NewsFix
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Responsible press piles on WSJ's "naive" defense of higher CO2 levels

Go down

Responsible press piles on WSJ's "naive" defense of higher CO2 levels Empty Responsible press piles on WSJ's "naive" defense of higher CO2 levels

Post by Ben Reilly Wed May 15, 2013 9:45 pm

Schmitt and Happer say our current CO2 levels are “low by the standards of geological and plant evolutionary history,” they pine for the days when “Levels were 3,000 ppm, or more,” and note that commercial greenhouse operators boost CO2 levels to ”1,000 ppm or more to improve the growth and quality of their plants.”

The recent scientific literature is beyond crystal clear that 1000 ppm — which is where we will end up this century if we listen to disinformers like these two — would result in multiple, simultaneous catastrophes for humanity, including widespread Dust-Bowlification.

http://www.treehugger.com/climate-change/wall-street-journals-defense-co2-monumentally-naive.html
Ben Reilly
Ben Reilly
King of Texas. Gigantic Killer Robot. Robin Hood of Epping Forest. Fifty Shades of Cray.

Posts : 30682
Join date : 2013-01-19
Age : 49
Location : West Essex

http://www.newsfixboard.com

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum