New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
+8
Andy
Original Quill
veya_victaous
Victorismyhero
nicko
Major
eddie
Ben Reilly
12 posters
Page 1 of 1
New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Members deemed by administrators to be exclusively or semi-exclusively engaged in harassing other members or disrupting the forum in general are subject to disciplinary action, including a permanent ban.
eddie- King of Beards. Keeper of the Whip. Top Chef. BEES!!!!!! Mushroom muncher. Spider aficionado!
- Posts : 43129
Join date : 2013-07-28
Age : 24
Location : England
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Stormee wrote:Ben_Reilly wrote:Members deemed by administrators to be exclusively or semi-exclusively engaged in harassing other members or disrupting the forum in general are subject to disciplinary action, including a permanent ban.
Don't forget some is done and accepted as a bit of fun, wit.
I luv a laff, keepz my chuckulmuscles in trim.
That's where "deeming" comes in -- we do try to accept the post in the spirit in which it was intended.
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
My spirit is Whiskey----hic--
nicko- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 13368
Join date : 2013-12-07
Age : 83
Location : rainbow bridge
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
we will gladly accept a whiskey with every post you make Nicko
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Whisky's all gone--hic------got some vodka left---hic----hic.
nicko- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 13368
Join date : 2013-12-07
Age : 83
Location : rainbow bridge
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
shucks Nicko...cant have vodka....the stuff makes me nasty...
a shot of that and I'll fight anyone and anything......
seriously...that stuff is pure poison for me.....
anything else and i'll quietly slide under the table after too many.....vodka....thats a different story.....
a shot of that and I'll fight anyone and anything......
seriously...that stuff is pure poison for me.....
anything else and i'll quietly slide under the table after too many.....vodka....thats a different story.....
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
nicko wrote:My spirit is Whiskey----hic--
Irish, Scotch, Bourbon, Tennesse, Tasmanian, Canadian, Chinese?
or is it all of the above
Personally Canadian is my favorite, then Irish
veya_victaous- The Mod Loki, Minister of Chaos & Candy, Emperor of the Southern Realms, Captain Kangaroo
- Posts : 19114
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 41
Location : Australia
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
veya_victaous wrote:nicko wrote:My spirit is Whiskey----hic--
Irish, Scotch, Bourbon, Tennesse, Tasmanian, Canadian, Chinese?
or is it all of the above
Personally Canadian is my favorite, then Irish
That's quite a switch. Canadian is a light whiskey. Irish is heavy-heavy...
Original Quill- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 58
Location : Northern California
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Original Quill wrote:veya_victaous wrote:nicko wrote:My spirit is Whiskey----hic--
Irish, Scotch, Bourbon, Tennesse, Tasmanian, Canadian, Chinese?
or is it all of the above
Personally Canadian is my favorite, then Irish
That's quite a switch. Canadian is a light whiskey. Irish is heavy-heavy...
I agree with the Canadian whiskey beign light, I mix it with spring water like Whiskey Coridal.
I don't know that i'd say Irish is heavy but it is different and I like the contrast and not too fruity like Bourbon can be.
I find the tutti frutti flavour of tennese whisky the least appealing.
veya_victaous- The Mod Loki, Minister of Chaos & Candy, Emperor of the Southern Realms, Captain Kangaroo
- Posts : 19114
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 41
Location : Australia
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Whisky makes me Frisky,
Gin makes me sin.
Brandy makes me randy.
[Don't know about Vodka]
Gin makes me sin.
Brandy makes me randy.
[Don't know about Vodka]
nicko- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 13368
Join date : 2013-12-07
Age : 83
Location : rainbow bridge
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
vodka makes you plonkas (crazy)
veya_victaous- The Mod Loki, Minister of Chaos & Candy, Emperor of the Southern Realms, Captain Kangaroo
- Posts : 19114
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 41
Location : Australia
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
That don't really ryme mate.
good try though.
good try though.
nicko- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 13368
Join date : 2013-12-07
Age : 83
Location : rainbow bridge
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Gin helps it slip in.nicko wrote:Whisky makes me Frisky,
Gin makes me sin.
Brandy makes me randy.
[Don't know about Vodka]
Rum helps me cum.
Andy- Poet Laureate & Traveling Bard of NewsFix
- Posts : 6421
Join date : 2013-12-14
Age : 67
Location : Winning the fight to drain the swamp of far right extremists.
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Mind below the belt again Handy?
nicko- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 13368
Join date : 2013-12-07
Age : 83
Location : rainbow bridge
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
I like Famous Grouse (don't know if you get that whisky in the US?)
I've tried loads - even very expensive ones - and I still like the bite of a grouse.....
I've tried loads - even very expensive ones - and I still like the bite of a grouse.....
eddie- King of Beards. Keeper of the Whip. Top Chef. BEES!!!!!! Mushroom muncher. Spider aficionado!
- Posts : 43129
Join date : 2013-07-28
Age : 24
Location : England
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Are mods disrupting their own thread lol
Guest- Guest
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
veya_victaous wrote:Original Quill wrote:
That's quite a switch. Canadian is a light whiskey. Irish is heavy-heavy...
I agree with the Canadian whiskey beign light, I mix it with spring water like Whiskey Coridal.
I don't know that i'd say Irish is heavy but it is different and I like the contrast and not too fruity like Bourbon can be.
I find the tutti frutti flavour of tennese whisky the least appealing.
Irish is heavy in the sense that it is peaty. Yes, Tennessee whisky is charcoal-filtered whisky. It gives off a sweet flavor. So Tennessee whiskys are quite sweet.
Original Quill- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 58
Location : Northern California
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Ben_Reilly wrote:Members deemed by administrators to be exclusively or semi-exclusively engaged in harassing other members or disrupting the forum in general are subject to disciplinary action, including a permanent ban.
If that's the case how come one member is allowed to insult, harass, bully, and threaten various posters on a daily basis, often without provocation?
I tend to ignore him most of the time and leave him and whoever wants to indulge him alone, but threads are being ruined and to be frank it's getting really boring.
Syl- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 23619
Join date : 2015-11-12
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Syl wrote:Ben_Reilly wrote:Members deemed by administrators to be exclusively or semi-exclusively engaged in harassing other members or disrupting the forum in general are subject to disciplinary action, including a permanent ban.
If that's the case how come one member is allowed to insult, harass, bully, and threaten various posters on a daily basis, often without provocation?
I tend to ignore him most of the time and leave him and whoever wants to indulge him alone, but threads are being ruined and to be frank it's getting really boring.
Actually, you are handling it in precisely the correct way. Look at how easily you detach yourself.
Original Quill- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 58
Location : Northern California
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Well I have better things to do than humour trolls.....but to be frank he goes above and beyond being a nuisance....he is outright nasty, and when threats are made I personally think he should be stopped not simply humoured or ignored.Original Quill wrote:Syl wrote:
If that's the case how come one member is allowed to insult, harass, bully, and threaten various posters on a daily basis, often without provocation?
I tend to ignore him most of the time and leave him and whoever wants to indulge him alone, but threads are being ruined and to be frank it's getting really boring.
Actually, you are handling it in precisely the correct way. Look at how easily you detach yourself.
Syl- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 23619
Join date : 2015-11-12
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Syl wrote:Well I have better things to do than humour trolls.....but to be frank he goes above and beyond being a nuisance....he is outright nasty, and when threats are made I personally think he should be stopped not simply humoured or ignored.Original Quill wrote:
Actually, you are handling it in precisely the correct way. Look at how easily you detach yourself.
First of all, no one is to be feared. This is the Internet. Second, he's a nerd, not a threat.
People like that are insecure...casting about for a role. Add to that a lower impulse control, and the lack of introspection...and you come up with a composite of a very frightened individual.
Not a threat. A pest...but not a threat.
Original Quill- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 37540
Join date : 2013-12-19
Age : 58
Location : Northern California
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Look, it's not that I'm frightened of his threats - do I seem like the sort of person who would be frightened of some twat on a forum threatening to harass me? It's the motive behind it, and the fact that a blind eye is turned all the time. People should be able to post on a forum without someone threatening to make them "suffer".
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
TECHNICALLY speaking the Dodger isn't a "troll" on here...
HE'S more accurately a kind of cyber bully..
EXACERBATED by his self delusions and perverse sense of superiority.
(Just stating the obvious.. ).
'Wolfie- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 8189
Join date : 2016-02-24
Age : 66
Location : Lake Macquarie, NSW, Australia
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Raggamuffin wrote:Look, it's not that I'm frightened of his threats - do I seem like the sort of person who would be frightened of some twat on a forum threatening to harass me? It's the motive behind it, and the fact that a blind eye is turned all the time. People should be able to post on a forum without someone threatening to make them "suffer".
100% agree. He can't hurt anyone because its the net, but his intention is to hurt and bully and frighten and that is what matters.
Guest- Guest
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Original Quill wrote:Syl wrote:
Well I have better things to do than humour trolls.....but to be frank he goes above and beyond being a nuisance....he is outright nasty, and when threats are made I personally think he should be stopped not simply humoured or ignored.
First of all, no one is to be feared. This is the Internet. Second, he's a nerd, not a threat.
People like that are insecure...casting about for a role. Add to that a lower impulse control, and the lack of introspection...and you come up with a composite of a very frightened individual.
Not a threat. A pest...but not a threat.
One I am certainly not a nerd thanks Quill
Certainly not insecure like you that has to invent job roles you have never have and I just give out as much as the pack have certainly done to me today., They are like a bunch of harpies, scavenging for my eyes and liver.
Its quite pathetic really and shows how they are immature
I could list the endless abuse I have had of rags, but why bother, people have already read it themselves and why her claim and Sassy to being victims is nothing short of a joke
The mods can see that and why they are ignoring them
Guest- Guest
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Of course, yesterday when a report from Didge was ignored, he pestered and pestered until a mod gave in and did what he wanted.
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Raggamuffin wrote:Of course, yesterday when a report from Didge was ignored, he pestered and pestered until a mod gave in and did what he wanted.
Well I was warned also by two mods
So that makes us in the same position
I suggest you move on and nems is right, this is tiresome and boring for the rest of the forum
Guest- Guest
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Isn't "harpy" rather a sexist term?
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Didge wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:Of course, yesterday when a report from Didge was ignored, he pestered and pestered until a mod gave in and did what he wanted.
Well I was warned also by two mods
So that makes us in the same position
I suggest you move on and nems is right, this is tiresome and boring for the rest of the forum
I suggest you change your ways before you demand that someone else "moves on". You made numerous threats to me. If you were bluffing, well I called your bluff, and now you're whining because I pulled you up for doing exactly what you threatened to do.
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Raggamuffin wrote:Didge wrote:
Well I was warned also by two mods
So that makes us in the same position
I suggest you move on and nems is right, this is tiresome and boring for the rest of the forum
I suggest you change your ways before you demand that someone else "moves on". You made numerous threats to me. If you were bluffing, well I called your bluff, and now you're whining because I pulled you up for doing exactly what you threatened to do.
Again best you get over this Rags and that is my last word on the matter
You clearly have plenty of growing up to do
Bye
Guest- Guest
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Didge wrote:Raggamuffin wrote:
I suggest you change your ways before you demand that someone else "moves on". You made numerous threats to me. If you were bluffing, well I called your bluff, and now you're whining because I pulled you up for doing exactly what you threatened to do.
Again best you get over this Rags and that is my last word on the matter
You clearly have plenty of growing up to do
Bye
I doubt it's your last word on the matter. I gave you the chance to retract your threats and you refused, so the fault is yours.
As for growing up - do you really think that you're a mature, sensible person? Read your own posts and you'll see that's exactly what you're not. You think you can say what you like and then expect the other person to "move on". Well I've done that before, but this time I'll move on when I'm good and ready, not when you tell me to.
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Right....I'm going to draw a line under this....
DIDGE....in reality you SHOULD appologise to those you have threatened..its a)pointless and b) irritating.
secondly
dont EVER think you can "abuse" "threaten" or "harrass" another poster within the terms of the rules...you cant
thirdly...IF you insist on so severely criticising a faith (which of course you are entitled to) you should expect to recieve criticism back from its followers
AND...just becasue someone disagrees with you DOESNT make them the enemy, or a "target" to be harrassed...
fourthly...you DONT know everything about anything
fifthly It is NOT your place to "educate" instruct" etc anyone about anything
and finally
IF YOU EVER AGAIN ISSUE SUCH A THREAT I WILL CAN YOU IN THE BASEMENT UNTILL YOU FESTER
RAGGA....
its about time YOU realised that faith is open and subject to ridicule and criticism. The religious have had it their own way for centuries and dont like "the age of reason" one little bit....
times past the religious were the ones throwing people into jail, burning them at the stake etc...even now practicing cyber harrasment on members who lose faith....any yet you expect protection from what....valid criticism....it aint going to happen
aside from that you are not the perp here except in as much as you dont know when to shurrup...
now please either kiss and make up (or at least agree to disagree) or put each other on ignore....
oh and ffs...stop the trivial pm's.....
DIDGE....in reality you SHOULD appologise to those you have threatened..its a)pointless and b) irritating.
secondly
dont EVER think you can "abuse" "threaten" or "harrass" another poster within the terms of the rules...you cant
thirdly...IF you insist on so severely criticising a faith (which of course you are entitled to) you should expect to recieve criticism back from its followers
AND...just becasue someone disagrees with you DOESNT make them the enemy, or a "target" to be harrassed...
fourthly...you DONT know everything about anything
fifthly It is NOT your place to "educate" instruct" etc anyone about anything
and finally
IF YOU EVER AGAIN ISSUE SUCH A THREAT I WILL CAN YOU IN THE BASEMENT UNTILL YOU FESTER
RAGGA....
its about time YOU realised that faith is open and subject to ridicule and criticism. The religious have had it their own way for centuries and dont like "the age of reason" one little bit....
times past the religious were the ones throwing people into jail, burning them at the stake etc...even now practicing cyber harrasment on members who lose faith....any yet you expect protection from what....valid criticism....it aint going to happen
aside from that you are not the perp here except in as much as you dont know when to shurrup...
now please either kiss and make up (or at least agree to disagree) or put each other on ignore....
oh and ffs...stop the trivial pm's.....
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Lord Foul wrote:Right....I'm going to draw a line under this....
DIDGE....in reality you SHOULD appologise to those you have threatened..its a)pointless and b) irritating.
secondly
dont EVER think you can "abuse" "threaten" or "harrass" another poster within the terms of the rules...you cant
thirdly...IF you insist on so severely criticising a faith (which of course you are entitled to) you should expect to recieve criticism back from its followers
AND...just becasue someone disagrees with you DOESNT make them the enemy, or a "target" to be harrassed...
fourthly...you DONT know everything about anything
fifthly It is NOT your place to "educate" instruct" etc anyone about anything
and finally
IF YOU EVER AGAIN ISSUE SUCH A THREAT I WILL CAN YOU IN THE BASEMENT UNTILL YOU FESTER
RAGGA....
its about time YOU realised that faith is open and subject to ridicule and criticism. The religious have had it their own way for centuries and dont like "the age of reason" one little bit....
times past the religious were the ones throwing people into jail, burning them at the stake etc...even now practicing cyber harrasment on members who lose faith....any yet you expect protection from what....valid criticism....it aint going to happen
aside from that you are not the perp here except in as much as you dont know when to shurrup...
now please either kiss and make up (or at least agree to disagree) or put each other on ignore....
oh and ffs...stop the trivial pm's.....
I shall reply to the bit addressed to me.
I do not think that my personal faith should be open to ridicule and criticism. That is harassment. If someone says to me that I'm not a Christian because they don't like my views, that is wrong. If they mock me for having faith, that is wrong. If they use my faith against me in order to harass me, that's wrong. If they say that I must be homophobic because of my faith, otherwise I'm cherry picking, that's wrong. I have never thrown anyone into jail or burnt them at the stake, and having a go at me for what others might have done in the past is wrong. That's like saying that all Muslims are responsible for terrorist attacks in the past and in the present.
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Oh, and Victor, I haven't sent you any PMs - not today anyway. Any I sent before today were not trivial.
Raggamuffin- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 33746
Join date : 2014-02-10
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
your input is NOT appreciated stormee....
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Lord Foul wrote:Right....I'm going to draw a line under this....
DIDGE....in reality you SHOULD appologise to those you have threatened..its a)pointless and b) irritating.
secondly
dont EVER think you can "abuse" "threaten" or "harrass" another poster within the terms of the rules...you cant
thirdly...IF you insist on so severely criticising a faith (which of course you are entitled to) you should expect to recieve criticism back from its followers
AND...just becasue someone disagrees with you DOESNT make them the enemy, or a "target" to be harrassed...
fourthly...you DONT know everything about anything
fifthly It is NOT your place to "educate" instruct" etc anyone about anything
and finally
IF YOU EVER AGAIN ISSUE SUCH A THREAT I WILL CAN YOU IN THE BASEMENT UNTILL YOU FESTER
RAGGA....
its about time YOU realised that faith is open and subject to ridicule and criticism. The religious have had it their own way for centuries and dont like "the age of reason" one little bit....
times past the religious were the ones throwing people into jail, burning them at the stake etc...even now practicing cyber harrasment on members who lose faith....any yet you expect protection from what....valid criticism....it aint going to happen
aside from that you are not the perp here except in as much as you dont know when to shurrup...
now please either kiss and make up (or at least agree to disagree) or put each other on ignore....
oh and ffs...stop the trivial pm's.....
1) I offered the chance to apologies about bringing up my family members and she threw that in my face
2) How can i actually threaten anyone on here, lets be realistic and stop being silly here? If words can hurt , then the person should not be here in the first place and that is a reality, as we are all grown up enough and give out abuse nilly willy when the time chooses
So lets have some really honest as I can claim bullying daily from the pack of wolves that they are, but I do not. That certainly is harassing and clearly with one intent to get me banned. Though if that means not saying I am going to get someone back which is essentially what you are saying, then that should carry to any poster intentionally going after people?
Correct?
So happy to oblige but a very silly point in reality
3) I happily receive abuse back and did not even complain about this today, maybe you can actually show where I did?
4) The most irrelevant point you made which has absolutely nothing to do with any of this. I again am one of the few to ever admit when I am wrong, and actually apologise. I would like you to actually show others who do so and apologise?
So that is really patronizing and down right poor on your part.
5) Its not your place to tell me how to debate either. If people take issue, then that is their problem and again, then they should not be here. You often come down hard calling lefties this that and the other. So I think you are hardly in a position to offer advice on that front.
So in the future if you want to offer me advice dont treat me like some school kid, try and be professional and offer this advice personally, as all you are doing is speaking down to me, which if I did to you, then you would tell me to get stuffed
Fair enough?
All you had to say was lets be adult and apologise to each other and move on
So in the spirit of this forum, I apologise for any wrong Rags has felt insult by
Again I have no hate for anyone here as I do not know any of you in real life and would not wish hate to any here. I have said this countless many times.
I think this also needs extending out to some other posters who only came online today to also stir, which I think a private PM is sufficient, thus saving and more ongoing issues.
Now I have said my peace
Guest- Guest
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Oh and one last point, I never said a thing or reported to you at all when I was threatened yesterday by a poster who claimed to know my identity and was going to reveal it to Victor by PM. Not that they even know my identity, or how countless people here are so fixated on my job, the hours I do, who I am with etc. So be sure to show balance when if you claim threats are issued or that people should get a life and not be so fixated on who I am in person, as that is my buisness and nobody else.
That is what is the most childish aspect here by posters.
Now have a good evening everyone
That is what is the most childish aspect here by posters.
Now have a good evening everyone
Guest- Guest
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Didge wrote:Oh and one last point, I never said a thing or reported to you at all when I was threatened yesterday by a poster who claimed to know my identity and was going to reveal it to Victor by PM. Not that they even know my identity, or how countless people here are so fixated on my job, the hours I do, who I am with etc. So be sure to show balance when if you claim threats are issued or that people should get a life and not be so fixated on who I am in person, as that is my buisness and nobody else.
That is what is the most childish aspect here by posters.
Now have a good evening everyone
and that was wrong too didge..
however as you well know it would not have mattered one jot
I treat all personal information that is revealed...no matter HOW it is revealed as confidential....
and had he done so I would have banned him for "doxing" in any case.....
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Didge wrote:Oh and one last point, I never said a thing or reported to you at all when I was threatened yesterday by a poster who claimed to know my identity and was going to reveal it to Victor by PM. Not that they even know my identity, or how countless people here are so fixated on my job, the hours I do, who I am with etc. So be sure to show balance when if you claim threats are issued or that people should get a life and not be so fixated on who I am in person, as that is my buisness and nobody else.
That is what is the most childish aspect here by posters.
Now have a good evening everyone
It's amusing watching you change tune now you've had those knuckles rapped. Perhaps now, you might stop harping on about who I am, what a coward I am for not revealing who I am, and assuming I'm other posters.
HoratioTarr- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 10037
Join date : 2014-01-12
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
And there is a prime example of someone not moving on and holding childish grudges
Horatio, if you had not noticed, peace is being attempted here and you are not helping.
This was about my real identity, not some forum identity, far removed
So let me be as blunt as possible to you
I hardly need advice from someone who acts immature as you did above
If you want to show the right way, then lead by example and stop shit stirring
@ Point taken Victor
Horatio, if you had not noticed, peace is being attempted here and you are not helping.
This was about my real identity, not some forum identity, far removed
So let me be as blunt as possible to you
I hardly need advice from someone who acts immature as you did above
If you want to show the right way, then lead by example and stop shit stirring
@ Point taken Victor
Guest- Guest
Re: New rule -- really a clarification of a policy we've enforced for a while
Didge wrote:And there is a prime example of someone not moving on and holding childish grudges
Horatio, if you had not noticed, peace is being attempted here and you are not helping.
This was about my real identity, not some forum identity, far removed
So let me be as blunt as possible to you
I hardly need advice from someone who acts immature as you did above
If you want to show the right way, then lead by example and stop shit stirring
@ Point taken Victor
I'll give it two weeks before you kick off again.
HoratioTarr- Forum Detective ????♀️
- Posts : 10037
Join date : 2014-01-12
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Victorismyhero- INTERNAL SECURITY DIRECTOR
- Posts : 11441
Join date : 2015-11-06
Similar topics
» Just to clarify a few things, yet again
» New new rule
» Armed police to be given more protection over shoot to kill
» Who Could Better Rule The UK?
» So it this going to be a new rule?
» New new rule
» Armed police to be given more protection over shoot to kill
» Who Could Better Rule The UK?
» So it this going to be a new rule?
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sat Mar 18, 2023 12:28 pm by Ben Reilly
» TOTAL MADNESS Great British Railway Journeys among shows flagged by counter terror scheme ‘for encouraging far-right sympathies
Wed Feb 22, 2023 5:14 pm by Tommy Monk
» Interesting COVID figures
Tue Feb 21, 2023 5:00 am by Tommy Monk
» HAPPY CHRISTMAS.
Sun Jan 01, 2023 7:33 pm by Tommy Monk
» The Fight Over Climate Change is Over (The Greenies Won!)
Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:59 pm by Tommy Monk
» Trump supporter murders wife, kills family dog, shoots daughter
Mon Dec 12, 2022 1:21 am by 'Wolfie
» Quill
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:28 pm by Tommy Monk
» Algerian Woman under investigation for torture and murder of French girl, 12, whose body was found in plastic case in Paris
Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:04 pm by Tommy Monk
» Wind turbines cool down the Earth (edited with better video link)
Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:19 am by Ben Reilly
» Saying goodbye to our Queen.
Sun Sep 25, 2022 9:02 pm by Maddog
» PHEW.
Sat Sep 17, 2022 6:33 pm by Syl
» And here's some more enrichment...
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:46 pm by Ben Reilly
» John F Kennedy Assassination
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:40 pm by Ben Reilly
» Where is everyone lately...?
Thu Sep 15, 2022 3:33 pm by Ben Reilly
» London violence over the weekend...
Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:19 pm by Tommy Monk
» Why should anyone believe anything that Mo Farah says...!?
Wed Jul 13, 2022 1:44 am by Tommy Monk
» Liverpool Labour defends mayor role poll after turnout was only 3% and they say they will push ahead with the option that was least preferred!!!
Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:11 pm by Tommy Monk
» Labour leader Keir Stammer can't answer the simple question of whether a woman has a penis or not...
Mon Jul 11, 2022 3:58 am by Tommy Monk
» More evidence of remoaners still trying to overturn Brexit... and this is a conservative MP who should be drummed out of the party and out of parliament!
Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:50 pm by Tommy Monk
» R Kelly 30 years, Ghislaine Maxwell 20 years... but here in UK...
Fri Jul 08, 2022 5:31 pm by Original Quill