Another "false flag" story.....again!

Tommy Monk wrote:Same as on 9/11 and london bombings...

veya_victaous wrote:@Cass
the best comment on imgur was
"fuck, if only all white people didn't look the same"


So could it be possible that 4 major cities, with people of European decent, that each has a brunette woman with tear ducts?  

eddie wrote:

veya_victaous wrote:@Cass
the best comment on imgur was
"fuck, if only all white people didn't look the same"


So could it be possible that 4 major cities, with people of European decent, that each has a brunette woman with tear ducts?  

They all look very very similar don't they?
I think that to find four women, who all look very similar in four different tragedies, is very coincidental.

Or is it the same one?

eddie wrote:

veya_victaous wrote:@Cass
the best comment on imgur was
"fuck, if only all white people didn't look the same"


So could it be possible that 4 major cities, with people of European decent, that each has a brunette woman with tear ducts?  

They all look very very similar don't they?
I think that to find four women, who all look very similar in four different tragedies, is very coincidental.

Or is it the same one?

Ben_Reilly wrote:So what would be the agenda with the terrier attack on Paris?

(Sorry edds, but that typo cracked me up)

Tommy Monk wrote:Are you denying what I said is true or not...!?

nicko wrote:Whoever buys their oil!

Irn Bru wrote:

nicko wrote:Whoever buys their oil!

Maybe I'm helping funding them when I put fuel in the car. Who knows?

When it comes to September 11, oil plays a crucial role in explaining al-Qaeda's motivations. Oil money was pivotal to funding the Afghan resistance, which counted among its ranks many Pakistanis educated in Saudi-funded madrassas. Oil money was also decisive for the rise of the Taliban, who also studied in the Saudi-sponsored schools and offered al-Qaeda a safe heaven for its operations in Afghanistan. Moreover, Yetiv argues, the United States would have tacitly tolerated the Taliban regime, in exchange for their consent to a U.S.-supported oil and gas pipeline to be built across Afghanistan from Turkmenistan. Petroleum also offered a powerful propaganda tool to Bin Laden, since he justified the attacks against America on 9/11 by accusing Washington of stealing Arab oil. In his mind, oil was instrumental in magnifying U.S. global power, and the Saudi royal family was responsible for giving in to America's greed. In fact, the Saudi rulers, by allowing U.S. forces to stay after the first Iraq war in 1991, proved themselves to be completely subservient to Washington's interests, according to the sheikh of terror. The growing anti-Americanism, which played such an important role in 9/11, is also related to oil, since the perception that the United States is driven by some sort of colonialist appetite for Arab black gold feeds into the hostility against America.

More broadly, oil has turned out to be crucial in financing terrorist networks and activities. Petro-dollars directly and indirectly financed terrorism and weapons of mass destruction through opaque connections among illegal organizations, states and international institutions. Complex financial transactions (hawala) and charities have provided the channels through which petrodollars have reached their final destination. As many scholars have shown, there are powerful connections between oil and the lack of democracy, and oil money helps to support those regimes that al-Qaeda rejects and fight against, such as Saudi Arabia. And the United States, in turn, supports the Saudi government because of its vast oil wealth.

Ben_Reilly wrote:So what would be the agenda with the terrier attack on Paris?

(Sorry edds, but that typo cracked me up)

Lord Foul wrote:well Tommy, you cant have it both ways....otherwise you are inhabiting the dualkist world of the lefty


either Muslims planned and  carried out these attacks

or our own govt did

if the first isnt true and the second is then all the anti Muslim rhetoric YOU have been spouting is rubbish (and you know it, which therefor makes you a nasty little racist/religiousist)
OR the first is true and the second false....in which case you are a paranoid little twerp

you cannot beleive both and be judged sane.......