I'm somewhat surprised that you haven't attempted to ban yourself (again) just to be with him, if either of you acted in the fashion of your online manner in real life, you'd be banged up and tagged!

I can't ban myself - a mod has to do that.

Oh, and sexist abuse is against the rules - just so you know.

by scrat Mon Dec 26, 2016 2:40 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
scrat wrote:
You whimper like a bitch on heat for a racist prick, I'm somewhat surprised that you haven't attempted to ban yourself (again) just to be with him, if either of you acted in the fashion of your online manner in real life, you'd be banged up and tagged!

I can't ban myself - a mod has to do that.

Oh, and sexist abuse is against the rules - just so you know.

Are you a dog?

by Tommy Monk Mon Dec 26, 2016 2:45 pm

Piss off scrat!

by Raggamuffin Mon Dec 26, 2016 2:46 pm

scrat wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

I can't ban myself - a mod has to do that.

Oh, and sexist abuse is against the rules - just so you know.
Are you a dog?

You wouldn't have said that to a man, so your comment was sexist and against the rules.

by scrat Mon Dec 26, 2016 2:48 pm

Raggamuffin wrote:
scrat wrote:
Are you a dog?

You wouldn't have said that to a man, so your comment was sexist and against the rules.

So are you a dog that thinks he's a man?

Fluke?

by Tommy Monk Mon Dec 26, 2016 2:55 pm

Piss off scrat!

by Guest Mon Dec 26, 2016 2:57 pm

scrat wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:

My denial is a matter of fact. If you can prove that I'm a far-right extremist, please do so. If you give examples of these views, please do so. If you can't, I'll just have to assume that you're trolling and that you have no idea what you're talking about.
You whimper ~~like a bitch on heat for a racist prick~~, I'm somewhat surprised that you haven't attempted to ban yourself (again) just to be with him, if either of you acted in the fashion of your online manner in real life, you'd be banged up and tagged!

Oh - man, Scrat ...couldn't we just keep to the topic and avoid such - cringe worthy gender assassinations?
I just hate those words as much as reading a MOD use those highly vulgar female gutter terms that she enjoys posting; they'll use your own words against you and then they WIN!

by eddie Mon Dec 26, 2016 3:05 pm

scrat wrote:
Raggamuffin wrote:
scrat wrote:
Yes Raggs, I suppose your denial is simply another factor that exposes your cognitive dissonance in full bloom, the views you display are far right and extremist just like those you surround yourself with and support.

Openly racist folk are rightly shunned in real life, and yet online they bring out the worst in some.

My denial is a matter of fact. If you can prove that I'm a far-right extremist, please do so. If you give examples of these views, please do so. If you can't, I'll just have to assume that you're trolling and that you have no idea what you're talking about.
You whimper like a bitch on heat for a racist prick, I'm somewhat surprised that you haven't attempted to ban yourself (again) just to be with him, if either of you acted in the fashion of your online manner in real life, you'd be banged up and tagged!

And another disgusting comment from scrat that has earned him a ban.

Two weeks for you. If you don't come back with a better tongue in your mouth then don't bother coming back.

And people actually have doubted that you've called me a "RW cock-sucking whore".

by scrat Mon Dec 26, 2016 3:05 pm

4EVER2 wrote:
scrat wrote:
You whimper ~~like a bitch on heat for a racist prick~~, I'm somewhat surprised that you haven't attempted to ban yourself (again) just to be with him, if either of you acted in the fashion of your online manner in real life, you'd be banged up and tagged!
Oh - man, Scrat ...couldn't we just keep to the topic and avoid such - cringe worthy gender assassinations?
I just hate those words as much as reading a MOD use those highly vulgar female gutter terms that she enjoys posting; they'll use your own words against you and then they WIN!

I like to use expressive terms, it beats beating around the bush, I don't think that "whimpering like a bitch on heat for a racist prick" is vulgar at all, it is simply expressive of the reality, bitches on heat do whimper, that's a fact of life.

by eddie Mon Dec 26, 2016 3:08 pm

THREAD LOCKED

WELL DONE

by Sponsored content