NewsFix
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare?

3 posters

Go down

EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare? Empty EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare?

Post by eddie Thu Jun 18, 2015 1:37 pm

Assassination • Healthcare
EBOLA – CIA Project Codename MKNAOMI & Hi-Tech assassinations


Project MKNAOMI
In 1948, Henry Kissinger, a 23-year-old American intelligence officer, recruited Nazi expatriates to serve in top positions in American military, aerospace, and biological science and medicine. Twenty years later, he left Harvard’s esteemed faculty and resigned a lucrative position as Nelson Rockefeller’s foreign policy attache’ to become President Nixon’s closest advisor and director of the National Security Council. Seeking alternatives to tactical nuclear weapons to bolster America’s “diplomacy” abroad, the paranoid and egomaniacal Kissinger quickly ordered the Army’s Chief of Staff to requisition $10 million from Congress for the development and testing of EBOLA & AIDS-like viruses. Within ten years, the AIDS and Ebola epidemics erupted coincidentally in the regions of Africa ravaged by CIA military covert operations also ordered by Kissinger.


Read more:
http://greatgameindia.com/ebola-cia-project-codename-mknaomi-hi-tech-assassinations/
eddie
eddie
King of Beards. Keeper of the Whip. Top Chef. BEES!!!!!! Mushroom muncher. Spider aficionado!

Posts : 43129
Join date : 2013-07-28
Age : 24
Location : England

Back to top Go down

The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message

EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare? Empty Re: EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare?

Post by Guest Thu Jun 18, 2015 4:23 pm

here piggy piggy.....

back to your sty.......

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare? Empty Re: EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare?

Post by Guest Thu Jun 18, 2015 6:05 pm

i have always believed that hiv was a man made virus, i actually believed it was developed by the germans..

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare? Empty Re: EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare?

Post by eddie Thu Jun 18, 2015 11:35 pm

darknessss wrote:here piggy piggy.....

back to your sty.......

Oh leave him. This is an alter ego who has to be let out sometimes.
eddie
eddie
King of Beards. Keeper of the Whip. Top Chef. BEES!!!!!! Mushroom muncher. Spider aficionado!

Posts : 43129
Join date : 2013-07-28
Age : 24
Location : England

Back to top Go down

EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare? Empty Re: EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare?

Post by Guest Thu Jun 18, 2015 11:43 pm

Sorry eddie...he mildly annoyed me, so.........

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare? Empty Re: EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare?

Post by Ben Reilly Fri Jun 19, 2015 12:00 am

The big problem with either virus being engineered for bio-warfare is that both can't even really survive contact with open air ...
Ben Reilly
Ben Reilly
King of Texas. Gigantic Killer Robot. Robin Hood of Epping Forest. Fifty Shades of Cray.

Posts : 30682
Join date : 2013-01-19
Age : 49
Location : West Essex

http://www.newsfixboard.com

Back to top Go down

EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare? Empty Re: EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare?

Post by Guest Fri Jun 19, 2015 12:06 am

and...they didnt have the technology at the time

and is it just coincidence that the rate of increase in outbreaks of ebola, and the spread of aids EXACTLY coincides with city building and increased travel, with the consequent increase in prostitution (in the case of aids)
that occured "post war"

EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare? 2396444674

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare? Empty Re: EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare?

Post by Ben Reilly Fri Jun 19, 2015 12:09 am

darknessss wrote:and...they didnt have the technology at the time

and is it just coincidence that the rate of increase in outbreaks of ebola, and the spread of aids EXACTLY coincides with city building and increased travel, with the consequent increase in prostitution (in the case of aids)
that occured "post war"

EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare? 2396444674

Nope! Just like when someone around here has their pet eaten by a coyote ... you can't convince them that it's because they moved into the coyotes' territory Evil or Very Mad

Just like how you have to get a dozen immunizations before you can visit South America, Africa, etc.
Ben Reilly
Ben Reilly
King of Texas. Gigantic Killer Robot. Robin Hood of Epping Forest. Fifty Shades of Cray.

Posts : 30682
Join date : 2013-01-19
Age : 49
Location : West Essex

http://www.newsfixboard.com

Back to top Go down

EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare? Empty Re: EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare?

Post by eddie Fri Jun 19, 2015 7:42 am

Ben_Reilly wrote:The big problem with either virus being engineered for bio-warfare is that both can't even really survive contact with open air ...

So...? Human contact is very powerful is it not? And detrimental to survibL is it not? And hRd to resist (AIDS) is it not?

Did you read that the two men who got infected with Ebola were cured?
eddie
eddie
King of Beards. Keeper of the Whip. Top Chef. BEES!!!!!! Mushroom muncher. Spider aficionado!

Posts : 43129
Join date : 2013-07-28
Age : 24
Location : England

Back to top Go down

EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare? Empty Re: EBOLA: was it a biochemical warfare?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum