10 Surprising Secrets From Apollo 11′s Historic Moon Landing

Ok dodge....

still not convinced it ever happened...   

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:still not convinced it ever happened...   

there is a perfectly reasonable explanation for that

and there seems to be some very good reasons to believe it was a hoax...   

Korben_Dallas wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:still not convinced it ever happened...   

there is a perfectly reasonable explanation for that

+1...have a   

Korben_Dallas wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:still not convinced it ever happened...   

there is a perfectly reasonable explanation for that

If ever the truth was spoken, that was it.

+ Everything + hundreds of   

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:and there seems to be some very good reasons to believe it was a hoax...   

Nope just "conspiracy theories" that a religion rotted mind like yours soaks up like a sponge...just like your quackery...

http://listverse.com/2012/12/28/10-reasons-the-moon-landings-could-be-a-hoax/

victorisnotamused wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:and there seems to be some very good reasons to believe it was a hoax...   

Nope just "conspiracy theories" that a religion rotted mind like yours soaks up like a sponge...just like your quackery...

Indeed, this articles sums them up very well and easily debunks their absurd claims

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/debunking-myth-that-moon-landing-was-hoax-1457501

which one debunks the multiple light sources didge??

did any of them mention the required thickness of the gloves they would have had to use and how it would have made manual manipulation of anything practically impossible??

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:which one debunks the multiple light sources didge??

did any of them mention the required thickness of the gloves they would have had to use and how it would have made manual manipulation of anything practically impossible??

 ://?roflmao?/:  ://?roflmao?/:  ://?roflmao?/: 


It really is comical, maybe explain this, which has proved them:










As well as footprints, flags, golf balls and $38m automobiles, the Apollo astronauts left something else on the surface of the moon – a large mirror, similar to a cats-eye reflector.
The moon is fairly reflective, but surprisingly its albedo (the amount of light that it reflects) is only 0.12 – about the same as coal. The reason it appears so luminous and white is partly because of its contrast with the blackness of space, but also because the Moon's reflectivity is fairly directional (light falling on the surface tends to reflect back in the same direction, making full Moons especially bright).
The Lunar Laser Ranging Experiment improves on both these characteristics, providing a surface on the Moon that is extremely reflective and very directional.
As a result, it is possible to fire a laser at the Moon's surface and, about 2.4 seconds later, detect the reflected beam. By measuring this time interval exactly, we can measure the distance to the Moon so precisely that we know, for example, it's getting further away by 3.8cm a year.
These experiments have been repeated independently multiple times since 1969, and none of them would have worked if that mirror hadn't been left there by the Apollo astronauts. 








Or this

lol its a make over there is only one source of light on the moon and none of that bull covers it... but they are inventive...lol

did you see the one about them filming from the module and they filmed from a window that some how was the wrong shape to the only window they could have used, that one was hilarious..

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:lol its a make over there is only one source of light on the moon and none of that bull covers it... but they are inventive...lol

did you see the one about them filming from the module and they filmed from a window that some how was the wrong shape to the only window they could have used, that one was hilarious..

Proving you are an idiot again:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/07/photogalleries/apollo-moon-landing-hoax-pictures/#/moon-hoax-light-flares_10055_600x450.jpg


DOH


Now I have debunked your daft claim, now attempt to debunk my facts, which you have avoided.

Good lukc

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:and there seems to be some very good reasons to believe it was a hoax...   

No there's some very stupid reasons and non of them are really any good
To even entertain the notion shows a profound unwillingness to face indisputable facts (some thing of your style really)

And diminishes every conversation you have as it demonstrates you have no credibility



Maybe a hoax FFS save me from idiots and morons

Didge wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:lol its a make over there is only one source of light on the moon and none of that bull covers it... but they are inventive...lol

did you see the one about them filming from the module and they filmed from a window that some how was the wrong shape to the only window they could have used, that one was hilarious..

Proving you are an idiot again:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/07/photogalleries/apollo-moon-landing-hoax-pictures/#/moon-hoax-light-flares_10055_600x450.jpg


DOH


Now I have debunked your daft claim, now attempt to debunk my facts, which you have avoided.

Good lukc

it does not debunk the argument just gives lame excuses, did you see the expert on the gloves they used that was very interesting...lol

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Didge wrote:



Proving you are an idiot again:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/07/photogalleries/apollo-moon-landing-hoax-pictures/#/moon-hoax-light-flares_10055_600x450.jpg


DOH


Now I have debunked your daft claim, now attempt to debunk my facts, which you have avoided.

Good lukc

it does not debunk the argument just gives lame excuses, did you see the expert on the gloves they used that was very interesting...lol

Oh dear, you still have not been able to debunk my facts and lets embarrass you some more:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Didge wrote:



Proving you are an idiot again:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/07/photogalleries/apollo-moon-landing-hoax-pictures/#/moon-hoax-light-flares_10055_600x450.jpg


DOH


Now I have debunked your daft claim, now attempt to debunk my facts, which you have avoided.

Good lukc

it does not debunk the argument just gives lame excuses, did you see the expert on the gloves they used that was very interesting...lol

There is no argument

MAN LANDED ON THE MOON


THE END

Already done this on flap, didn't happen....

check the gloves issue, very interesting...

did you check out the filming from the window, that was a hilarious clanger...

the waving flag was kinda fun..

the crosses on the photo's being covered were quite amusing...

http://inaflap.forumotion.co.uk/t11529-apollo-11-moon-landing-conspiracy-theories-debunked


All covered here in depth.

Tommy Monk wrote:http://inaflap.forumotion.co.uk/t11529-apollo-11-moon-landing-conspiracy-theories-debunked


All covered here in depth.

it was clearly a hoax...  

Thanks for posting that Twati, everyone can no see where you got your arse spanked by so many, brilliant.


Still waiting for my facts I presented to be shown false and if you too idiots are not clued up to the fact every claim has been debunked then you are far more gullible than I thought, but if you two want to remain delusional be my guess, but I suggest you both do the laser test and then place a bag on your head to hide your shame.

Have a good evening you pair of dummies

the facts are the landings were a huge hoax...

who has claimed to land on the moon recently..??

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:the facts are the landings were a huge hoax...

who has claimed to land on the moon recently..??

Nope you did not attempt to answer my questions on the facts I presented.

I expect an answer and not loads of bullshit as you always do.

Good luck dummy

Didge wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:the facts are the landings were a huge hoax...

who has claimed to land on the moon recently..??

Nope you did not attempt to answer my questions on the facts I presented.

I expect an answer and not loads of bullshit as you always do.

Good luck dummy

lol you did not answer mine but hey i don't bame you nasa has had a lot longer to bull shit than you...  

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

Didge wrote:


Nope you did not attempt to answer my questions on the facts I presented.

I expect an answer and not loads of bullshit as you always do.

Good luck dummy

lol you did not answer mine but hey i don't bame you nasa has had a lot longer to bull shit than you...  

Please put the bag back on your head you are so embarrassing yourself again, your claim was debunked, I can keep posting so many, but as you are a fruitcake, you will just continue to disagree and as shown fail to answer my points, so lets allow you to look silly by yourself and will post this for others so they can all  chuckle at you and Twatti.



laters dummy

CONSPIRACY	PHOTO ANALYSIS	ENVIRONMENT
About the Site Why a Conspiracy? Occam's Razor Round in Circles Problems of Scale Just a Big Hollywood Movie The Holmesian Maxim About the Author	Individual Photos Chapter Overview Exposure Field-of-View Photo Quality Lens Flare Crosshairs Examples of Shadow Angles Terrain and Shadow Glowing Flags	Heat Soil Rocks Van Allen Belts Solar Particle Events Radiation and Film Leaping Simulating Low Gravity Dust Fluttering Flags
TECHNOLOGY	SPACE VEHICLES	BIBLIOGRAPHY
NASA's Technology Soviet Technology Computer Technology TV Quality Space Suits Communications	Moon vs. Mars Rocket Engines Rocket Guidance Lunar Module Stability LM Training Craft Other NASA Landers Defects Pogo and the Saturn V	Print Video Web

http://www.clavius.org/index.html

Didge wrote:

heavenlyfatheragain wrote:

lol you did not answer mine but hey i don't bame you nasa has had a lot longer to bull shit than you...  

Please put the bag back on your head you are so embarrassing yourself again, your claim was debunked, I can keep posting so many, but as you are a fruitcake, you will just continue to disagree and as shown fail to answer my points, so lets allow you to look silly by yourself and will post this for others so they can all  chuckle at you and Twatti.



laters dummy

CONSPIRACY	PHOTO ANALYSIS	ENVIRONMENT
About the Site Why a Conspiracy? Occam's Razor Round in Circles Problems of Scale Just a Big Hollywood Movie The Holmesian Maxim About the Author	Individual Photos Chapter Overview Exposure Field-of-View Photo Quality Lens Flare Crosshairs Examples of Shadow Angles Terrain and Shadow Glowing Flags	Heat Soil Rocks Van Allen Belts Solar Particle Events Radiation and Film Leaping Simulating Low Gravity Dust Fluttering Flags
TECHNOLOGY	SPACE VEHICLES	BIBLIOGRAPHY
NASA's Technology Soviet Technology Computer Technology TV Quality Space Suits Communications	Moon vs. Mars Rocket Engines Rocket Guidance Lunar Module Stability LM Training Craft Other NASA Landers Defects Pogo and the Saturn V	Print Video Web

http://www.clavius.org/index.html

lol you seem to be struggling..lol

who was the last person to walk on the moon?

The thread I posted shows where Didge and king of The ring stings got spanked..... then they ran away!!!!
That was after king got caught lying that is....

Tommy Monk wrote:The thread I posted shows where Didge and king of The ring stings got spanked..... then they ran away!!!!
That was after king got caught lying that is....

sounds right, what was king lying about that time..lol

Tommy Monk wrote:The thread I posted shows where Didge and king of The ring stings got spanked..... then they ran away!!!!
That was after king got caught lying that is....

Hilarious, if people could see it of course, being the complete idiot you are, you do not realise people have to be a member of flap to read it, the reality is both King, Dean, me and countless others got bored of your constant denial, it showed you are a complete loon when all the evidence presented to you, showed clearly, you believe in pseudo science bullshit. When so many of your claims were debunked, with you not admitting one, what is the point, it showed you are a wacko.

Anyway that was priceless to present a thread where you looked a complete dick and nobody can see it if they are not a member ha ha ha


That just about summed up what a twatti you are.

As seen you two dummies can deny all you like, but  the fact is man has been to the moon where like I said the laser tests prove it beyond doubt.

Bless but thanks for the entertainment and you can both have the last word, as happy you both continue to embarrass yourselves.


Bye

Didge, you cant educate pork..thats a known fact...

best thing that could happen is that all idiots like HF are hunted down and have their records endorsed "1st grade wanker" thereby letting potential employers, lenders and licensing bodies know what they are dealing with....

No amount of education can make up for a total lack of mental capacity......

victorisnotamused wrote:Didge, you cant educate pork..thats a known fact...

best thing that could happen is that all idiots like HF are hunted down and have their records endorsed "1st grade wanker" thereby letting potential employers, lenders and licensing bodies know what they are dealing with....

No amount of education can make up for a total lack of mental capacity......

says dick wad victor..lol

victorisnotamused wrote:Didge, you cant educate pork..thats a known fact...

best thing that could happen is that all idiots like HF are hunted down and have their records endorsed "1st grade wanker" thereby letting potential employers, lenders and licensing bodies know what they are dealing with....

No amount of education can make up for a total lack of mental capacity......

  


Love it, enjoy Victor, maybe catch you later or tomorrow.

so they still haven't dealt with the gloves, the window and various other impossibilities..lol

Ok....