Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

by Major Wed Feb 17, 2016 12:36 pm

Laffin all over their faces

Give me the job of kicking them out, I will do it FREE.

Somali so called refugee family who have not worked since arriving in the UK in 2008 are rehoused from their £2m Hampstead council house - into a £1.3m one around the corner
Family provoked outrage when they were given £2million mansion in 2011
They've now been moved into a £1.3million property due to the benefits cap
Locals say the property has been expensively renovated for them

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3450746/Jobless-Somali-refugee-family-rehoused-2m-mansion-1-3m-semi.html#ixzz40QbH0YGn
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

I cannot believe we stand for this.

by nicko Wed Feb 17, 2016 2:35 pm

I thought they were going to stop this!

by Raggamuffin Wed Feb 17, 2016 2:49 pm

That's above the benefit cap. Sack the people who gave them that house, and move the family out of London - or tell him to get a job.

by HoratioTarr Wed Feb 17, 2016 5:10 pm

Stormee wrote:Laffin all over their faces

Give me the job of kicking them out, I will do it FREE.

Somali so called refugee family who have not worked since arriving in the UK in 2008 are rehoused from their £2m Hampstead council house - into a £1.3m one around the corner
Family provoked outrage when they were given £2million mansion in 2011
They've now been moved into a £1.3million property due to the benefits cap
Locals say the property has been expensively renovated for them

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3450746/Jobless-Somali-refugee-family-rehoused-2m-mansion-1-3m-semi.html#ixzz40QbH0YGn
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

I cannot believe we stand for this.

Anyone would think this couple owned the house. Obviously they're on benefits. I'm not sure why they're not living in a council property other than council property is overcrowded in London.

by nicko Wed Feb 17, 2016 6:05 pm

They will not move them out of London to a cheaper district because it would be against their "human rights"

by Major Wed Feb 17, 2016 6:19 pm

I can;t see why they are living here at all with hard working taxpayuz footing their bill and I bet they get a load of other stuff thrown in.

by HoratioTarr Wed Feb 17, 2016 6:21 pm

nicko wrote:They will not move them out of London to a cheaper district because it would be against their "human rights"

The irony of which is the bedroom tax.

by Major Wed Feb 17, 2016 6:23 pm

HoratioTarr wrote:
nicko wrote:They will not move them out of London to a cheaper district because it would be against their "human rights"

The irony of which is the bedroom tax.

lol lol lol good point.

by eddie Wed Feb 17, 2016 6:45 pm

Unless there is some loophole here, I can't see how they managed to get a house of that value??

by Guest Wed Feb 17, 2016 6:47 pm

Read the article, they are within the new rules because of the number of children they have.

by Major Wed Feb 17, 2016 6:52 pm

They have been here 8 years scamming and procreating at the expense of our own taxpayer, they should have been sterilised at the welcome foruna gate, cheeky bleeduz.

by eddie Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:59 pm

sassy wrote:Read the article, they are within the new rules because of the number of children they have.

Yes they might well be within their rights to a certain amount of bedrooms but surely a cheaper house could be found.

It is pretty disgusting, and it's got nothing to do with colour or creed either.

by Guest Wed Feb 17, 2016 9:02 pm

The only way they could be housed cheaper is to move them out of London. They say they have been moved to an 'up and coming' location in Cricklewood. That means it's not very nice at the moment. It's just the cost of London housing.

Nobody knows if he has been looking for work or not, they don't bother saying that. Could be he has been trying, maybe he hasn't.

by eddie Wed Feb 17, 2016 9:05 pm

If someone is on benefits then they should be moved to cheaper accomadation. Not unliveable accomadation, but cheaper.

by Raggamuffin Wed Feb 17, 2016 10:18 pm

They should have made them stay in Coventry. If neither of them lift a finger to work, they don't need to be in London.

by Major Wed Feb 17, 2016 10:22 pm

They are scamming takers who are depriving out own needy and sick.
Get rid of them and their supporters, they are bringing this country down.

Why should someone else work to pay for them, they are forunuz.

by Raggamuffin Wed Feb 17, 2016 10:23 pm

No wonder some people avoid taxes. What have these people contributed?

Absolutely nothing.

by Major Wed Feb 17, 2016 10:32 pm

My family has a long history of working extremely long hours, twaz not entirely necessary but they did it for their children as I have.
I can only remember my great granddad, my gran and granddad, my old man worked and worked and worked, mind you, he enjoyed it, I followed suit, it came natural to do a good job.
So WHY should I give it away to someone whom I do not know from across the sea?

by Sponsored content

Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

Re: Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

Re: Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

Re: Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

Re: Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

Re: Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

Re: Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

Re: Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

Re: Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

Re: Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

Re: Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

Re: Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

Re: Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

Re: Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

Re: Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

Re: Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

Re: Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

Re: Somali Scammer Costing £Millions

Re: Somali Scammer Costing £Millions