QUADRUPLE KILLER, GETS THE DEATH SENTENCE IN KS

Yes, indeed this cretin had served time for attempted murder, had a long rap sheet - and then he's out and did this heinous crime to 3 adults and one helpless 18 month old baby girl...my justification for humanities need for the DP and why these animals do not need to be allowed to breathe and eat for the rest of their lives!

Prosecutors will seek death penalty against Kyle Flack in quadruple Ottawa homicide

By Scott Rothschild — Lawrence Journal-World                       
April 22, 2014, 9:47 a.m. Updated April 22, 2014, 2:01 p.m. 
LJWorld coverage: Ottawa homicides
Ottawa — Prosecutors on Tuesday announced that they would seek the death penalty against Kyle Trevor Flack in connection with a quadruple homicide in Franklin County.
Flack, 28, is accused in the 2013 shooting deaths of Kaylie Bailey, 21, of Olathe; her 18-month-old daughter, Lana-Leigh; Andrew Adam Stout, 30, of Ottawa; and Steven Eugene White, 31, of Ottawa.
During an arraignment hearing Tuesday, Franklin County Attorney Stephen Hunting said the state would seek the death penalty against Flack for the deaths of Kaylie Bailey and her daughter.
In the notice of intent to seek the death penalty, prosecutors said Kaylie Bailey was killed “in an especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel manner.”
The court document also says Flack had a previous conviction of attempted murder. He had served four years in prison for the 2005 shooting of an Ottawa man.
Prosecutors have charged Flack with first-degree murder in connection with the slayings of Stout and White and will seek a “Hard 50” sentence in each case, which provides 50 years in prison with no possibility of parole.
During the approximately 10-minute arraignment hearing, Flack, dressed in a jail outfit, sat in shackles by his attorneys, Ron Evans and Tim Frieden, with the Kansas Death Penalty Defense Unit.
Flack waived his right to a speedy trial. He was silent on entering a plea, so Franklin County District Court Judge Eric Godderz entered pleas of not guilty.
A tentative trial date was set for Sept. 21, 2015. A hearing on motions in the case is set for this June 6.
The bodies of the adults were found in May 2013 at a rural house where Flack had once lived, about five miles west of Ottawa. The child was believed to have been killed there too, but her body was found in a suitcase in a creek in Osage County about 20 miles west.
The criminal complaint filed by prosecutors says that Bailey and her daughter were killed on May 1, while Stout was killed April 29 and White was killed between April 20 and April 29, 2013.
Flack also is charged with being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm and sexual battery of Kaylie Bailey.
Attorneys for Flack and for the state declined to comment after the hearing.
Kansas’ death penalty statute was struck down in 1972 and reinstated in 1994.
But there have been no executions since then.
The last execution in the state was in 1965.
Currently, there are nine men in Kansas who are sentenced to die by lethal injection.
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2014/apr/22/prosecutors-will-seek-death-penalty-against-flack-/

They couldn't INJECT this rat bastard with a large enough needle or make it slow enough to make me ...but he'll get his just rewards!

Clinton Dick/The Ottawa Herald.                          
Kyle Trevor Flack, 30, Ottawa, listens Thursday morning, March 31, 2016, at the Franklin County District Court, as a jury recommends that he be sentenced to death. Flack was sentenced to death Wednesday morning, May 18, 2016.

sassy wrote:Absolutely disgusting man, but I'd lock him is solitary with bread and water for the rest of his life.

Lord Foul wrote:vicarious victimhood 4ever??

I mean...be honest...were the victims known to you ? (if they were that makes a difference of course)

If not....what is it to you ...yes he needs locking up...permanently...and as sassy says in a deep dark gloomy damp nasty dungeon......with rats and bread and water for company....(though maybe even the rats would shun him) for public safety.....

but state revenge? revenge of the people?    ughhh...

Lord Foul wrote:
vicarious victimhood 4ever??

I mean...be honest...were the victims known to you ? (if they were that makes a difference of course)

If not....what is it to you ...yes he needs locking up...permanently...and as sassy says in a deep dark gloomy damp nasty dungeon......with rats and bread and water for company....(though maybe even the rats would shun him) for public safety.....

but state revenge? revenge of the people?    ughhh...

WhoseYourWolfie wrote:

I AGREE, Victor...

'State Sanctioned' Executions of the worst kinds of murderers, child abusers and rapists is in practice, a killing by proxy system --  providing a "revenge/closure" solution for that spineless minority in the population not prepared to undertake that execution themselves..

WHILE that "eye for an eye" oriented mob focused solely on their own bloodlust is happy to ignore the salient fact, that a much longer-lasting  and effective revenge punishment would be achieved by locking the perpetrator(s) away in a cage for the rest of his/her life..

IF SUCH A criminal doesn't want to do the jail time, then they always have the suicide option -- whether by their own hand, or via "suicide by cop".
IF THE CRIME is so bad that a relative/friend/neighbour believes that the scumbag must die, then they should also be prepared to carry out that execution themselves -- either make it appear an "accidental" death, or don't leave a body -- and be prepared to live with any consequences..        

4EVER2 wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:vicarious victimhood 4ever??

I mean...be honest...were the victims known to you ? (if they were that makes a difference of course)

If not....what is it to you ...yes he needs locking up...permanently...and as sassy says in a deep dark gloomy damp nasty dungeon......with rats and bread and water for company....(though maybe even the rats would shun him) for public safety.....

but state revenge? revenge of the people?    ughhh...

Oh, you really are quite the community 'JESTER'; first you twist/turn/avoid and jab/parry the mere thought that I dared compare our legal system's history from where be began to current day...and you post that bit of humorous BS like it has merit!     

If I wanted to carry on such a --- waste of bandwidth I'd go seek the mental-midget of Tommy-kins; that post was much more along his lines for obtuse type!

LMAO 
You can't be serious, so I'll just leave it lay like a warm

4EVER2 wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:vicarious victimhood 4ever??

I mean...be honest...were the victims known to you ? (if they were that makes a difference of course)

If not....what is it to you ...yes he needs locking up...permanently...and as sassy says in a deep dark gloomy damp nasty dungeon......with rats and bread and water for company....(though maybe even the rats would shun him) for public safety.....

but state revenge? revenge of the people?    ughhh...

Oh, you really are quite the community 'JESTER'; first you twist/turn/avoid and jab/parry the mere thought that I dared compare our legal system's history from where be began to current day...and you post that bit of humorous BS like it has merit!     

If I wanted to carry on such a --- waste of bandwidth I'd go seek the mental-midget of Tommy-kins; that post was much more along his lines for obtuse type!

LMAO 
You can't be serious, so I'll just leave it lay like a warm

4EVER2 wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:vicarious victimhood 4ever??

I mean...be honest...were the victims known to you ? (if they were that makes a difference of course)

If not....what is it to you ...yes he needs locking up...permanently...and as sassy says in a deep dark gloomy damp nasty dungeon......with rats and bread and water for company....(though maybe even the rats would shun him) for public safety.....

but state revenge? revenge of the people?    ughhh...

Oh, you really are quite the community 'JESTER'; first you twist/turn/avoid and jab/parry the mere thought that I dared compare our legal system's history from where be began to current day...and you post that bit of humorous BS like it has merit!     

If I wanted to carry on such a --- waste of bandwidth I'd go seek the mental-midget of Tommy-kins; that post was much more along his lines for obtuse type!

LMAO 
You can't be serious, so I'll just leave it lay like a warm

4EVER2 wrote:Just Dropping By to dribble a little more of your 'SPARKLING PERSONALITY' this morning Raggy and not a word about the TOPIC;
tsk - tsk - tsk...so very troll like but then Didgy-dooer seems on a rant as well this morning so the TAG TEAMING event seems to be Game On! 
  
BTW - sticking to the topic and having a clear - concise thought is a struggle; I see how often things have to be explained over & over & over again for YOU!  But we do try to educate

Lord Foul wrote:

4EVER2 wrote:
Oh, you really are quite the community 'JESTER'; first you twist/turn/avoid and jab/parry the mere thought that I dared compare our legal system's history from where be began to current day...and you post that bit of humorous BS like it has merit!     

If I wanted to carry on such a --- waste of bandwidth I'd go seek the mental-midget of Tommy-kins; that post was much more along his lines for obtuse type!

LMAO 
You can't be serious, so I'll just leave it lay like a warm

perhaps YOU should consider YOUR post in the light of your "advice" to ragga.....since you fail your own test of

"BTW - sticking to the topic and having a clear - concise thought is a struggle"

Raggamuffin wrote:Why the hell that idiot is allowed to troll all over this forum is a mystery to me.

4EVER2 wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:

4EVER2 wrote:
Oh, you really are quite the community 'JESTER'; first you twist/turn/avoid and jab/parry the mere thought that I dared compare our legal system's history from where be began to current day...and you post that bit of humorous BS like it has merit!     

If I wanted to carry on such a --- waste of bandwidth I'd go seek the mental-midget of Tommy-kins; that post was much more along his lines for obtuse type!

LMAO 
You can't be serious, so I'll just leave it lay like a warm

perhaps YOU should consider YOUR post in the light of your "advice" to ragga.....since you fail your own test of

"BTW - sticking to the topic and having a clear - concise thought is a struggle"

Awwww, so you don't care of the warm pile of pooo that I regarded YOUR post to be and now as a 'MODERATOR' you can't be expected to adhere to YOUR OWN 'I'm here to enforce the rules' mantra!  LMAO 
As to be expected --- MOOD and the Ability to MODERATE is always suspect

Lord Foul wrote:vicarious victimhood 4ever??
I mean...be honest...were the victims known to you ? (if they were that makes a difference of course)

If not....what is it to you ...yes he needs locking up...permanently...and as sassy says in a deep dark gloomy damp nasty dungeon......with rats and bread and water for company....(though maybe even the rats would shun him) for public safety.....
but state revenge? revenge of the people?    ughhh...

4EVER2 wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:vicarious victimhood 4ever??
I mean...be honest...were the victims known to you ? (if they were that makes a difference of course)

If not....what is it to you ...yes he needs locking up...permanently...and as sassy says in a deep dark gloomy damp nasty dungeon......with rats and bread and water for company....(though maybe even the rats would shun him) for public safety.....
but state revenge? revenge of the people?    ughhh...

A.) isn't this a community to discuss current events/criminal court proceedings/things of entrust to us  --- so why would 'I' have to know any of the victims personally in any of these give topics or horrid crimes to be able to state MY FUCKING OPINION?

are you THAT thick??? of course it makes a difference...IF the victims were personally known to you your "opinion" would carry far more weight...or, rather, deserving of more consideration.
if they are not then what I asked was a perfectly valid question....which you patently failed, utterly to understand......vis...
relatives/friends of the victim are in themselves directly ALSO victims....anyone else is merely a "vicarious victim" and moreover a self made vicarious victim
which means that you need to justify your opinion...not merely give it....
without reasoning your "opinion" is just so much hot air and smell.........

you could have replied with "they should execute him becasue I think X,Y and or Z

which could nicely lead to furthe avenues to explore....but no...just a mouthful of chicken shit



B.) "yes he needs locking up...permanently...and as sassy says in a deep dark gloomy damp nasty dungeon" - yet, again; you admonished me repetitively for dredging up punishment from 'jolly ole' England history' and kept hacking away at it and HOLY BAT CRAP...here you are 'SCREAMING BRAVO'...dungeons for everyone when there's no more the likely hood of that happening then hell freezing over or you actually reading the ACLU link
C. You might 'ASSume' you have the   of when/why I joined here but as with all of your little PM's behind the scene --- you were F'n off target back then and as I kept telling you; I don't need you hand holding me - telling/warning me off of the F-Nuts here...I'm quite capable of learning the problem children and for the rest of your opinion about my posts -   dial 1-800-Rats-Ass because I DO NOT CARE 

Take your foul fucking mood and do as didgey is always ranting - shove it up your fat arse! 

4EVER2 wrote:

Raggamuffin wrote:Why the hell that idiot is allowed to troll all over this forum is a mystery to me.

And yet...you've been allowed a membership here and I'll match my IQ against yours any day and should anyone care to scroll through your posting history; well the vile/hysteria and attacks on your history would far exceed any on mine!

You do bring the hysteria where ever you troll.

Original Quill wrote:Straighten up, people.  Vic you're a mod, you should know better.

Y'all are missing an excellent opportunity to have an intelligent discussion on capital punishment.  Instead, y'all are calling each other names and acting like children.

4EVER2 wrote:

Lord Foul wrote:vicarious victimhood 4ever??

I mean...be honest...were the victims known to you ? (if they were that makes a difference of course)

If not....what is it to you ...yes he needs locking up...permanently...and as sassy says in a deep dark gloomy damp nasty dungeon......with rats and bread and water for company....(though maybe even the rats would shun him) for public safety.....

but state revenge? revenge of the people?    ughhh...

Oh, you really are quite the community 'JESTER'; first you twist/turn/avoid and jab/parry the mere thought that I dared compare our legal system's history from where it began to current day...and you post that bit of humorous BS like it has merit!     

If I wanted to carry on such a --- waste of bandwidth I'd go seek the mental-midget of Tommy-kins; that post was much more along his lines for obtuse type!

LMAO 
You can't be serious, so I'll just leave it lay like a warm

The Mighty LF SPOKE > you could have replied with "they should execute him becasue I think X,Y and or Z
which could nicely lead to furthe avenues to explore..