NewsFix
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

5G

Go down

5G Empty 5G

Post by HoratioTarr on Tue Mar 26, 2019 10:45 pm



Dangers of 5G
More bandwidth – more dangers of 5G
Let’s start with some basic background on 5G technology. Faster processing speeds require more bandwidth, yet our current frequency bandwidths are quickly becoming saturated. The idea behind 5G is to use untapped bandwidth of the extremely high-frequency millimeter wave (MMW), between 30GHz and 300GHz, in addition to some lower and mid-range frequencies.

High-frequency MMWs travel a short distance. Furthermore, they don’t travel well through buildings and tend to be absorbed by rain and plants, leading to signal interference. Thus, the necessary infrastructure would require many smaller, barely noticeable cell towers situated closer together, with more input and output ports than there are on the much larger, easier to see 4G towers. This would likely result in wireless antennas every few feet, on every lamp post and utility pole in your neighbourhood.

Here are some numbers to put things into perspective: as of 2015, there were 308,000 wireless antennas on cell towers and buildings. That’s double the 2002 number. Yet 5G would require exponentially more, smaller ones, placed much closer together, with each emitting bursts of radiofrequency radiation (RFR)–granted, at levels much lower than that of today’s 4G cell towers–that will be much harder to avoid because these towers will be ubiquitous. If we could see the RFR, it would look like a smog that’s everywhere, all the time.

Dangers of 5G
Serious health concerns
First, it’s important to know that in 2011, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer classified RFR as a potential 2B carcinogen and specified that the use of mobile phones could lead to specific forms of brain   tumors.

Many studies have associated low-level RFR exposure with a litany of health effects, including:

DNA single and double-strand breaks (which leads to cancer)
oxidative damage (which leads to tissue deterioration and premature ageing)
disruption of cell metabolism
increased blood-brain barrier permeability
melatonin reduction (leading to insomnia and increasing cancer risks)
disruption of brain glucose metabolism
generation of stress proteins (leading to myriad diseases)

The new 5G technology utilizes higher-frequency MMW bands, which give off the same dose of radiation as airport scanners. The effects of this radiation on public health have yet to undergo the rigours of long-term testing. Adoption of 5G will mean more signals carrying more energy through the high-frequency spectrum, with more transmitters located closer to people’s homes and workplaces–basically a lot more (and more potent) RFR flying around us. It’s no wonder that apprehension exists over potential risks, to both human and environmental health.

https://eluxemagazine.com/magazine/dangers-of-5g/
HoratioTarr
HoratioTarr

Posts : 9643
Join date : 2014-01-12

Back to top Go down

5G Empty Re: 5G

Post by HoratioTarr on Tue Mar 26, 2019 11:03 pm

5G harms the planet, too
Equally disturbing, 5G technology puts environmental health at risk in a number of ways. First, MMWs may pose a serious threat to plant health. This 2010 study showed that the leaves of aspen seedlings exposed to RFR exhibited symptoms of necrosis, while another Armenian study suggested low-intensity MMW’s cause “peroxidase isoenzyme spectrum changes”–basically a stress response that damages cells–in wheat shoots. Plant irradiation is bad news for the planet’s flora, but it’s bad news for us, too: it could contaminate our food supply.

Second, the 5G infrastructure would pose a threat to our planet’s atmosphere. Network implementation will require the deployment of many, short-lifespan satellites via suborbital rockets propelled by hydrocarbon rocket engines. According to this 2010 California study, launching too many of these babies will vomit enough black carbon into the atmosphere to pollute global atmospheric conditions, affecting distribution of ozone and temperature. Worse, solid-state rocket exhaust contains chlorine, an ozone-destroying chemical. How can any government seriously concerned about climate change allow for this?

Third, 5G will potentially threaten natural ecosystems. According to several reports over the last two decades–some of which are summarized here–low-level, non-ionizing microwave radiation affects bird and bee health. It drives birds from their nests and causes plume deterioration, locomotion problems, reduced survivorship and death. And bee populations suffer from reduced egg-laying abilities of queen bees and smaller colony sizes. More evidence of ecosystem disruption comes from this 2012 meta-study, which indicates that 593 of 919 research studies suggest that RFR adversely affects plants, animals and humans.

It bears repeating: 5G is bad news for all living creatures and the planet we share.
HoratioTarr
HoratioTarr

Posts : 9643
Join date : 2014-01-12

Back to top Go down

5G Empty Re: 5G

Post by Guest on Tue Mar 26, 2019 11:06 pm

Where is the evidence for this crack pot claim?

Cuckoo

I mean you know when something is crank, when the links it provides. For its evidence . The one that claims International Agency for Research . Takes you to google maps

The second link takes you to an even more warped site claiming to be able to kill cancer cells

Hence the claims made, do not even correlate to the links provided and hence its simple made up bullshit, by some complete fuckwit

I gave up after this, as some people truely are gullible reading this tripe

lol!

One sucker born every minute

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

5G Empty Re: 5G

Post by Guest on Tue Mar 26, 2019 11:18 pm

The funniest thing about these claims, where people take out of context something stated. Like where anything has the bases for potenial harm, but in variance. I mean throw in the word carcinogenic and to those uneducated and gullible as clearlt Horatio must be. As many things already are carcinogenic, like alcohol. What this article does not prove or show with any shred of evidence. Is what amounts of levels we are talking about here that are harmful.

Its simple a scare mongering load of babble

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

5G Empty Re: 5G

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum